Leaderboard

Thanks! I've added my thumbs-up but where are the others? ;)

This is one of those rare weeks where I've got a lot of projects in progress, but all are in the middle, none are at a convenient Friday conclusion for this weekly update. In progress are some core updates, Pro module updates, other module updates, and a client project that's keeping me busy. So I don't have anything new or interesting to report this week, but I like to still check in and say hello, and let you know I'm not running low on coffee or anything like that. ? I hope that you have a great weekend!

You could achieve this if you are using your own custom CSS animation: Take a look at my Codepen example Uikit scrollspy animation different on viewport width (codepen.io) You can see, that I use a media query to trigger the different directions of the animation @keyframes my-animation { 0% { transform: translateX(-100%) } 100% { transform: translateX(0) } } @media(min-width: 768px){ @keyframes my-animation { 0% { transform: translateY(100%) } 100% { transform: translateY(0) } } } <div class="uk-child-width-1-3@m" id="animateMe" uk-grid uk-scrollspy="cls: uk-animation-slide-bottom; target: .uk-card; delay: 300; repeat: true"> <div> <div class="uk-card uk-card-default uk-card-body" uk-scrollspy-class="my-animation"> <h3 class="uk-card-title">Animation based on viewport width</h3> <p>On a small viewport I slide into your DMs from the left.</p> <p>On a large viewport I sneak in from the bottom.</p> <p>Resize the window and click on me me to trigger the animation again. </div> </div> </div>

Hi @alexm. Thanks for letting me know. I might have to speak to Ryan about this one as I have no clue where to look. I'll focus on it over the hols. Cheers.

One step closer, yes. But realistically, that's still not very close at all. Someone always needs to enter those prompts, after all. And while I've heard some people say an AI will always create more secure code than a human being, I don't believe that at all. So any code created by an AI should always be double-checked by a human being. The code examples ChatGPT is giving us right now is only snippets. There's still a lot of manual work needed in creating, say, a new Fieldtype and Inputfield. I've asked ChatGPT to create a Fieldtype and Inputfield and it wasn't able to show me a fully working example that didn't need a lot of manual editing. It always "forgot" some things, like the constructor, or it used a wrong parameter signature. Of course this will get better, but the more complex your prompts are becoming, the higher the risk the code simply will not work out of the box. The way I'm seeing it, AI is a great and valuable TOOL. It can save you from having to Google an answer for 30 minutes. It can give you some inspiration. But it's still just a tool, and for the foreseeable future, our jobs will be safe, because it's going to be US who will write the prompts and incorporate the code created. We shouldn't ignore it, and we need to learn to use it correctly. If all goes well, it might make our jobs a little easier, but shhh, don't tell our clients! Seriously though, yes, it's probably going to change things in the long term. See it as an evolution of our jobs. It might make SOME jobs obsolete. But frankly, comparing the clean elegance of ProcessWire with the convoluted mess of some other web frameworks and content management systems that keep reinventing the wheel every six months, you could argue if some web developers maybe should become obsolete. But finally, there's the issue that's been debated when it comes to art AI and Github Copilot already: copyright. AIs are always trained on existing material, and there will always be the risk that it simply lifts some code/art that has been released under an incompatible license. That's something a human will need to have an eye on, too.

found a solution ....maybe someone yould use it sometimes... setup only the right HOST under the config.php nothing else /** * Installer: HTTP Hosts Whitelist * */ $config->httpHosts = array('newdomain.com'); in the htacess i've setup a additonal redirect to the existing force https and redirect www to nonwww for catching all oldomain.com calls to redirect to newdomain.com - all links should be working perfect after that switch under the new domain...the rest is fixing seo mess that comes with domain url chaning ? kind regards mr-fan # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- # 9. If you only want to allow HTTPS, uncomment the RewriteCond and RewriteRule lines below. # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off RewriteRule (.*) https://%{HTTP_HOST}%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301] RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} olddomain.com$ [NC] RewriteRule (.*) https://newdomain.com%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301] RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\. [NC] RewriteRule (.*) https://newdomain.com%{REQUEST_URI} [L,R=301]

https://github.com/madebymats/ImageDownload

Sorry for the delay, I’ve posted the PR here: https://github.com/processwire/processwire/pull/251 Since it simply uses an anchor tag with a download attribute, it also allows you to open the full-size image in a new tab using a middle click or “open in new tab”, which is just the behaviour I would expect and seems pretty useful. Your SCSS module is amazing! Unfortunately SCSSPHP doesn’t seem to do exactly what Ryan’s setup does, and I suppose the “self” thing is a bug in SCSSPHP, but a great help nonetheless!

Is this for real ? Don't know if I should be surprised or worried. Are we one step closer where web designers/coders become obsolete ? I hear that ChatGPT is already in competition with iOS Swift developers ?