Recently Browsing 0 members
No registered users viewing this page.
Having just wasted the best part of a day debugging an access issue because I hadn't realised that page-edit-created negated any related page-edit permissions, could I suggest that a note to this effect is included in the default title. I have amended the title on my system to read:
Edit only pages user has created (IMPORTANT: This will negate any related page-edit permission - including permissions granted to a user by other roles) ..although it may be possible to make it briefer while not losing clarity and impact.
Is it possible to let people edit a page without having to have a user-role?
My case is the following:
Visitors fill in a form (Formbuilder) which is saved to pages. They get a confirmation email which could contain a unique editing link. In case they need to update some information, they can click on this link, edit the fields and save.
Am I totally off? Is there a better practice?
I'm using this kind of setup (https://processwire.com/blog/posts/language-access-control-and-more-special-permissions/#language-page-edit-permissions) in order to control the page edit permissions. Now I'm wondering if it's possible to hide the "none-ediable" language-tabs instead of striking them through.
By Kiwi Chris
I have a role that has page edit, view, and clone permissions on a specific template.
If a page using the template is locked by a user in a role with lock/unlock permissions on the template , the only button alongside it in the page tree is view, for users who don't have lock/unlock permissions.
If however, I also give the role page-lock permission on the template, they then get additional buttons, edit, copy, and unlock.
I don't actually want to give this role unlock permissions, but I do want the copy (clone) button to display alongside the page in the page tree.
Elsewhere, I've discussed how I've worked out how to create a hook to unlock the copy, but I want to keep the original page so a user without lock permissions can't unlock from the page tree it to make changes.
Question: What method should I hook into to intercept any attempt to change the lock status?
this maybe a simple question, but it bothers me for a while now:
There used to be a warning, if two or more user try to edit the same page. But ever since AdminThemeUIkit I haven't seen it any more.
Is this a bug or are there special circumstances under which the warning will be displayed?
If I am logged-in in the same browser with one default and one privat window, I don't see this warning. But also different browsers on different machines in the same network don't see this warning.
I was looking for the blog post on which this feature was announced, but couldn't find it anymore.
We had the case, that two people were writing a text for the same page, but after person A saved the page first, the text of the person B was lost. I know we could have used ProDrafts for this case, but it shouldn't happen in the first place.
I would appreciate some feedback. 😀