Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Metadata Exif

Version 0.9.0  (currently a WIP) for PW 2.8.+ / 3.0+

This is a new attempt to add easy EXIF reading support to ProcessWire. It should be an easy and less error prone API task. Thats why the module internally uses lowercase key names for all EXIF keys and all of your requested key names. But you are not forced to use lowercase key names, you can use any mixed chars for it as you like. You will get back an array or object with keynames / properties named the same (casesensitive) way as you have passed them in with your request.

API

The module adds one hook to the Pageimage: getExif($options = null)

Without any $options passed to the method, it returns all EXIF data in a RAW multidim array.

Passing a simple list with requested key names as array to it returns an array with only the values of those requested keynames.

If you want change the output from array to object, you can use the a boolean "toObject" set to true. Additionally to this and / or any other option, you need to put your requested keynames list to the option "keys".

$rawArray = $image->getExif();

$options = array('Whitebalance', 'Flash', 'ISOSpeedRatings', 'FNumber', 'UserComment');
$array = $image->getExif($options);

$options = array('toObject' => true, 'keys' => array('whitebalance', 'flash', 'isospeedratings', 'fnumber', 'usercomment'));
$object = $image->getExif($options);

 

Possible options are

Quote

              keys = array,
                       a list with case insensitive keynames

              thumbnail = bool,
                       you can set thumbnail explicitly as own option,
                       or you can add thumbnail as keyname to keys

              toObject = bool,
                       if is false or missing, an array is returned

              unformatted = bool,
                       if explicitly set to true, you will get back unformatted (raw) values

              returnRaw = bool,
                       when no $options are set, or no $options['keys'] are set,
                       or explicitly this param is set to true,
                       the complete RAW EXIF data is returned

 

A working example

    $options = array(
        'keys' => array('ISOSpeedRatings', 'FNumber', 'Flash')
    );
    echo "<table><tr>";
    foreach($options['keys'] as $key) echo "<th>{$key}</th>";
    echo "</tr>";
    foreach($page->images as $image) {
        $exif = $image->getExif($options);
        echo "<tr>";
        foreach($exif as $value) echo "<td>$value</td>";
        echo "</tr>";
    }
    echo "</table>";

 

This will output something like:

Quote
ISOSpeedRatings    FNumber    Flash
320    f/2.2    Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode
100    f/4.0    Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode

 

With the boolean option "unformatted" passed as true, the output would look like:

Quote
ISOSpeedRatings    FNumber    Flash
320    11/5    16
100    40/10    16

 

For some keys, that only store something like integer values, what are not very meaningful to most of us, the module contain xyzFormatted methods. This way, it is easy to enhance and maintain the module in the future. :)

 

Help wanted

It would be nice if some of you test the module and report back if the intended API suites your needs. And you are very welcome to post suggestions for which keys you want to have a ...Formatted method.

 

Thank you!

https://github.com/horst-n/MetadataExif

 

  • Like 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Thanks for the great module.

I'm trying to use this for a single image, however, i'm unable to get this to work for just the first image in multi-image field.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

how does your code look like for getting the (first) image from your field and getting the exif information?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and what is the outcome?

can you try

var_dump($page->galleryimages->first()->getExif('FNumber'));

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
var_dump(count($page->galleryimages));
$image = $page->galleryimages->first();
var_dump($image->url);
var_dump($image->getExif());

please verify that:

  • your field has at least one image
  • that the image is of type jpeg
  • that it (the original version) contains EXIF-data
  • that it contain an entry FNumber

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, horst said:

please verify that:

  • your field has at least one image
  • that the image is of type jpeg
  • that it (the original version) contains EXIF-data
  • that it contain an entry FNumber

 

Yes I can confirm all of this. The multi-image field has two images. Using your example array from the first post of this thread I can see Exif information being returned for both. Both files are jpg type files.

See array information returned from your working example code below.

 

Screenshot at Nov 27 17-12-27.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, horst said:

var_dump(count($page->galleryimages));

returns - int(2)

Quote

$image = $page->galleryimages->first();

Returns - nothing.
 

Quote

var_dump($page->galleryimages->url);

returns - string(36) "/photography/site/assets/files/1031/" 

Quote

var_dump($page->galleryimages->getExif());

returns - array(2) { ["apc_0046.jpg"]=> NULL ["img_0335.jpg"]=> NULL }

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

your url does not contain an image name, it only points to the folder.

and the last var_dump should get the EXIf from the single image, not from the image collection!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

var_dump($page->galleryimages->first()->getExif());

Notice: Undefined offset: 0 in /Applications/XAMPP/xamppfiles/htdocs/photography/site/modules/MetadataExif/MetadataExif.module on line 44
array(5) { ["FILE"]=> array(6) { ["FileName"]=> string(12) "apc_0046.jpg" ["FileDateTime"]=> int(1511813872) ["FileSize"]=> int(1160717) ["FileType"]=> int(2) ["MimeType"]=> string(10) "image/jpeg" ["SectionsFound"]=> string(30) "ANY_TAG, IFD0, THUMBNAIL, EXIF" } ["COMPUTED"]=> array(9) { ["html"]=> string(26) "width="2797" height="3496"" ["Height"]=> int(3496) ["Width"]=> int(2797) ["IsColor"]=> int(1) ["ByteOrderMotorola"]=> int(0) ["ApertureFNumber"]=> string(5) "f/2.2" ["Copyright"]=> string(20) "photography" ["Thumbnail.FileType"]=> int(2) ["Thumbnail.MimeType"]=> string(10) "image/jpeg" } ["IFD0"]=> array(10) { ["ImageDescription"]=> string(36) "time flies" ["Make"]=> string(5) "Apple" ["Model"]=> string(14) "iPhone 6s Plus" ["XResolution"]=> string(5) "240/1" ["YResolution"]=> string(5) "240/1" ["ResolutionUnit"]=> int(2) ["Software"]=> string(49) "Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 7.0 (Macintosh)" ["DateTime"]=> string(19) "2017:11:27 16:17:21" ["Copyright"]=> string(20) "j.sobers.photography" ["Exif_IFD_Pointer"]=> int(302) } ["THUMBNAIL"]=> array(6) { ["Compression"]=> int(6) ["XResolution"]=> string(4) "72/1" ["YResolution"]=> string(4) "72/1" ["ResolutionUnit"]=> int(2) ["JPEGInterchangeFormat"]=> int(896) ["JPEGInterchangeFormatLength"]=> int(17303) } ["EXIF"]=> array(26) { ["ExposureTime"]=> string(6) "1/2400" ["FNumber"]=> string(5) "22/10" ["ExposureProgram"]=> int(2) ["ISOSpeedRatings"]=> int(25) ["ExifVersion"]=> string(4) "0230" ["DateTimeOriginal"]=> string(19) "2017:07:10 11:47:22" ["DateTimeDigitized"]=> string(19) "2017:07:10 11:47:22" ["ShutterSpeedValue"]=> string(16) "11228819/1000000" ["ApertureValue"]=> string(15) "2275007/1000000" ["BrightnessValue"]=> string(8) "8488/781" ["ExposureBiasValue"]=> string(3) "0/1" ["MeteringMode"]=> int(5) ["Flash"]=> int(16) ["FocalLength"]=> string(5) "83/20" ["SubjectLocation"]=> array(4) { [0]=> int(2015) [1]=> int(1511) [2]=> int(2217) [3]=> int(1330) } ["SubSecTimeOriginal"]=> string(3) "208" ["SubSecTimeDigitized"]=> string(3) "208" ["ColorSpace"]=> int(1) ["SensingMethod"]=> int(2) ["SceneType"]=> string(1) "" ["ExposureMode"]=> int(0) ["WhiteBalance"]=> int(0) ["FocalLengthIn35mmFilm"]=> int(29) ["UndefinedTag:0xA432"]=> array(4) { [0]=> string(5) "83/20" [1]=> string(5) "83/20" [2]=> string(4) "11/5" [3]=> string(4) "11/5" } ["UndefinedTag:0xA433"]=> string(5) "Apple" ["UndefinedTag:0xA434"]=> string(39) "iPhone 6s Plus back camera 4.15mm f/2.2" } }

 

Quote

 

var_dump($page->galleryimages->first()->url);

 

 

string(48) "/photography/site/assets/files/1031/apc_0046.jpg"

 

Sorry about that, i corrected my mistake. see above.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, now I see that you are using a single value string as $options. This is not possible.

Please refer to the examples above: you need to pass an array to the function, also if you want to retrieve a single value:

$image->getExif( array('FNumber') );

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

echo $page->galleryimages->first()->getExif( array('FNumber') );

Returned :

Quote

Notice: Array to string conversion in /Applications/XAMPP/xamppfiles/htdocs/photography/site/templates/clientgallery.php on line 9
Array

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to echo out your desired array key, or object property, depending on what you choosed.

You choosed an array for the return, therefore you need to output the key "FNumber" of the array:

$result = $page->galleryimages->first()->getExif( array('FNumber') );

// output the value for one key of the returned array
echo $result['FNumber'];

// if you have choosen the result as object, you would use
echo $result->FNumber;

This all you can read in the initial post of this thread.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Horst,

With your instructions and help, I got it to work.

Thanks again for working with me in understanding proper methods for rendering the values I needed.

 

For Future reference for anyone else(including myself if I forget )... There are two methods for rendering data from Metadata EXIF module.

Array Method:

// output the value for one key of the returned array
$firstGalleryImage = $page->galleryimages->first()->getExif( array('FNumber') );
echo $firstGalleryImage['FNumber'];

Object Method:

// if you have choosen the result as object, you would use
$options = array('toObject' => true, 'keys' => array('FNumber'));
$object = $page->galleryimages->first()->getExif($options);
echo $object->FNumber; 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By teppo
      Hey folks!
      Took a couple of late nights, but managed to turn this old gist of mine into a proper module. The name is SearchEngine, and currently it provides support for indexing page contents (into a hidden textarea field created automatically), and also includes a helper feature ("Finder") for querying said contents. No fancy features like stemming here yet, but something along those lines might be added later if it seems useful (and if I find a decent implementation to integrate).
      Though the API and selector engine make it really easy to create site search pages, I pretty much always end up duplicating the same features from site to site. Also – since it takes a bit of extra time – it's tempting to skip over some accessibility related things, and leave features like text highlighting out. Overall I think it makes sense to bundle all that into a module, which can then be reused over and over again 🙂
      Note: markup generation is not yet built into the module, which is why the examples below use PageArray::render() method to produce a simple list of results. This will be added later on, as a part of the same module or a separate Markup module. There's also no fancy JS API or anything like that (yet).
      This is an early release, so be kind – I got the find feature working last night (or perhaps this morning), and some final tweaks and updates were made just an hour ago 😅
      GitHub repository: https://github.com/teppokoivula/SearchEngine Modules directory: https://modules.processwire.com/modules/search-engine/ Usage
      Install SearchEngine module. Note: the module will automatically create an index field install time, so be sure to define a custom field (via site config) before installation if you don't want it to be called "search_index". You can change the field name later as well, but you'll have to update the "index_field" option in site config or module settings (in Admin) after renaming it.
      Add the site search index field to templates you want to make searchable. Use selectors to query values in site search index. Note: you can use any operator for your selectors, you will likely find the '=' and '%=' operators most useful here. You can read more about selector operators from ProcessWire's documentation.
      Options
      By default the module will create a search index field called 'search_index' and store values from Page fields title, headline, summary, and body to said index field when a page is saved. You can modify this behaviour (field name and/or indexed page fields) either via the Module config screen in the PocessWire Admin, or by defining $config->SearchEngine array in your site config file or other applicable location:
      $config->SearchEngine = [ 'index_field' => 'search_index', 'indexed_fields' => [ 'title', 'headline', 'summary', 'body', ], 'prefixes' => [ 'link' => 'link:', ], 'find_args' => [ 'limit' => 25, 'sort' => 'sort', 'operator' => '%=', 'query_param' => null, 'selector_extra' => '', ], ]; You can access the search index field just like any other ProcessWire field with selectors:
      if ($q = $sanitizer->selectorValue($input->get->q)) { $results = $pages->find('search_index%=' . $query_string . ', limit=25'); echo $results->render(); echo $results->renderPager(); } Alternatively you can delegate the find operation to the SearchEngine module as well:
      $query = $modules->get('SearchEngine')->find($input->get->q); echo $query->resultsString; // alias for $query->results->render() echo $query->pager; // alias for $query->results->renderPager() Requirements
      ProcessWire >= 3.0.112 PHP >= 7.1.0 Note: later versions of the module may require Composer, or alternatively some additional features may require installing via Composer. This is still under consideration – so far there's nothing here that would really depend on it, but advanced features like stemming most likely would.
      Installing
      It's the usual thing: download or clone the SearchEngine directory into your /site/modules/ directory and install via Admin. Alternatively you can install SearchEngine with Composer by executing composer require teppokoivula/search-engine in your site directory.
    • By teppo
      MarkupMenu is a markup module for generating menu trees. When provided a root page as a starting point, it generates a navigation tree (by default as a HTML "<ul>" element wrapped by a "<nav>" element) from that point onwards. If you've also provided it with current (active) page, the menu will be rendered accordingly, with current item highlighted and items rendered up to that item and its children (unless you disable the "collapsed" option, in which case the full page tree will be rendered instead).
      Modules directory: https://modules.processwire.com/modules/markup-menu/ GitHub repository: https://github.com/teppokoivula/MarkupMenu Usage
      As a markup module, MarkupMenu is intended for front-end use, but you can of course use it in a module as well. Typically you'll only need the render() method, which takes an array of options as its only argument:
      echo $modules->get('MarkupMenu')->render([ 'root_page' => $pages->get(1), 'current_page' => $page, ]); Note: if you omit root_page, site root page is used by default. If you omit current_page, the menu will be rendered, but current (active) page won't be highlighted etc.
      A slightly more complex example, based on what I'm using on one of my own sites to render a (single-level) top menu:
      echo $modules->get('MarkupMenu')->render([ 'current_page' => $page, 'templates' => [ 'nav' => '<nav class="{classes} menu--{menu_class_modifier}" aria-label="{aria_label}">%s</nav>', 'item_current' => '<a class="menu__item menu__item--current" href="{item.url}" tabindex="0" aria-label="Current page: {item.title}">{item.title}</a>', ], 'placeholders' => [ 'menu_class_modifier' => 'top', 'aria_label' => 'Main navigation', ], 'include' => [ 'root_page' => true, ], 'exclude' => [ 'level_greater_than' => 1, ], ]); Note: some things you see above may not be entirely sensible, such as the use of {menu_class_modifier} and {aria_label} placeholders. On the actual site the "nav" template is defined in site config, so I can define just these parts on a case-by-case basis while actual nav markup is maintained in one place.
      Please check out the README file for available render options. I'd very much prefer not to keep this list up to date in multiple places. Basically there are settings for defining "templates" for different parts of the menu (list, item, etc.), include array for defining rules for including in the menu and exclude array for the opposite effect, classes and placeholders arrays for overriding default classes and injecting custom placeholders, etc. 🙂
      MarkupMenu vs. MarkupSimpleNavigation
      TL;DR: this is another take on the same concept. There are many similarities, but also some differences – especially when it comes to the supported options and syntax. If you're currently using MarkupSimpleNavigation then there's probably no reason to switch over.
      I'd be surprised if someone didn't draw lines between this module and Soma's awesome MarkupSimpleNavigation. Simply put I've been using MSN (...) for years, and it's been great – but there are some issues with it, particularly in the markup generation area, and it also does some things in a way that doesn't quite work for me – the xtemplates thing being one of these. In some ways less about features, and more about style, I guess 🙂
      Anyhow, in MarkupMenu I've tried to correct those little hiccups, modernise the default markup, and allow for more flexibility with placeholder variables and additional / different options. MarkupMenu was built for ProcessWire 3.0.112+ and with PHP 7.1+ in mind, it's installable with Composer, and I have a few additional ideas (such as conditional placeholders) still on my todo list.
      One more small(ish) difference is that MarkupMenu supports overriding default options via $config->MarkupMenu. I find myself redefining the default markup for every site, which until now meant that each site had a wrapper function for MarkupSimpleNavigation (to avoid code / config repetition), and this way I've been able to leave that out 🙂
      Requirements
      ProcessWire >= 3.0.112 PHP >= 7.1.0 If you're working on an earlier version of ProcessWire or PHP, use MarkupSimpleNavigation instead.
    • By tonicastillo
      Hi. Can I ask why this happens?
      When I upload a jpg, the meta keywords and description of the file loses the accents and spanish symbols of the words.
      Original image on the left, and the image generated by PW on resize on the right.

      This happens on resize. The uploaded file is ok.
      How can I control which meta keep in the photo?
      Thanks a lot (and sorry for my English)...
    • By teppo
      Hey folks!
      I'm happy to finally introduce a project I've been working on for quite a while now: it's called Wireframe, and it is an output framework for ProcessWire.
      Note that I'm posting this in the module development area, maily because this project is still in rather early stage. I've built a couple of sites with it myself, and parts of the codebase have been powering some pretty big and complex sites for many years now, but this should still be considered a soft launch 🙂
      --
      Long story short, Wireframe is a module that provides the "backbone" for building sites (and apps) with ProcessWire using an MVC (or perhaps MVVM – one of those three or four letter abbreviations anyway) inspired methodology. You could say that it's an output strategy, but I prefer the term "output framework" since in my mind the word "strategy" means something less tangible. A way of doing things, rather than a tool that actually does things.
      Wireframe (the module) provides a basic implementation for some familiar MVC concepts, such as Controllers and a View layer – the latter of which consists of layouts, partials, and template-specific views. There's no "model" layer, since in this context ProcessWire is the model. As a module Wireframe is actually quite simple – not even nearly the biggest one I've built – but there's still quite a bit of stuff to "get", so I've put together a demo & documentation site for it at https://wireframe-framework.com/.
      In addition to the core module, I'm also working on a couple of site profiles based on it. My current idea is actually to keep the module very light-weight, and implement most of the "opinionated" stuff in site profiles and/or companion modules. For an example MarkupMenu (which I released a while ago) was developed as one of those "companion modules" when I needed a menu module to use on the site profiles.
      Currently there are two public site profiles based on Wireframe:
      site-wireframe-docs is the demo&docs site mentioned above, just with placeholder content replaced with placeholder content. It's not a particularly complex site, but I believe it's still a pretty nice way to dig into the Wireframe module. site-wireframe-boilerplate is a boilerplate (or starter) site profile based on the docs site. This is still very much a work in progress, but essentially I'm trying to build a flexible yet full-featured starter profile you can just grab and start building upon. There will be a proper build process for resources, it will include most of the basic features one tends to need from site to site, etc. --
      Requirements and getting started:
      Wireframe can be installed just like any ProcessWire module. Just clone or download it to your site/modules/ directory and install. It doesn't, though, do a whole lot of stuff on itself – please check out the documentation site for a step-by-step guide on setting up the directory structure, adding the "bootstrap file", etc. You may find it easier to install one of the site profiles mentioned above, but note that this process involves the use of Composer. In the case of the site profiles you can install ProcessWire as usual and download or clone the site profile directory into your setup, but after that you should run "composer install" to get all the dependencies – including the Wireframe module – in place. Hard requirements for Wireframe are ProcessWire 3.0.112 and PHP 7.1+. The codebase is authored with current PHP versions in mind, and while running it on 7.0 may be possible, anything below that definitely won't work. A feature I added just today to the Wireframe module is that in case ProcessWire has write access to your site/templates/ directory, you can use the module settings screen to create the expected directories automatically. Currently that's all, and the module won't – for an example – create Controllers or layouts for you, so you should check out the site profiles for examples on these. (I'm probably going to include some additional helper features in the near future.)
      --
      This project is loosely based on an earlier project called pw-mvc, i.e. the main concepts (such as Controllers and the View layer) are very similar. That being said, Wireframe is a major upgrade in terms of both functionality and architecture: namespaces and autoloader support are now baked in, the codebase requires PHP 7, Controllers are classes extending \Wireframe\Controller (instead of regular "flat" PHP files), implementation based on a module instead of a collection of drop-in files, etc.
      While Wireframe is indeed still in a relatively early stage (0.3.0 was launched today, in case version numbers matter) for the most part I'm happy with the way it works, and likely won't change it too drastically anytime soon – so feel free to give it a try, and if you do, please let me know how it went. I will continue building upon this project, and I am also constantly working on various side projects, such as the site profiles and a few unannounced helper modules.
      I should probably add that while Wireframe is not hard to use, it is more geared towards those interested in "software development" type methodology. With future updates to the module, the site profiles, and the docs I hope to lower the learning curve, but certain level of "developer focus" will remain. Although of course the optimal outcome would be if I could use this project to lure more folks towards that end of the spectrum... 🙂
      --
      Please let me know what you think – and thanks in advance!
×
×
  • Create New...