renobird

Hi Ryan, I need to set some values for this fieldtype from the API, and I can't quite sort out how it would work. Do you mind sharing a quick example?

Thank you Ryan! I'm importing hundreds of user profiles and the biography information is a nightmare. This should clean it up nicely.

A blog can be a standalone site, or it can be one part of a website. They can easily live together in one ProcessWire install. That isn't really how the blog profile is currently set up. It's meant to be a standalone blog and not a "section" of a site.

The field fails entirely here (other than to display images that I've uploaded from the actual user page).

Same behavior on the latest dev (2.4.1) here. Adrian, just to verify, the issue is only on the user profile page /processwire/profile/ If you add an image(s) field to the user template and then allow it to be edited on the profile page it works as expected?

Thanks Adrian, Running stable here — I will test on the latest dev.

Opened a github issue for this. https://github.com/ryancramerdesign/ProcessWire/issues/444

Uploading images to the user profile page had been working for quite some time. Just had a report from a user that they couldn't upload images, and discovered this same issue. There are no JS errors, but it acts like a JS issue because ui-state-hover isn't being added when you attempt to drop an image. I tried the solution schafdog27 mentioned (swapping processInput), but that didn't solve the issue. The same field works correctly when accessed from the user page. The issue seems isolated to the profile page. Anyone else able to confirm this before I open a github issue?

Makes sense. I might use that method myself instead. In my case, the extra pages were the most obvious method for me, and they were an issue since the news/events editors are jailed to the CFA Today parent. They can't actually see the page tree. I'll PM you about that.

Probably time to get this admin theme out there for general testing.

Quick shot of the news page (filled with test data). Advanced filters are hidden by default.

Here are some screenshots of one section of admin pages I have. CFA Today is our news and events site, this is how the editors manage all the news/events/venues Page Tree Navigation I do almost exactly that with breadcrumbs. My breadcrumb module is a little different, but same idea.

It works really well, and keeps the context for everything — including the navigation.

I've never tried this way of editing. I usually create a child page called /edit/ for my custom admin page that has the ProcessPageEdit process assigned. Then pass it the the page ID <a href=edit/?id=12345"><?=$page->title;?></a> You can (have everything). I have a lot of custom admin pages that highlight correctly. Give me more detail, perhaps I've already solved it.

Right, I see you are getting the ProcessPageEdit module. I was wondering if you create a new page with ProcessPageEdit would things save correctly? Nice one Soma. I bet that's it.

Pete, Have you checked to see if it works from a new admin page with ProcessPageEdit? I have some custom admin pages that use similar custom selectors and they save fine.

Santa, I would also like the profile page to support FieldsetTab.

This still trips me up from time-to-time. Perhaps a note on the user template?

Nice looking sites Ollie. I'll dig in a little deeper later today.

A different topic, but here is a code example to get you started. There is a link up a posts in the thread to Ryan's original post about adding this feature.

Hi Kurbel, What you described is the same functionality I was hoping to achieve when I saw that Soma's dependencies for repeaters code was added. I documented what I know about where it breaks. I don't know how complicated it is to fix (or if it can be fixed). I tried to decipher the problem, and tracked it down as far as _getDelayedChildren() in /wire/core/InputfieldWrapper.php. I don't have a work around (yet).

School is for fools man… *Perhaps too American to translate*

Think of how much better it would be if I added a WillyC beard. Also, that is what happens after 2 weeks in the recording studio.

No worries. Glad to help.

diogo, Nice one. That method is cleaner for sure. I would go that route in this case. I've always set this up where there are multiple views, never needed to just prevent a direct view.