-
Posts
1,472 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
10
Everything posted by Peter Knight
-
Sorry LostKobrakai - I'm not sure where you mean Is that some information outputted by TraceyDebugger or a file within /site/core ?
-
Hi guys I've a PW site running real slow in the back end and was wondering about diagnostic tools. It's fine on the front end but takes about 12+ seconds to even load a page once I click edit. I often get 504 Gateway Time-out messages too. I have Tracey Debugger installed but I'm not really sure which options I need to check etc. Having cherry-picked a few and loaded a page in the front end, I only have one error (a missing include file) which doesn't affect my site. PHP 7.0.12 PW 3.040 MySQL: 5.5.41-1 Any tips? Thanks Peter
-
Fatal error: 'ModuleJS' not found after Upgrade to PW 3.034
Peter Knight replied to Peter Troeger's topic in General Support
Hey Peter I had the same issue this week. Can confirm that manually replacing the entire wire folder will work. -
Good luck with it. 3.X is such a great release I didn't want to stick with 2.7 (as great as that is too).
-
>> Is that a setting in the php.ini file? I did it through a UI in the Plesk control panel but I think that it writes to a php.ini file >>Incidentally from which version to which new version were you upgrading PHP to? 5.5.38 to 5.6.25
-
All working now. Seems to have been a few issues. In case this is helpful to anyone ... Manually download 3.0.33 and manually upload .htaccess, indepx.php and /wire/ Login to site and I noticed a few Modules updating I'd over looked that the Live site had been running 2.X so that was definitely a factor I upgraded PHP on the Live site to a higher version and noticed too that short tags needed to be enabled All those combined seem to have fixed it. Luckily I had full backups of everything before I started (phew!).
-
Hi guys I have a Test site on a VPS and a Live site on a VPS both running 3.0.33* (see follow up post below) . Upon moving the test site to the live site, I get a message as follows There's 2 strange behaviours here: Odd thing 1 The only error logged in the errors.txt is this: Oddly enough, that file and directory doesn't exist on the working test site either. Odd thing 2 I can get the live site working again by re-importing the database at which point the front end looks and works fine. However, once I am in the Admin area and browse to, say Setup>Upgrades, the Admin and live site throw the Internal Server Error That's kind of weird right? P
-
Hi Mike Are the number of Jumplinks displayed in the Jumplinks manager capped at a certain point? I noticed there was no pagination (good) and wondered if it only shows first 250 etc
-
Cheers Adrian I'll try that. Oddly enough, an update to last Fridays 3.0.33 got the module working again on this problem server.
-
I have 2 sites running LoginNotifiers on 3.0.32 One of them refuses to send an email when there is a login even though they're both identical servers with the same host. I've no errors in the error logs. The LoginNotifier specific log found under assets/logs/LoginNotifier.txt successfully records logins. Any ideas on why 1 site may fail and 1 works?
-
@horst It's great to see croppableImage back and available again for 3.X Is this version here to stay or is there a risk that upcoming changes to get to 3.1 will break functionality?
-
That's a pretty generous allowance. I presume you could have multiple single-plan accounts if the client themselves signed up and you managed the service.
-
MarkupSEO - The all-in-one SEO solution for ProcessWire.
Peter Knight replied to Nico Knoll's topic in Modules/Plugins
Hi @nico Did you ever get a chance to look into this? To be able to specify a NOINDEX or NOFOLLOW on a page by page basis would be great. I know the original request on GitHub is quite old but it's still a feature that IMHO would really enhance the Module. -
That looks nice. I use Uptime Robot and it's been enlightening how much downtime one of my shared accounts goes down. The email feature IMHO is the most useful part.
-
FieldtypeSelectFile & InputfieldSelectFile
Peter Knight replied to Martijn Geerts's topic in Module/Plugin Development
Hey @Martijn Geerts No worries. In the end I upgraded and it worked with PW 3.X Soon after testing it, the project I was working on required functionality outside of the Modules scope. Thanks for replying though. -
MarkupSEO - The all-in-one SEO solution for ProcessWire.
Peter Knight replied to Nico Knoll's topic in Modules/Plugins
I'm running 0.8.7 right now and it doesn't seem like you can specify on a Index, noindex, follow, nofollow etc on a page by page basis. These setting should be showing up on the SEO tab of any page, right? -
Hey Robin I don't want to move the dependent files around as each client also calls those files in an iFrame. They're not using PW so I need to keep 'em alone. I'm pretty sure I could hook up all the dependent files if I only had a field type that allowed me to freely browse through my public_html directory.
-
BTW you probably saw but there was a fix pushed for this. Worked for me.
- 1 reply
-
- 2
-
-
Just popping in on some updates. I tried the SelectFile module and I'm glad I discovered it but it may not be applicable here. My actual folder structure is as follows /gallery/ /Location 1/ / Location 1 Pano 01/ - index.html / Location 1 Pano 02/ - index.html /Location 2/ / Location 2 Pano 01/ - index.html / Location 2 Pano 02/ - index.html So essentially even if I set ../../gallery as my source folder, I get a list of sub folders (great) but need to be able to then drill down into each to cherry pick a sub-folder or file within. I could of course create a free text field and manually enter the paths but I'm trying to future proof this a bit and make is scalable.
-
FieldtypeSelectFile & InputfieldSelectFile
Peter Knight replied to Martijn Geerts's topic in Module/Plugin Development
Hi @martijn-geerts I'm testing this for the first time on 2.8.29 and am getting the following error It doesn't say it's 2.8 compatible but was wondering if you had plans to try it? I can always revert to 2.7.3 etc but thought I'd ask. Many thanks P -
I'm redeveloping my photography site in PW. Most of the "photos" are 360 degree views so they're not single JPGs as such which I can manage traditionally in PW and add to a page. Each photo gets generated by a separate application which then outputs a wrapper folder for each photo. So I might have a photo called Beach01 and the corresponding Output folder contains -images (folder) -index.html - pano.xml - pano-player.js - skin.js - tiles (directory containing multi-resolution images) It's early days but I've uploaded a few of these wrapper folders onto my server. I've then created a PW page called Beach01 and I can embed the 360 image onto the page using an iframe called from a HannaCode. It works well but I know it's not very scalable. I don't really know what I'd like but I'd love to have some kind of PageSelect field that could I could point at a server directory (Beaches01 etc) instead of using HannaCodes and iFrames. Any high level thoughts on a good approach? At the same time, I don't want to complicate it too much either
-
if else failing (but working in HannaCode)
Peter Knight replied to Peter Knight's topic in General Support
Very cool. I've shortened some massive if/else statements since reading this. -
Wow - I was surprised to read this and even thought it was a joke. I'm sorry to see CMS Critic go. They did a lot for ProcessWire in that short space of time. Then again, ProcessWire does a lot for ProcessWire too I'm sure both parties will survive their CMS Brexit! Regardless of the CMS which powers CMS Critic, I must admit I almost never visit the site. IMHO they primarily have a design and information architecture problem and not a CMS problem. Ok, they're running on WP now so they have a CMS problem once again but you know what I mean ...
- 80 replies
-
- 11
-
-
@Ivan Gretsky me too! This might be covered already (I've been offline for a week) but you can use the newspaper icon on the top right to access the new content. Only noticed it this morning. Overall, I really like the new forum presentation. There's a little getting used to the new layout but that's only because I've used the old layout almost every day for the past 3 ish years. Well done @Pete and co.