Jump to content

Soma

Moderators
  • Posts

    6,808
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    159

Everything posted by Soma

  1. If you have Page and Subpage's display the content, you already have it.
  2. ... Attention: kongondo is on to about something ...
  3. Maybe they're hidden or unpublished?
  4. U all hace too cinplicated niknames.
  5. To be honest, I'm not sure. Yes it's alpha/proof of concept but seems pretty stable and some use it already. But it also means it didn't get any love since then. I don't think there can happen much as it just creates pages with a image on it. So even you could go and do it without/remove ImagesManager. The parsing part for image tags could also be replaced or handled differently. It's all not things that can break easily or go competly wrong you wouldn't be able to fix somehow.
  6. In ImagesManager I used to create a new PageImage before adding it so it will get resized according to max width settings. $im = new PageImage($page->images, $url_to_image); $page->images->add($im); https://github.com/somatonic/ImagesManager/blob/master/ImagesManager.module#L527
  7. I'm not sure I can follow. It's there but can't output? You're using Inputfield here not a Field, you'll need to provide some method to store image after submit to a page. Depending what this code is for. You' also have to give a upload path to the inputfield. See some example of usage in my gist is helpful. https://gist.github.com/somatonic/5236008
  8. Great thanks Ryan. This should have been in 2.4 stable
  9. If you put it before default.php?
  10. Opening an issue on github would be better than here. Opening an issue on github would be better than here.
  11. I'm sure your module is very useful, just wanted to mention.
  12. Thanks adrian, so I don't have to take care once again. Looks like it got through...
  13. You would even save more time when creating a profile of your basic setup. Next time install it with the profile and you're ready.
  14. Yeah party is over time to go home now nothing to see.
  15. Btw with my brillant memory I remembered this one https://github.com/ryancramerdesign/ProcessWire/issues/358
  16. Issue https://github.com/ryancramerdesign/ProcessWire/issues/378
  17. I was able to reproduce when using a %= on multiple fields before the checkbox=, it would return results found with the %= search and checkbox checked. As soon as I move the checkbox=0 before the title|body|summary%=value it works again.
  18. How could we reproduce?
  19. it does not for checkboxes, actually.
  20. It is the same as "checkbox=0" or "checkbox=" (these all return the expected results for me) Can you tell where or how you know it's not returning expected result? I mean I use checkboxes all the time and never noticed something wrong with it. Maybe a mysql thing? What PW version?
  21. I meant for checkboxes !field doesn't make sense, does it?
  22. !field=value doesn't exist. (Edit: for checkboxes)
  23. They all work. I mostly use check= Never experienced what you say.
  24. If you would try it would give you an error saying that you have to first save the page, I think.
  25. Not enough spam on twitter we also need here I often work in the dark at night and having a white background is killing my eyes...
×
×
  • Create New...