Leaderboard

Separate color pickers for main color (light) and main color (dark) sound like a good solution to allow proper branding while still being accessible. Also, I would like to second the request for adding CSS variables for the border radius. There are some great additions in the new theme to make things more customizable, but to call it truly "customizable", it should offer the possibility of changing the border radius on buttons and inputs. The current look (very round buttons + completely square inputs) is a bit peculiar, but that's okay as long as we get a way of tuning things ourselves 🙂

Because "Artificial Intelligence" is a marketing word, and computers will never become intelligent as the definition of intelligence according to the Oxford Dictionary on may Mac is: "the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills" You see, LLMs cannot acquire knowledge (nor skills), they are "trained" (which is also a marketing phrase, BWT...), and a database full of data is not knowledge, the dictionary says that knowledge is: "facts, information, and skills acquired through experience or education; the theoretical or practical understanding of a subject" "Understanding" is the key word here. LLMs and fine-tuned models calculate probability which is very far from being a "fact". Another key word is "experience". A computer with experience? BTW, Interesting article to read: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ai-model-training/ Anyways, thank you for sharing you module! Could you please also add an image or two to the readme, so that people can have a visual view of what to expect in that regard?

All in all, I agree with @wbmnfktr, but sometimes AI isn´t even capable of getting the basic things right... 😆

This week ProcessWire has an awesome new admin design thanks to the work of @diogo and @jploch of KONKAT Studio. You can get it now on ProcessWire’s dev branch! Read the latest blog post for details, screenshots, Q&A with the designers, and more: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/new-processwire-admin-redesign/

Hey ProcessWire Community, We recently built a user data table module for a client. It was solid – tailored for specific fields, neatly formatted, and with just the right amount of complexity. Then we thought, “Why not turn this into a fully configurable module for ProcessWire’s admin?” And to make it even more interesting, we decided to pair up with AI to build it. Spoiler: AI is not great at ProcessWire. ⸻ Why AI? We figured AI could help with some of the more repetitive coding tasks – like parameter parsing, formatting logic, and output generation. But AI had its own plans. It decided to take every simple task and turn it into a five-step process involving nested arrays, regexes, and a lot of unnecessary conversions. What We Learned: • AI is good at suggesting solutions – even when they’re completely wrong. • AI will confidently map dates to currency values and sum() text fields. • AI thinks that everything is a map() – and if it’s not, it should be. • ProcessWire is flexible, but it doesn’t bend to AI’s will – and that’s a good thing. But have a look for your own: User Data Table or https://processwire.com/modules/process-user-data-table/ It is more or less production ready and we test it in some client projects as it really comes handy when showing user related data as a table in the backend. We even forced AI to do the Change log and the Readme files, so it should be not too hard to test. 😁 Example 1: (detailed example including configuration can be seen in the README file) UserAdminTable with users that have the 'member' status (showing their created value on :hover), their visits of certain pages (with modal opening for details), their purchases (with modal opening for details) and the Total of their purchases. All column titles are clickable for sorting asc/desc, direction is indicated after sorting. Example 2: (detailed example including configuration can be seen in the README file) UserAdminTable with standard user fields and one virtual field showing `created` value as column with minimal configuration.

@Bia If you share more how you build your slider, such as your template code, would be helpful for us to give you some real helpful hints. Gideon

I haven't seen this happen for over 10 years as it's a very friendly and helpful community and it's also part of our community guidelines: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/8234-community-rules-guidelines/ 😉 If you see anybody violating the rules just contact one of the moderators - no need to blame anybody upfront. Thx

Been testing this and loving it so far. A website is never finished, neither is an admin theme. Keep up the great work, I will do some thorough testing closer to a master release, but everything that needs looking at seems minor at present.

This week I’m going to briefly tell you about what we’ll have for you next week. If all goes according to plan, the new admin theme will be committed to the dev branch by this time next week. Technically it’s not a new admin theme in the module sense, but rather a new look for the AdminThemeUikit theme. (The original look will be there too, should you want to keep using it.) There are a lot of cool things about the new look, but here’s a few things to whet your appetite: 1. It comes with a “dark” mode, and a really fantastic dark mode at that. Every user can choose whether they want a light or dark version of the theme, or they can switch on-the-fly from any page. Both the light and dark versions of the theme are equally beautiful and refreshing. 2. The configuration screen lets you choose what your “main” color is for the theme, whether using predefined traditional PW colors, or a color picker where you can choose your own. 3. This theme also customizes the look of TinyMCE, so that it fits right in with the rest of the interface. 4. If you want to change more about the appearance of theme than what’s on the module config screen, you can do so with a custom CSS file. And there are more than 30 CSS variables that are easy to understand and customize. More next week, so stay tuned!

Nice to see movement in this space! One suggestion would be to add separate light / dark mode config for main colour, otherwise there will always be accessibility issues with contrast for buttons etc in one or both of light / dark mode.

@PWaddict Yeah I'm seeing the same. I'm not where I can debug it right now, but will hopefully by tomorrow. It may just be that something needs a reboot.

It’s already possible in the UIkit Admin Theme Just Go to Modules -> Core Category Admin UIKit -> Settings -> Masthead + Navigation -> Logo File

On a scale of 1-10, this is an 11.

@kalimati That file is not actually included in the module. When you install the module, it downloads the Google Client API library directly from Google. It looks like there's a bug in the version you have installed. Actually, I remember that one, they had the arguments in the wrong order for an implode() call. That's a simple one to fix if you want to edit the file yourself. Another option would be to upgrade the library. https://github.com/googleapis/google-api-php-client/releases/ You can check the box to change the version in the module settings, but unless you are also seeing other errors, I would probably just edit the Resource.php file directly and fix it, so that you don't have to go through re-authenticate. Here's the change to make on line 297 of /site/assets/GoogleClientAPI/google-api-php-client/src/Google/Service/Resource.php // $requestUrl .= '?' . implode($queryVars, '&'); // OLD $requestUrl .= '?' . implode('&', $queryVars); // NEW

Hey guys, Im trying to sort pages depening on the count of pages who has them selected as page reference (the new owner selector might be handy for this?). my array is: $array = $pages->find("template=xx, sort=-profile_linked, sort=title"); I want to add a third sort which sorts the count of pages that have the array pages in a page reference field called "refField". What I tried: $array = $pages->find("template=xx, sort=-profile_linked, sort=title, sort=refField.owner.count"); Obviously this isn't working.. can I use the owner-selector for this at all? Or what would be the best practice? Thanks in advance!