Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/16/2026 in all areas

  1. Hi @elabx, First of all, thank you for the AlpineJS module! I have been working on a fork to modernize the module and make it more flexible for my projects. Instead of shipping a static (and potentially outdated) JS file, I implemented a downloader mechanism. Here is a summary of the new features I added: Local Hosting & Updater: The module can now download the latest Alpine.js core and plugins directly from unpkg.com to the server. This allows for 1-Click Updates via the module config without needing a module update. Plugin Support: Added checkboxes to easily enable official plugins (Mask, Intersect, Persist, Focus, Collapse, Morph, History). You can review the changes in my fork here: https://github.com/markusthomas/AlpineJS I think these changes would be a good addition to the your repository. Would you be interested in a Pull Request? Best regards, Markus
    2 points
  2. @lpa I didn't deliver a formal release announcement but Fluency 2.3.0 was released. There were some fixes to CKEditor that may possibly be related. I've had 2 reports of issues with CKEditor fields in the last couple of weeks that hadn't been seen before. Not sure what caused it. 2.3.0 is in the modules directory, you can upgrade from within ProcessWire or download the latest version from Github. Let me know if that fixes the issue. I'm going to be away from my computer over the weekend so I won't be able to come back and check until Monday afternoon at the earliest.
    1 point
  3. Oh sorry, i missunderstood this. Go to "Releases" > "Draft a new release".
    1 point
  4. Yes of course, let's do a pull request! I've just been running on this version non-stop lol
    1 point
  5. I was able to speak with someone at TinyMCE on a Zoom call this week and we had a good meeting. They are going to make it possible for us to continue using TinyMCE 7.x+ in the core, even though it is using a GPL license, while we use the MPL 2.x license. They will make a custom license available for ProcessWire and I hope to have the details of that potentially next week. We’ll have to review the conditions and everything to make all is good, but it sounds like it will very likely solve the issue for us. I’m really happy about this and look forward to working with TinyMCE 7.x They also expressed interest in us potentially collaborating on a separate module that would make some of the commercial and advanced TinyMCE features available to ProcessWire users that wanted them via a paid service, like a Pro module. This option hasn't been available to us before, so I thought it sounded interesting. I'll definitely be communicating with them more about that to see what's possible. That’s all I know so far, but will keep you up-to-date as I learn more.
    1 point
  6. Today I’ve merged the dev branch to the main/master branch in preparation for our next official tagged version, which is likely to be 3.0.255. I’ll likely git tag it with the version number early next week. This doesn’t mean that work on the next main/master version is complete. Just that no new issues have appeared that would warrant delaying it any longer. So while there’s still work to do, we’re also at a good point to start getting these updates on the main/master branch. As before, if you run into any issues after upgrading, please report them in the processwire-issues repo. I’ll compile and post a list of all that’s new in 3.0.255+ relative to 3.0.246 within the next week or two so stay tuned. There have been some really nice sites showing up in our sites directory lately. Thank you for those that have been submitting new ProcessWire-powered sites, and please keep it up! It’s great to see such awesome web design and development work.
    1 point
  7. Ryan has already merged the code from the dev branch into main branch and setup a release page for 255. However, Ryan hasn‘t yet created a 255 release tag on the Github main branch. The Github tag typically follows in some days unless a serious show stopper is found. So if you want to be 100% sure, wait a couple of days until the 255 release tag is published on Github. Have used the previous dev version for two public projects for about 1 month now without any issues, so I don‘t expect big surprises at this state.
    1 point
  8. @ryan was there ever any movement on this, they are now up to version 8.1.2. I don't keep up with the WYSIWYG landscape, does it matter that PW is so far behind?
    1 point
  9. @ryan, is there an update on this? It would be good to have PW use the current version of TinyMCE because v6 is now past the official End Of Life.
    1 point
  10. Mh, an investment company gobbling up open source projects. Yeah, that's never a good sign. I think we need an RTE that's governed by the OSI or something.
    1 point
  11. A cloud-hosted version would indeed be troublesome in terms of GDPR. As almost all of my clients are based in Europe, this is a crucial and sensitive topic to me. It's a bit frustrating how the licensing problem with rich text editors just keeps repeating itself. First CKEditor, now TinyMCE. That said, I need to emphasize that it's not about "wanting things for free". If the solution is a paid module, I'm perfectly fine with that. I just wish there would be a long-term solution to this problem that wouldn't involve Ryan having to negotiate licenses every two years or so.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...