bwakad Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 I am not so used to the github. But in this topic I came across: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/6822-module-dynamic-roles-for-pw-246/ it states, Make sure you are running ProcessWire 2.4.6 (dev branch) or newer. Download from GitHub (we will add this module to the Modules directory later). So I was searching for the dev branch (which is certainly not easy to find), but I guess it is this link: https://github.com/ryancramerdesign/ProcessWire/tree/dev But the readme file talks about PW 2.4 I would not mind using a dev branch while developing, but I do mind things could be presented a little more clear. For example, a download link to the dev branch from processwire.com was not easy to find. And as I said above, once found, a readme file for pw 2.4 while it resides in the dev branch (apparantly) 2.4.6 makes to me no sence. Just a thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcus Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 (edited) The readme doesn't state explicitly 2.4.0, so it's still valid since dev is currently 2.4.11. It's actually quite good that a not-for-production version of a software is relatively hard to find... But maybe it would be nice to have a short URL like http://dev.grab.pw directly pointing at the ZIP of the dev branch Edited August 11, 2014 by marcus 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adrian Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 http://processwire.com/download/ ProcessWire 2.4 at GitHubView, clone, fork or download the latest ProcessWire version and/or source code at GitHub. See also the dev branch which always contains the latest updates not yet migrated to the stable version. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
diogo Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Actually, it's not even that difficult to find... http://processwire.com/download/ ProcessWire 2.4 at GitHub View, clone, fork or download the latest ProcessWire version and/or source code at GitHub. See also the dev branch which always contains the latest updates not yet migrated to the stable version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bwakad Posted August 11, 2014 Author Share Posted August 11, 2014 Okay, I agree with you that 2.4 is valid for 2.4.xxx but then you could just say PW version 2. Somehow I feel, like people do with copyright year, just make it automatic. Anyway, it IS 2.4.11 and looks great by the way! edit - and YES, I did see the link to github, but from the topic I mentioned, I was looking for 2.4.6 !!! So it was confusing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrganizedFellow Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 I understand bwakads confusion. I was a little confused back then too lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now