HerTha

Thanks @FireWire for taking the time and providing the hint! This PHP version madness creates me a decent amount of headache. Anyway, meanwhile I was lucky to get some additional help from the original module author @ussliberty - the updated code will be available here soon!

Hi @DaveP thank you for providing this module fork! It has been very helpful for many years on one of my sites. Could you imagine to work on this again, to get rid of a few PHP 8 incompatibilities? Some function parameters used for trim() and preg_replace() functions seem to require a modification. My PHP skills turned out to be too limited when I tried to patch this myself...

okay, got it - it's embedded in a check already: if( ... function_exists('get_magic_quotes_gpc') ... great that there are source files to look into 🙂

Shouldn't be there when it comes to PHP8, right?

I guess I found the trick: Duplicator offers a setting "Flush ZIP after quantity of MBytes" Tried setting "500" and voila, the backup finished successfully on that all-inkl server. Happy New Year!

The process stops after 40 something seconds, don't think there is a limit already.

Thanks for the hint! There is a recommendation not to exceed 5GB when running a PHP backup script: https://all-inkl.com/wichtig/anleitungen/datensicherung/webspace/php-skript-zum-sichern-der-ftp-daten/einrichten_97.html If that is valid, 2GB should not be a problem. Will check with all-inkl support to get this confirmed...

Comrades: Copied a site to a new server at all-inkl All went very well so far, but when I start a backup using Duplicator, the script terminates after a minute or so. The backup zip actually starts being written (with FTP, I can see how the file size increases) but stops at about 1GB (and file disappears). The server is running PHP 8.1 and I have a .user.ini file in place to establish higher PHP limits already, like: max_execution_time = 600 memory_limit = 1024M Checked that it came into effect using phpinfo(). Anyone having a clue, what other limits could prevent the backup file from growing larger?

Hi Pip, for me, it is not clear what you mean here - basically, using a Page Reference field sounds like a good approach for such an assignment of (a number of) 'ingredient' pages to an 'item' page. I think we need some more details to analyze the problem...

Thanks for looking into this! "link" is a VerifiedURL (pro) field, actually. In a template context echo $item->link just outputs the URL like any other text field.

Great to hear it works! Thanks for providing a summary to help others! This reminds me to #1 support rule:

This matches numerical IDs only, right? Could that be the reason for not working with text like 'agb'?

Installed the module and works out-of-the-box. Thank you very much for providing it! In my application I use a custom URL field named "link". So I replaced "url" with "link" in the module settings, i.e. in "Returned fields" and "Result template" and "Link template". Now, the url/link part is not inserted correctly, this is the resulting source: <a data-pageid="10666" href="[object Object]">@abcde</a></p> Could you look into this, if time permits? TIA!

Thanks guys! ? Great recommendations. Difficult to judge which would fit best. Basically, I'd like to have a modified "insert/edit link" dialog in CKE which allows to select a page which in turn provides link URL and description text. Well, I will try these and see what can be achieved...

Sometimes, a task seems to be challenging at first, but the solution turns out to be surprisingly simple. Fortunately, while working with Processwire, this is a very common situation ? I hope someone can help me repeating this experience. I use pages to define external links. So, for every external link there is a page object with a descriptive text (field) and an url (managed by the most valuable VerifiedURL fieldtype). It is easy to add a page reference field to a template for using these. How to use such references within a CKEditor context, though?

I am not a web developer pro, but I understand that a (piece of) code or a (programming) concept can be "beautiful". If you make yourself familiar with Processwire, you will find such very often.

If you could have a quick look at those database details before I carry out the update, that would be great! Thanks a lot for your offer. Maybe it spreads some light on what's going on behind the scenes, on such server/setup. I'll send you a PM then (it'll be 2..3 weeks from now)...

Okay, I understand there is no simple toggle/option to exclude/include hidden files, so I will have a closer look at hooks then. Thank you so much for the time you are dedicating to maintain this module and to answering (my) questions!

I guess I need to grow up before taking on such tasks! ?

wow, what is that? ?

I'd like to exclude all hidden pages - except for a few specific ones (manually selected). Is there a way how this could be established?

Hi @Mike Rockett first let me repeat what I told you two years ago: Thank you for the Jumplinks module! This is one of the big life savers when it comes to run a real-world website, IMHO. Great job, thanks for maintaining this project! Thought it was time to update the module from 1.5.50 to 1.5.60. Same happened to me what was reported here: I don't feel very comfortable with patching databases myself, but as it's just a test site I fired up phpMyAdmin. The proposed workaround: fixed the problem for me. Of course, besides the 404 log was empty, all the "Last hit" information was gone. No problem on a test site, but I don't want to loose this information on the production site. Any ideas on a better way to handle this?

um - yes, those pages not counted in were hidden. So ... quick test ... 2.0.7 fixed the problem for me! @adrian your awesomeness is shining brightly! ? Thank you very much indeed.

I just did an update from 2.05 to 2.06. When finished, I checked module config, which told me I currently have no protected pages at all. Truth is, however, there is actually 1 protected page. Also, this page (protection) still worked after the update. I checked on another site where I have multiple protected resources. On this site - after updating - module config showed me all protected pages, however the numeric count in the headline was given wrongly. Could there be a regression in determining the count of protected pages? I use PW >/= 3.0.123 on both sites.

Hi @Wanze thanks for this fantastic module! Is there a way to control how the module's XML sitemap generator handles hidden pages?