apeisa

It has been there since 1500BC (Ryan added it on launch): http://modules.processwire.com/modules/process-redirects/

You should be able to pick that kind of date from dropdown. 8.4.2010

Adrian, nothing like that. I have been super happy with all the great feedback and ideas you have gave. Keep em coming! I played with renderAll little more and not entirely sure if it really fits... Gotta get some real life experiences before deciding.

Since these comments might give impression that Fredi is just page editing in a modal (like AdminBar does) I just wanted to mention that the main difference (and the only reason I wrote this module), is you can use Fredi per field basis. That means you can build super nice front end editing UI, where you have edit icons just next to the content you want to edit. When you have over 10 fields per page it might be confusing for users trying to figure out where content is shown. Seeing clients used AdminBar never made me happy - with big templates they were just lost and it would have been nicer to just send them to actual admin page. That being said - modules like Fredi really makes the line between content and visuals more unclear and are not a great fit for all sites. And while "field at the time" was the main driver, I can see the benefit for having full page edit modals also (although if template has 13 fields, I would cut that to three or five edit links, based on how the layout works in frontend). $fredi->renderAll() is now implemented - currently it also allows deleting and creating child pages (not sure if I like that).

You have to look into tinyMCE settings (or whatever editor you are using) to add newlines. If that doesn't work, you could create textformatter, that adds few newlines after </p>, </h1>,</h2>, </h3>, </h4>..

Ah, sorry. I misunderstood the anchor button with link button. Anchor seems to be broken. Hard to tell which could cause it (maybe some dependency with link tool, that we have replaced... or something). I try to figure.

Hmm.. I am not able to reproduce it (chrome). Latest InputfieldCKeditor and 2.3 stable pw.

I'll take a look!

Create an account on transifex and I add you into a project. It seems to be a very nice tool for doing translations in collaboration. Translations are easiest way for many people to "give back", and current way isn't very easy to get started. In github model you don't even see the original strings, which makes it clumsy. I think that tool like Transifex would lower the barrier to contribute and manage translations.

Which browser? Clear cache and check what console/firebug or similar says when freezing?

Oh yes, quickly tested these and Transifex is very very cool. I tested it with adminbar strings, I made it to this: en_US: site--modules--adminbar--adminbar-module: translations: 1b9abf135ccb7ed2f2cd9c155137c351: "Browse" 7dce122004969d56ae2e0245cb754d35: "Edit" 03c2e7e41ffc181a4e84080b4710e81e: "New" 0323de4f66a1700e2173e9bcdce02715: "Log out" e3afed0047b08059d0fada10f400c1e5: "Admin" 5f0ab45d8140d117f4c5dd9e45286107: "Page is locked" 5a1680fd738b22b7c0a8191373985ac8: "No rights to edit" a46d5c11c00d0d1df7504e10b8f6da3e: "%s moved to trash." 2049f18f9d75ff92438a31f97b58311d: "%s was saved succesfully." And what it gave to me was super cool editing interface. Free for open source too. It seems to me that this would be superb tool compared to current way with github and json. How much work it would be to get that kind of YAML out from source files Ryan?

Yep, definitely in that case, when all fields get rendered.

Could the new index be negative?

I think Ryan has pretty much build this kind of behaviour with form builder form export/import. Here is children (= fields) part of one form: { "children": { "your_name": { "type": "Text", "label": "Your name", "required": 1, "columnWidth": 50, "maxlength": 2048 }, "your_email": { "type": "Email", "label": "Your email", "required": 1, "columnWidth": 50, "maxlength": 512 }, "tours": { "type": "Page", "label": "Tours you are interested in", "columnWidth": 50, "template_id": 59, "labelFieldName": "title", "inputfield": "InputfieldCheckboxes" }, "accommodation": { "type": "Page", "label": "Accommodation options you are interested in", "columnWidth": 50, "parent_id": 1046, "labelFieldName": "title", "inputfield": "InputfieldCheckboxes" }, "size": { "type": "Text", "label": "Size of your group", "required": 1, "columnWidth": 100, "maxlength": 2048 }, "information": { "type": "Textarea", "label": "Other information and questions you might have for us?", "columnWidth": 100, "rows": 5 }, "minimum_budget_available": { "type": "Text", "label": "Minimum budget available", "columnWidth": 50, "maxlength": 2048 }, "maximum_budget_available": { "type": "Text", "label": "Maximum budget available", "columnWidth": 50, "maxlength": 2048 } } }

We have it build in. Thanks Ryan.

Arjen, I have seen that error few times (from live site), but never figured how to reproduce it. Big thanks for finding it, I think there should be some check that payment was found. So some check on between lines 220 and 221.

Glad you found it.

Soma is the machine! (I am turning into a repeater here)

Yep, that is what I meant. Clicking "Edit" would open Fredi with editing and save.

I like the idea, it's nice option to have. Also, as I see it doesn't clash with the current model, so no need for option. Happy to test it (maybe a pull request?)

There are page fields, that allow dragging and sorting: try asmSelect.

Those active boxes are on the dev branch.

If I am not total out of the map, Page field + Fredi would be pretty much SSM that joe_g is talking about. Although instead of inline it would be modal.

Yes, you are getting it right. I might try to see if Fredi wants to go backend too, so there could be modal edit links on page fields...

Might be worth testing for us: http://www.getlocalization.com