Leaderboard

Thanks a lot. My mistake was to look for the title. That does not work directly. So with your help I managed to get the data I needed. $searchterm = $input->urlSegment1; $myPage = $pages->findOne("template=Template1, title={$searchterm}"); $myList = $pages->find("template=Template2, PRfield={$myPage}"); That works as expected.

Make sure: in myTemplate settings>URLs you Allow URL Segments then // decomposed example $title = $input->urlSegment1; // single $ref = $pages->get("template=myTemplate, title=$title"); // get retrieve a single result $pageList = $pages->find("template=myTemplate, prfield=$ref"); // or if many is needed $refs = $pages->find("template=myTemplate, title=$title|Foo|Bar"); // find retrieve a page array $pageList = $pages->find("template=myTemplate, prfield=$refs");

HTMX already sends headers to identify itself with every request it initiates, so you could just put something like this into your config.php: $config->htmx = isset($_SERVER['HTTP_HX-Request']); The other headers seem useful, too: https://htmx.org/docs/#request-headers

A friend of mine has changed his job, he owns a video game room, he now "develops" websites, I could see a result, and the tools used, I prefer to keep quiet here (it's in the title). I have to interfere in his conversion process before it's too late: Have the right habits, keep in mind that the goal is to help the client to improve the conversion of his business through his website, and thus to make more money rather than losing it. Otherwise, what's the point, an instagram or facebook page would have been enough. So I wanted to make a synthesis of the arguments to make him take into account, I also saw an old forum thread that came up recently, so I wanted to ask a neutral "person" (person.. lol) what she think. I have the impression that the arguments are those already exposed in the answers given to these threads. In short, a good synthesis, I think, and non-biased, I hope. As always, the same question, "How to convince my client to use Processwire instead Wordpress?" Yours sincerely, GPT ?

Password reset here:

Thanks for the updates and happy easter! When I click on the search icon I get redirected to https://processwire.recipes/topic/search/. Some if I type /search in the URL diractly. Something going wrong with the routing there, I guess

Just pushed the 2023-04-08 update: ⚒️ Features Search: Added a first version (proof-of-concept) of the recipe search. #6 Prev/Next Links: Added previous/next links on the recipe pages to for faster navigation around recipes. #7 ? Bugfixes Twitter Meta/Social Tags #4 Internal links, SEO tags and assets #5 ? Misc changes Added: Transparency Report Added: Advertisement Added: Community projects Updated: About, Changelog Listing only 5 recent recipes on homepage, makes it a bit faster Enabled Table of contens on pages where necessary More in the Changelog.

Just to go against the grain a bit: Those modules are way, way overkill for 99% of sites. Just looking at the screenshot in the Seo Maestro thread, all those options would confuse most of my clients. Who really wants or needs to manually edit the change frequency of a single page? Some of those options should also be generated automatically (Locale, based on the current language) or set globally (Site Name, for example). I get that you can control which fields to show and that it's kind of a framework which you can use for all kinds of sites. But in my experience, showing five screens of SEO settings on every page is the best way to get clients/editors to be scared of them and never use them. Three fields - title, description, preview image - are all you need most of the time. KISS. I would use external tools for this. There are many tools that are much better at this stuff than Yoast, and they look at the page as a whole, not just the body content. For example, at work we have at some points used the following tools among others, in no particular order: Ryte, Seobility, Semrush, Sistrix. And many more ...

Same. I also tend to bundle these with fields for open graph metadata, option to override page title separately, and whatnot. You might want to check out module solutions if you haven't yet. Seo Maestro is a neat one, and MarkupMetadata is what we use for our web projects (though latter one doesn't provide a GUI for content editors, it's just for generating proper markup). My experience is similar: the content analyzing features of Yoast have never been particularly useful for me, in part because I've mostly worked on non-English sites where they don't seem to work so well. Also these reports seem to — at best — provide a rough estimate of how good your content might be, and (in my opinion) there are better tools for that. If your clients are often interested in doing "hardcore SEO", I'd definitely dig into external tools and see if there are some that you can recommend instead. Yoast has some nice features for working around WP's shortcomings, and I've found their "helper" tools (such as breadcrumb creation) pretty handy in the past. ProcessWire, on the other hand, makes things like breadcrumbs and canonical links trivial, and the structure is often so straightforward that you don't need to do a whole lot to make your site "SEO friendly". One thing to note is that Yoast actually does handle "modular pages" relatively well. Last I checked it required a separate plugin and only worked if your content was all visible in the editor, though. My understanding is that it just mashes it all together and then does its magic. Crude perhaps, but in many (if not most) cases this provides decent results ?