Lance O. Posted November 9, 2022 Share Posted November 9, 2022 I've personally found the Font Awesome icon options for fields very limited since most are for some sort of online service. What are the chances that it could be replaced with Google Material Icons, or even a subset of them? https://fonts.google.com/icons 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
szabesz Posted November 9, 2022 Share Posted November 9, 2022 1 hour ago, Lance O. said: Google Material Icons While not "most of them" but surely a lot of them, so I agree that our options are limited. I'm not keen on Font Awesome icons, btw. 1 hour ago, Lance O. said: icon options for fields very limited since most are for some sort of online service I guess they can be downloaded and actually be bundled with the core, but I cannot find an easy way being offered to do that. https://github.com/google/fonts What I found is this: Download All Google Fonts You can download all Google Fonts in a simple ZIP snapshot (over 1GB) fromhttps://github.com/google/fonts/archive/main.zip Another option is this, for example: https://icons.getbootstrap.com/ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pwired Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 https://feathericons.com/ Choose any stroke, size and color Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndZyk Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 ProcessWire uses still a limited subset of Font Awesome 4 for the back-end. One solution could be to upgrade to Font Awesome 6 with 2000 icons in the free version: https://fontawesome.com/search?o=r&m=free Of course the Feather and Material icons are also beautiful. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bernhard Posted November 10, 2022 Share Posted November 10, 2022 Sticking to FA will probably be a good idea because there's a lot of javascript on the backend (for example for adding spinners that indicate loading) and that would likely break with other icon libraries that work differently or use other classes. On the other hand having more icons available would be nice, so the free subset of FA6 sounds like a good idea to me if it does not take up too much space just for the small benefit of having more icons. I think the best chances to get that into the core are if someone just tried it out and provided a PR and let Ryan know about it. Or maybe ask Ryan before doing it if he'd be willing to add it at all (to prevent useless work). 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now