heldercervantes

I was looking back at this and I'm wondering, was this feature removed? This post is from 2021, I bought ProFields a little over a year ago, and my copy doesn't have these options. I'm also not finding any info on the blog. @ryan?

Still interested. I agree the site doesn't do justice to the product. Wordpress is looking pretty good these days, and the only other alternative I've seen deserving of notice, CraftCMS, is also looking pretty good. I think our site is directed too much at the developer audience, and I often found myself having to convince my clients that this is a better option than Wordpress or whatever platform they have in mind. And the site doesn't help much at that. If you guys want to consider a redesign, I'll gladly join that effort.

Yeah it's clear now that I was confusing RockPageBuilder with RepeaterMatrix. I probably saw the conversation in its early stages and that's why I wasn't finding anything. At some point I hacked the file selector module to a similar effect. The user experience was great, but it was a pain to set up using the standard repeater module (had to add all possible fields and then control visibility of each one depending on the chosen file). Eventually I started using RepeaterMatrix instead. I might have a look at Rock's module in a future project, as this one's too far ahead in development and it's hard to add the cost now.

I think I might be thinking of RockPageBuilder: https://www.baumrock.com/en/processwire/modules/rockpagebuilder/docs/quickstart/

Apologies if this is redundant, I'm convinced I've seen this discussed here but I just can't find it. If my memory isn't failing me, I'm sure there's a way of replacing the text links for adding new entries with thumbnails on RepeaterMatrix. I'm using it to create a content blocks solution and want to have a better visual cue of what the block the admin is adding looks like. Or maybe I'm losing my mind, which is quite possible.

Thanks for your replies. It was most likely a false positive. After updating and requesting a new review, the site was cleared. @ryan I don't think the file was modified. That would be too weirdly specific and discreet for a hack. It was probably something harmless the code that was raising suspicion. Sucks that without any fault a site that's running campaigns and paying to grab traffic would get such an alarming message from Google. Hard hit on the brand. On a side note: First time ever that I had to update something on a published project. I have sites published almost 10 years ago that had zero issues of this sort.

@bernhard you might want to have a look at this. One of my sites is displaying the red screen of extermination, saying that the site is dangerous and contains malware. Google itself wasn't much help with search console just giving me a vague answer, but using other tools it comes down to Rockfrontend's JS: Has anyone had this issue? Any ideas? Edit: I was on version Rockfrontend version 3.2.2. After updating to the current version, Sucuri's SiteCheck doesn't seem to complain about RF anymore and only says the site is blacklisted by GSF. I've requested a new review from Google and I'm awaiting a response.

Hi guys. Check out my latest project Casa Douro Guesthouses. As the name implies, Casa Douro offers a few guesthouses in historic Porto and on the Douro Region. They came to us looking for a well built website that would fit their marketing efforts and grab direct reservations, instead of relying only on Booking.com and Airbnb. Since their channel manager (CM) software only offers a cookie-cutter website and no API, ours does all the presentation and jumps straight to the booking system when the user decides to make a reservation. As usual on my sites, pages are built using a blocks system (Profields Repeater Matrix), allowing the admin to change things up a little bit between the different units. Plus the usual WireMailSMTP, SEOMestro, and Rockfrontend because I love using Latte templates. The frontend is a mix of Tailwind + SCSS on more complicated components, and JS over Vite which allows me to keep it as vanilla as possible. We already have plans for new sections, and maybe upgrade the booking system in the future.

Page loads on every step. Adding to a repeater is a lot quicker and less frustrating than creating a page. I usually add a "Global settings" tab to the homepage where I put a repeater for the social networks, email for form submissions and stuff like that, so I was wondering if I could have a field there to manage this list instead of pages. It would also seem more tidy and even intuitive for the admin than using pages on the tree. The idea that pages on the tree might not be actual pages but also the options for a field is super weird to me. This is what I mean. The amenities are grouped in sections, but those are lost when selecting them on the page. Not an issue with the 9 or 10 that I have now, but considering in the end there will be 50 of them, it won't be very user-friendly. Oh, as I was writing this, @BitPoet pointed out the solution. Thanks man, great timing ?

Happy new year, everyone! I'm working on a BnB website and I need to have an anemities list like this: How would you approach something like this in the admin? I need to create a global list of amenities, with sections, each with a title, icon and optional note, that in each unit I can just select with checkboxes. The most viable option is probably to create separate pages for each + a multi-page select field. But there are a couple of things I don't quite like in that approach. One is creating / managing the options. Having to create these as pages one by one makes my skin crawl, and I'd much rather have someting like a repeater on a global config section of the homepage. The other is selecting them. I've created amenities/section/amenty templates, the pages select field looks for the amenity template, and in the end the sections aren't accounted for when I'm selecting in the unit page. I'll probably have to grind a bit to get them to display organised by section in the end, now that I think about that. Any better ideas?

Has this been deprecated? Just tried this module on a site, trying to get watermarks on its opengraph images, and I'm getting this error: Compile Error: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is no longer supported (line 2385 of site/modules/PageImageManipulator/ImageManipulator.class.php) (My server is running PHP 8.0)

The directory is writable and there's stuff there. It's weird that the older version works. I'll probably just leave it at that

Here I am doing maintenance on a site that seems to have went through some hard times and had multiple issues. I started off by updating to version 3.0.229 and then went ahead to finding crap and cleaning up, replacing the old SEO module with the new one, refactoring some stuff, yadda yadda. Most of it's done but now I'm getting a weird error on WireMailSmtp. I can configure it fine, but when I send a test email or uninstall the module I'm getting this: Class "WireMailSmtp" not found in site/modules/WireMailSmtp/WireMailSmtpAdaptor.php:143 Any idea what's going on? I've already removed the module manually from the file system, refreshed modules to remove it from the database and installed it again, but the same thing happens. **EDIT** I've downgraded from version 0.6.3 to 0.6.0 (just copied the folder from another site) and I don't get this error anymore ?‍♂️

The problem isn't breaking the boilerplate, but rather breaking my habits ? I mean I'm so used to just making my own vanilla js and getting it doing what I want that needing to flip the switch to Alpine's way is enough to make me postpone the decision to the next project.

Love this! Makes total sense. Although I did try to make AlpineJS part of my boilerplate and quickly gave up. Just easier for me to add a JS file and do my stuff with vanilla. Right now I just have a Vite thing, a js that imports and inits scripts from a file (like the one that Bernhard mentioned). Effects like my text reveal thing require adding the type of ready-made JS and CSS that I tend to avoid. However if it could be part of a library of stuff a developer can browse and easily add to their project, it might be a cool idea. Alpine might help with this.