• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

35 Excellent

About NorbertH

  • Rank
    Full Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

2,453 profile views
  1. Thanks alot ! The idea of looking at the console solved the problem , as i had javascript turned off in all of my browsers So i guess we can close this now .
  2. I have a PW page that is about 2 - 3 Years old . After an upgrade to Version 2.6 all Pages and modules where gone in Admin backend. As i had no time to look after the page i left it like it was for quite a while. Now that i needed to get the Page online again i searched whith google anf fount that i should upgrade the page to PW 2.7.3 As the Upgrade to 2.6 was done in a hurry , its perfectly possible that i accidentallly upgraded from 2.0 to 2.6. Please have a look at the images to see the desaster in full color ....
  3. I hoped to find at least one or two free templates that come close to the ones found on Codecanyon or Templatemonster :-( To be true i did a lot of google search myself. Guess i use BLOCKS to put together a collection of blocks that are needed for the tutorials plus giving it a more or less nice look. That will do the Job for now. It's my first try on video tutorials ... whish me some luck.
  4. @diogo I guess quite a few of those templates are made whith some kind of editor like or (Blocks). But they are CC License and would basically do the job. @Manfred62 Thanks for posting the links! Now i still got the problem to find a template that stands out from the masses. Its not so easy to find templates whith licenses that make them usable, its hard to find good ones and its even harder to find outstanding ones. I wanted to save me some time searching through hundreds of templates. I still hope finding something as complete as the example i posted.
  5. Exactly, and i want to go some further that other tutorials right now. I want to show how to make some usefull navigation, fill the Blog whith live, get the Slider running ..... Templatemonster got lots of really nice looking ones(ok some got ugly code) whith almost anything a page possibly need as predesigned HTML+JS but they all lack a usefull license. Or i could use the SPOT Template, used in several other tutorials, (its not feature complete, but its ok) but it feels overused by me. I am looking for something that is really nice, really rocks , really looks good as the most free templates look average at best. Looks promissing, license ok , they do NOT look like complete crap when turning JS off, many aren't feaature complete but its really worth a look. Lots of them may be worth to build a ready profile.(haven't looked at all yet!) Maybe some additional, more feature complete ones, or maybe some GPL ones ? Maybe something whith a set of features like this : Not sure if there is something like that for free ?
  6. I am looking for a multipurpose, high quality and free to use template to build some video tutorials. It should be responsive and have at least a blog/news section and somthing like a gallery. Additional features, especially multiple(or configurable) colorshemes would be nice. I really don't care if it uses Bootstrap or anything else. Almost any templates i found (and that don't look like crap) forbid to republish them as a Processwire profile (or template for any other CMS) or they have an unclear license. A template under GPL or BSD license would be perfect as i whish to publish the results of the tutorials as PW profiles. Hopefully someone can help.
  7. On Install i get : Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '[' in /somepath/site/modules/FieldtypeFontIconPicker/InputfieldFontIconPicker.module on line 22 I guess this is because that server uses php 5.4. that does not support the new [] Syntax. The funnie thing about that is that it should support it !
  8. Maybe its a solution to export the whole page to a Profile and install it whith a clean 2.6?
  9. @evan Thanks, that helped me out for the moment! @ryan Actual may version is a 2.5.28 Def that was upgraded in multiple steps to always the latest def version, i tried upgrading to 2.6 but the error was still there. Later i downgraded using a backup as 2.6 had some other issues. (couldn't deninstall the old comments manager ) . Maybe its mentionable that i echoed the $field->schemaVersion and it just gave me a Zero(0). I guess that schould be a 5. I remember something from PHP manual : try { $error = 'Always throw this error'; throw new Exception($error); // Code following an exception is not executed. echo 'Never executed'; } so maybe $schemaVersion = 5; is never executed as all tests fail and so its never saved ? EDIT: Did a few more tests and it does not get executed. I guess thats the reason why the error only states something about upvotes and never about downvotes as even downvotes isn't checked. EDIT2: I had the Funnie Idea of simply setting $schemaVersion manual. $schemaVersion = 5; //I ADDED THIS ! if(((int) $field->schemaVersion) < $schemaVersion) { $this->message("Updating schema version of '{$field->name}' from $field->schemaVersion to $schemaVersion", Notice::log); $field->schemaVersion = $schemaVersion; $field->save(); } This led to a few little Errors where the most interesting might be : TemplateFile: Field comments is not saveable because it is in a specific context
  10. I just upgraded to PW 2.6 The new Comments Admin requires me to remove this Comments Manager , but when i try to uninstall it i get a : Fatal error: Class 'Comment' not found in /var/www/web207/html/site/modules/ProcessLatestComments/ProcessLatestComments.module on line 59 Comments Module is installed.
  11. When using the Comments Module i get Errors at all actions that have to do whith comments, for example editing the field settings. Session: SQLSTATE[42S21]: Column already exists: 1060 Duplicate column name 'upvotes' FieldtypeComments: SQLSTATE[42S21]: Column already exists: 1060 Duplicate column name 'upvotes' ProcessWire 2.5.28 dev Right now there are no comments posted on the page yet!
  12. Great work , no problems so far!
  13. The problem whith changing the elements only occures if you don't use classes or id's as placeholder . If you use em you can far more easily change element. So i t looks like most of the problems we discussed here highly depend on workflow and how you collaborate whith your designers(and maybe their skills). Btw. we are comparing a higly experimental idea to something thats been stable whith something thats been elegant and stable for some years already(like mustache). Compared to some of the widespread and completely bloated TE i think even this experimental TE looks elegant, not sure if you agree, but as you seem to be using mustache i guess you turned your back to those systems too?
  14. Ok, lets go through this step by step . First of alll i took a look at the two Links you posted: ITCSS is a really great concept and i guess it will help me organizing my CSS files a lot better in the Future ! Second about the Article: I got the concept why its a bad idea to add IDs, yes its true if you use em they completely break the "flow" of your actual cascade an i already had a load of issues caused by this whith templates that clients simply bought on Templatemonster or so. But the author also stated that he thinks it's ok to use ID's for internal page navigation as those ID have no relevance inside of the CSS, they usually don't have any CSS definitions. So i don't think its doing any harm if you add some more for templating. Its just additional stuff you put into your template same as if you put some TE stuff like {{{something}}}) into it. Third your example: (after some experiments whith the example DOM Template engine) The change would break nothing but it simply would have the default content in the headline. but this would happen to any other TE too. For example in Smarty you have to add Variables via $smarty->assign('variable', 'Value'); . So if you don't assign that variable somehow the content would not be displayed. In addition to that the designer needs an up to date list of all available variables In DOM you would do this by adding one line: $item = $template->repeat (".list--popular"); foreach ($list as $elemant) { $item->setValue ('a', $element->linkname); $item->setValue ('a@href', $element->url); $item->setValue ('h2', $element->headline); //This line is added to make it display $item->next (); } In this example i didn't even needed additional classes or IDs. Some of my recent test show that you just need to add a few classes or ids from time to time, plus you can filter em whith a single regex if you choose the names right and its absolutely necessary. I also see a few advantages in this: 1. You have the full power of PHP available if it comes to decisionmaking, modifying content or anything else. 2. The Template may contain example content, so you can use it independently if you like. 3. You can use static mockup template and simply make it live whithout any changes at all. So even the Designer can fetch the document whith slightly changed classes and reimport into its editing tool. I am sure that if you want logic free templates you have to pay a price for this, but i am not so sure if that price is so high like if you are using some of the big bloated TE's of our days. At least it's a really interesting concept that really deserves a second look!
  15. Finallly i found someone who actually implemented a TE based on DOM templating: That brings this discussion to the level of having actual examples available More comes later as i am busy right now.