Leaderboard

This week I worked with Claude Code on refactoring the core WireHooks class to improve it in various ways. I do this work because I like to code, so am of course handling that part. But Claude has been very helpful in finding issues as well as reviewing all my code before it gets committed. In this case, Claude found several bugs that are now fixed, and also saved me from introducing more when I added new features. Working with Claude Code reminds me of 1989 when I was in high school learning Turbo Pascal and building a BBS, and getting help from a neighbor and good friend that was doing the same. I learned so much then and now it feels like that time again. But man have things come a long way since then. I asked Claude about helping with the ProcessWire issues and requests GitHub repos, and now it's solving issue reports, replying to them and committing fixes. For simple fixes that involve a line or two, I'm going to let it handle the the whole thing. It's posting under my GitHub account, but it identifies itself as Claude in replies and and in commits. That way it's easy to tell what it does under my account. I had it just cover a couple of issue reports today as a test (see 2195 and 2192), but will be having it do a lot more going forward. Back to the WireHooks class, I asked Claude about writing a commit message for the WireHooks updates, and wow, check this out: Bug fixes in WireHooks: - conditionalArgMatch(): Fix Selector mutation bug where the shared Selector object stored in hook options was permanently mutated after the first call, causing argMatch hooks (e.g. addHook('WireLog::save(=errors)')) to stop matching after their first invocation. - getHooks(): Remove key variable from foreach to prevent shadowing $method param. - getHooks(): Replace array_merge() in loops with direct array append. - addHook(): Prevent 'noAddHooks' option from leaking into stored hook options. - isHookedOrParents(): Use $className string consistently in cache key writes, rather than $class which may be a Wire object. - runHooks(): Scope $useHookReturnValue inside foreach so it resets per hook. - runHooks(): Use strict null comparison ($toObject === null). Bug fixes in HookEvent: - arguments(): Allow setting an argument value to null (use func_num_args() > 1 instead of $value !== null check). - arguments(): Use array_key_exists() instead of isset() for null-correct lookup. - getArgumentNames(): Guard ReflectionMethod instantiation with method_exists() to avoid uncaught ReflectionException for dynamically-added hook methods. - __toString(): Fix argument list building (was appending to string instead of array), add null/bool display, avoid PHP fatal for objects without __toString(). New features in WireHooks: - cancelHooks: Now accepts string values 'before' or 'after' (in addition to boolean true) to cancel only hooks of a given type. For example, a before hook can set $event->cancelHooks = 'after' to cancel remaining after hooks without affecting the hooked method call. - Custom event data carry-forward: Custom data set on a HookEvent (via $event->customKey = $value) is now carried forward to subsequent HookEvent instances within the same runHooks() call. This allows before hooks to pass data to after hooks without using external variables. - getHooks('*'): Supports wildcard method to return all hooks for all objects. Available in debug mode only (uses allStaticHooks/allLocalHooks aggregates). - allStaticHooks: Now tracked alongside allLocalHooks when debug mode is on. - addHooks() comment fix: "If there is a parenthesis" corrected to "no parenthesis". - addHook() exception messages improved with additional context. - runHooks() docblock updated to include 'either' type. - hookTimer() PHPDoc: @param String corrected to lowercase string. New features in HookEvent: - $defaults static property: Defines the canonical set of standard HookEvent fields, used to distinguish custom data from built-in event properties. - $eid property: Each HookEvent instance gets a unique sequential event ID. - set() override: Tracks non-default keys set on the event in $customKeys. - getCustomData(): Returns only the custom (non-default) data set on the event, used internally by runHooks() for the carry-forward feature. - cancelHooks property updated to support bool|string type. Anyway, I know a lot of you here are deep into the AI stuff, and I'm just getting started, so none of this is surprising. But it sure is a pleasure collaborating with Claude Code on this stuff and it brings back that coding wonder and excitement from 1989. Some Claude and Claude Code podcasts I've enjoyed listening to or watching this week include one from AI for Humans Claude is Cooking, Wednesday's AI Daily Brief on How to use Claude's new upgrades, and the Get Educated AI video of how to setup Claude to use your computer and web browser, etc. (though I've not tried this just yet!). Lastly, last week I put together a ProcessWire powered JSON feed of bike tours, and the client prompted that they wanted a map and look what Claude Code did, I'm impressed!

Sooo, I'm still alive and in August, I will start on a new job and project that probably brings me back to work with the cool and great Processwire. :D 7 years ago I was forced to change job and ended in a cool new place doing front-end dev not using PW anymore. So unfortunately I didn't really use or follow PW in that time except once a year doing something tiny bits on the handful of websites I am responsible for. I'm sorry if I just disappeared "over night" and maybe left some things behind I was doing for PW, and didn't spend time looking out for them. The reason is, I also was very frustrated with a lot of things with the job and life at that time and 2019 was also when I started painting again digitally, as maybe some of you know. I went full hyper focus mode, everyday almost for 2-3 years in my spare time and since then slowed down. I was able to make a small career with it, and made a lot of new connections and experiences which was awesome. I will continue to work on making art and illustrations as I have a lot of new freedom with the new job too combine a lot of my skills. Finally I can work from home full time. A little dream come true. Thanks for still being here and keeping this small but awesome community alive! I have to catch up now! :D Cheers Soma

I try not to worry about things I cannot control, and AI falls squarely in that category for me. It's here, it's not going anywhere, and every senior person I know in tech is embracing it rather than fighting it. I use it daily now and it makes me more productive. That's the reality. The people protesting or boycotting it aren't going to slow it down, they're just going to fall behind. That said, I don't think caring about the environmental and societal side means you have to opt out. If anything, the opposite. People who use AI and care about how it's built and powered are the ones with any real influence over where it goes. I'd genuinely have no hesitation donating to make AI development better and more responsible, that feels like a more direct lever than abstaining. Ryan put it well: sitting out doesn't improve anything. Use it, push for better, and concentrate on what's within your own family four walls.

Human in the loop, aka HITL. The latest acronym and IMHO vital for devs.

It's always great to hear feedback, it makes modules a must-have for every developer!

Hi, everyone! While working on a client project we were looking for a way to let editors apply CSS classes to individual images in rich text fields — quickly, visually, and also in the frontend editor. ProcessWire already has several ways to get CSS classes onto images, so it's worth being precise about what this module does differently: TextformatterFluidImages adds one class to all images automatically — great for img-fluid across the board, but there's no per-image choice. TextformatterImageInterceptor is more powerful: editors tag images in the image field, and the Textformatter applies the corresponding classes at render time. The logic is developer-defined and centralized, which is exactly right when you want consistent, rule-based image treatment. But the class is invisible in the editor, applied only in the frontend output, and editors have to set the tag in a completely separate place from where they're actually working. TinyMCE's built-in styleFormatsCSS is the closest thing to what we wanted. You write CSS, ProcessWire turns it into a Styles dropdown. It works, but the dropdown is generic — it shows all defined styles regardless of what's selected — and there's a known accumulation issue where nothing prevents float-left float-right ending up on the same image. And it doesn't work in the frontend editor. What we needed was simpler: editor clicks an image, picks a style, sees immediately which styles are active, can combine them or remove them individually. No dialogs, no separate fields, no render-time magic — the class goes directly into the <img> tag in the saved HTML, visible and editable right there in the editor. That's what this module does: It registers a context toolbar in TinyMCE that appears as a floating "Image Style" button when an image is selected. For CKEditor the same options show up in the right-click context menu. The class list is defined once in the module settings and works across both editors — no separate configuration per editor type. Each entry shows a checkmark when active, clicking it again removes it, multiple classes can be combined freely. Works in the admin and in the frontend editor. Complete Readme on GitHub: https://github.com/frameless-at/ProcessImageClasses and the module directory. Any thoughts on further improvements welcome! Cheers, Mike

@Soma a massive welcome back. I followed you on Twitter and absolutely loved your art journey but then it just seemed to disappear. As I hate social media I am not really on anything else, and certainly don't use X anymore. I always wondered what happened to a forum legend. As somebody mentioned earlier, you probably don't realise how much your posts have and still do help people.

@adrian Thanks for bringing this up. It seemed like x-user came here to troll with an expectation that ProcessWire should ignore and blacklist anything having to do with AI. That doesn't seem realistic. But it did make me wonder, are there any other CMS projects that are taking this approach? It seems unlikely. I imagine we're not too many years away from the point where a CMS project can't compete if it's not involved in the AI space in some way or another. I also think that the AI changes are coming whether we like it or not. So we can either jump on and grow, and make things better, or get left behind, and perhaps get left without a job. If it's only the people that dismiss environmental concerns using AI and voting with their wallets, then there's no incentive for these companies to do better. X-user would make a greater difference to the world by being an AI user that cares and chooses companies based on their values. And I think that's what we all should do. Whereas abandoning anything having to do with AI does nothing to improve the direction of AI and seems a little like self-sabotage. In the future, and with users that care, there will be pressure on AI companies to do things right. For example, when they build that next data center, they will also build a giant solar array or wind farm to power it. Depending on coal and gas plants for electricity is not sustainable, and now it's more costly than solar. Coal and gas is EOL'd. It may be that the power demands of AI push us towards sustainable solutions faster than otherwise, and we need that as quickly as possible. My opinion: We can't dismiss AI and complain. We have to participate and push for better solutions when there are opportunities to do so. If we sit out, there will be no such opportunities. The environmental problems were here long before AI. As I understand, the root of it is power generation. The US (at least) is not solving the power generation problem in a way that can overcome the politics, corruption and outright stupidity. But I also think that it's very likely AI that will be in some way responsible for the solutions for these problems. There are so many problems to solve that are bigger than any of us have answers for. And if there are solutions for these problems, I have no doubt they'll be coming with the help of AI in some fashion. From my perspective blacklisting AI solves nothing and instead is abandoning the problems and giving up.