Jump to content


Photo

Where did you find about ProcessWire?


  • Please log in to reply
99 replies to this topic

#21 Pete

Pete

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 1,756 posts
  • 658

  • LocationChester, England

Posted 16 October 2011 - 08:55 AM

I've spent too much time with online votings in the past when creating custom content for games, there was contant fights for years going on on star ratings. So what. I think star ratings aren't really what should be chosen anyway.


We've had similar discussions about this on StrategyCore. Every time it gets to the point where we start thinking about star ratings as a quick way to grab peoples' attention, I get reminded that if people are too lazy to read reviews then that's their own problem and that we shouldn't be spending too much time catering for those with low attention spans ;)

I discovered PW through an "Best CMS" online poll/voting I went coming from an tweet by modx community. Somebody mentioned PW in the comments with only: "ProcessWire, like modx done right.". This caught my attention. After reading "jquery inspired" and watching the video and what it's all about I was hooked in a matter of minutes, didn't even try out the demo, just started installing and playing around. I was amazed by how simple and powerful the API was and the general approach seemed to makes all sense. I was literally thinking "Finally the CMS I was looking/wishing for since a long time appeared! It's a dream come true"


This was the exact same way I found out about it :) I must admit, I was initially a bit put off by the pink (:P) but the video won me over.

#22 Soma

Soma

    Hero Member

  • Moderators
  • 3,216 posts
  • 1761

  • LocationSH, Switzerland

Posted 17 October 2011 - 07:04 AM

Also, made good progress with PW 2.2 today and admin multilanguage support!


Awesome! Can't wait to see it :D

@somartist | modules created | support me, flattr my work flattr.com


#23 ryan

ryan

    Hero Member

  • Administrators
  • 5,780 posts
  • 3125

  • LocationAtlanta, GA

Posted 17 October 2011 - 08:13 AM

This thread has been really helpful to read. It's interesting to hear how you all found ProcessWire, and it's different than I would have thought. Among other things, It makes me think we should target things like custom fields in our keyword strategy rather than things like jQuery. For instance, terms like 'custom fields cms' seem appropriate, and we don't appear for those right now. We do show up for 'jquery cms' (top of page 2, google) but that's not really a driver of traffic and more clear now that it's not what people are looking for.

Have you posted to Opensourcecms about their voting system? It seems to me that it should be quick fix to do - although not sure if there is anyone who cares enough (site feels like there is no one giving love for it).


I don't think this is a quick fix. I don't see a way around the problems with the system unless you tie the votes to accounts or reviews. What they are doing is tying it to an IP address and that's it. So all you need is a rotating IP (remember AOL?), proxy server, or even a cell phone, and you can vote as many times as you want. If you want to down/up vote something fast and en masse, then you just take that same concept an existing site with traffic and point a hidden iframe and image src to the voting mechanism... then every user unknowingly becomes a voter. It's a hugely flawed system. But not any more so than any others that allow anonymous votes. So it's not technically opensourcecms.com's fault, other than that they've chosen to accept the compromises associated with such a system. And those compromises are not obvious to most people that visit.

What it gets down to is that I think we're conditioned to give more legitimacy to such ratings than they deserve. For me, that's because I rely on Amazon's star ratings for when I buy stuff. But their system is pretty good– If someone wants to upvote or downvote something en masse, it's a bit hard to do because every vote has to be tied to a real person with a credit card number. It's easy for me to forget that other star-rating systems aren't nearly as legitimate as that.

Someone suggested earlier in the thread that they should tie every rating to a real review, and I agree with that. That would prevent automated attacks on the ratings system and make it a real pain for someone to try and manipulate the ratings. I think that's the only way you can give legitimacy to an anonymous 5-star ratings system like this.

PW is a weightlifter in the body of a ballerina (maybe you'll want to use this as a tagline)


I didn't realize it was viewed that way before you wrote it, but it's really quite a powerful metaphor and definitely makes me think a little differently about the software.

I was annoyed by the hosting "ads" too.


I do wish they had asked for permission before taking the logo and pasting it into the ads. On the other hand, they are still providing a good service to the community by hosting all the CMS demos and I know it can't be cheap and they've got a business to run. My opinion is that if they have to use those ads, then they should only use them on the CMSs they are hosting the demos for… because presumably they are using that hosting service to host the demos. I hope I can get in contact with someone there because it seems like they are overall a good service that is just making a few mistakes and maybe they just don't know how they are perceived.

…looking forward to see PW 2.2 and multilanguage support right out of the box soon.


I also want to clarify that this is multi-language support in the admin so that people can see PW's tools in their own language. This isn't a new solution for a multi-language web site on the front end. Though there is some crossover and some may find the additions handy for front-end stuff too. But this would not replace a full multi-language solution on the front end (like what LorGG is working on).





#24 Sylvio

Sylvio

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 51 posts
  • 5

  • LocationBelgium

Posted 17 October 2011 - 08:55 AM

I found it on http://www.cmswire.com


Been working with open-source content management systems for a long time now

Drupal, MODx, CMS Made Simple, ExpressionEngine, etc.. but none of them provides the simplicity that
PW provides. The jQuery style API is just AWESOME.
Until now I didn't had the feeling that I had to bend in every corner to get the result I wanted, it all went SIMPLE




#25 slkwrm

slkwrm

    Sr. Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 248 posts
  • 66

Posted 17 October 2011 - 11:50 AM

Wow! This topic is pretty intense :)

Soma, that gag is really funny, though it's not 100% what I was imagining while writing ;D I'm really surprised it's getting so much feedback especially taking in consideration my limited knowledge of English. Maybe it's really worth using as a tagline  ;)

Also, made good progress with PW 2.2 today and admin multilanguage support!

This is really great news!
Yeah, this issues with opensource cms is quite disturbing, I also used this site a lot, but I always was pretty skeptical about voting systems. And this site is no exception, there are CMSs listed that have several hundred votes and hardly a single review :o) So I usually just read what other users had written. But I still think it's good that now PW is represented there. Many people visit this site and often they try out demo before making final decision.

What it gets down to is that I think we're conditioned to give more legitimacy to such ratings than they deserve. For me, that's because I rely on Amazon's star ratings for when I buy stuff. But their system is pretty good– If someone wants to upvote or downvote something en masse, it's a bit hard to do because every vote has to be tied to a real person with a credit card number. It's easy for me to forget that other star-rating systems aren't nearly as legitimate as that.

It's pretty sad, but Amazon system also can't be fully trusted. There are a lot of hired guns there who make a living writing reviews, some of them manage to write a dozen of them daily. From IT books to blenders. So, don't believe the hype :)
I posted my almost identical reviews on both sites. The one posted on opensourcecms is still awaiting moderation.

Among other things, It makes me think we should target things like custom fields in our keyword strategy rather than things like jQuery.

Definitely! I would never think of such a thing like jQuery CMS. Custom fields, fast backend, easy api are all good candidates for using in seo because almost all CMSs at the moment suck in this respect.


#26 GGSuper3

GGSuper3

    Jr. Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts
  • 5

  • LocationLangley, BC. Canada

Posted 17 October 2011 - 02:52 PM

Great question! Even the fact you are asking displays a desire to grow an effective & healthy community here at ProcessWire. I am a newer webbuilder with lots to learn on all fronts. I by accident, came across a comment posted by Ryan (I forget where) about 'fields'. It immediately caught my attention, I went to the PW website and got led to the video introduction, got excited by Ryan's easy straight forward approach to using PW, jquery, and it's scalability and depth of use. I found the software quick to download and open in admin on my home server(to give it a try) and voila, was amazed at the ease to get started using it. I hope to have the first site public in the next couple weeks(online jewelry business) ;)

Cheers,
Grant
'A word fitly spoken is like apples of gold in pitchers of silver'

#27 Soma

Soma

    Hero Member

  • Moderators
  • 3,216 posts
  • 1761

  • LocationSH, Switzerland

Posted 17 October 2011 - 03:10 PM

Soma, that gag is really funny, though it's not 100% what I was imagining while writing ;D I'm really surprised it's getting so much feedback especially taking in consideration my limited knowledge of English. Maybe it's really worth using as a tagline  ;)


Yeah ,I know there's a little twist, but it's hard to visualize yours 100% :D. It is sure spot on and lit a spark in my brain... sorry if it did offend anyone.

Well, to put it in Ryans metaphor terms, it should be anyway be called Skyscraper in the body of a Chalet. ;)

@somartist | modules created | support me, flattr my work flattr.com


#28 slkwrm

slkwrm

    Sr. Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 248 posts
  • 66

Posted 17 October 2011 - 03:22 PM

Yeah ,I know there's a little twist, but it's hard to visualize yours 100% :D. It is sure spot on and lit a spark in my brain... sorry if it did offend anyone.

What a pity people can't read each other's minds :) I think everybody liked it, I can't see it's offensive in any way. Well, maybe it is for Drupal users because of fake bicepses ;D

Well, to put it in Ryans metaphor terms, it should be anyway be called Skyscraper in the body of a Chalet. ;)

Here's another good flavor  ;)


#29 Christoph

Christoph

    Jr. Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 25 posts
  • 1

Posted 19 October 2011 - 04:09 PM

I found ProcessWire through a comment by Ryan on an article about Expression Engine. I think is was something about proprietary mark up languages in CMSs like EE or Textpattern.
I checked the intro video and was impressed. The demo and a really helpful and nice Ryan convinced me to give it a try. Currently designing and developing my first site using PW and I'm enjoying every minute. Things I missed in WordPress that had to be added with plugins were build right into the core of PW and the way it is build is exactly the way I think.
Couldn't be more happy with a CMS right now :-)


#30 Sevarf2

Sevarf2

    Sr. Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 301 posts
  • 13

  • LocationBratislava

Posted 20 October 2011 - 05:03 AM

Honestly i don't remember but probably i was looking for "custom fields cms" because this WAS the only thing i never found in any other cms. So happy now.  ;D

#31 ryan

ryan

    Hero Member

  • Administrators
  • 5,780 posts
  • 3125

  • LocationAtlanta, GA

Posted 20 October 2011 - 11:01 AM

Thanks for the continued feedback. Given what I've learned here, I have updated our homepage <title> tag to:

ProcessWire CMS: Custom Fields, Strong API, Easy Admin (PHP 5)


I don't think I can go any longer than that before Google will truncate it in the serps. But if anyone has any optimizations to suggest let me know. I think the first half is probably about right, but not sure how audience and keyword-relevant the second half is with "Strong API, Easy Admin (PHP 5)"... that's just my best guess.

#32 MarcC

MarcC

    Sr. Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 255 posts
  • 63

  • LocationCalifornia

Posted 20 October 2011 - 05:22 PM

A short writeup on people searching Google for "custom fields CMS" (with that string in writeup article title), discussing the way Processwire fits the needs of that distraught, often lonely crowd, ought to help out nicely, too. :-)

I'm a freelance, processwire-using web designer based in california. work site | personal site | visuals


#33 diogo

diogo

    Hero Member

  • Moderators
  • 2,010 posts
  • 1089

  • LocationPorto, Portugal

Posted 20 October 2011 - 06:02 PM

I imagine that Processwire potential users also look for markup freedom

#34 slkwrm

slkwrm

    Sr. Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 248 posts
  • 66

Posted 20 October 2011 - 06:29 PM

Just googled "strong API". Processwire.com is on the third place. Good start :)

#35 ryan

ryan

    Hero Member

  • Administrators
  • 5,780 posts
  • 3125

  • LocationAtlanta, GA

Posted 20 October 2011 - 06:43 PM

It looks like they finally posted all of your reviews at opensourcecms--great reviews!! Thanks for this.

#36 Pete

Pete

    Administrator

  • Administrators
  • 1,756 posts
  • 658

  • LocationChester, England

Posted 21 October 2011 - 01:04 AM

Hehe, except I posted mine twice because I thought the form was broken and both are now up there. Sorry for hogging the page guys! :D

#37 ryan

ryan

    Hero Member

  • Administrators
  • 5,780 posts
  • 3125

  • LocationAtlanta, GA

Posted 21 October 2011 - 07:42 AM

Actually I thought it deserved to be posted twice. :)


#38 Guillaume

Guillaume

    Jr. Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 11 posts
  • 0

  • LocationFrance

Posted 25 October 2011 - 12:08 AM

Hello,

I'm new here. I discovered ProcessWire a few days ago, thanks to this tweet :
http://twitter.com/c...053335701372929

Then I watched the video overview on the ProcessWire site. It's an excellent video, made me curious about PW and installed it. And then I felt in love :)

I'm rebuilding a tiny site with PW and so far, so good.

#39 ryan

ryan

    Hero Member

  • Administrators
  • 5,780 posts
  • 3125

  • LocationAtlanta, GA

Posted 25 October 2011 - 07:58 AM

ggtr1138–thanks for the feedback and welcome to the forums!

#40 martinluff

martinluff

    Full Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 79 posts
  • 2

  • LocationChristchurch NZ

Posted 30 October 2011 - 09:53 PM

Well I found ProcessWire through a discussion on the MODx forums "If you *had* to choose another CMS for a project, what would it be?" (long time supporter of MODx but not quite so sure about the recent direction although there's some very cool stuff in there). Have been using various CMS over a period of about ten years and not found too many one's to stick with. Had used ExpressionEngine as the core of my business for a while but steadily accumulating a lot of issues with the system as time went on rather than the reverse; so I had started to move towards SilverStripe but think you need to be more of a programmer to really harness and extend the system properly - but still promising). So was on one of my periodic trawls for something better when I came across ProcessWire.

Agree I'd not be Googling for jQuery CMS - more like custom fields MVC object oriented and so forth... also things like CMF. I tend to keep an eye on thinks like the annual Packt awards - not that I'd automatically adopt a system based on that but it often flags projects worth watching.

I think the PW site design helps draw you in and obviously comes from someone with a design background; has the same quality feel of ExpressionEngine and Symphony CMS and feels much better to me than so many other CMS sites. I loved the video with Ryan - great intro and definitely drew me in to explore the system more and great to discover someone with both great design and front-end skills plus a really good grasp of all the back-end stuff as well. Then going into the API and other features it just started to tick so many boxes  :) The comments in the source code are really useful especially in the demo sites - although it took a little while for me to decode that big include in the Skyscraper demo and possibly an enhanced demo site shipped with the product which didn't abstract so much code would have been useful in the early days to quickly see what was going on there.  But I know you're already expanding that demo now and I also respect that the starting docs on the PW site took a lot of work and already outstripped some other much more established projects.

Now we have much more of a goldmine of examples provided by Ryan and the community in the forums - but would still be nice to have a bit of a 'cookbook' area of documentation which pulled a lot of these together rather than having to trawl these forums?

Well I've now built a few sites in PW and so far not come across any show-stoppers, plus any boxed still not ticked on my list are steadily getting there with community contributions and Ryan's ongoing hard work so I can foresee a time in the not too distant future when it could be used for most of my projects... and I've been more than happy to shout about it through my Twitter account and in other place so hopefully others get to hear the good news :)

PS great images Soma  ;D




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users