fay Posted November 27, 2013 Posted November 27, 2013 Hi I recently finished my first ProcessWire website, and it's a gallery of black and white vintage erotica. Here's what I used: Default ProcessWire Installation. Bootstrap, jQuery (for the bootstrap carousel and MediaElement.js), MediaElement.js and Glyphicons (they come with Bootstrap.) Photos are sharing two templates (one is for single photo entries, and the other is for multiple photo entries and it uses Bootstrap's carousel.), Featurettes have their own template and there is only one. I also have a simple tagging system. It didn't really take me a while to figure ProcessWire out, it really was a piece of cake for someone without a lot of PHP knowledge. I had way more trouble getting a hang of WordPress than ProcessWire. It's a great piece of software. Before I forget, http://faysjoint.com Fay 10
DaveP Posted November 27, 2013 Posted November 27, 2013 Loving both the site and the subject. Looking good on mobile. 1
fay Posted November 28, 2013 Author Posted November 28, 2013 Loving both the site and the subject. Looking good on mobile.Thanks!My website works on all resolutions thanks to Bootstrap. uhm ??
MatthewSchenker Posted November 28, 2013 Posted November 28, 2013 Greetings, Nice work. Thanks for exposing us to your site! Matthew 2
diogo Posted November 29, 2013 Posted November 29, 2013 Works well on mobile, I only had a little trouble with the clicking area on the navigation links. on small screens they are a bit to close from each other and from the title and the search. Please excuse Dr Spock, sometimes he is not very clear here in the forum 1
fay Posted November 29, 2013 Author Posted November 29, 2013 What resolution? I checked on http://responsinator.com/?url=faysjoint.com and it seems to work on all smaller resolutions, even 240px. Do you think I should add some padding between the links anyway?
pwired Posted November 29, 2013 Posted November 29, 2013 Please excuse Dr Spock, sometimes he is not very clear here in the forum all right, all right, translation uhm => front end use in processwire, or should i say up front
diogo Posted November 29, 2013 Posted November 29, 2013 320 x 480, but I'm looking at it in a big screen now and i still feel that the header needs some breathing space in general. Some padding should solve I guess.
fay Posted November 29, 2013 Author Posted November 29, 2013 all right, all right, translation uhm => front end use in processwire, or should i say up front I still don't really understand what is it you meant with it though. 320 x 480, but I'm looking at it in a big screen now and i still feel that the header needs some breathing space in general. Some padding should solve I guess. Any better now?
MatthewSchenker Posted November 29, 2013 Posted November 29, 2013 Greetings, It seems improved. I just viewed it to on the iPad and iPhone (Safari). See attached screen shots. Thanks, Matthew 1
MatthewSchenker Posted November 29, 2013 Posted November 29, 2013 all right, all right, translation uhm => front end use in processwire, or should i say up front I think perhaps he is wondering what the back-end looks like. Thanks, Matthew
fay Posted November 29, 2013 Author Posted November 29, 2013 I think perhaps he is wondering what the back-end looks like. Thanks, Matthew Oh, right. I didn't begin with customization of the back-end yet. Here are some screenshots: http://faysjoint.com/admin_1.png http://faysjoint.com/admin_2.png http://faysjoint.com/admin_3.png http://faysjoint.com/admin_4.png http://faysjoint.com/admin_5.png 2
ryan Posted December 6, 2013 Posted December 6, 2013 Fay, I noticed your last two screenshots contain a plain HTML field with raw visible HTML tags. Is that what you intended, or is this supposed to be a rich text field? I ask because it's a little unusual to edit raw HTML like that (that's what TinyMCE and CKEditor are great for, or an LML like Markdown or Textile). Always respect for editing raw HTML, but it's not something I see very often, so just wanted to make sure there's not some JS error or something blocking the rich text editor. 1
fay Posted December 7, 2013 Author Posted December 7, 2013 Nice catch! Yes, it's intentional. I'm not against rich text editors per se (I use TinyMCE on Legal Statements & Contact) but I just find this approach easier, because I'd have an extra step to add the class for the description text itself on TinyMCE.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now