1,000 stars on ProcessWire GitHub!

[Alexander]

Hi there!

I love ProcessWire, and whenever I see someone asking for a lightweight CMS, I always recommend it. However, ProcessWire is somehow still extremely underestimated on GitHub, 201 forks, which is really good, but only 990 stars.

Let's make an effort together and bring ProcessWire to 1000 stars this weekend! Only 10 stars left. 

Star on Github: https://github.com/processwire/processwire

More context about initial GitHub stars initiative of @adrian:

Upd: 10 stars done in five hours. 

[Ivan Gretsky]

Nice challenge!
Pinging my friends and colleagues. Already +1 )))

[Ivan Gretsky]

+2 !!!

+3 !!!!!

Hey, I know those 3 by names... Community! Start to show your power!!!

 

[Alexander]

I'm sure everyone is waiting to post the 1,000th star on ProcessWire's GitHub - don't be shy, being the 994th star is even better!

[Alexander]

@kaspercom, @ondrejzeleny, @AMOC - guys, we are trying to get PW to 1,000 stars on Github. Are you in? 

https://github.com/processwire/processwire

[Ivan Gretsky]

@harmvandeven, @thomas, join us!

Got the game! I hope we're not getting banned for spam)

[Alexander]

@Ivan Gretsky We are not affiliated, so that should be fine. However, it seems that this demand violates rule number 8 of posting, therefore we could indeed be banned.

So, I will not mention all 8,370 (9,363 members minus 993 stars) members who ignore the matter that if you use someone's code and don't pay for it, you can at least star it on GitHub to help it get a better position in the rankings.

[Alexander]

Thank you, @thomas! <3 

[taotoo]

+1 🙂

[Alexander]

Thank you, @taotoo! <3 <3 

[Ivan Gretsky]

And here goes another friend of mine!

Only 2 more to go!

Seems like we won't need the whole weekend😎

[Ivan Gretsky]

And now... someone is going to be the one to change that 3-digit count to a beautiful 1000. Who is that going to be? I am a little jelous I can't be the one.

[cwsoft]

Mission complete. Now towards the next 1.000 stars. 

[Alexander]

We all know that ProcessWire started much before all the stars hype on GitHub. Moreover, the initial repository with ProcessWire 2.0 had over 722 stars and nearly 200 forks, which means that ProcessWire reached the 1k milestone a long time ago. But as @Ivan Gretsky mentioned early "... keep the love to ProcessWire always burning deep in your heart..." And of course, the most important and valuable star for PW is always inside our hearts (even if it's not always visible on Microsoft GitHub).

I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate @ryan, @adrian for initial initiative to give PW more visibility on GitHub, all contributors, and the whole community on this formal milestone and wish for decades of successful development and deployments ahead. Congratulations! 

[Alexander]

@Ivan GretskyTechnically it's a 2-digit count instead of the full 1000. Just 1k.

[Ivan Gretsky]

Great!

I was waiting for this moment since the times stars were not yet rounded in k's))

Congrats, everyone! But I still want to encourage everyone reading this go and check it their ⭐ is there and properly counted. And add it if not. We are heading for 2k))

[Alexander]

First look at ProcessWire GitHub as I remember it.