Jump to content

marcus

Members
  • Posts

    289
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by marcus

  1. Without having read this thread and this very post I (didn't find the time to look in the forums last weeks and should have waited for ProcessWireWeekly to catch up with all developments before yelling ideas into the forum ) coincidentally had a similar idea (again): https://processwire.com/talk/topic/7572-processwire-recipes/#entry73055
  2. Oh, thanks for the pointer. Totally missed this thread because I haven't found the time to look into the forums for a while I haven't yet caught up with all developments, infos, ideas - which are kind of fast-paced lately
  3. In a funny coincidence, Apertus was released the same week as Admin Theme Reno - and the latter is far more advanced and had a longer phase of development. And instead of using Apertus, like I planned, I find myself using Reno in my current projects I'm at crossroads here - both admin themes bring finally the sidebar back to PW 2.4+, which was kind of my main intent So instead of putting the focus on Apertus I could try to help implement its "exclusive features" forum search and useful links to Reno (if the creators are interested to have this functionality in there - otherwise, I'll fork ).
  4. A spontaneous friday-night idea for project supporting the spread of ingenious CMS/CMF @processwire - https://t.co/MBnV9F2x9o - opinions?

  5. Thanks for the valuable insights, Peter. Originally I also started this thread with the intention in mind to compare what arguments and features other systems offer and promote, what "enterprise customers" search in a CMS and - on the other side, what ProcessWire already has to offer. Like mentioned later in this thread, ProcessWire is theoretically able to offer solutions to a part of these expectations, while others could be on the project's roadmap. It's good and enlightening to read such a checklist from the clients' side of view
  6. Often times, creating a side project is first and foremost scratching your own itch Or to start differently: Currently, I'm developing a site where I need CKeditor (and later jQueryUI Datepicker) outside of the admin, in frontend. I searched Google and the forums and found an approach to follow - but during the research the site laravel-recipes.com came into my mind (since I'm currently also looking into this framework). It's content consists of small, spot-on bits of information, for example: http://laravel-recipes.com/recipes/269 Just to think out loudly here, wouldn't it be nice to have a ProcessWire counterpart of such a site? processwire-recipes.com for example? Target group: Developers, from beginner to advanced Difference to these forums: Stripping the discussion part, concentrating on the info; and if done properly: bypassing the mediocre forum search, better tagging Difference to the official tutorial section: Focusing on not creating a whole site, but modular parts of it. Single solutions. For example: First child redirects (shameless plug, but this is the format of information pieces I'm having in mind) Difference to the API documentation: Situation-based ("I need this and that") instead of architecture-based Laravel.io (forum), laravel.com (official, and doc) and laravel-recipies.com possibly prove that these type of sites can coexist in a framework ecosystem, so I guess a recipes site would not cannibalize this forum here nor the doc section. A recipe site like this would live and die with its content, of course. I would be ready to share all the small pieces of information I encounter that would make a good "recipe". But that alone wouldn't be enough so this project won't survive without contribution of the community. What's your opinion on this? Yea or nay? Update: ...it just took, erm, nearly three months,... but here it is: https://processwire-recipes.com/
  7. RT @UARRR: Heel even geduld yourself, Apple Store.

  8. Faking text-shadow for IE9 that wasn't even in scope in the first place :( Admins, why do you force offices to stay on a IE9/W7 combination?

  9. One could say you're able to pre-order PW 2.5 this friday, and it gets shipped on the 19th
  10. It's even responsive, kind of. Welcome to 2014, Apple #applecomredesign

  11. The proof that you are really feeling not well today: typing "vommit" instead of "commit" #sorry #subconsciousness #webdev

  12. RT @s1mn: The guy next to me on the train is using iOS 6. I’ve got shift key envy.

  13. RT @boti_net: New blog post: Another @processwire quicky: Limiting debug mode to your development environment http://t.co/6yzHJ2VwkD

  14. Support the development of the best PHP framework in town, @laravelphp - and get yourself a plush elephant - http://t.co/ehzNNnUBQW #webdev

  15. The first one, since the second one sounds redundant and users are pages anyway. And you could use roles to control viewing and editing. Detecting a user's role or create new ones via a module is way easier than to manage a somewhat parallel structure.
  16. People claiming that @twitter just aims to provide better user-on-boarding forget how invisible #Ferguson was in Facebooks curated feeds.

  17. Finally managed to watch 'Searching for Sugar Man'. What. An. Amazing. Story. And person. Goosebumps.

  18. #de "Dilettant" falsch geschrieben. Oh, the irony #lasttweet

  19. Oh, The Bill Cosby Show is *actually* funny, in english. German dub never ever transported that and just left a somehow weird show.

  20. Sadly, my @ownCloud experiment ends as of today. Mac client is simply not reliable enough. Now looking into @SpiderOak #dropboxalternative

  21. RT @BlogtorWho: Designer Michael Pickwoad takes us on a tour of the new TARDIS http://t.co/N8wv2tVqV2 #DoctorWho

  22. If anyone stumbles upon this thread and is looking for a solution to teach their IDE (with static analysis) some of the ProcessWire classes, find: https://github.com/mindplay-dk/TemplateStubs
×
×
  • Create New...