For fun, but also seriously...
ProcessWire CheatSheet Poll - How much do you use it?
#1
Posted 01 June 2012 - 12:19 PM
For fun, but also seriously...
@somartist | modules created | support me, flattr my work flattr.com
#3
Posted 01 June 2012 - 01:27 PM
After a while some of it sticks (or so I tell myself), so I don't ened to refer to it all the time
It is invaluable though for when I draw a blank and want to check whetner I can do something a certain way.
#4
Posted 01 June 2012 - 01:34 PM
#8
Posted 08 July 2012 - 01:14 PM
BTW is there a reason why "$user->language" is not on the list ? ( or do I say something weird )
#9
Posted 08 July 2012 - 02:03 PM
One reason it's not in there, is because language support was still in development and moreover it's not core, it's a third-party module and need to be installed (although it's in the distribution). There's couple things not in the cheatsheet that are not permanent modules i.e. like the comments, pager etc.
I'm not sure if those distributed modules should be added somehow or make a separate sheet. What you guys think?
@somartist | modules created | support me, flattr my work flattr.com
#11
Posted 08 July 2012 - 02:34 PM
Thanks for the post Martijn. Glad to hear it serves its purposes.
One reason it's not in there, is because language support was still in development and moreover it's not core, it's a third-party module and need to be installed (although it's in the distribution). There's couple things not in the cheatsheet that are not permanent modules i.e. like the comments, pager etc.
I'm not sure if those distributed modules should be added somehow or make a separate sheet. What you guys think?
I wouldn't say that language support is a third-party module. I think all modules that come by default are core modules (some of them permanent, some of them installed by default and some of them not installed by default).
I think language stuff should be in cheatsheet, but not sure about things like comments, pager etc.. Probably the more the better!
#12
Posted 09 July 2012 - 03:48 AM
Although if there are lots of things to add for these core modules then perhaps they should go under a separate page for modules, and maybe separated by module type?
Might be getting a bit too complicated there but it's an idea.
#13
Posted 09 July 2012 - 10:51 AM
The only issue I can think of is when/where to stop (i.e. which modules are worth keeping, and should one even make that judgement) /how to add information... But I would love to have even third party modules not in the distribution acessible - provided they don't overcomplicate the cheatsheet - filters that could be off by default, maybe?maybe they can be there filtered, just like the advanced things
Afterthought: would it make sense for someone who make a third party module to submit entries to the cheatsheet? This may be completely off, and ruin the whole concept of the cheatsheet, i dunno.. Just tossing out ideas
#14
Posted 09 July 2012 - 11:41 AM
That said, now I think about it there aren't all that many modules that would have more than a handful of cheat sheet functions anyway.
#16
Posted 09 July 2012 - 01:22 PM
@somartist | modules created | support me, flattr my work flattr.com
#17
Posted 09 July 2012 - 02:06 PM
#18
Posted 09 July 2012 - 02:23 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













