Is this a bug?

[bernhard]

When toggling an Inputfield the whole row is toggled. I'm not sure if that is intended? Is that the same for you? What do you think? Should it be like this?

[DV-JF]

I recognized this behaviour, too, but i like it ?

Perhaps there could be an option, where you can choose whether to toggle the whole row or just the field itself.

[szabesz]

It used to close just the InputField in question, yeah, which I always found strange. Currently, the most up-to-date dev version I am working with is 3.0.205 which also works the way you noticed, except that there are cases when the label and icons left to the closed InputField disappear:

[gebeer]

2 hours ago, bernhard said:

What do you think? Should it be like this?

I personally can live with this behaviour but still would consider it a bug since it is unexpected. Inputfields should open/close independently whether they are in the same row or not.

[MarkE]

7 hours ago, gebeer said:

Inputfields should open/close independently whether they are in the same row or not.

I agree. I always considered the behaviour slightly odd as the inputfields are not necessarily related and even differ depending on the screen size. 

[DV-JF]

37 minutes ago, MarkE said:

... as the inputfields are not necessarily related ...

but when they are it's nice, especially when you hide them initially and only have to click once to open the whole row.

[MarkE]

17 hours ago, DV-JF said:

especially when you hide them initially and only have to click once to open the whole row.

But then why not use a fieldset, in which case it doesn’t depend on the screen layout?

[DV-JF]

15 hours ago, MarkE said:

But then why not use a fieldset, in which case it doesn’t depend on the screen layout?

Because in it's an overhead and it needs extra time to configure. In some situations I just like some fields beneath each other, hidden initially, especially when I'm already in a fieldset ?