alexcapes
Members-
Posts
120 -
Joined
-
Last visited
alexcapes's Achievements
-
Did hsts in the new .htaccess just break everything?
alexcapes replied to alexcapes's topic in General Support
Thanks @netcarver I'll update here on progress. The situation was that we had all our DNS on an old hosting company — I set this account to be closed and copied over all the DNS records to our new hosts (DigitalOcean). However the old account was taken offline earlier than expected so the TTL values are all high and so everything needs to propogate. Couple that with being locked out of DigitalOcean because I can't verify my login, means I'm stuck waiting to see if this all works out and everything comes back. Life lesson: switching anything to do with DNS should be done with great care and planned for. It's not nice when everyone is looking at you as why their email stopped working and there's nothing to do but... wait. -
Did hsts in the new .htaccess just break everything?
alexcapes replied to alexcapes's topic in General Support
Ok so I think my panic on hsts was a little misguided. What seems to be the issue was transferring DNS records over to a new hosting company which has not happened seamlessly. ? -
Hi, I enabled hsts in the new .htaccess file in latest version of PW (as described here https://processwire.com/blog/posts/pw-3.0.135/#step-4-decide-whether-to-to-enable-hsts-section-9f) Everything seemed okay but realised my subdomains had gone offline ('This site can’t be reached') and now both our main business website has gone offline and our emails (done through Google Apps) have stopped working). Could hsts be responsible for all this? I removed the new .htaccess and now have the old one, I also tried resetting Chrome to remove the hsts domains but nothing works. Funnily I can't access our hosting now (Digital Ocean) because I have no access to my email. Please can any help shine a light on this? Can hsts be this dangerous?!
-
Running PHP 7.3.1 with the latest version of Jumplinks return a blank page for me. PHP 7.2.14 seems to work fine.
-
Hi, I've been invited by Apple to use their 'News' service for a publication in the UK. https://www.apple.com/uk/news/ A number of CMSs already have plugins to publish content via the API, however Processwire is not one (yet!) https://newsresources.apple.com/en/faq/66346243 It's slightly beyond my technical abilities but would be very interested in anyone that is willing to look at developing a Processwire Module. (for reference here is the Apple News API documentation) Update: Chapter Three have created a PHP Apple News library here https://github.com/chapter-three/AppleNewsAPI
-
SmartyPants Typographer incorrect curly quote
alexcapes replied to alexcapes's topic in General Support
Digging a bit (and by that I mean actually looking at the source!) it looks like this is not a SmartyPants issue. I can see that the double quote is being encoded by Processwire incorrectly as a right double quotation mark. <p class='review'>”<i>How Music Works </i>is a melange of bookish musings on how music is shaped by the places it is played and the technology used to create and disseminate it”<br/><span class='review-source'>Danny Eccleston<br/><em>mojo</em></span> However the data source for this content (an XML file) the quotes look just to be normal double quotes <Text><![CDATA["<i>How Music Works </i>is a melange of bookish musings on how music is shaped by the places it is played and the technology used to create and disseminate it"]]></Text> So I'm not sure why Processwire would encode (incorrectly) the first double quotation mark (if before an HTML tag) and no others?- 4 replies
-
- smartypants
- module
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hi, I have an issue when using the SmartyPants Typographer text formatter. If the text has an HTML tag (such as italics) straight after the quotation mark, it reverses it. So for example: This only seems to occur when an HTML tag is placed at the beginning. Does anyone know how this could be corrected?
- 4 replies
-
- smartypants
- module
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
This would be for super-users only as last resort to fix mistakes. I think using 'Version Control' may be a workable solution although it does feel a little like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut - I don't really need/want version control and it might add too much complication for the client - and I only need this 'restore' option on one single pagetable field. Just to note I don't think changelog offers any way to 'restore' the a previous state of a field. *Update* Version Control can be switched on for specific fields only so I think this is going to be a workable solution for me. Thanks @Robin S *Update #2* Looks like Version Control is not compatible with PageTable fields.
-
Thanks @Robin S I'll have a play around and see if I can get something working.
-
RT @processwire: New post: Building the Canongate website with ProcessWire, by Alex Capes @alexandercapes – https://t.co/kH9VBPwMAu
-
I wonder how difficult it would be to store the relationship info somewhere else and then add the page back to the PageTable if restored? Do you think it's doable with a simple module?
-
Hi, I've noticed when I trash pages from a PageTable field, then restore them, they are restored to their original location, however the connection is broken with the PageTable field. Is this expected behaviour? Is there a way for it to maintain this relationship? Otherwise restoring it doesn't actually restore it to it's previous state. Note that in this case the parent pages for the PageTable field is not set as the direct parent.
-
Upgrade to 3.0.61 breaks adding images from URL via API
alexcapes replied to alexcapes's topic in General Support
Thanks @szabesz will do. -
Hi, I just updated a site to 3.0.61 and it's breaking uploading images from a URL via the API. I get the following error: Recoverable Fatal Error: Method ProcessWire\Pageimage::__toString() must return a string value The code getting the image is very simple: $new_edition->work_cover = $cover_url; $new_edition->save('work_cover'); It works fine on 3.0.42 but returns the error on 3.0.61
-
I've updated my code to remove ? ( ) from the selectorValue $q = preg_replace('/[?()]/', '', $q); However I wonder how many other characters may possibly break the search and whether there's a better way to sanitize?
- 2 replies
-
- selectorvalue
- search
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with: