[Solved] Do I need special permissions to edit the focus point of an image? Which?

[Christian Fischer]

Last week I stumbled upon the focus point feature and I love it.

There's only one problem: I made a user role “editor“ for my client. And while as a superuser I can work with the focus point feature as much as I want, she can only set a focus point while uploading pictures and before she saves the page the first time.
Once the page is saved she can‘t see the three buttons “Crop“, “Focus“ and “Variations“. Her only option is to remove the focus point via the dropdown but after that she can't set a new one.
Do I have to give her an extra permission? Which?

Additional info: The gallery where this happens is placed inside a repeater matrix. I wouldn't imagine that this could be a problem but who knows … ?

[Tom.]

This looks like a bug? I don't believe that Crop or Focus is a permission based thing. I would post this on Github. 

[Soma]

Can't reproduce this.

[Christian Fischer]

23 minutes ago, Soma said:

Can't reproduce this.

Could you send a screenshot of the permissions you gave to the editors role? Maybe there's a difference …
Did you put the image-field into a repaeater-matrix, too?

[Soma]

There's not special permission. page-view and page-edit the usuals. Yes it's in a repeater-matrix.

[Christian Fischer]

5 hours ago, Soma said:

There's not special permission. page-view and page-edit the usuals. Yes it's in a repeater-matrix.

Hm, thx.

[Soma]

I would install a new PW and test it. If it works it's something with your installation, maybe some settings or module?

[gmclelland]

I think this was a bug in a past version of Processwire that has been fixed.  What version are you running?

[Christian Fischer]

5 minutes ago, gmclelland said:

I think this was a bug in a past version of Processwire that has been fixed.  What version are you running?

Nice idea, but it’s 3.0.98.

[Christian Fischer]

1 hour ago, Soma said:

I would install a new PW and test it. If it works it's something with your installation, maybe some settings or module?

Yeah sure. I admit: I wanted to avoid that and hoped that it was a known bug with a simple workaround … ?

[gmclelland]

Here you go https://github.com/processwire/processwire/commit/c7dfb37a7ece9d1a2e0369a92263e7c18663502a

Looks like it was fixed in 3.0.100

[Christian Fischer]

11 hours ago, gmclelland said:

Here you go https://github.com/processwire/processwire/commit/c7dfb37a7ece9d1a2e0369a92263e7c18663502a

Looks like it was fixed in 3.0.100

oh thx!

[Soma]

Well funny thing is i also tested in 3.0.98 and it works.