marcus
-
Posts
289 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
8
Everything posted by marcus
-
Although I may or may not have confused Geoff with @stevewoz publicly - an interesting read on OS X state of affairs http://t.co/SlOc4rEXiu
-
See two posts above, such a feed already exists https://processwire-recipes.com/feed edit: Regarding sidebar implementation: We'd by honored, but of course this is Ryan's decision to make.
-
New year, new blog post, new blogging discipline? Hm! But definitely new CMS under the @boti_net hood: @getkirby - http://t.co/LOjjgmvKz0
-
RT @aerotwist: I’m super interested in Microsoft’s new browser. They’ve been great at shipping features devs want lately. I’d love it to be…
-
RT @daylerees: Being a developer, and thinking like one, is kind of like having a strange mental illness that pays the bills. #thoughtofthe…
-
Nice write up and smart ideas for the future of WordPress. Missing one particular headline though: "Core rewrite" https://t.co/HZrOnPMJ2f
-
RT @extra3: Richtigstellung:#CSU will keine #Deutschpflicht für Migranten. Generalsekr. @AndiScheuer ist falsch ins Deutsche übersetzt wor…
-
You can now subscribe to incoming ProcessWire Recipes via RSS http://t.co/xbYgOpBinA or Twitter: @pwrecipes
-
Thanks for your contribution, mr fan, we'll include in after we finished small adjustments in the recipes structure. In other news, you can now subscribe to new recipes via RSS or Twitter.
-
Suddenly, a wild side project of @owzim and me appears: meet http://t.co/iDjnCvIxU6, a directory of spot-on mini tutorials for @processwire
-
So, let's launch this finally! › https://processwire-recipes.com/ ‹ As you can see, it's a work in progress. The design is going to change, Nico at the helm, and once we got a "critical mass" of recipes, another way of structuring recipes (the "table of contents") will also go online. To contribute, you can post your recipes either in this thread and we'll pick it up, or - codey - via Pull Request on GitHub of this repo here. Frankly, that's the favoured way, simple and a good start dive in to GitHub and this form of Open Source contribution. As always, feedback (and of course, contribution) is really welcome. We're always eager to learn - and helping to learn new stuff and create a place to spread some PW knowledge, that's what PWR was about in the first place Big big thanks to my partner in crime owzim who, among other things, contributed the - imho - heart of this tiny project: a textfile-to-page-importer. Finding an elegant way to contribute was one of the reasons this took so long, and during Beyond Tellerrand conference, it finally clicked into place.
- 89 replies
-
- 20
-
-
RT @laura_nobilis: As per their new terms of use, @Skype now claims intellectual property rights to the contents of every conversation via …
-
Fixed module versioning after feedback here, tested under 2.5, added small improvements.
-
Modules crashing ProcessWire sites and having other problems
marcus replied to lisandi's topic in Modules/Plugins
Thanks for the heads up regarding module versioning. I learned that the modules not showing up as being updated have one thing in common: Version numbers below 1.0.0 (like for example, my FlagPages module). I just installed FlagPages on a PW 2.5.10 system, and though its version is set as 022 (0.2.2) ProcessWire somehow understands it as 0.1.8 and offers an update to 0.2.2. I'll test FP's ability to run under 2.5+ (it totally should), and will then bump both version number and compatible PW version. -
Friday's #starwarstrailer obviously made a subconscious impression on my coding. http://t.co/CvaqFpqXkG
-
RT @malsaafin: Ah, President Drone has stopped by to say there's never an excuse for violence. http://t.co/eoiIoG5ZNS
-
It’s funny that the oh so precise German language doesn’t differentiate between “client” and “customer”. Both are just “Kunden”.
-
Re: Yesterday's tweet about Zimmer's starting point of "Interstellar" Soundtrack: http://t.co/DfoWBmBwFI
