AndZyk

Hello @_Roy_, you have to add or change the styles in the module settings, so that you can see it in the editor: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/using-tinymce-6-in-processwire/#customizing-the-styles-dropdown https://processwire.com/blog/posts/using-tinymce-6-in-processwire/#adding-extra-css-styles-without-adding-to-em-styles-em-dropdown You are right, ProcessWire doesn't know what framework you are using. That is why you have to tell the editor which classes of your framework you want to use. Regards, Andreas

Last week I upgraded all our sites to ProcessWire 3.0.255. Thank you as always for your amazing work @ryan 😄 Also switched all sites to the new admin theme and love it so far. Thank you @diogo and @jploch 😘 One small request: Could you please make the page tree more compact on mobile phones (in this example iPhone 12)? There is some white space that could be removed.

Hi @horst, here is the link to the discussion: https://github.com/FortAwesome/Font-Awesome/discussions/21364 Regards, Andreas

Thank you for remembering me. The original GitHub request was by me. I think there are still many people using Font Awesome (12K stars on the repo), but if they did not include ProcessWire after 9 years, I would not get my hopes up. 😅 But we could still try. Do you want to open a discussion or should I? Regards, Andreas

Ok, so it seems that you have 10 000 free requests per month, so maybe you can still use it. 😉 Are you using your own reCAPTCHA script or with FormBuilder? If it is your own script I think you could set your a treeshold score, for example 0.6 or so. Regards, Andreas

I like Google reCAPTCHA but at the end of the year it won't be free anymore. So its time to look for an alternative. But right now I have no alternative to recommend. ☺️

You can set custom icons for your Repeater Matrix elements in the item header. 😉 https://processwire.com/blog/posts/new-repeater-and-repeater-matrix-features/#custom-icons-for-repeater-types

Is there a way to remove sites from the ProcessWire Sites directory, that are no longer powered by ProcessWire or does this happen automatic? https://processwire.com/sites/ Sadly, I have a few websites, that are no longer powered by ProcessWire anymore. 🙁

Hello, the hoster of our client migrated their servers and now I get this warning in the back-end when logging in: I know this topic was already answered in two other threads. I tried out this solution: At first this seemed to be a simple solution, but then I noticed that pages in the page tree were blank. So this seems to be no ideal solution. I tried to find out the name of the new timezone, the current name ist "Berlin/Europe", but how do you find out the exact name? It seems to be some Pacific timezone. I tried out different websites to find out the timezone name, but with no luck yet. 😅 In this thread are some solutions with SQL commands and hooks. But I am not experienced with SQL and don't want to touch the database: Can somebody please recommend me a simple solution to get rid of this warning? Regards, Andreas

What will happen to developer directory?https://directory.processwire.com/ It is not mentioned anymore on the website but you can still find it on Google. You cannot login anymore. At this point I think it should either be deleted or relaunched. 😆 Regards, Andreas

Is it possible to change the color of links in the new admin theme? I have set a new main color in the module settings and in the admin.css with --pw-main-color, like recommended. But the links of modules or the login screen have still this styling: a, .uk-link { color: #e83561; text-decoration: none; cursor: pointer; } There seems to be no CSS variable. Is this intentional? Regards, Andreas

Congratulations to the new website. 🎉

Captured on iPhone 8 Safari (yes my phone is old) The navigation has issues and the page tree could look more compact. 😉

Hello @ryan, I meant the headers of repeater items. For my taste they are to subtle in the new admin theme and should be styled more likes button, as they were before. They contain most of the time the most content in my case and therefore should be styled more important. Regards, Andreas