gRegor Posted July 31 Share Posted July 31 Edit: this appears to be resolved as of at least 2025-08-08, whether due to the new site design launching or due to a temporary fluke earlier on. I noticed today that on some API reference pages like https://processwire.com/api/ref/wire-mail-tools/, the CSS for the code sample appears to have broken a bit: code is appearing all on one line, syntax highlighting is slightly off. Screenshot attached. It does not appear to affect individual method pages, e.g. when I click into https://processwire.com/api/ref/wire-mail-tools/from/ it looks correct. I'm on Windows 10, Chrome 138.0.7204.169 Screenshot: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elabx Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 Saw it here too: https://processwire.com/api/ref/module/ Maybe it's part due to the site being updated soon? Since this is recent, I was jus reading this docs yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamClayton Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 (edited) On 8/1/2025 at 8:25 PM, elabx said: Saw it here too: https://processwire.com/api/ref/module/ Maybe it's part due to the site being updated soon? Since this is recent, I was jus reading this docs yesterday. CSS issues on API reference pages can make it harder for users to navigate and understand the content. Fixing layout bugs improves both usability and trust in the platform. While reading about web fixes, I also came across https://casino-stranieri.com/bonus/senza-deposito/non-aams/ reminding me how clear design and accessibility matter across all types of sites. Thank you, now I know the reason. Edited August 20 by WilliamClayton Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
poljpocket Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 (edited) I think this is a fluke. I am using the PW docs daily and have never noticed any problems with it. That's how your example looks to me right now. I am on Chromium 138. So you see any JavaScript errors in the console? Edited August 6 by poljpocket Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elabx Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 58 minutes ago, poljpocket said: I think this is a fluke Indeed, looking fine again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gRegor Posted August 8 Author Share Posted August 8 Updated the thread title and first post, appears to be resolved either way (new site, or fluke on old site). Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now