InputfieldFieldset inside a InputfieldFieldset and how find pages

[bluellyr]

Hi,

It is possible to create a field InputfieldFieldset (fieldsetPage1) that have a FieldtypeFieldsetPage (fieldsetPage2) and the field2 has a FieldtypeFieldsetPage (fieldsetPage3) that has a text field (text_field) a added the fieldsetPage1 to a template (template1) like this and use $p = $pages->find("template=template1, fieldsetPage1.fieldsetPage2.fieldsetPage3.text_field=test"); to find pages?

Thank you

[bluellyr]

To test this possibility I have created a field InputfieldFieldset (fieldsetPage1) that have a FieldtypeFieldsetPage (fieldsetPage2) and the field2 has a FieldtypeFieldsetPage (fieldsetPage3) that has a text field (text_field) a added the fieldsetPage1 to a template (template1) like this:

- template1 > fieldsetPage1 > fieldsetPage2 > fieldsetPage3 > text_field 

When I page a page using this template, $p = $pages->find("template=template1")->first(); , I can get the "text_field" value using the object notation link this: 

- $text_field_value = $p->fieldsetPage1->fieldsetPage2->fieldsetPage3->text_field;

But when I try to find a page using:

-  $p = $pages->find("template=template1, fieldsetPage1.fieldsetPage2.fieldsetPage3.text_field=test");

I get an error:

- Exception: Operator ~= not supported for fieldsetPage2.data (in /www/domain.com/wire/modules/Fieldtype/FieldtypeRepeater/FieldtypeRepeater.module line 1384)

I am using ProcessWire 3.0.126,
Do anyone have done something like this or explain what is wrong?

[Robin S]

13 hours ago, bluellyr said:

I get an error:

- Exception: Operator ~= not supported for fieldsetPage2.data (in /www/domain.com/wire/modules/Fieldtype/FieldtypeRepeater/FieldtypeRepeater.module line 1384)

I can reproduce. Seems like a bug. Issue here: https://github.com/processwire/processwire-issues/issues/826

[bluellyr]

On 3/7/2019 at 1:44 AM, Robin S said:

 I can reproduce. Seems like a bug. Issue here: https://github.com/processwire/processwire-issues/issues/826

Hi, I am going to report the bug.

Many thanks 

[bluellyr]

Sorry, you already issued, thank you.