Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'file structure'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Welcome to ProcessWire
    • News & Announcements
    • Showcase
    • Wishlist & Roadmap
  • Community Support
    • Getting Started
    • Tutorials
    • FAQs
    • General Support
    • API & Templates
    • Modules/Plugins
    • Themes and Profiles
    • Multi-Language Support
    • Security
    • Jobs
  • Off Topic
    • Pub
    • Dev Talk

Product Groups

  • Form Builder
  • ProFields
  • ProCache
  • ProMailer
  • Login Register Pro
  • ProDrafts
  • ListerPro
  • ProDevTools
  • Likes
  • Custom Development

Categories

There are no results to display.


Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 2 results

  1. Hi All! Currently Processwire saves the files in the assets directory as follows assets > files > pageid > jpg, doc, mp4, etc. But what happens I have a project that we developed 2 years ago and currently uses 2 TB of space because the majority of content is video, so I thought that if Processwire could save the files per year, it means that the structure is thus assets > files > year > Pageid > jpg, doc, mp4, etc. This in order to be able to create an NFS volume for each year and that the volume does not grow in an exaggerated way, since the bigger the volume, the longer the reading and writing times in that volume. Thanks
  2. I wonder how different people handles different "file structures" for templates. I know that you can only put php code inside a template files, and i have thought that when you have to create a lot of unique "pages" with different php code it will take time to create a template file for each page. Not only that, but eventually, if you create a lot of templates, the templates folder would get very crowded. I was looking for a better way to organize my php files and found this solution. Instead of creating a template for each unique page with custom php code, I just create a single template named "include". This template just has two fields: title and include_path. The code of this template is just: <?php include $page->include_path; ?> In the "include_path" field I set the relative path for including other php files, and this method gives me a more organized collection of php files nested in various folders. For example, for a form called "reservation", I would just create a page with the template "include", and the field "include_path" set to "./php/forms/reservation.php". An example of this file structure: site/ --templates/ -----/styles -----/scripts -----/php --------/forms --------/processes --------/catalogs --------/galleries -----head.inc -----foot.inc -----home.php -----blog-post.php -----include.php Do anyone know if there is a better way to handle php files? o anybody would share their file structure approach?
×
×
  • Create New...