Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'css framework 320andup'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Welcome to ProcessWire
    • News & Announcements
    • Showcase
    • Wishlist & Roadmap
  • Community Support
    • Getting Started
    • Tutorials
    • FAQs
    • General Support
    • API & Templates
    • Modules/Plugins
    • Themes and Profiles
    • Multi-Language Support
    • Security
    • Jobs
  • Off Topic
    • Pub
    • Dev Talk

Product Groups

  • Form Builder
  • ProFields
  • ProCache
  • ProMailer
  • Login Register Pro
  • ProDrafts
  • ListerPro
  • ProDevTools
  • Likes
  • Custom Development

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


AIM


MSN


Website URL


ICQ


Yahoo


Jabber


Skype


Location


Interests

Found 1 result

  1. Hiya gang! [waves and slaps some High Fives to those nearest to me] My current client wants to go responsive on his website. I built it earlier this year using Foundation 2.x. Now that v.3 is responsive, I thought I might give it a much needed upgrade. While going through my files I noticed that I didn't use much of the framework. Only the grid, the modal (Reveal) and the slideshow thingee (Orbit). So I was thinking ... hhhmmm ... instead of upgrading Foundation 2 to 3 ... I'd really like to give 320andup a shot. And since it doesn't use any grids, I may use the the gridpak generator, or just take what I need from Foundation. I've grown quite fond of their layout (div.row>div.columns). OR It just may be easier to use Skeleton for the grid (I don't really like having to use 'alpha & omega'). FlexiSlider or BlueBerry for the slideshow. Reveal is available stand-alone, but I really want to minimize my dependence on too much javascript. I've seen several nice HTML5/CSS3 based modals around.
×
×
  • Create New...