diogo

Just want to share this with you guys, To commemorate the launching of our new website https://processwire.com/talk/topic/7170-ed-design/ we decided to share a title font that we used on one of our projects under the SIL Open Font License (OFL). The font is available for download as otf and as webfont package on our site here and open for collaboration on Github and Open Font Library (you can also embed it from there). If you like it, use it and enjoy

Actually, it's not even that difficult to find... http://processwire.com/download/

I had to give up on NFS because of their safe_mode imposition (FLEX was not a real alternative), but with PHP 5.4 things must be better now. I will have to try them again as I really like their philosophy. Their FAQ is a great reading for anyone that wants to know a bit more about the hosting business http://faq.nearlyfreespeech.net/

That's how we should always start thinking with PW It abstracts things less and allows to use the API for everything.

@zwergo, I took the freedom to correct the links in your post, the "watch?v=" part was missing. Hope you don't mind.

Well, damn it! I will refrain from posting for the rest of the day. Maybe tomorrow I will be awaken... Anyway Manaus, there is your answer. Parent and children in one go.

This is working for me in the latest dev! $pages->find("id|parent=1236|1244|1264|1768|1456") The pipe is working also on the left side of the operator. When did Ryan add this? I completely missed it! :)

@appeisa, you're right of course. Already corrected it.

$getTheseAndItsChildren = "1236|1244|1264|1768|1456"; $myPages = $pages->find("id={$getTheseAndItsChildren}, parent={$getTheseAndItsChildren}"); edit: I have to wake up before posting $myPages = $pages->find("id=1236|1244|1264|1768|1456"); echo $myPages->import($pages->find("parent={$myPages}"));

Thanks for the testing Sinnut!

Focus on both. But you will find it much easier to start with pw

How about if they are called Emma and Tim, it still works?

You can show the title field as collapsed in those templates, or even hidden. I collapsed them on mine because as you can see in the screenshot they are good to identify each block. It also happened that I edited some blocks directly by searching in the admin for their titles.

I half solved this. I still wanted the images to have different weights, but now I pause the rotation when you scroll the image up. I think it's a nice compromise @totoff, can I ask you to check the font again?

Welcome to the forum bipster! For the projects in our website (see my signature) I used a table field and works very well I created three templates: paragraph, images and video, and added them to the table field "content" These are the fields in each template: paragraph: text (textarea) images: is_slider (checkbox), images (image) video: mp4 (file), webm (file), poster (image) on each template I put the code for rendering each object, for example, the video template is like this: //video.php (simplified) <div class="video"> <video muted poster="<?=$page->poster->url?>"> <source src="<?=$page->webm->url?>" type="video/webm"> <source src="<?=$page->mp4->url?>" type="video/mp4"> <p>bad browser, no video for you!</p> </video> </div> and on the project pages I output all the content simply with: foreach($page->content as $c) { echo $c->render(); }

Addressed first and second points and planning the third. I installed montserrat on the server and changed the order from the formats as suggested in the article linked by SiNNuT. totoff can you check how it looks like now? :) Thanks again for the suggestions, we really appreciate!

Thanks totoff, I sent your suggestions to Erika.

Thanks a lot for your comments and suggestions Horst and sinnut. Now I'm on mobile, but will address them later.

Hi guys, As some of you know I'm part of the Milktop team, but strategically we decided to go back to the format we had one year ago and recover ED Design, my collaboration with Erika. Today we are launching our website. http://ed-works.com/ This is a soft launch only for the PW community because I trust that this is the best place possible to have a site tested I hope soon I can write a case study. Hope you guys like it! (still some work to be done concerning SEO and accessibility)

Ok, last one on this, but just so you guys know about the kind of journalistic quality we are dealing with in that blog post, this is the thumbnail that was used to illustrate it: http://wptavern.com/tag/processwire

MS Word it's actually a great software if you actually learn how to use it well and take it to it's full potencial (I extend that to Open and Libre Office)

I completely agree with these 3 comments. From a graphic designer point of view, it's like comparing inDesign and MS Word, you can, but for that you really have to focus on the audience. Might be a big temptation to try to please everyone, but PW would start suffering from the same problems that others do. I'm glad Ryan doesn't think like that, and we can be sure that PW will only get better. edit: try to spend 30 minutes working with inDesign without knowing anything about professional publishing systems and see how frustrated you will get.

As I told you before, you did wrong but well, whatever... it's an empty discussion and I doubt it will get richer than this. Maybe others will have the patience to listen to what you say, and I hope they will. I don't.

Jeff, first of all, welcome to the forum. I'm the one that commented in a less respectful way from your point of view. I give you credit for actually trying PW before commenting, I've seen others that didn't even do that before emitting an opinion, but I just don't think that's enough. Just think of how you assumed that one didn't even read the post to the end only because one didn't write an extensive and paternal comment (no pun intended Joss, your comment is great), or that one thinks you're taking crap on the project only because one didn't agree with you. The truth is that you didn't only document your 30 minute journey, but you had an ostensively negative tone against PW and against Mike's article that was 1000 times more careful, more scientific and more neutral than your own. edit: I also give credit to the fact that you're here. Don't take the above as an offence or something similar.