diogo

Fieldsets were not designed for that purpose, so it's a bit harder than you may think. Have a look at the solution here https://processwire.com/talk/topic/10226-getting-fields-in-a-fieldset/

You could actually have created a poll for this topic using the forum, although that's not obvious at all. Check the "more reply options" button.

I also don't... I find myself looking on google and the forum for solutions or even creating new ones. Not very efficient, I know, but it does exercise my brain

Easiest way would probably be to have a template file with the redirection and set those templates to use it on the "files" tab of the template settings.

You can also install my ProcessPageAdmin module to do this https://github.com/ocorreiododiogo/ProcessHomeAdmin

Maybe you can inspect the code to know where the style is coming from.

Honestly, I don't think it's necessary to reproduce the grid in the backend unless there is a very spacial need. Users can take a certain level of abstraction and can easily understand that, in a list of images, te first five will be the first row and so on. You can limit the amount of images in the field to 50, but you can also do it at template level when calling the field ("limit=50"). Because this field will have many images, you can have "grid" as default view in the field settings. If you think it's less confusing for the user, and since you'll have a fixed number of rows, you can also create 10 different multi image fields named "row1, row2..." and wrap them inside a field set.

See here for the reason why you can't https://processwire.com/talk/topic/3927-can-you-have-a-repeater-field-within-a-repeater/

Just curious, why aren't you using an anchor instead of a button with onclick?

Linode is amazing and has datacenters in Tokyo and Singapore

Not being available at the product store doesn't make it open.

Like Martijn said, repeater is a field, but it's items are pages. So, a repeater field is not more than a reference to a group of pages. You can find these pages hidden under your "admin" page, and can be called and treated as any other pages. You usually don't have to call them directly, like we just did with the ID, but instead, you call them through the repeater field, either by looping the field: foreach($page->repeater as $item) { echo $item->title; } or by using the pageArray methods to call one of it's items: echo $page->repeater->first()->title;

Welcome to the forum Paschalis. This is not the usual way of getting repeater Items, but since you know the ID and repeaters are pages just like any other page, it's as easy as: $pages->get($repeater_id)->title

The language switcher would also have to be adapted to reflect this. --- You could add a new checkbox field to the languages template that would make a language inactive. Then you just would have to make your language switcher reflect that with a selector and use LostKobrakai's suggestion limited to those languages with the checkbox selected.

true, sorry about that... Have you tried removing the url segment for the languages on the home settings? Like this they will all have "/" as base, and the default should prevail in any subpage also.

You can make the language "hidden" in that language page settings

Slightly unrelated, but for knowing more about Patreon, this talk from Jack Conte is great Before watching that, I didn't even know that he was behind Patreon, although I was following his music and videos on Youtube

This is not even about defending the system, it's about defending the quality of the posts in the forum. It's quite amazing that someone that joined the forum 4 days ago, already has 52 posts, with a posts/likes rate of 52/1, and started 5 new topics, two of them named after modules that have their own topics. @cssabc123, this is a great community where people are always eager to help and discuss things, but you are expected to do your own work and some research before asking questions and raising these kind of topics, otherwise you're just wasting everyones time.

From time to time someone appears from nowhere and starts the same discussion that we had already over and over, without even taking the time, or having interest to read a bit of what was said before here in the forum. I quickly found an example of a discussion that you could/should have read before https://processwire.com/talk/topic/7565-making-pw-more-userfriendly/ I'm sorry if I sound rude, but after having answered and seen many others answering to some of your multiple questions from last week —which clearly show that you didn't get anything of how PW works—, I can't take these sudden very profound questions seriously.

Too busy building one more PW website to answer to this question...

Thanks guys! Yep, it has to do with the height of the screen. I'll have a look at it and force it to change when the site approaches the bottom.

Hey guys, we published a new website made with PW. Anja is a German artist. We designed an exhibition catalog for her previously, and now she asked us to create her website. Here it is: http://anjawiebelt.com/ The site is extremely simple, and PW didn't have to do anything too heavy, besides some calculations for displaying the dates in the right order. Most of the work was on the frontend and went into creating the customised slideshow — see also the responsive version. See also on our website for more details http://ed-works.com/projects/anjawiebelt.com/ If you see any issue, please tell

No problem. You seem to be having a good time discovering PW, and everyone understands that there are lots of doubts. But if you do some investigation work, you will find the answers to most of those questions by your own. You will likely have more useful answers if your questions are more sparse and thought out.

You can't unpublish the home, wouldn't make sense. Can I suggest that you collect all your doubts from the day and post them in one thread instead of populating all the forum with several single questions? You're taking over the forum entry wall.

Apparently, sexiness http://vschart.com/compare/processwire/vs/silverstripe