cstevensjr

I would exclude the computers by MAC (Media Access Control) filtering, if possible in Google Analytics, because many PCs these days are using dynamic IP addresses.

From your screenshot it looks as you never entered a password for the admin account and one is required.

On your page where you would want to see the Foundation Callout, you would have a textarea field (mine is called "body"). In the body field I add the Hanna code: [[wgc-panel-home-bottom-holiday]] I make use of the _init.php file and have the following: $body = $page->body; In the particular template file or better yet in _main.php or header.inc you would have: echo $body;

<div class="panel callout radius"> <p><H4>Happy Labor Day!!!</H4></p> <p><strong>Wishing everyone a fun and safe Labor Day Holiday.</strong></p> <p><strong>We're closed today and will be open tomorrow, 2 September 2014.</strong></p> </div> This is one I used for the US Labor Day Holiday. This is a Foundation Callout. Here's how it looks from the Admin side:

I don't know if this is what you are asking for or talking about: I use Hanna Code for most Foundation specific add-on stuff (Buttons, Panels, Pricing Tables, etc....). It works very nicely and saves an enormous amount of time. I either create an exclusive field (normally textarea) that will render whatever Foundation add-on I need or add it to existing $body (textarea) or text fields.

Great job with this and PW 2.5

Developers or Designers who have real talent have nothing to fear from others learning the trade. The PW forum is not populated by an elitist bunch of coders. Usability will be improved and believe or not you are an important part of that discussion. It's not a case of us against you. You are now a part of the PW community and we hope that you learn and succeed. I can only speak for myself, but my hope is for the PW core will remain as is (with continual enhancements). I support others creating all the usability functionality that has been proposed, just not in the core of PW.

User-Friendly is very subjective, what's hard for someone is easy for another person. PW requires (and rightly so) that you invest some time in learning the basics (PHP, Jquery, CSS and HTML). These are skills you need anyway to be productive and secure when dealing with a modern day website. Without knowledge of how things work (i.e PHP, Jquery, CSS and HTML), you will never be able to realistically maintain a website. I sincerely hope PW is not "user-friendly" to the cookie-cutter variety out there. They will never take the time to learn the basics, because everything about web development/design is all magic to them. This will most certainly kill this wonderful forum with numerous and countless issues that are entirely based on their refusal to learn simple processes. That would be a shame and will hopefully be resisted. Suggestions on how to improve PW are encouraged and actively discussed on this forum. I enjoy reading the diversity of opinions and concepts. In 2 short years PW has blossomed. I originally had problems understanding why the PW palette was so open, but as time went on and I relearned PHP, Jquery, CSS and HTML I came to respect and appreciate PW. I have read the forum every day for these 2 years. I can say that I never did that with any other software. I hope that we don't inadvertently kill this golden goose on the magical chase for "user friendlyness" and more users. The funny thing is, no matter how "user friendly" PW gets, someone will always think it can be more friendly. That's just human nature at work. To me, PW is already very user friendly and useful. Every client of mine that has seen PW has been happy working with it.

Well said!

Just a FYI, when I was learning about using @font-face, I ran across an old post that helped me understand some things: http://nicewebtype.com/notes/2009/10/30/how-to-use-css-font-face/ This article also had many additional links to all things @font-face and web typography.

I have been using @font-face format recently on most of my websites (always in the CSS). Here is what's working for me with PW: p {font-family: "steagal_regularregular", Helvetica, Tahoma, sans-serif} @font-face { font-family: 'steagal_regularregular'; src: url('fonts/SteagalRegular-webfont.eot'); src: url('fonts/SteagalRegular-webfont.eot?#iefix') format('embedded-opentype'), url('fonts/SteagalRegular-webfont.woff') format('woff'), url('fonts/SteagalRegular-webfont.ttf') format('truetype'), url('fonts/SteagalRegular-webfont.svg#steagal_regularregular') format('svg'); font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; }

Very nice

I would advise that you go into maintenance mode (offline) and then you should be able to remove the field from the template without a problem. That should eliminate everyone but the superadmin accounts from accessing the website. http://modules.processwire.com/modules/maintenance-mode/

+1 Scenario #1

Tutorial That Explains How To Incorporate A Front-End Framework In PW http://processwire.com/docs/tutorials/installing-a-css-framework/

Ok, that is different

I believe there are also _func.php, _init.php and _main.php files in the /Templates directory on this install. If you look under /Templates/Styles you will find the main.css file. _main.php has the reference you are looking for. You should look at all the files in the /Templates directory and study them.

As an American, who has previously lived in the UK, it's an expression that I learned from friends and liked. Too British --- for me, No.

I believe you cannot use the same database name on a different host. You should have created a new database (on the new host) and imported the old database to it. That's what I get for not reading the whole post. Please disregard Check the permission of the database user to ensure they have all permissions.

A few places of the many on this forum to start reading: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/988-new-page-from-inputfield/ https://processwire.com/talk/topic/3579-tutorial-approaches-to-categorising-site-content/

I agree. Now if we could only have clients work with us that listen to reason and facts.

@Ivan Gretsky, I will. It will probably be a few months before that happens. I currently have a second generation prototype working with a few of my clients now. PW is proving to be a great platform for doing that type of thing.

I agree with everyone about RWD, however I also agree with things that @muzzer says. First, content will always be king. A great looking website means nothing without good content. RWD, SEO and a host of other things cannot replace content that is specific to whatever the website is about. Secondly, the customer pays the bills. We can create all these gee wiz bang websites, however someone (the paying client) needs to be satisfied with your work. Ultimately, they are the only ones who count, no matter what their artistic tastes are. I support anyone who has the tenacity to spend their time and resources creating websites. Some people are more talented than others, but we all deserve appreciation for doing what others haven't done. I honestly believe the only websites that I would never support are the ones that have music playing as soon as you arrive at the site.

It sounds more that your process needs refining. I copy my unpublished pages that need review to a temporary url (as listed) and give that URL to whomever needs it. Once finished with that page, I simply trash it. The original page then gets edited or published. The original content never gets moved. It's just an affordable process to allow a review by outside interests. I use a project management system (PW based system) for any internal or client review.

You can make the page Hidden and put it somewhere in your structure that can't be easily guessed. From the outside, a page has to be published to be seen. Then you can give out this URL to whomever needs to see it. An Example: www.yourwebsite.com/cteded23xt4/review/preview-page-for-review/