-
Posts
6,630 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
358
bernhard last won the day on September 9
bernhard had the most liked content!
Contact Methods
-
Website URL
https://www.baumrock.com
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Vienna, Austria
-
Interests
Sports
bernhard's Achievements
-
RockIcons Backend Error after Upgrade of RockFrontend and Less modules
bernhard replied to gebeer's topic in RockFrontend
Hey @gebeer thx for that report! I have pushed your suggested fix on the dev branch of RockFrontend ๐ -
Less Parser support for @property (and other modern features)
bernhard replied to Stefanowitsch's topic in General Support
@spoetnik does the latest version of the less parser fix all issues and make it work with the latest version of UIkit? -
RockShell - a ProcessWire Commandline Companion โจ๏ธ
bernhard replied to bernhard's topic in Modules/Plugins
hi @Jonathan Lahijani I can't remember of any flag that I set, but there is $config->external that should be true when used from the cli, which is the case with rockshell. What is "put PW in CLI mode?", I don't understand. -
New blog: FormBuilder v57 released (5 September 2025)
bernhard replied to ryan's topic in News & Announcements
Thx for the heads up. That's perfectly fine, but it would help if you let us know if something is considered to be implemented in a day, a week or a year or not at all. It would be very frustrating if I went through all my modules and then on the next weekly post get informed that the the requested update is ready and all efforts were useless. I'm confused. My modules are in private git repos. How would I do that? I also tried to add content to the README.md textarea input in the modules directory but it didn't work because I didn't provide a Github url. But providing a Github url to a private repo makes no sense to me. I understand it is like this, we can see that. My question was does it have to be like this. I don't think it adds value to anybody, especially not to guest users, as I tried to point out. RockCalendar has had this category selected but still doesn't show up. At first I thought the issue might be that I used "premium modules" as second category, but still it does not show up even though I flipped both selected categories. I guess it's because I don't fill the Github url field. -
The logs directory definitely does NOT need 775. See https://processwire.com/docs/security/file-permissions/#permission-755-for-directories-and-644-for-files 755 is the least restrictive recommendation and as ryan notes if it can be locked down further its recommended to do so. If it only works for you with 775 that's a good and a bad news: good: you know that permissions are the issue bad: you should fix it properly to make it work with 755 ...which should be the case if the webserver runs as the same user that owns the directory and log files. You might want to talk to your hosting company if you are not hosting it yourself.
-
This means that only the owner of the file can write to it. Does it have the correct owner?
-
New blog: FormBuilder v57 released (5 September 2025)
bernhard replied to ryan's topic in News & Announcements
@ryan still none of my paid modules show up in the modules directory. Also do you have some feedback on my questions/suggestions from 4 weeks ago here and here? I'd like to know if you plan to add the suggested improvements or if I have to update all my modules manually. When I look at the RockPageBuilder module it (still) looks like this: Is that warning really necessary? Why is that warning shown to regular (non-logged-in) users? IMHO it doesn't add any helpful information for them. How would a guest user add or update the readme of my module? I understand that my module does not have a readme, but it has extensive docs here: https://www.baumrock.com/en/processwire/modules/rockpagebuilder/docs/ I put a lot of effort into these docs so it is frustrating that all that is visible in the modules directory is an ugly red warning. Even worse I think this warning can make the impression that the module is dead or not actively maintained, which is not the case and which would be harmful to my business. The "Project" button does nothing when I click on it. What is it intended to do? And why does it appear on my modules page? And all that said, why does that lead to my modules not being shown in the list of paid modules? Or is there another reason for that? Next, a minor thing: Why does it show "Since 2025/01/10" and does it have to be like this? On my releases page the oldest release is v3.6.0 from January 2023 and it would be nice to make it obvious that this module has a long history and has always been actively maintained, updated and improved. I understand that this is likely the date when I added the module to the directory, but it's imho nothing that adds value to my module's entry. Could that be made configurable so that I can show the real release date or instead only (not additionally) show the last updated date there, which would be more helpful information for anybody I guess? Thx -
Of course RockMigrations can do that. Example migrate.php: <?php namespace ProcessWire; $rm = rockmigrations(); // install modules $rm->installModule('TracyDebugger'); $rm->installModule('RockDevTools'); $rm->installModule('RockFrontend'); $rm->installModule('AdminThemeUikit', [ 'toggleBehavior' => 1, // consistent 'themeName' => '', // original theme ]); $rm->installModule('RockAdminTweaks', [ 'enabledTweaks' => [ 'General:QuickAdd', 'Inputfields:CopyFieldNames', 'Inputfields:ImageDownload', 'PageList:TemplateLink', 'PageEdit:PrevNextPage', ], ]); $rm->installModule('Less', [ 'useCache' => 1, ]);
-
I don't think so but I don't have time to look into it ๐
-
Ryan wrote a blog post for you: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/optimizing-404s-in-processwire/ ๐
-
Would you mind sharing your sources for what makes code mergeable?
-
Hey @gornycreative that's not planned from my side and I'd not recommend adding it unless you really don't have another option. I added this once so that I can create different colored versions of one website, but using css variables for this is much better! When you use LESS variables you need to keep track of every stylesheet that you generate, eg style-magenta.css and style-blue.css; having 10 colors means having 10 css files to create and load, whereas when using css variables it's just one! With css variables you can even set different color schemes within one page just by setting a new value for your --theme-color or whatever css variable: <section style='--theme-color: red;'>...</section>