markus-th

What I meant to say was that the relaunch was perhaps a little rushed. It's not a good user experience if the users doesn't get what is presented to them.

Has anyone else noticed that the screenshots of the “new” backend are incorrect, as it does not exist at all in the current master?

I'm confused. Isn't ProcessWire primarily the tool we want to convince more developers to use in order to gain a larger user base? So this page should primarily be used to convince developers of the advantages with examples (sorry to say that) instead of animations that have nothing to do with ProcessWire. To convince customers of the system, it would be better to provide a good demo that shows how simple ProcessWire is to user. However, this could also be done here, among other places: https://www.softaculous.com/apps/cms/ProcessWire

I see this the same way on Win 11 with Chrome/Firefox/Opera/Edge.

I think everyone here knows that and just wants to help improve the site for new users. On the download page I noticed Softaculous: Here, especially with regard to new users, the text could be updated. However, in my opinion, the demo available there is a problem that is more likely to deter new users than get them excited about ProcessWire: No one new to Processwire can figure out the backend or anything else from this demo.

I found some issues in the modules directory: Long Text on a paid module need a bit of a gap. Also the paid-filter don't work properly, none of @bernhard's modules are shown.

Unfortunately, it still doesn't work. @diogo Not such an easy fix after all?

My quote of the century

You had Padloper v1, the Migration is for Padloper v2. I think it is better to start from the scratch. @kongondo Please update the title, I also thought I could migrate my old Padloper v1 store to PWCommerce.

Everything you need is already in ProcessWire 😉 Look in the details-tab from your image-field -> https://processwire.com/blog/posts/pw-3.0.142/ For CK-Editor: In the image-dialog you can set alt an "title" (figcaption)

I use the RepeaterMatrix in most of my installations to build page content. To make elements visually easier to grasp, I use the option to adjust the colors in the item headers. Unfortunately, this no longer works with the new theme. Original: New Default: New default with @ryan's admin-tweak.css @adrian I agree with that. In my opinion this is not a good user experience. The "old" style was a lot better/faster to scan.

@bernhard this Setting-Options only appears when you Choose "Default" not when you go to "Original". I agree, the options to choose the favorite theme would be a good solution.

There is a lot of talk about “design by committee,” which I also think is wrong. But nobody asked for this, not even @bernhard. I have followed his posts very closely and all I can see is that he had hoped that the community would be consulted before the design phase. And I absolutely agree with him on this point, because if wishes and ideas had been solicited beforehand, I am quite sure that this thread would have been much less emotional. Now to my “problems” I currently manage nearly 50 active ProcessWire projects, and the advance announcements of a more modern admin theme naturally raised expectations that have now turned to disappointment for me, as many of my installations run on UIKit-based custom modules that are sure to cause problems with the CSS overrides. For me, this means that all development systems will soon need to be updated to the DEV version in order to identify and address any problems. I hope to find the time soon to contribute constructively to improving the theme.

At first you should check the errorlog. To find it go with FTP to site/assets/logs/errors.txt Normaly it is easy to update Processwire with simply upload the new wire-folder, index.php & .htaccess to your server (it depends a bit on your previous PW-Version) Here you find the Upgrade-Guide -> https://processwire.com/docs/start/install/upgrade/

I only use the API key in Curl requests and that works perfectly. (PHP-Session) $url = "API-URL"; $curl = curl_init(); curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_RETURNTRANSFER, 1); curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_URL, $url); curl_setopt($curl, CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER, array('x-api-key: *******************')); $data = curl_exec($curl);

Gemini (Basic 2.0 Flash) - not so bad.

I think URL hooks can be a good solution for this case: https://processwire.com/blog/posts/pw-3.0.173/

Many thanks for the module. I have some small ideas that could make it easier to install the forum on an existing site and integrate it seamlessly into the layout. Are you planning to make the module available on GitHub?

Nice, thanks for sharing. BTW: Works also perfect for the ProModule RepeaterMatrix from @ryan

@Klenkes I currently have the same problem with v 1.0.9, after a downgrade to v 1.0.8 everything works as expected again.

Hello webguy, to integrate a Google tag on your site, you can integrate the code e.g. in the header template (sometimes _header.php). But the answer is not quite that simple, as it depends on how the templates of your site are structured. My templates usually look like this: _header.php _footer.php home.php (include header, templatecontent, footer) basic-page.php (include header, templatecontent, footer) ... and so on ? I hope this helps

Look, here in the docs is every information you need ? https://processwire.com/docs/modules/hooks/#what-methods-in-processwire-are-hookable

<script> function gtag() { dataLayer.push(arguments); } gtag('consent', 'default', { 'ad_storage': 'denied', 'ad_user_data': 'denied', 'ad_personalization': 'denied', 'analytics_storage': 'denied' }); </script> <script type="text/plain" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="statistics"> window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || []; function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);} gtag('consent', 'update', { 'analytics_storage': 'granted' }); </script> <script type="text/plain" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="statistics"> // GTM </script> I use GTM only for Statistics, this is how it work for me.

Looked at it on Andriod. No image ... tested with another website, work with image

Look at this idea: Since I have been using this method, I no longer need any other approach to build up the content on my pages and I also need far fewer different templates. You don't have to use depth, but it allows extremely flexible output of content when needed. My basic_page template look like this: <?php namespace ProcessWire; include "_header.php"; $items = $page->content; foreach ($items as $key => $item) { $item->position = $key; $item->all_items = $items; } foreach ($items->find("depth=0") as $item) { echo $item->render(); } include "_footer.php"; And all matrix "content" templates are inside the fields folder.