adrian

Restrict Tab View

Recommended Posts

For ages I used an admin helper module to do this. I finally decided to try this module, and whaddya know — works like a charm.

Thanks Adrian!

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @adrian,

Very useful module (as always.) Question though, is there any reason to use Inputfield::collapsedYes rather than collapsedHidden for the _pw_page_name field when removing the settings tab? (Reference line 114 of module code.)   I'd have thought it would be more natural to hide all the fields from the settings tab if the module were setup to hide the Settings tab, not just move the _pw_page_name field into the start of the content tab.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, netcarver said:

I'd have thought it would be more natural to hide all the fields from the settings tab if the module were setup to hide the Settings tab, not just move the _pw_page_name field into the start of the content tab.

It used to work like that, but it wasn't working for multi-language page names. This change happened in this commit (https://github.com/adrianbj/RestrictTabView/commit/9316082a26315a42d5036481da9d136eb5d4c42e). You could use an older commit, or if you can find a way to make it work while being hidden, I'd love to know. Maybe it needs to be hidden (or positioned off screen) via CSS instead?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@adrian

Thanks for the reply. That seems strange - I would have thought the collapsedHidden status would have included it in the form as a hidden input.

For now, I'll just use a hook in my site/ready.php to hide the unneeded tabs as I don't want have any module updates remove changes.

Thanks!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, adrian said:

Maybe it needs to be hidden (or positioned off screen) via CSS instead?

Yes, I think the module should do this (or offer an option for it). Because the name field is normally on the Settings tab, and if you are removing that tab for a role then you probably don't want the role seeing any of the fields normally on that tab.

You probably know this but it was new to me... you can add styles to an inputfield without needing to include a CSS file with the module:

$if = $wrapper->getChildByName('_pw_page_name');
$if->wrapAttr('style', 'display:none;');

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great idea @Robin S - I do know about wrapAttr but I must admit that I often forget about it in situations like this - thanks for the reminder.

I have implemented like this and it seems to be working well now. @netcarver - if you decide to revert to using this module, let me know how it goes for you.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What about the Restore tab?

I'm looking at the ProcessPageEdit.module and in ___BuildFormContent() is:

if($this->page->template->nameContentTab) {
    // add InputfieldPageName ...
}

But in ___BuildFormSettings() the condition is different:

if(($this->page->id > 1 || $this->hasLanguagePageNames) && !$this->page->template->nameContentTab) {
    // add InputfieldPageName ...
}

Why?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@matjazp - I'll take a look at the new Restore tab - thanks for the reminder.

As for the difference between those two conditions - that's a good question - I am not sure really - you'd think the check for homepage and languagePageNames would be relevant on the content tab as well. I guess maybe because you have to explicitly check the "Display 'name' field in content tab?" option for the home template it's up to you as the dev to decide if you want the name on the Content tab. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The "Restore" tab is now supported.

I have also added a new option that lets you display the name field in the Content tab if you have hidden the Settings tab - default is not to show it though.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @adrian

I'm seeing an error - apparently due to this module - when trying to add a Repeater item on a page where tabs have been hidden and I'm not logged in as a super-user (all ok when logged in as a Super.)

Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to a member function wrapAttr() on null in /site/modules/RestrictTabView/RestrictTabView.module:117 Stack trace:
#0 site/modules/RestrictTabView/RestrictTabView.module(79): RestrictTabView->removeTabs('Settings', Object(ProcessWire\HookEvent))
#1 /wire/core/Wire.php(383): RestrictTabView->afterBuildForm(Object(ProcessWire\HookEvent))
#2 /wire/core/WireHooks.php(825): ProcessWire\Wire->_callMethod('afterBuildForm', Array)
#3 /wire/core/Wire.php(442): ProcessWire\WireHooks->runHooks(Object(ProcessWire\ProcessPageEdit), 'buildForm', Array)
#4 /wire/modules/Process/ProcessPageEdit/ProcessPageEdit.module(531): ProcessWire\Wire->__call('buildForm', Array)

<snip>

This causes ajax loaded repeater items to fail.

Guarding the call seems to fix it...

                if ($pn instanceof Inputfield) {
                    $pn->wrapAttr('style', 'display:none;');
                }

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello @adrian and @netcarver

I think I have the same issue here. When I try to hide the tab "Settings", I can't add a new repeater field item on a page if I'm logged in as a non-superuser. With other choices ("Children", "Restore", etc) there is no conflict.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@vincent Yes, sounds like the same problem. If you edit the .module file and make the change I posted above, your problem should be resolved.

I cloned the repo and added the change. Can you try my version from here and let me know if that fixes it for you. If so, I'll send a PR over to Adrian.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, @vincent I've submitted a pull request to get this change into the master repository. Thanks for checking.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @netcarver and @vincent for finding this issue and getting a fix in place and tested. PR has been merged and the module updated!

Sorry for the delay - was away last week.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great to have you back, Adrian. Thanks for pulling in the change.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By blad
      Hi guys!
      I just uploaded a module to explore files based on elFinder. By default it will show the "Files" folder.
      Screenshots:

      Video:
       
      To do:
       More options To fix:
       The function of rotating or scaling an image fails  Image editors V 1.01 (view issue)
      Fixed the bug working with the Multi-Language support ( translation of folders ). Fixed the name of elfinder.en  Github:
      https://github.com/LuisSantiago/ProcessElFinder/
      I hope you like it.
    • By BitPoet
      I'm really in love with FormBuilder, but the one thing missing to match all my end users' expectations were repeatable field groups. Think repeaters, in ProcessWire terms. Our primary application of PW is our corporate intranet, so "lines" of fields are quite common in the forms I build. We have all kinds of request forms where the information for a varying number of colleagues needs to be entered (from meal order to flight booking request) and where it is simply impractical to send a form for each, and I don't want to clutter my forms with multiple instances of fields that may only get used ten percent of the time.
      That's why I started to build FormBuilderMultiplier (link to GitHub).
      What it does:
      Adds an option to make a regular Fieldgroup repeatable Lets you limit the number of instances of a Fieldgroup on the form Adds an "Add row" button the form that adds another instance of the Fieldgroup's fields Adds a counter suffix at the end of every affected field's label Stores the entered values just like regular fields Makes the entered values available in preview and email notifications Supports most text based fields, textareas and selects (really, I haven't had enough time to test all the available choices yet) What it doesn't do (yet):
      Support saving to ProcessWire pages (i.e. real Repeaters) I haven't tested all the validation stuff, Date/Time inputs etc. yet, but since I'm utterly swamped with other stuff at work, I didn't want to wait until I have it polished. Any feedback is welcome. There might also be some issues with different output frameworks that I haven't encountered yet. The forms I work with mostly use UIKit.
      Status:
      Still alpha, so test well before using it in the field.
      Known issues:
      When rows are added, the form's iframe needs to be resized, which isn't completely clean yet.
      How it works:
      The Fieldgroup settings are added through regular hooks, as is the logic that adds the necessary field copies for processing the form and displaying previews.
      "Multiplied" field instances are suffixed with _NUM, where NUM is an incremental integer starting from 1. So if you have add two fields named "surname" and "givenname" to a fieldgroup and check the "multiply" checkbox, the form will initially have "surname_1" and "givenname_1" field (I'm still considering changing that to make the risk to shoot oneself into the foot by having a regular "surname_1" field somewhere else in the form less likely).
      When a "row" is added, the first row is cloned through JS and the counter in the fields' IDs, names and "for" attributes as well as the counter in the label are incremented before appending the copies to the Fieldset container in the form.
      To keep backend and frontend in sync, a hidden field named [name of the fieldset]__multiplier_rows is added to the form. Both the backend and the frontend script use this to store and retrieve the number of "rows".
      ToDo:
      Naturally, add the option to store the data in real repeaters when saving to pages. Do a lot of testing (and likely fixing). Make a few things (like the "Add row" button label etc.) configurable in field(set) context. Add a smooth API to retrieve the multiplied values as WireArrays. The mandatory moving screenshot:

    • By MoritzLost
      Hello there,
      I'm working on a tiny textformatter module that searches the text for titles of other pages on your site and creates hyperlinks to them. I'm not sure if something like this exists already, but I haven't found anything in the module directory, so I wrote my own solution 🙂
      It's not properly tested yet and is still missing some functionality I would like to implement, so at the moment it should be considered in BETA. Features include limiting the pages that will get searched by template, and adding a custom CSS class to the generated hyperlinks. As I'm writing this I noticed that it will probably include unpublished and hidden pages at the moment, so yeah ... it's still in development alright 😅
      You can download the module from Github:
      https://github.com/MoritzLost/TextformatterPageTitleLinks
      There's some more information in the readme as well.
      Anyway, let me know what you think! I'm happy about any feedback, possible improvements or ideas on how to improve the module. Cheers.
    • By adrian
      This module provides a way to rapidly generate Page fields and the required templates and pages for use as a drop down select (or any other Page field type).
      This module will let you create a full page field setup in literally a few seconds 
      To use, run Page Field Select Creator from the Setup Menu
      Enter a Field Title, eg: Room Types Select Options - These will become the child pages that will populate the page field select options. There are two different options.
       
      Option 1. TITLE FIELD ONLY - enter one option per line, eg:
       
      Single
      Double
      Suite
       
       
      Option 2. MULTIPLE FIELDS - the first line is used for the field names and the first field must be 'Title'. Subsequent lines are the values for the fields, eg:
       
      Title, Number of Beds, Number of People, Kitchen Facilities
      Single, 1, 1, Fridge Only
      Double, 2, 2, Fridge Only
      Suite, 3, 6, Full Kitchen
        Choose the parent where the page tree of options will be created, eg a hidden "Options" parent page Select a "Deference in API as" option depending on your needs Choose the input field type Check whether "Allow new pages to be created from field?" should be enabled. As an example, if you entered "Room Types" as the field title, you would end up with all of the following automatically created:
      a fully configured page field called: room_types MULTIPLE FIELDS OPTION - 3 additional fields - number_of_beds, number_of_people, kitchen a parent template called: room_types a child template called: room_types_items (with either just a title field, or with the 3 additional fields as well) a parent page called: Room Types a series of child pages named and titled based on the per line entries in the Select Options textarea The templates are configured such that the "room_types_items" child template can only have the main "room_types" template as a parent, and vice versa.

      Then all you have to do is add the newly created page field to any template you want and you're ready to go!
       
      You can grab it from:
       
      Modules directory: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/process-page-field-select-creator/
      Github: https://github.com/adrianbj/ProcessPageFieldSelectCreator
       

    • By bernhard
      WHY?
      This module was built to fill the gap between simple $pages->find() operations and complex SQL queries.
      The problem with $pages->find() is that it loads all pages into memory and that can be a problem when querying multiple thousands of pages. Even $pages->findMany() loads all pages into memory and therefore is a lot slower than regular SQL.
      The problem with SQL on the other hand is, that the queries are quite complex to build. All fields are separate tables, some repeatable fields use multiple rows for their content that belong to only one single page, you always need to check for the page status (which is not necessary on regular find() operations and therefore nobody is used to that).
      In short: It is far too much work to efficiently and easily get an array of data based on PW pages and fields and I need that a lot for my RockGrid module to build all kinds of tabular data.

      Basic Usage

       
      Docs & Download
      https://modules.processwire.com/modules/rock-finder/
      https://github.com/BernhardBaumrock/RockFinder
       
      Changelog
      180817, v1.0.6, support for joining multiple finders 180810, v1.0.5, basic support for options fields 180528, v1.0.4, add custom select statement option 180516, change sql query method, bump version to 1.0.0 180515, multilang bugfix 180513, beta release <180513, preview/discussion took place here: https://processwire.com/talk/topic/18983-rocksqlfinder-highly-efficient-and-flexible-sql-finder-module/