Recommended Posts

Jumplinks for ProcessWire

Release: 1.5.50

Jumplinks is an enhanced version of the original ProcessRedirects by Antti Peisa.

The Process module manages your permanent and temporary redirects (we'll call these "jumplinks" from now on, unless in reference to redirects from another module), useful for when you're migrating over to ProcessWire from another system/platform. Each jumplink supports wildcards, shortening the time needed to create them.

Unlike similar modules for other platforms, wildcards in Jumplinks are much easier to work with, as Regular Expressions are not fully exposed. Instead, parameters wrapped in curly braces are used - these are described in the documentation.

Under Development: 2.0, to be powered by FastRoute

As of version 1.5.0, Jumplinks requires at least ProcessWire 2.6.1 to run.

View on GitLab
Download via the Modules Directory
Read the docs

Features

The most prominent features include:

  • Basic jumplinks (from one fixed route to another)
  • Parameter-based wildcards with "Smart" equivalents
  • Mapping Collections (for converting ID-based routes to their named-equivalents without the need to create multiple jumplinks)
  • Destination Selectors (for finding and redirecting to pages containing legacy location information)
  • Timed Activation (activate and/or deactivate jumplinks at specific times)
  • 404-Monitor (for creating jumplinks based on 404 hits)

Additionally, the following features may come in handy:

  • Stale jumplink management
  • Legacy domain support for slow migrations
  • An importer (from CSV or ProcessRedirects)

Feedback & Feature Requests

I’d love to know what you think of this module. Please provide some feedback on the module as a whole, or even regarding smaller things that make it whole. Also, please feel free to submit feature requests and their use-cases.

Note: Features requested so far have been added to the to-do list, and will be added to 2.0, and not the current dev/master branches.

Open Source

Jumplinks is an open-source project, and is free to use. In fact, Jumplinks will always be open-source, and will always remain free to use. Forever. If you would like to support the development of Jumplinks, please consider making a small donation via PayPal.

Enjoy!  :grin:

Edited by Mike Rockett
Updates
  • Like 24

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow!  Nice work Mike!  I'll try to carve some time later in the week to give this a thorough test run.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've made few changes, which I'll be uploading tomorrow morning as v0.1.1. Some of it is to do with bettering my code (specifically in the way of Regular Expressions), and the rest of it is to do with better path cleaning, and a few backend CSS fixes.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<development post>

New Alpha Release - 0.1.1

The full changelog is below, but I want to highlight an important addition to the module. In its present state, this  new feature is classified as an experiment, and so it may not make it into the final 1.0 release.

The experiment is called Enhanced Path Cleaning which basically splits and hyphenates TitleCased wildcard-captures, as well as those containing abbreviations or acronyms in capital letters.

This is quite handy for those who come from a DNN background, or some other ASP-based framework.

As an example, EnvironmentStudy would become environment-study and NASALaunch would become nasa-launch.

It also changes any numbers that are not broken out with hyphens.

You'll need to turn the experiment on in the module's config page, as it is off by default.

Example from scan log:

Page not found; scanning for redirects...

    - Checked at: Tue, 06 Jan 2015 10:20:20 +0200
    - Requested URL:
http://processwire.local/NAGMagazine/home/tabid/1027/default.aspx
    - PW Version: 2.5.13

[ASPX Content]

    - Source Path (Unescaped): {path}/tabid/{id}/Default.aspx
    - Source Path (Stage 1): {path:segments}/tabid/{id:num}/Default.aspx
    - Source Path (Stage 2): ([\w/_-]+)/tabid/(\d+)/Default.aspx
    - Destination Path (Original): {path}/?otid={id}
    - Destination Path (Compiled): processwire.local/{path}/?otid={id}
    - Destination Path (Converted): processwire.local/nag-magazine/home/?otid=1027

Match found! We'll do the following redirect (301, permanent) when Debug Mode has been turned off:

    - From URL: processwire.local/NAGMagazine/home/tabid/1027/default.aspx
    - To URL: processwire.local/nag-magazine/home/?otid=1027

Changelog

[5 Jan]

- Modified Module Config page
- Simplified wildcard and cleanPath() expressions
- Added 'segments' check to 'segments' smart wildcard, where only 'path' existed before
- Added 'num' check to 'num'
- Changed ellipses style (added border)
- Made Legacy Redirects temporary (302)
- Fixed CSS #ModuleEditForm declaration so other modules are not impacted by the style change
- Changed CSS p.notes to p.parNotes so we don't conflict with anything else
- Other small semantic code modifications

[6 Jan]
- Added Experiments fieldset in Module Config
- Added Enhanced Path Cleaning Experiment
- Removed license file, refer to
http://mikeanthony.mit-license.org/

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, great work, thanks. Gonna try it out later.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes during a migration people have second thoughts and want to make some adjustments after redirects are in place. How about an option to redirect as 302 for a while (think of it as a probationary period) before automatically converting to 301 (so we don't forget).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for bringing that up, Steve. I did indeed think about this earlier, and made a comment on my to do list: "Find out if we should prevent the deletion of 301s".

Granted, that isn't the right question to ask, but it reminds me to look at the various options regarding this.

I think your idea is quite good. After such period, should we prevent the deletion of redirects?

And what does everyone else think about this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<development post>

New Alpha Release - 0.1.2 (Breaking Changes)
 
This module introduces a new feature: Mapping Collections (this is the final name for it).
 
The feature allows you to map key/value pairs to your redirects so that you need not repeat yourself.

An example would be the following: Redirect /blog.php?id=2309 to /hello-world/, by using the following redirect:

blog.php?id={id}      =>      {id|pages}

You're wondering, what's {id|blog}? Simply put, that's called a mapping reference, which refers to an entry in a Mapping Collection.

A Mapping Collection, in this case, would look something like this:

1=a-post
2=another-post
3=third-post
...
2309=hello-world

So, when it comes time to redirect, it will scan the provided id against the collection called blog and, if it finds a match, will redirect accordingly.

If, however, there is no match, the segment that asked for the mapping will be left out, resulting in an invalid URL. I may get it to insert the original capture instead.

Some Screenshots:

post-2289-0-00830100-1420570260_thumb.pn

--

post-2289-0-03432300-1420568167_thumb.pn

--

post-2289-0-99072900-1420568173_thumb.pn

--

Full Changelog for this release:

[6 Jan]
- Some refactoring; moving code blocks from main module to UtilityProcess
- [New Feature] Mapping Collections
- Changed module title to Advanced Redirects [ALPHA]
 
Breaking Changes: The DB schemas have changed in this release. If you already have 0.1.0 or 0.1.1 installed, please uninstall it first.
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At this point, the module is quite feature-rich. As such, I'm pausing development. This gives time for those testing the module to do so without me introducing new things every three seconds, and it also gives me time to prepare for the whole 'back to work' thing - I return on Monday, and need to prepare for it.

I'll still be here to discuss things, but there won't be any changes for about two weeks.

Looking forward to the results/feedback of everyone's testing. :)

Update: Lol, the stuff I had to do couldn't be done today - so there are a few changes up on the repo now.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

<development post>

Right, in terms of features: I need feedback. As mentioned, the module is feature-rich in its current state. Normal and wildcard redirects, along with mapping collections, makes this module ready for almost anything. But there are two features which I haven't implemented yet. They are:

Variables

This is probably something that may never get used. I needed it once upon a time for social accounts and user names, but it really doesn't seem practical. The idea is this: You create a redirect, and use {@something} somewhere in the destination path. Based on your variables table, it would then be replaced accordingly. Like I said, doesn't seem to be something that anyone would really make use of. However, I would like some feedback on it.

Just in Time Replacements

These would probably be used much more - they are quite handy. Say, for example, you had the following page structure in your old site:

  1. About Us.html
  2. Services.html
  3. Contact Us.html

Then you have the following redirect set up:

Source Path: {page:any}.html

Destination Path: {page}/

Naturally, those pages would redirect to:

  1. about-us/
  2. services/
  3. contact-us/

But now, you've decided to use different page names in your new PW site - for example: who-we-are, solutions, and connect.

Considering we're using a wildcard redirect here (saves time for a lot of pages), we don't want define more redirects to go the new pages. This is where JIT Replacements comes in. It's like a simple find and replace:

Find                                                    Replace

about-us                      who-we-are

services                      solutions

contact-us                    connect

 

 

And, therefore:

Request                                             Destination

About Us.html                 who-we-are/

Services.html                 solutions/

Contact Us.html               connect/

 

In a nutshell, this saves a redirect. One might argue that they may as well create redirects for each and every page, but you have to consider that not every page name will change. And what happens if you move all the pages down a level? You'd only need to change one redirect.

So, I'd like some feedback on this too. Will you find it useful?

Until I've got some decent feedback, I'm not going to add these features. With that said, and because I know some people are eager to use the module now, I'm going to release a beta. I haven't found any bugs as yet, and so I think its ready for beta status.


(Oh, and I'll add the history feature before beta release - nearly forgot about that!)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mike, my humble opinion, that you have already huge amount of features. Adding more makes starting to use this module in simpler cases more difficult: "I installed it and it felt like total overkill for my needs.". Of course we have the current redirects module for those needs... But I think your feature set is great and would much rather see the current as stable instead of more scenarios supported.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay - I understand where you're coming from.

Do you think it would be useful to have a redirect log? Or just a simple hit counter like you had?

And have you encountered any problems as yet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nearly done with the importing side of things. Hit counter will be quick and easy.

Last thing I need to ask:

Currently, a 302 redirect will occur if it has a start/end time assigned. Otherwise, it will do a 301. Should we include functionality to let the end-user choose if it should be 301/302? Or should we stick with the previous idea of a probation period?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just pushed 0.9.1 to the repo. Sorry, haven't had time to finish up faster.

Importing from CSV is done (seemingly). Will also support importing from Redirects module, if you don't want to run both.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, so I've actually decided to rename the module to ProcessJumplinks. I prefer it.

https://github.com/mike-anthony/ProcessJumplinks

Hit counter is done. Still need to work on importing from Redirects module - I'll do that tomorrow as I'm super-tired now.

I don't think I'm going to make this compatible with the current stable (2.5.3). If you really want me to, please let me know.

:-)


Will also work on docs soon - though my intro post covers a lot. Nice to have docs, however.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pete - I will do so shortly. Thanks.

Edit - though, the module isn't compatible with 2.5, so I can't add it... Could we perhaps add a 2.6-dev to that list?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Mike - any thoughts of making is possible to add redirects via an API call. After the discussion this morning about imported Wordpress rewriting (https://processwire.com/talk/topic/8869-wordpress-url-rewrites/), I would like to add this functionality to MigratorWordpress so that rewrites are automatically added. Obviously I can do it through SQL inserts, but thought an API method would be nice.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Robin S
      Another little admin helper module...
      Template Field Widths
      Adds a "Field widths" field to Edit Template that allows you to quickly set the widths of inputfields in the template.

      Why?
      When setting up a new template or trying out different field layouts I find it a bit slow and tedious to have to open each field individually in a modal just to set the width. This module speeds up the process.
      Installation
      Install the Template Field Widths module.
      Config options
      You can set the default presentation of the "Field widths" field to collapsed or open. You can choose Name or Label as the primary identifier shown for the field. The unchosen alternative will become the title attribute shown on hover. You can choose to show the original field width next to the template context field width.  
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/TemplateFieldWidths
      https://modules.processwire.com/modules/template-field-widths/
    • By horst
      Croppable Image 3
      for PW 3.0.20+
      Module Version 1.1.16
      Sponsored by http://dreikon.de/, many thanks Timo & Niko!
      You can get it in the modules directory!
      Please refer to the readme on github for instructions.
       
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
      Updating from prior versions:
       
      Updating from Croppable Image 3 with versions prior to 1.1.7, please do this as a one time step:
      In the PW Admin, go to side -> modules -> new, use "install via ClassName" and use CroppableImage3 for the Module Class Name. This will update your existing CroppableImage3 module sub directory, even if it is called a new install. After that, the module will be recogniced by the PW updater module, what makes it a lot easier on further updates.
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
      For updating from the legacy Thumbnail / CropImage to CroppableImage3 read on here.
       
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
    • By MoritzLost
      UPDATE: I have published a stable version of this module!
      Discussion thread:
      Github: https://github.com/MoritzLost/TextformatterPageTitleLinks
      ---
      Hello there,
      I'm working on a tiny textformatter module that searches the text for titles of other pages on your site and creates hyperlinks to them. I'm not sure if something like this exists already, but I haven't found anything in the module directory, so I wrote my own solution 🙂
      It's not properly tested yet and is still missing some functionality I would like to implement, so at the moment it should be considered in BETA. Features include limiting the pages that will get searched by template, and adding a custom CSS class to the generated hyperlinks. As I'm writing this I noticed that it will probably include unpublished and hidden pages at the moment, so yeah ... it's still in development alright 😅
      You can download the module from Github:
      https://github.com/MoritzLost/TextformatterPageTitleLinks
      There's some more information in the readme as well.
      Anyway, let me know what you think! I'm happy about any feedback, possible improvements or ideas on how to improve the module. Cheers.
    • By blad
      Hi guys!
      I just uploaded a module to explore files based on elFinder. By default it will show the "Files" folder.
      Screenshots:

      Video:
       
      To do:
       More options To fix:
       The function of rotating or scaling an image fails  Image editors V 1.01 (view issue)
      Fixed the bug working with the Multi-Language support ( translation of folders ). Fixed the name of elfinder.en  Github:
      https://github.com/LuisSantiago/ProcessElFinder/
      I hope you like it.
    • By BitPoet
      I'm really in love with FormBuilder, but the one thing missing to match all my end users' expectations were repeatable field groups. Think repeaters, in ProcessWire terms. Our primary application of PW is our corporate intranet, so "lines" of fields are quite common in the forms I build. We have all kinds of request forms where the information for a varying number of colleagues needs to be entered (from meal order to flight booking request) and where it is simply impractical to send a form for each, and I don't want to clutter my forms with multiple instances of fields that may only get used ten percent of the time.
      That's why I started to build FormBuilderMultiplier (link to GitHub).
      What it does:
      Adds an option to make a regular Fieldgroup repeatable Lets you limit the number of instances of a Fieldgroup on the form Adds an "Add row" button the form that adds another instance of the Fieldgroup's fields Adds a counter suffix at the end of every affected field's label Stores the entered values just like regular fields Makes the entered values available in preview and email notifications Supports most text based fields, textareas and selects (really, I haven't had enough time to test all the available choices yet) What it doesn't do (yet):
      Support saving to ProcessWire pages (i.e. real Repeaters) I haven't tested all the validation stuff, Date/Time inputs etc. yet, but since I'm utterly swamped with other stuff at work, I didn't want to wait until I have it polished. Any feedback is welcome. There might also be some issues with different output frameworks that I haven't encountered yet. The forms I work with mostly use UIKit.
      Status:
      Still alpha, so test well before using it in the field.
      Known issues:
      When rows are added, the form's iframe needs to be resized, which isn't completely clean yet.
      How it works:
      The Fieldgroup settings are added through regular hooks, as is the logic that adds the necessary field copies for processing the form and displaying previews.
      "Multiplied" field instances are suffixed with _NUM, where NUM is an incremental integer starting from 1. So if you have add two fields named "surname" and "givenname" to a fieldgroup and check the "multiply" checkbox, the form will initially have "surname_1" and "givenname_1" field (I'm still considering changing that to make the risk to shoot oneself into the foot by having a regular "surname_1" field somewhere else in the form less likely).
      When a "row" is added, the first row is cloned through JS and the counter in the fields' IDs, names and "for" attributes as well as the counter in the label are incremented before appending the copies to the Fieldset container in the form.
      To keep backend and frontend in sync, a hidden field named [name of the fieldset]__multiplier_rows is added to the form. Both the backend and the frontend script use this to store and retrieve the number of "rows".
      ToDo:
      Naturally, add the option to store the data in real repeaters when saving to pages. Do a lot of testing (and likely fixing). Make a few things (like the "Add row" button label etc.) configurable in field(set) context. Add a smooth API to retrieve the multiplied values as WireArrays. The mandatory moving screenshot: