Jump to content
adrian

Page Protector

Recommended Posts

Hi @adrian, this seems to work now!

But I didn't need the include '_main.php'; -line. When having that, I got the _main.php content rendered twice. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, lpa said:

Hi @adrian, this seems to work now!

But I didn't need the include '_main.php'; -line. When having that, I got the _main.php content rendered twice. 

Great that it's working for you now.

Your _main.php must be included automatically somewhere - probably in config.php. That's why you'd get it twice.

Mine needs to be included manually with the way I have things set up in my sandbox install.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@lpa - I have just committed another update - turns out my initial fix broke the standard form approach. The new version works with both.

Because of the breaking changes, I have committed it to the dev branch (https://github.com/adrianbj/PageProtector/tree/dev) for now. I would really appreciate it if others using this module could please try this new version. The only change you should need to make is if you are using the custom Login Template option - you will need to change $loginForm to $page->loginForm

I'll push this dev version to master once there's been a little time for others to test it.

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, adrian said:

I'll push this dev version to master once there's been a little time for others to test it.

I do not use loginForm so I cannot really test it but after updating I had no issues at all.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone following this thread have any issues with the dev version before I merge to master?

I'll merge later today if I don't hear anything.

Thanks!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, v2 has been merged to master.

Be warned about the breaking changes!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

I have setup a login template but cant seem to stop the head and foot loading, I've disabled auto prepend/append in the template but the they still load any ideas?

Cheers

Jon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Jon on mobile right now, but just wondering if the chosen template file is actually connected to a PW template. It doesn't need to be and maybe that is the issue but I'll have to check when I'm back at my desk in the morning. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Jon - just took a look and can't seem to reproduce.

What version of the module are you running?

Can you please details of the code in the template file, and your auto prepend/append settings please?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@adrian - Iam using version 2.0.1 and PW 3.0.15

the code in the template is just the login form for testing.

echo $page->loginForm;

 My prepend/append setup within the config is

$config->prependTemplateFile = 'head.inc';
$config->appendTemplateFile = 'foot.inc';

I also check the disable prepend/append within the template setup.

Jon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Jon - thanks for the details, but I guess I am not sure what you are expecting to have happen.

If you don't want the head.inc and foot.inc to be loaded, why not just use the standard (no login template) way of adding the login form. That's how it's designed to work. maybe if you could provide a mockup of how you expect it to look I might be able to get a better idea?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have pages like this:

Page1
  - page1.1
  - page1.2

Page1 has been given access to roles: musician, assistant. Page1.2 has been given access to role musician only. 

When logged out, both pages ask to be logged in. When logged in as the user with only assistant role, I still can see the page1.2. I can't figure out why the roles based restrictions don't work at the moment. How should I debug this?

Second question: can I hide the page1.2 from the user with assistant role in my navigation somehow? What should I do in my navigation script to hide the pages that the used doesn't have view access to?

Third question: I need to customize the login-form by including some content from PW, but now when the customized login-form is not a PW form, I can't run any functions from the PW templates. How should I customize the login-form content when I need something more than just the form?

Edited by lpa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@adrian Thanks for your reply, I just wanted to customise the login page a bit to match my site a bit more. I have managed to do this with the standard template now. One thing I cant seem change is the default Login Message Ive set this in the module settings but the changes arent reflected in the frontend?

Cheers

Jon 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Jon said:

One thing I cant seem change is the default Login Message Ive set this in the module settings but the changes arent reflected in the frontend?

I expect you are changing the main default in the module settings. This populates the value on the Settings tab of the page that is being protected, but if a page has already been protected, you will need to change the value for that page. It allows for different messages for different pages. Does that make sense?

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@lpa 

1) I'll look at the hierarchy you described in a minute

2) You can check if a page is protected by checking $page->protected eg:

if(!$page->protected) {
	//show in navigation
}

3) I have just made the message function hookable, so you will be able to put this is your ready.php file:

$this->addHookAfter("PageProtector::getMessage", function($event) {
    $event->return = 'My custom message';
});

I'll commit this once I look at your first issue.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@lpa - I am not seeing the issues you are regarding access to the child. My thought is that you might have checking the "protect children" checkbox for Page 1. If you are separately protecting child pages, I think you don't want that checked. Can you try that and see if it works as expected?

I have committed the change that makes that hook available. Please let me know how you go with that also.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@adrian Thanks for that works prefect :)

1 hour ago, adrian said:

I expect you are changing the main default in the module settings. This populates the value on the Settings tab of the page that is being protected, but if a page has already been protected, you will need to change the value for that page. It allows for different messages for different pages. Does that make sense?

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. No, the protection is not taking in account the role at all. Even if I change just one page without child protection to be protected, I can access that page after login with a user account that does not have the required role!

2. Yes, $page->protected works, but it does not make any difference on who is accessign the page. Should it give different results based on the users roles? I would like to make it to not show the navigation item if the page is protected for that particular user. 

3. What is actually the message the hook returns? I would like something like this:

// Give me a random picture to the login page
$image = getRandomPict($homepage);
$content = "
<div class='row'>
	$page->loginForm
	<div class='large-12 columns'>
	$image
	</div>
</div>
";
$event->return = $content;

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@lpa - just heading to bed here, but 

1) I am not seeing any problems like that here - any chance this site is live and you could give me a login to check things out?

2) I'll need to confirm the role stuff in the morning - you might be onto something though - I might need protected vs prohibited?

3) The part I made hookable is just the message before the username/password fields. I think if you want custom classes around the login form you should just put them in your template file you as want - no need for a hook for that. Does that make sense?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@lpa - for now I am going to attach the new version here. This adds support for the new "prohibited" property so now you can check if a page is protected and then also check if it's prohibited for the current user.

I refactored a few things so don't want to commit the changes just yet.

Can you please test this for your needs. I would also like to help you with Issue 1, but will might need some access to test that. As for Issue 3, did you try my suggestion?

PageProtector.zip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. I'll send you a private message on this. 

2. Thanks, the $page->prohibited works just as I wanted based on  a quick test. 

3. At the moment I have a login.php file that is included on every page in _init.php. That page has my own logic without PageProtector. There, if I need the login form, I can format it just like I want and even use the getRandomPict()-function which is in _func.php. But if I use the PageProtector I use the $page->loginForm, as show above, where I can't use my getRandomPict()-function, because it is not a PW template. I get errors like: "Call to undefined function getRandomPict()". I don't want to add the image to every template.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@adrian has a great support on his modules! All the problems solved with his help a long time ago! Thank you very much! 

And this module is great for cases where the PW template based access rights scheme is not so flexible.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, lpa said:

@adrian has a great support on his modules! All the problems solved with his help a long time ago! Thank you very much! 

And this module is great for cases where the PW template based access rights scheme is not so flexible.

Thanks for your help @lpa in fixing those issues.

FYI for everyone else - all the changes that were included in that zip posted above are now in the master repo on github.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A feature request for the future: allow login only with a password. As a workaround I used a simple str_replace and added hardcoded "value=USERNAME" attribute to the username input, plus a good old display: none to it. This way it doesn't show up but contains the username pre-filled.

The same could be perhaps achieved if there was a per-page setting where we could enter one username. Then the module could add a hidden input with an encrypted username (instead of a text type username input). But maybe you have a better idea.

I needed this because the client needed a password protected page without asking for a username. Fortunately the protection doesn't need to be bulletproof so my workaround is fine for now, but in the future it would be nice having this built-in.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I get an 500 error after the third failed login attempt:

Please wait at least 10 seconds before attempting another login. (in /wire/modules/Session/SessionLoginThrottle/SessionLoginThrottle.module line 97)

SessionLoginThrotte settings are the default ones, 5 sec and 60 sec, no IP throttle. I'll disable the SLT module for now but I'm curious whether this happens for others too. 

Using PW 3.0.100 and PageProtector 2.0.4, but just checked on another site running on 3.0.52 / 0.2.1 and it happens there too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By eelkenet
      Hi! I've created a small Inputfield module called InputfieldFloatRange which allows you to use an HTML5 <input type="range" ../> slider as an InputField. I needed something like this for a project where the client needs to be able to tweak this value more based on 'a feeling' than just entering a boring old number. Maybe more people can use this so I'm hereby releasing it into the wild. 
      EDIT: You can now install it directly from the Modules directory: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/inputfield-float-range/
       
      What is it?
      The missing range slider Inputfield for Processwire. 
      What does it do?
      This module extends InputfieldFloat and allows you to use HTML5 range sliders for number fields in your templates.
      It includes a visible and editable value field, to override/tweak the value if required.  
      Features
      Min/max values Precision (number of decimals) Optional step value (Read more) Optional manual override of the selected value (will still adhere to the rules above) Configurable rounding of manually entered values (floor, round, ceil, disable) Usage
      Clone / zip repo Install FieldtypeFloatRange, this automatically installs the Inputfield Create new field of type `Float (range)` or convert an existing `Float`, `Integer` or `Text` field. To render the field's value simply echo `$page->field` Demo
      A field with Min=0, Max=1, Step=0.2, Precision=2

      Field with settings Min=0, Max=200, Step=0.25, Precision=2

       
      Todo
      Make the display-field's size configurable (will use the Input Size field setting)  Hopefully become redundant  
      Changelog
      004 (current version)
      - Make rounding of manually entered values configurable (floor, round, ceil or disable)
      - Fix small JS bug when the value-display field was not displayed
      - Update README
      003
      - Code cleanup, add some ModuleInfo data & LICENSE
      - Submit to PW Modules directory (http://modules.processwire.com/modules/inputfield-float-range/)
      002
      - Fix issue where setting the step value to an empty value created problem with validation
      - Make the display-field optional
      001
      - Initial release
       
      Thanks!
       
       
    • By Gadgetto
      Status update links (inside this thread) for SnipWire development will be always posted here:
      2019-10-18
      2019-08-08
      2019-06-15
      2019-06-02
      2019-05-25
      If you are interested, you can test the current state of development:
      https://github.com/gadgetto/SnipWire
      Please note that the software is not yet intended for use in a production system (alpha version).
      If you like, you can also submit feature requests and suggestions for improvement. I also accept pull requests.
      ---- INITIAL POST FROM 2019-05-25 ----
      I wanted to let you know that I am currently working on a new ProcessWire module that fully integrates the Snipcart Shopping Cart System into ProcessWire. (this is a customer project, so I had to postpone the development of my other module GroupMailer).
      The new module SnipWire offers full integration of the Snipcart Shopping Cart System into ProcessWire.
      Here are some highlights:
      simple setup with (optional) pre-installed templates, product fields, sample products (quasi a complete shop system to get started immediately) store dashboard with all data from the snipcart system (no change to the snipcart dashboard itself required) Integrated REST API for controlling and querying snipcart data webhooks to trigger events from Snipcart (new order, new customer, etc.) multi currency support self-defined/configurable tax rates etc. Development is already well advanced and I plan to release the module in the next 2-3 months.
      I'm not sure yet if this will be a "Pro" module or if it will be made available for free.
      I would be grateful for suggestions and hints!
      (please have a look at the screenshots to get an idea what I'm talking about)
       




    • By Robin S
      Another little admin helper module...
      Template Field Widths
      Adds a "Field widths" field to Edit Template that allows you to quickly set the widths of inputfields in the template.

      Why?
      When setting up a new template or trying out different field layouts I find it a bit slow and tedious to have to open each field individually in a modal just to set the width. This module speeds up the process.
      Installation
      Install the Template Field Widths module.
      Config options
      You can set the default presentation of the "Field widths" field to collapsed or open. Field widths entered into the Template Field Widths inputfield are only applied if the Edit Template form is submitted with the Template Field Widths inputfield in an opened state. "Collapsed" is the recommended setting if you think you might also use core inputs for setting field widths in a template context. You can choose Name or Label as the primary identifier shown for the field. The unchosen alternative will become the title attribute shown on hover. You can choose to show the original field width next to the template context field width.  
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/TemplateFieldWidths
      https://modules.processwire.com/modules/template-field-widths/
    • By adrian
      Tracy Debugger for ProcessWire
      The ultimate “swiss army knife” debugging and development tool for the ProcessWire CMF/CMS

       
      Integrates and extends Nette's Tracy debugging tool and adds 35+ custom tools designed for effective ProcessWire debugging and lightning fast development
      The most comprehensive set of instructions and examples is available at: https://adrianbj.github.io/TracyDebugger
      Modules Directory: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/tracy-debugger/
      Github: https://github.com/adrianbj/TracyDebugger
      A big thanks to @tpr for introducing me to Tracy and for the idea for this module and for significant feedback, testing, and feature suggestions.
×
×
  • Create New...