interrobang

ImageFocusArea

39 posts in this topic

New bug?

If the image field is loaded via Ajax then the click of the focus-link will be redirected to the homepage instead of opening the image in modal frame.

For explaination:

I have an image focus area field inside a fieldset. I have decided to show the content of the fieldset only if i click on the fieldset and the content will be shown afterwards via Ajax. In PW you can choose under the fieldset setting tab when to show the content (open, open only if there is content inside,...).

If I choose to show the content via Ajax the image focus area field doesnt allow to set a focus area. After clicking the link I will be always redirected to the homepage.

If I change the fieldset status to something without Ajax (fe always open) the image focus area field work as expected.

Maybe this could be a bug if other users have the same problem.

Best regards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I have not tested this module in any recent version, but I recommend using the dev version in the thumbnails branch, some minor issues might be fixed there: https://github.com/phlppschrr/ImageFocusArea/tree/thumbnails

I have not looked into these new ajax features. Does anybody know of any thread here how to support ajax editing and loading for your own fields?

Please continue to report any issues and improvement ideas here (or even better at github). 

PS: Sorry, for being a bad module maintainer. I still have some plans with this module, but not enough time - too much customer work and a newborn baby at home.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

and a newborn baby at home.

Congrats! (and take all the time you can get for beeing with the baby) :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again.

In case anyone is wondering... this module doesn't currently work with the new image field upgrade in 3.0.17  :-(

As Ryan points out here https://processwire.com/blog/posts/major-images-field-upgrade

Note that other modules that extend the old images field (like those that provide additional crop functions) may not work with the new one. If that turns out to be the case, we'll likely move the old images field to a 3rd party module so that it can continue to be used for these cases.

Many thanks

Nik

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

i had the problem today as Nik, when i tried to upgrade an old 2.6 installation to PW3.

Would be really great if this module could be upgraded to work with the new Imagefield.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Interrobang - hope you are well

Have you had any thoughts on how this module might become usable in PW 3.x?

I'm trying to work out a way forward for sites reliant on this module, and it would be useful to know if there is any prospect of future development, so I can make an informed decision.

Kind regards

Nik

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nik,

thanks, I am well :) Honestly I have not used my module myself for a long time, and I still have not looked into what has to be done to migrate this module to PW3 and its new image field. I plan to release a new version eventually, but can't say how long it will take. But seeing somebody still uses it at least motivates me to test it myself in PW3.

Sorry, that I cant give you a more satisfying answer. I will post back here after testing.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Interrobang.  Your module was mentioned in the thread for Horsts Croppable image module.  Using the focus of an image would be my preferred method for retaining flexibility, but I guess I'm in a minority.

Regards

Nik

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, NikNak said:

Using the focus of an image would be my preferred method for retaining flexibility, but I guess I'm in a minority.

i'm still voting for a solid and core solution of image cropping. using either an exact crop, or predefined ratios, or using a focus area and make it possible to get the right image for the right spot on your template/design and allowing different ratios!

but i guess we 2 are in a minority... ;)

5 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bernhard

I don't think many people could have seen how useful this approach is. 

Fingers crossed for the future.

 

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

+1

Until the change in PW3 image module it was my prefered solution for image cropping. Just let the user define the important part of the image and do the cropping in the templates. 

One solution for this would be the approach Ryan mentioned https://processwire.com/blog/posts/major-images-field-upgrade

Quote

If that turns out to be the case, we'll likely move the old images field to a 3rd party module so that it can continue to be used for these cases.

 

But i think it would be way nicer, if we had the ImageFocusArea function and all the the new features of the new image field.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am really missing this module in version 3, are we any closer to an update?

I am having to make do with Croppable Image 3, but the crop settings require both width and height values, not allowing either to be flexible.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Without this module, I am now struggling to find a way to get an image cropped to a particular ratio, that retains the full resolution of the original image. ie - have a cropped image that is as good as it can be at a particular ratio. From that master, i would then make variants. 

Using CropableImage3 this is not possible - as all defined crops are pixel based rather than ratio based - and not dependent on the original size image. This therefore restricts the flexibility of generating a subsequent scaling of the image from the best master possible.

Horst's suggestion of uploading a large image to start with and cropping it to the right proportion at high res and then scaling, is impractical in day to day situations for my use, as you can't always impose that kind of restriction on your client's images. 

I had hoped that if I turned upscaling off, then perhaps I would be able to set a very large crop setting, and the cropping would just be made as large as possible. 

Anybody managed to find alternatives to the conundrum this has left, if you want to retain maximum flexibility in the automated scalings of your images. ?

Cheers

Nik

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By alexcapes
      Hi,
      I have an issue when using the SmartyPants Typographer text formatter.
      If the text has an HTML tag (such as italics) straight after the quotation mark, it reverses it. 
      So for example:

      This only seems to occur when an HTML tag is placed at the beginning. 
      Does anyone know how this could be corrected? 
    • By benbyf
      Done quite a bit of Googling and haven't quite worked out how one would create a field of type repeater and add fields to it via the API in a module. Anyone have any links or examples?
    • By benbyf
      HELLO!
      I've been working on a user messaging module which I am nearly ready to release as version 1.
      Currently I have the below functionality and I'm looking for feedback to what other things may be useful for people looking to add user to user messaging on their sites.
      compose message to one or more users known to PW js to enable tag based UI display of user names input on compose message form display all message threads with reply forms reply to message thread displaying each user name by each message in the thread display "unread" when a thread has new content that hasnt been seen by current user delete or unpublish message thread (configurable) display total message thread count display total unread threads (threads that have new replies that the current user has not seen) delete all message threads and associated data (not meant for the users to have access to) road map
      send email to user on new message to a thread they are included in
    • By louisstephens
      So I was working on a module and trying to include a library (so I could use it across the site) using $modules->get('myModule'); . However, When I go to include the library folder (modeled after the LibFlourish module created some time ago). I keep getting: 
      site/modules/MyModule/libraryName/ProcessWire\filetoinclude.php This comes with an error notifying that "failed to open stream: No such file or directory in ...".. Is ProcessWire supposed to be in the include url, or is there a way around this? Sorry, I am quite new to working with my own modules.
       
      I just noticed the sub forum regarding Development, if someone could move this to the correct area I would appreciate it.
    • By louisstephens
      I wasn't quite sure where to post this, as this is a question regarding the module (sorry if it is in the wrong place). I was wondering if anyone has used the Email to Page module and figured out a way to "move" incoming css to another field, or how to render the css so the message just renders utilizing the css. 
      Right now all of the message contents get dropped into a textarea field and display in a template as a jumbled mess. Perhaps I am missing a formatting option in the text area field to render the css and html.