Jump to content
Pete

Module: XML Sitemap

Recommended Posts

I'm on the verge of converting your code back to a template, this is getting silly...

Just want to clarify that the problem is not with Pete's module. There was an obscure problem with the modules installer in the core which has been fixed. I'm not certain this is the problem in your case as you are still getting a different behavior than us, but I suggest grabbing the latest copy of ProcessWire before trying anything else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just want to clarify that the problem is not with Pete's module.

My apologies for implying any such thing, just getting frustrated. When I saw this module it looked like a great timesaver, and that hasn't worked out.

I'm uploading a fresh copy of PW now, we'll see how it goes.

EDIT: Still no go!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you confirm that you still get this same error message and that your ProcessWire reports it's version number as 2.2?

Exception: Unable to create path: /MarkupSitemapXML/ (in /home/theseeke/public_html/wire/core/CacheFile.php line 62) This error message was shown because you are logged in as a Superuser. Error has been logged.

thanks,

Ryan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just downloaded a fresh/blank copy of PW 2.2 and installed this module just to make sure it didn't have anything to do with the dev site I had tested on before. But it's working as expected, creating the dir in the right place, etc. So there must be something else that I'm missing. The behavior you are describing definitely indicates a core bug. I can't think of any other possibility. I'm going to do more testing here and hope to find and push a solution shortly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm pleased to say that this issue is resolved, and when it came right down to it, Problem Existed Between Keyboard and Chair.

Stupid me forgot to read the instructions, and installed the module to /wire/modules instead of /site/modules.

Now that it's in the right place it's working fine, cheers!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for reporting back, glad that it's working. I was stuck trying to determine how it was doing that, so it's a relief to hear it's resolved. This has still been valuable though as we did solve a bug as a result (top of this page).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

I've been using this module on a couple of sites in place of the template I previously used and it certainly is a boon in keeping my template folder a lot tidier — great work!

I changed line 53 to check for access when iterating the children so that user-restricted pages do not show up in the sitemap. I think this is a saner default but could be a settting too.

foreach($page->children("check_access=1") as $child) $entry .= $this->sitemapListPage($child);

Thanks,

Stephen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Stephen: check_access=1 is default, so you don't have to include that. If you don't want to check access, then you need to use check_access=0.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very true. I obviously visited the sitemap straight after installing, while still logged in as admin. My mistake!

Thanks, apeisa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to share a few things I've added for a magazine site I'm building:

First of all, I think "priority" and "changefreq" are fairly important if you're going to have a sitemap at all. This post has some info on Google's guidelines: http://www.eduki.com...-are-important/

What I decided to do was quickly add two global fields to PW so I can set these values manually in each page:

-sitemap_priority

-changefreq

And in the code:

public function sitemapListPage($page) {
$entry = "";
$default_priority = "0.5";
$default_changefreq = "monthly";

include $this->fuel('config')->paths->templates . "sitemap_module_defaults.inc";

if ($page->sitemap_ignore == 0 || $page->path == '/') { // $page->path part added so that it ignores hiding the homepage, else you wouldn't have ANY pages returned
$modified = date ('Y-m-d', $page->modified);
$entry = "\n <url>\n";
$entry .= " <loc>{$page->httpUrl}</loc>\n";
$entry .= " <lastmod>{$modified}</lastmod>\n";

if(!empty($page->sitemap_priority)) {
$entry .= " <priority>{$page->sitemap_priority}</priority>\n";
} else {
$entry .= " <priority>{$default_priority}</priority>\n";
}

if(!empty($page->changefreq)) {
$entry .= " <changefreq>{$page->changefreq}</changefreq>\n";
} else {
$entry .= " <changefreq>{$default_changefreq}</changefreq>\n";
}

 $entry .= " </url>";
if($page->numChildren) {
foreach($page->children as $child) $entry .= $this->sitemapListPage($child);
}
}
return $entry;
}

The sitemap_module_defaults.inc file in the templates dir is so I can set some values on the fly without doing it manually:

<?php
switch($page->template->name) {
case "blog_post":
case "blog_topic":
case "blog_topic_type":
$default_priority = "0.7";
$default_changefreq = "daily";
break;
}
?>

That's done and works fine for me.

Something I found frustrating with the sitemap module was that I couldn't add virtual pages I made. For example, if there's a page with urlSegments with some kind of page manipulation they won't show up on the sitemap, for obvious reasons. So what I did was add this method to the module:

public function sitemapListVirtualPage($httpUrl, $modified = NULL, $sitemap_priority = "0.5", $changefreq = "monthly") {
$entry = "";
$modified = date ('Y-m-d', $modified);
$entry = "\n <url>\n";
$entry .= " <loc>{$httpUrl}</loc>\n";

if($modified) {
$entry .= " <lastmod>{$modified}</lastmod>\n";
}

if($sitemap_priority) {
$entry .= " <priority>" . (float)$sitemap_priority . "</priority>\n";
}

if($changefreq) {
$entry .= " <changefreq>{$changefreq}</changefreq>\n";
}

 $entry .= " </url>";
return $entry;
}

And added this include to the init method before the output is saved to cache:


public function init() {
// Intercept a request for a root URL ending in sitemap.xml and output
if (strpos($_SERVER['REQUEST_URI'], wire('config')->urls->root . 'sitemap.xml') !== FALSE) {
// Check for the cached sitemap, else generate and cache a fresh sitemap
$cache = wire('modules')->get("MarkupCache");
if(!$output = $cache->get("MarkupSitemapXML", 3600)) {
$output = "<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"utf-8\"?>\n";
$output .= '<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9">';
$output .= $this->sitemapListPage(wire('pages')->get("/"));

include $this->fuel('config')->paths->templates . "sitemap_module_virtual.inc";

$output .= "\n</urlset>";
$cache->save($output);
}

header("Content-Type: text/xml");
echo $output;
exit;
}
}

And in my sitemap_module_virtual.inc file I did this:

<?php
foreach(wire('pages')->find("template=blog_topic|blog_topic_type") as $real_page) {
$output .= $this->sitemapListVirtualPage("http://" . $this->fuel('config')->httpHost . $real_page->url . "archives/", wire('pages')->get("template=blog_post,sort=-created")->modified, "0.4", "daily");
}
foreach(wire('pages')->find("template=blog_topic|blog_topic_type") as $real_page) {
$output .= $this->sitemapListVirtualPage("http://" . $this->fuel('config')->httpHost . $real_page->url . "rss/", wire('pages')->get("template=blog_post,sort=-created")->modified, "0.4", "daily");
}
?>

In this part, I have manipulated /archive/ and /rss/ sub-pages for each blog_topic and sub-topic(or blog_topic_type) using urlSegments. I wanted these to show up on the sitemap, even though they're probably not super important.

Usually I wouldn't bother doing this if it was just these kinds of pages. But what if you have countless articles with manipulated urls that don't show in the sitemap? This is perfect example of why I did this for the future as well.

I've been trying to understand how to do these things for a while, so I hope it helps someone out.

EDIT: I have a download with all of my changes if anyone's interested in taking a look: http://clintonskakun.com/processwire-docs/posts/the-xml-sitemap-module-with-priority-and-changefreq-and-more/

Edited by ClintonSkakun
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for posting this, these seem like some useful additions and some good insights on sitemap.xml too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

jukooz asked me a while back how to stick the sitemaps into a template as he's using the multisite module and currently I guess that this module will pull the sitemap for EVERY site on an install...?

This should work on a per-site basis having it in a separate template file per site as a workaround for now, but pay attention to the comments please as there are things to change per-site - please also note that this is un-tested and largely just pulled from the module and tweaked for pasting into a template for use instead of the module:

EDIT: See attachment as the forum software tries to parse a URL in the code : sitemap.txt

I've also updated the module (see first post) to v1.0.3 to check if the page is viewable before including it in the sitemap - I noticed that it was incorrectly listing pages that had no template file... oops!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey,

is it possible to use this module with the LanguageLocalizedURL ?

I wanne make the site multilanguage like this:

www.url.de/de/testindeutsch/

www.url.de/en/testinenglish/

Would like to hear from you... Greets Jens alias DV-JF

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I've not tried it, I would guess that this module does not collaborate with or accommodate the LanguageLocalizedURL module in any special way. Though Pete could say for sure. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey Ryan,

thx for answering...

Though Pete could say for sure. 

Hope so :)

Greets

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It doesn't accommodate it at the moment, no, but I may need this myself soon so if you can wait a week or two I may have an update (it's not at the top of my list at the moment but I might surprise myself and do it sooner ;)).

Thinking out loud, it needs:

  • Check if LanguageLocalizedURL is installed
  • Find the root page for each language
  • Generate a sitemap.xml page under each root page (it doesn't really generate a page in the database, it just outputs the sitemap if you request that URL)

I think that's it, but I need to get to grips with the LanguageLocalizedURL first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pete the LLU module doesn't have separate trees, it uses a gateways page for each language in the root like "/de/" "/en/" with url segments to then get the page and switch user language.  The site structure is still all the same as without, you just use text language fields.

The parsing of the url happend automaticly through these gateway pages and it hooks into Page::path to change the url of the pages system wide. So if you do a echo $page->url you'll get the language url in the language you're currently in. Like /en/about-us/, /de/ueber-uns/. 

Have anyone tried yet if it doesn't already work?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Soma just submitted a pull request and I merged it.

The 1.0.4 version should allow you to use this with the LanguageLocalizedURL module - let us know how you get on and thanks to Soma ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pete, thanks, but I already pulled another request, forgot to up the cache time.

Also to fully work it would also have to add the "language_published" check to see if language version of the page is really published. Will try to add that later.

Also wanted to add that I never use sitemaps for google and never will again (used to try long time ago, but it doesn't really help at all if you build the site carefully. It just eating time doing it and making sure everthing works still). It's not as easy as it first seems and can even be contra productive if not done carefully. Problem with this module as it is now, it will not find and list pages that may are added through urlSegments and I don't see a way to do it easy. Also it doesn't have weighting etc.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks - merged it :)

The main reason I created it was because it gets a new site listed faster - plain and simple. That was my experience from sitemaps a few years ago at least so I hope it still happens, but it does seem to work from my experience.

I've never bothered with weighting or anything like that. Not bothered about URL segments either as for a start the crawler will find a link to that from a normal page on the site presumably, but my main goal was to get Google to crawl the page sooner than it normally would - and I think it will do this every time it looks at the sitemap and sees a new page (assuming it doesn't find it in the crawl already on its own by following links in the content).

Think of it this way - if you release a brand new site without telling Google, it will take until someone links to your site before Google is aware of its existence. On a small, personal site with no blog or comments that could be a loooong time, but the first thing I usually do is launch a site and submit it so I know it's done.

The argument against this is there are other ways of doing that as search engine companies often have pages where you can just type your domain in and they will search it sometime later, but I like to keep Google informed when I add new pages etc just in case it has a lapse in concentration and misses something :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

just uped another pull request... :)

I think google doesn't parse the website if it has a sitemap.xml. Or has this changed? I found myself fixing others website by actually removing the sitemap form google.

Google is so fast nowadays it doesn't matter that much, as it won't be in index before index update. I could be wrong as things change all the time, but thats my personal experience and from readup. Also if you add a sitemap page to your site will help if you really worry about it. As with most seo things you have to take everything with a grain of salt at the end.

It's maybe ok if google doesn't come to your new site if it's new, but tests have shown even only 1 link to your site and google will parse it in 1 day if you have a nice structure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I used to post a link on my website to give my new client sites a poke. Work well. Or even in this forum.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to mention, I've pulled in the last of Soma's pull requests so this is now v1.0.5 to implement the added functionality he wrote as well as the fixes for the bugs he created :P;)

My fault for not testing :D

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By MoritzLost
      This is a new module that provides a simple solution to clearing all your cache layers at once, and an extensible interface to perform various cache-related actions.
      The simple motivation behind this module was that I was tired of manually clearing caches in several places after deploying a change on a live site. The basic purpose of this module is a simple Clear all caches link in the Setup menu which clears out all caches, no matter where they hide. You can customize what exactly the module does through it's configuration menu:
      Expire or delete all cache entries in the database, or selectively clear caches by namespace ($cache API) Clear the the template render cache. Clear out specific folders inside your site's cache directory (/site/assets/cache) Refresh version strings for static assets to bust client-side browser caches (this requires some setup, see the full documentation for details). This is the basic function of the module. However, you can also add different cache management action through the API and execute them through the module's interface. For this advanced usage, the module provides:
      An interface to see all available cache actions and execute them. A system log and logging output on the module page to see verify what the module is doing. A CacheControlTools class with utility functions to clear out different caches. An API to add cache actions, execute them programmatically and even modify the default action. Permission management, allowing you granular control over which user roles can execute which actions. The complete documentation can be found in the module's README.
      Beta release
      Note that I consider this a Beta release. Since the module is relatively aggressive in deleting some caches, I would advise you to install in on a test environment before using it on a live site.
      Let me know if you're getting any errors, have trouble using the module or if you have suggestions for improvement!
      In particular, can someone let me know if this module causes any problems with the ProCache module? I don't own or use it, so I can't check. As far as I can tell, ProCache uses a folder inside the cache directory to cache static pages, so my module should be able to clear the ProCache site cache as well, I'd appreciate it if someone can test that for me.
      Future plans
      If there is some interest in this, I plan to expand this to a more general cache management solution. I particular, I would like to add additional cache actions. Some ideas that came to mind:
      Warming up the template render cache for publicly accessible pages. Removing all active user sessions. Let me know if you have more suggestions!
      Links
      https://github.com/MoritzLost/ProcessCacheControl ProcessCacheControl in the Module directory

    • By joshua
      This module is (yet another) way for implementing a cookie management solution.
      Of course there are several other possibilities:
      - https://processwire.com/talk/topic/22920-klaro-cookie-consent-manager/
      - https://github.com/webmanufaktur/CookieManagementBanner
      - https://github.com/johannesdachsel/cookiemonster
      - https://www.oiljs.org/
      - ... and so on ...
      In this module you can configure which kind of cookie categories you want to manage:

      You can also enable the support for respecting the Do-Not-Track (DNT) header to don't annoy users, who already decided for all their browsing experience.
      Currently there are four possible cookie groups:
      - Necessary (always enabled)
      - Statistics
      - Marketing
      - External Media
      All groups can be renamed, so feel free to use other cookie group names. I just haven't found a way to implement a "repeater like" field as configurable module field ...
      When you want to load specific scripts ( like Google Analytics, Google Maps, ...) only after the user's content to this specific category of cookies, just use the following script syntax:
      <script type="optin" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="statistics" data-src="/path/to/your/statistic/script.js"></script> <script type="optin" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="marketing" data-src="/path/to/your/mareketing/script.js"></script> <script type="optin" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="external_media" data-src="/path/to/your/external-media/script.js"></script> <script type="optin" data-type="text/javascript" data-category="marketing">console.log("Inline scripts are also working!");</script> The type has to be "optin" to get recognized by PrivacyWire, the data-attributes are giving hints, how the script shall be loaded, if the data-category is within the cookie consents of the user. These scripts are loaded asynchronously after the user made the decision.
      If you want to give the users the possibility to change their consent, you can use the following Textformatter:
      [[privacywire-choose-cookies]] It's planned to add also other Textformatters to opt-out of specific cookie groups or delete the whole consent cookie.
      You can also add a custom link to output the banner again with a link / button with following class:
      <a href="#" class="privacywire-show-options">Show Cookie Options</a> <button class="privacywire-show-options">Show Cookie Options</button> This module is still in development, but we already use it on several production websites.
      You find it here: https://github.com/blaueQuelle/privacywire/tree/master
      Download: https://github.com/blaueQuelle/privacywire/archive/master.zip
      I would love to hear your feedback 🙂
      Edit: Updated URLs to master tree of git repo
       
    • By David Karich
      Admin Page Tree Multiple Sorting
      ClassName: ProcessPageListMultipleSorting
      Extend the ordinary sort of children of a template in the admin page tree with multiple properties. For each template, you can define your own rule. Write each template (template-name) in a row, followed by a colon and then the additional field names for sorting.
      Example: All children of the template "blog" to be sorted in descending order according to the date of creation, then descending by modification date, and then by title. Type:
      blog: -created, -modified, title  Installation
      Copy the files for this module to /site/modules/ProcessPageListMultipleSorting/ In admin: Modules > Check for new modules. Install Module "Admin Page Tree Multible Sorting". Alternative in ProcessWire 2.4+
      Login to ProcessWire backend and go to Modules Click tab "New" and enter Module Class Name: "ProcessPageListMultipleSorting" Click "Download and Install"   Compatibility   I have currently tested the module only under PW 2.6+, but think that it works on older versions too. Maybe someone can give a feedback.     Download   PW-Repo: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/process-page-list-multiple-sorting/ GitHub: https://github.com/FlipZoomMedia/Processwire-ProcessPageListMultipleSorting     I hope someone can use the module. Have fun and best regards, David
    • By dimitrios
      Hello,
      this module can publish content of a Processwire page on a Facebook page, triggered by saving the Processwire page.
      To set it up, configure the module with a Facebook app ID, secret and a Page ID. Following is additional configuration on Facebook for developers:
      Minimum Required Facebook App configuration:
      on Settings -> Basics, provide the App Domains, provide the Site URL, on Settings -> Advanced, set the API version (has been tested up to v3.3), add Product: Facebook Login, on Facebook Login -> Settings, set Client OAuth Login: Yes, set Web OAuth Login: Yes, set Enforce HTTPS: Yes, add "https://www.example.com/processwire/page/" to field Valid OAuth Redirect URIs. This module is configurable as follows:
      Templates: posts can take place only for pages with the defined templates. On/Off switch: specify a checkbox field that will not allow the post if checked. Specify a message and/or an image for the post.
      Usage
      edit the desired PW page and save; it will post right after the initial Facebook log in and permission granting. After that, an access token is kept.
       
      Download
      PW module directory: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/auto-fb-post/ Github: https://github.com/kastrind/AutoFbPost   Note: Facebook SDK for PHP is utilized.


×
×
  • Create New...