Wanze

Module: TemplateEngineFactory

Recommended Posts

Nevermind.  Rookie mistake.  I just needed to check if the post.template == "calendar-posting" before trying to access post.event_description.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Exception: An exception has been thrown during the rendering of a template ("Method Page::event_description does not exist or is not callable in this context") in "search.twig" at line 50. (in /Users/glenn/websites/mysite/wwwroot/site/assets/cache/FileCompiler/site/modules/TemplateEngineTwig/TemplateEngineTwig.module line 110)

@gmclelland

Twig sometimes has problems when you try to access a property via magic getter. I consistently use $page->get('my_field') to avoid this issue. So in your example, you could use {{ post.get('event_description') }}.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @Wanze, I haven't ran into any issues so far, but that's good to know.  The only thing I'm currently stuck on right now is trying to figure out how to get the TwigExtensions module to work with the latest versions of TemplateEngineTwig.  It was working previously before TemplateEngineTwig 1.1.0.  Any help testing is appreciated.

Are you using TwigExtensions library at all in your projects?  If not, don't you need the date functions and text truncating functions?

After I get my sites upgraded to the latest version of TemplateEngineFactory and TemplateEngineTwig, I can start checking into a possible bug I think I see with the new changes to handle Wire404Exception.

Side note:  I really appreciate the work you've done on this module.  To me it is so much cleaner looking at Twig code than looking at a php mixed with html.   I like that in Processwire, I can simply build up my variables in the template to be sent to the view.  That way my views(Twig files) are very simple and contain simple logic only.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Sipho

Sorry I missed your post. I don't know/use markup regions myself, so it's hard for me to help. Does your code work if you disable the TemplateEngineFactory module? If it works, then somehow markup regions are not respected when your ProcessWire templates are getting rendered by this module. I try to look into this at the end of this week.

Cheers

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Wanze It does work when I disable TemplateEngineFactory (and move my home.php file back into templates/).

I don't really know how ProcessWire renders templates under the hood but it could be that it only renders markup regions of files under templates/.

I would greatly appreciate it if you could take a look at it. You can take a look at this tutorial to get started using markup regions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Wanze

I don't know if it's possible in the current state of the module to disable "Global File Template" for a given template file.

I needed this feature in order to work with a REST API endpoint. The problem is when I try to get JSON data from http://my.sites.sek/api, the markup of the global template file is sent.

 

I forked your module and added an option to ignore the global template file on given template. If it make sense, I can send a pull request.

 

gft.png.0cee3346e719a4379fd2ff9d5db5f4e6.png

 

 

tef.thumb.gif.c676ea77fbb91688138eae7a995315af.gif

 

 

Edited by flydev
screencast

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Sipho

MarkupRegions is currently only processed during Page::render(). TemplateEngineProcessWire uses TemplateFile::render() to return the markup, where MarkupRegions are not recognized/populated.

Here are the relevant lines: https://github.com/processwire/processwire/blob/master/wire/modules/PageRender.module#L521-L526

It should be possible to integrate this logic into TemplateFile::render via hooks. Unfortunately I do not have much time for ProcessWire these days 😕
I'm happy to accept a pull request though :)

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello @Wanse and all of you,

This plugin is a must, thank you Wanse.

For 2 days I have been searching, I guess I have a pattern problem with my twig templates.

  1. My global template is base.twig
  2. Inside I have {% block home %}{% endblock %} and several includes parts.
  3. Nothing from this block is displayed. It works only if I keep my global template file field empty.
  4. In my home.twig I have
{% extends 'base.twig' %}
{% block home %}
<div id="corps"> <div id="titres">
<div id="titre">{{ page.title }}</div>
</div>
 <div class="hr"></div>
<br>
{% block engagement %}{% endblock %}
{% endblock %}

What do you think ?

In my base.twix I have all my html code...

Thank you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello @Sten So what exactly is the problem? Don't you get any output? What happens? What is you path to templates in the config of the module? I have /templates/views and with my twig files in this directory everything works fine. Did you choose twig as the template files suffix?
Your code and extend seem to be correct.
The global template file field has to be empty so you can work with extends like you do

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Sten

Your twig templates look fine, the problem is the global template file setting. Just leave that config empty. This is a "global setting" of the TemplateEngineFactory which is supported by all engines, but actually makes no sense in Twig and generally in engines supporting template inheritance. It was introduced by a feature request, but now I think it's more confusing than useful.

Cheers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Jmartsch and Wanze,

It is great to be assisted, thank you 😊. I changed my config to have the global file field empty. So I put all my *.twig files in the views directory. I created partials directory for parts included in base.twig.
So I keep home.twig and engagement.twig in views.

in home.twig I have
 

{% block home %}
<div id="corps"> <div id="titres">
<div id="titre">{{ page.title }}</div>
</div>
 <div class="hr"></div>
<br>
{% block engagement %}{% endblock %}
{% endblock %}

In engagement.twig, I have
 

{% extends 'home.twig' %}
{% block engagement %}
<p>His cognitis Gallus ut serpens adpetitus telo vel saxo iamque spes extremas opperiens et succurrens saluti suae quavis ratione colligi omnes iussit armatos et cum starent attoniti, districta dentium acie stridens adeste inquit viri fortes mihi periclitanti vobiscum.</p>
<p>Mensarum enim voragines et varias voluptatum inlecebras, ne longius progrediar, praetermitto illuc transiturus quod quidam per ampla spatia urbis subversasque silices sine periculi metu properantes equos velut publicos signatis quod dicitur calceis agitant, familiarium agmina tamquam praedatorios globos post terga trahentes ne Sannione quidem, ut ait comicus, domi relicto. quos imitatae matronae complures opertis capitibus et basternis per latera civitatis cuncta discurrunt.</p>
{% endblock %}

But still engagement block is not displayed.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Sten In home.twig, the block engagement block is nested inside the home block. In engagement.twig, this is not the case. Does it work if you either move it out of the home block in your parent template; or recreate the nested block structure in engagement.twig.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

I'm trying out TemplateEnginePug, and I get a blank page. I have a empty home.php and a views/home.pug. This one has a very basic paragraph. Still I get a blank page, without any error. Same with TemplateEngineJade. Can't manage to see a byte on screen no matter what.

Tested other template languages (twig, processwire, latte), and it works fine. Config debug is `true`.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey @Manaus 

I updated the Pug Engine to work with the latest version, it should work now again, please try!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi folks!

I just released a new major (2.x) version of the module. Important things first: This version includes backwards compatibility breaks. At the moment, only Twig and the bundled ProcessWire engine work with the 2.0 version. I will now contact maintainers that implemented other engines (Pug, Jade etc.) and ask them to release a 2.x version as well. The 1.x version of the module is still available on the 1.x branch and continues to exist.

So why a version 2.x? Basically it's the same concept, but done in the right way. 😉

  • The rendering via template engine is now integrated correctly into Page::render(). You can call the render() method on any page, and the module will render it via template engine. In version 1.x, this is only true for the current page.
  • Automatic page rendering is now optional, you can use the module to only integrate a template engine, without hooking into Page::render at all.
  • There are settings to enable/disable the automatic page rendering for templates. Because there might be templates where Page::render should not be replaced.
  • The module provides hooks to customize it for your needs.
  • I wrote a bunch of unit tests and use Travis for CI. Problems like "the 404 page is not displayed if a Wire404Exception is thrown in a controller" are now tested properly.

I am writing a documentation on everything, you can read it here: https://github.com/wanze/TemplateEngineFactory/blob/master/DOCUMENTATION.md

One important part is how to update from 1.x to 2.x. Depending on the feature usage of the module, this might involve some manual update steps, because the public API changed. If you try to update, please let me know about any issues you are encountering, so that we can add them to the documentation. Don't worry, you do not have to update, as the 1.x version continues to exist. For a new project, definitely start with 2.x!

Last but not least, modules providing template engines must be updated too, but this should be quite easy. For Twig, I decided to support installations only via Composer, and I think that this should be the way to go for the other modules. 3rd party dependencies must be manageable in a reliable way, and Composer is the right tool for this job.

Cheers

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, tiefenbacher_bluetomato said:

Nice! will you upgrade TemplateEngineSmarty also soon?

Actually I wanted to ask you if you would like to develop the 2.x version of TemplateEngineSmarty, and if you like, maintain the project? The implementation itself is really easy, you can basically copy + past from Twig and tweak/change things for Smarty. I only use Twig these days, so I might miss some useful/important stuff for Smarty. What do you think? 😄

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, Wanze said:

Actually I wanted to ask you if you would like to develop the 2.x version of TemplateEngineSmarty, and if you like, maintain the project? The implementation itself is really easy, you can basically copy + past from Twig and tweak/change things for Smarty. I only use Twig these days, so I might miss some useful/important stuff for Smarty. What do you think? 😄

Sure we can do that 🙂 Do you want to transfer the repo to our account: https://github.com/blue-tomato ?

You can write me also via email for the details: markus.tiefenbacher {at} blue-tomato.com

Edited by tiefenbacher_bluetomato

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Anssi
      A simple module to enable easy navigation between the public and the admin side of the site. After installation a green bar will appear to the upper side of the screen, containing a few navigation elements and displaying the PW version number.
      Heavily inspired by @apeisa's great AdminBar (Thanks!). I needed a bit simpler tool for my projects and as a result, this was made. Available on GitHub .

    • By Sebi
      I've created a small module which lets you define a timestamp after which a page should be accessible. In addition you can define a timestamp when the release should end and the page should not be accessable any more.
      Github: https://github.com/Sebiworld/PageAccessReleasetime
      Usage
      PageAccessReleasetime can be installed like every other module in ProcessWire. Check the following guide for detailed information: How-To Install or Uninstall Modules
      After that, you will find checkboxes for activating the releasetime-fields at the settings-tab of each page. You don't need to add the fields to your templates manually.
      Check e.g. the checkbox "Activate Releasetime from?" and fill in a date in the future. The page will not be accessable for your users until the given date is reached.
      If you have $config->pagefileSecure = true, the module will protect files of unreleased pages as well.
      How it works
      This module hooks into Page::viewable to prevent users to access unreleased pages:
      public function hookPageViewable($event) { $page = $event->object; $viewable = $event->return; if($viewable){ // If the page would be viewable, additionally check Releasetime and User-Permission $viewable = $this->canUserSee($page); } $event->return = $viewable; } To prevent access to the files of unreleased pages, we hook into Page::isPublic and ProcessPageView::sendFile.
      public function hookPageIsPublic($e) { $page = $e->object; if($e->return && $this->isReleaseTimeSet($page)) { $e->return = false; } } The site/assets/files/ directory of pages, which isPublic() returns false, will get a '-' as prefix. This indicates ProcessWire (with activated $config->pagefileSecure) to check the file's permissions via PHP before delivering it to the client.
      The check wether a not-public file should be accessable happens in ProcessPageView::sendFile. We throw an 404 Exception if the current user must not see the file.
      public function hookProcessPageViewSendFile($e) { $page = $e->arguments[0]; if(!$this->canUserSee($page)) { throw new Wire404Exception('File not found'); } } Additionally we hook into ProcessPageEdit::buildForm to add the PageAccessReleasetime fields to each page and move them to the settings tab.
      Limitations
      In the current version, releasetime-protected pages will appear in wire('pages')->find() queries. If you want to display a list of pages, where pages could be releasetime-protected, you should double-check with $page->viewable() wether the page can be accessed. $page->viewable() returns false, if the page is not released yet.
      If you have an idea how unreleased pages can be filtered out of ProcessWire selector queries, feel free to write an issue, comment or make a pull request!
    • By David Karich
      Thanks to the great Pro module "RepeaterMatrix" I have the possibility to create complex repeater items. With it I have created a quite powerful page builder. Many different content modules, with many more possible design options. The RepeaterMatrix module supports the cloning of items, but only within the same page. Now I often have the case that very design-intensive pages and items are created. If you want to use this module on a different page (e.g. in the same design), you have to rebuild each item manually every time.
      With this proof of concept I have created a module which adds the feature to copy a repeater item to the clipboard so that you can paste this item to another page with the same repeater field. The module has been developed very rudimentarily so far. It is currently not possible to copy nested items. There is also no check of Min/Max. You can also only copy items that have the same field on different pages. And surely you can solve all this more elegantly with AJAX. But personally I lack the deeper understanding of the repeaters. Also missing on the Javascript side are event triggers for the repeaters, which would make it easier. Like e.g. RepeaterItemInitReady or similar.
      it would be great if @ryan would implement this functionality in the core of RepeaterMatrix. I think he has better ways to implement this. Or what do you think, Ryan?
      Everybody is welcome to work on this module and improve it, if it should not be integrated into the matrix core. Therefore I put it for testing and as download on GitHub: https://github.com/FlipZoomMedia/InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDublicate
      You can best see the functionality in the screencast: 
       
    • By anderson
      Hi,
      Please take a look at this:
      https://templatemag.com/demo/Good/
      The upper nav bar, including dropdowns like "pages" and "portfolios", what do you call this whole thing? At first I guess it's called "dropdown nav bar", but seems not.
      AND of course, what's the simplest way/module to achieve this in PW?
      Thanks in advance.
    • By Sebi2020
      Hey, I'm new and I created a simple module for tagging pages because I didn't found a module for it (sadly this is not a core feature). This module is licensed under the GPL3 and cames with absolutly no warranty at all. You should test the module before using it in production environments. Currently it's an alpha release. if you like the module or have ideas for improvements feel free to post a comment. Currently this fieldtype is only compatible with the Inputfield I've created to because I haven't found  an Inputfield yet, that returns arrays from a single html input.
      Greetings Sebi2020
      FieldtypeTags.zip.asc
      InputfieldTagify.zip
      InputfieldTagify.zip.asc
      FieldtypeTags.zip