Jump to content
Jonathan Dart

Module: Spex: An asset and template management module

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

I'd like to share a module the development team at metric marketing and I came up with. I have a lot of experience with the Symfony framework, and when working with PW I came to miss some of the practices I grew accustomed to when working with PW. This module is aimed at bridging my previous experience with doing things to PW way.

I have a big readme on the github project so be sure to check that out to get all the details: https://github.com/jdart/Spex

From the readme "The project makes use of lessphp, less.js, jQuery, modernizr, Minify and the ProcessWire Minify Module."

There's an example site in the github repo that illustrates how Spex works:

https://github.com/jdart/Spex/tree/master/example-site

In short your template file isn't responsible for including the head and foot etc... and instead is injected into a layout. In addition to this is adds some conventions for adding css/less/js to the page so that it can be combined and minified.

Have a look through it and let me know if you have any feedback.

  • Like 8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks cool Jonathan! I look forward to taking a closer look soon. In reading the notes, I noticed what you said of head.inc/foot.inc and just wanted to mention that most of us don't actually use that method. It's just what it is in the default profile purely because it's the simplest for newbies to understand (and most similar to the WordPress approach). So the use of head.inc/foot.inc is really more about making things easy to understand and a gentle introduction, but it's probably not the way to go as your needs grow. 

I also noticed that you use _init.php – is this related to ProcessWire's _init.php using the $config->prependTemplateFile and $config->appendTemplateFile options, or is this something different? I also see in your API methods addStyles/addScripts -- do these use the $config->styles and $config->scripts or is this something different? Maybe I will find my answers when I get more time to explore the module. Thanks for your work and sharing this with us. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fair enough regarding the head.inc etc...

I used the convention of a file named _init.php based on the way you use prependTemplateFile in your example site profiles, but spex just automatically calls is before the page render event.

addStyles/etc... are in fact using $config->styles internally. They're just there as a bit of syntactical sugar and to handle the compiling of .less files.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've updated Spex to include support for "slots" and image preloading.

Check out the details below: 

https://github.com/jdart/Spex#slot--hasslot

https://github.com/jdart/Spex#addimage

I'd also like to add that there are equivalent procedural helpers available that don't require the $spex variable:

https://github.com/jdart/Spex#procedural-helpers

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jonathan, when ready, would you mind adding this to the modules directory? Not everyone sees the modules here in the forums and we want to make sure those interested are able to find it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jonathan, it's really nice & fun to use Spex!
 
Now as I have played around with it when switching debug mode to false I run into an issue that breaks the minify process and end up with a page without styles.
 
In the modules method compileStyle a link to a stylesheet appended by a ?v=100 isn't recognized correctly. A vardump of the pathinfo outputs something like:

array(4) { 
    ["dirname"]   => string(34) "/site/modules/AdminTemplateColumns" 
    ["basename"]  => string(30) "AdminTemplateColumns.css?v=100" 
    ["extension"] => string(9) "css?v=100" 
    ["filename"]  => string(20) "AdminTemplateColumns" 
} 

The extension isn't recognized. As the $stylesheet is a URL at first and not a filesystem link I come up to pass it through parse_url() first and use that path. Also needed is to keep the extracted path and return it back if it isn't a less-file:

	$sheetInfo1 = parse_url($stylesheet);
	$sheetInfo2 = pathinfo($sheetInfo1['path']);

	if ($sheetInfo2['extension'] != 'less')
		return $sheetInfo1['path'];

This solved the issue with breaking the Minify.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Guys,

Based on some feedback I decided to favour the AIOM+ module over the Minify module, which means I no longer need the less compiler in Spex, I also removed all other 3rd party libraries to make it less opinionated. Starting with v0.8.0 the Spex module no longer bundles less.js, less.php, modernizr and jquery. Spex is actually a lot less code now which is fine by me.

Check out the base template now: https://github.com/jdart/Spex/blob/master/example-site/layouts/_base.php

vs before:

https://github.com/jdart/Spex/blob/0dd56629232d68be4f6248555caf47f6972dad87/example-site/layouts/_base.php

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have one question that becomes a problem for me. I have pages with children as something like content blocks. One should render a image, another a text and so on. When i loop through the children and render it, then i became the whole page... Maybe i overlooked something but is there a way to render only the template file without the _base.php markup?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How do you do the loop? Some code would be useful, also which template (file/s?) do they use and which one(s) uses the parent (where the loop happens)?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have set up the _base.php file with the markup for header and footer. Then i have a default layout file with only one line:

echo $spex->slot('content')

Now i have a page, lets say a feature page of an application. As childrens of these page i have pages with feature 1, feature 2 and so on. Feature 1 should render a headline, feature 2 an image and maybe feature 3 a table.

In the parent page i loop over the childrens:

foreach ($page->children() as $c) {
  echo $c->render();
}

The result is, that i became the whole page markup with header and footer with each call of the render method. This is probably the expected result. But maybe there a way to render only the content of the template file without the html from the _base.php file.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EDIT:

now I'm on desktop.

You can simply set a temporary $config var to force the output of the $layout_body without the content of the _base.php.

Simply define $config->onlybodycontent = true before starting the loop and in top of your _base.php check for it:

<?php
if($config->onlybodycontent) {
	echo $layout_body;
	return;
}
?>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<head>
   ...

This is same like you can use it with content loading via ajax into a page:

if($config->ajax || $config->onlybodycontent) {
Edited by horst

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the below, you can also $spex->setLayout(false) to disable the layout.

EDIT:

now I'm on desktop.

You can simply set a temporary $config var to force the output of the $layout_body without the content of the _base.php.

Simply define $config->onlybodycontent = true before starting the loop and in top of your _base.php check for it:

<?php
if($config->onlybodycontent) {
	echo $layout_body;
	return;
}
?>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<head>
   ...

This is same like you can use it with content loading via ajax into a page:

if($config->ajax || $config->onlybodycontent) {
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is tricky, maybe I should only enable the layout stuff if the page being rendered is the current $page and bail otherwise... I'll try some stuff out.

I have set up the _base.php file with the markup for header and footer. Then i have a default layout file with only one line:

echo $spex->slot('content')

Now i have a page, lets say a feature page of an application. As childrens of these page i have pages with feature 1, feature 2 and so on. Feature 1 should render a headline, feature 2 an image and maybe feature 3 a table.

In the parent page i loop over the childrens:

foreach ($page->children() as $c) {
  echo $c->render();
}

The result is, that i became the whole page markup with header and footer with each call of the render method. This is probably the expected result. But maybe there a way to render only the content of the template file without the html from the _base.php file.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@geniestreiche 

I've updated the master branch of the github repo with a change that might solve the problem for you, let me know what you find.

This is tricky, maybe I should only enable the layout stuff if the page being rendered is the current $page and bail otherwise... I'll try some stuff out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is tricky, maybe I should only enable the layout stuff if the page being rendered is the current $page and bail otherwise... I'll try some stuff out.

But then, is it possible to force rendering _with_ layout from a (let's say kind of) controller page?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But then, is it possible to force rendering _with_ layout from a (let's say kind of) controller page?

Can you give me a bit more detail of an example when you'd want that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.

With Horsts suggestion and with $spex->setLayout(false) i became a blank site where only the child templates are rendered, no header, no footer in my case. With the update from Jonathan it seems we are on the right road again  :blink:. I have the _base markup and within the child templates. But now in the child templates the $page variable contains not the fields from the child template but from the parent page.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you give me a bit more detail of an example when you'd want that?

For example if you have a hidden tree with children containing different downloadable content and one public page with url /download/ that get information which downloadable page is requested by session or some input. The current page is /download/ but I want to render and display another page. Does this make sense?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.

With Horsts suggestion and with $spex->setLayout(false) i became a blank site where only the child templates are rendered, no header, no footer in my case. With the update from Jonathan it seems we are on the right road again  :blink:. I have the _base markup and within the child templates. But now in the child templates the $page variable contains not the fields from the child template but from the parent page.

I was overriding the $page variable naively, I've pushed a change that should address the issue. Let me know if it addresses your issue. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For example if you have a hidden tree with children containing different downloadable content and one public page with url /download/ that get information which downloadable page is requested by session or some input. The current page is /download/ but I want to render and display another page. Does this make sense?

Hi Horst,

I added a function to the Spex class that hopefully solves that use case: renderPage

So in the template for the page at the url "/download/" you might do something like... 

echo $spex->renderPage($the_real_page);

That changes the page that Spex treats as the request page, i.e. it's as if the request was for $the_real_page rather than wire('page').

It's a bit ugly but seems to be a edge case, so maybe it's ok. What do you think?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a dream last night that Jonathan updated the module. When i woke up i realize that was not a dream  :grin: . It works now for me. Thanks for your work...

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Jonathan: looks good! Thanks.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Robin S
      Another little admin helper module...
      Template Field Widths
      Adds a "Field widths" field to Edit Template that allows you to quickly set the widths of inputfields in the template.

      Why?
      When setting up a new template or trying out different field layouts I find it a bit slow and tedious to have to open each field individually in a modal just to set the width. This module speeds up the process.
      Installation
      Install the Template Field Widths module.
      Config options
      You can set the default presentation of the "Field widths" field to collapsed or open. Field widths entered into the Template Field Widths inputfield are only applied if the Edit Template form is submitted with the Template Field Widths inputfield in an opened state. "Collapsed" is the recommended setting if you think you might also use core inputs for setting field widths in a template context. You can choose Name or Label as the primary identifier shown for the field. The unchosen alternative will become the title attribute shown on hover. You can choose to show the original field width next to the template context field width.  
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/TemplateFieldWidths
      https://modules.processwire.com/modules/template-field-widths/
    • By adrian
      Tracy Debugger for ProcessWire
      The ultimate “swiss army knife” debugging and development tool for the ProcessWire CMF/CMS

       
      Integrates and extends Nette's Tracy debugging tool and adds 35+ custom tools designed for effective ProcessWire debugging and lightning fast development
      The most comprehensive set of instructions and examples is available at: https://adrianbj.github.io/TracyDebugger
      Modules Directory: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/tracy-debugger/
      Github: https://github.com/adrianbj/TracyDebugger
      A big thanks to @tpr for introducing me to Tracy and for the idea for this module and for significant feedback, testing, and feature suggestions.
    • By adrian
      This module allows you to automatically rename file (including image) uploads according to a configurable format
      This module lets you define as many rules as you need to determine how uploaded files will be named and you can have different rules for different pages, templates, fields, and file extensions, or one rule for all uploads. Renaming works for files uploaded via the admin interface and also via the API, including images added from remote URLs.   Github: https://github.com/adrianbj/CustomUploadNames
      Modules Directory: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/process-custom-upload-names/
      Renaming Rules
      The module config allows you to set an unlimited number of Rename Rules. You can define rules to specific fields, templates, pages, and file extensions. If a rule option is left blank, the rule with be applied to all fields/templates/pages/extensions. Leave Filename Format blank to prevent renaming for a specific field/template/page combo, overriding a more general rule. Rules are processed in order, so put more specific rules before more general ones. You can drag to change the order of rules as needed. The following variables can be used in the filename format: $page, $template, $field, and $file. For some of these (eg. $field->description), if they haven't been filled out and saved prior to uploading the image, renaming won't occur on upload, but will happen on page save (could be an issue if image has already been inserted into RTE/HTML field before page save). Some examples: $page->title mysite-{$template->name}-images $field->label $file->description {$page->name}-{$file->filesize}-kb prefix-[Y-m-d_H-i-s]-suffix (anything inside square brackets is is considered to be a PHP date format for the current date/time) randstring[n] (where n is the number of characters you want in the string) ### (custom number mask, eg. 001 if more than one image with same name on a page. This is an enhanced version of the automatic addition of numbers if required) If 'Rename on Save' is checked files will be renamed again each time a page is saved (admin or front-end via API). WARNING: this setting will break any direct links to the old filename, which is particularly relevant for images inserted into RTE/HTML fields. The Filename Format can be defined using plain text and PW $page variable, for example: mysite-{$page->path} You can preserve the uploaded filename for certain rules. This will allow you to set a general renaming rule for your entire site, but then add a rule for a specific page/template/field that does not rename the uploaded file. Just simply build the rule, but leave the Filename Format field empty. You can specify an optional character limit (to nearest whole word) for the length of the filename - useful if you are using $page->path, $path->name etc and have very long page names - eg. news articles, publication titles etc. NOTE - if you are using ProcessWire's webp features, be sure to use the useSrcExt because if you have jpg and png files on the same page and your rename rules result in the same name, you need to maintain the src extension so they are kept as separate files.
      $config->webpOptions = array(     'useSrcExt' => false, // Use source file extension in webp filename? (file.jpg.webp rather than file.webp) ); Acknowledgments
      The module config settings make use of code from Pete's EmailToPage module and the renaming function is based on this code from Ryan: http://processwire.com/talk/topic/3299-ability-to-define-convention-for-image-and-file-upload-names/?p=32623 (also see this post for his thoughts on file renaming and why it is the lazy way out - worth a read before deciding to use this module). 
       
       
      NOTE:
      This should not be needed on most sites, but I work with lots of sites that host PDFs and photos/vectors that are available for download and I have always renamed the files on upload because clients will often upload files with horrible meaningless filenames like:
      Final ReportV6 web version for John Feb 23.PDF

×
×
  • Create New...