Jump to content
horst

Page Image Manipulator 1

Recommended Posts

Wow, good find! ^-^

The ratio is stored as extended info for the image and not used further, so a very good find. (and a very stupid bug, info[2] holds the mimetype  :wacko: )

I will fix this with the next update.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Horst, I think I found one more.

PageImageManipulator.module, line 13: $this->optionNames is always NULL, because it doesn't get defined before (the class isn't even included at this point).

In consequence, param 2 and 3 are not working correctly as described here:

pimLoad

pimLoad($prefix, $param2=optional, $param3=optional)

  • param 1: $prefix - (string) = mandatory!
  • param 2: mixed, $forceRecreation or $options
  • param 3: mixed, $forceRecreation or $options

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, Horst, I don't want to be pesky, but how does this work:

PageImageManipulator.module, line 142:

if(!in_array(strtolower($outputFormat), array('gif','png','jpg'))) {
	$outputFormat = $p['extension'];
}
$outputFormat = strtolower($outputFormat);
if(empty($targetFilename)) {
	$targetFilename = $p['dirname'] .'/pim_'. $prefix .'_'. $p['filename'] .'.'. $outputFormat;
}

$outputFormat is always NULL, that's how it was defined in line 96.

As a result, $outputFormat is always set to the original extension the image has when it was uploaded. Assuming I'm doing a format conversion (png -> jpg), $targetFilename always points to the wrong extension (png instead of jpg), and this file is non-existant. Meaning: everytime all images are recreated, slowing down the page...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

titanium, please can you provide the code line for that with pimLoad?

At line 13 there is only comments. Also without need to test, param 2 definitely work, because I often use it to force recreation of a variations. So you cannot be right with this.

Your post regarding outputFormat, have you tested this or do you see this just by reading the code?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

titanium, please can you provide the code line for that with pimLoad?

Ah sorry, a "1" is missing. It's in line 113.

Regarding the "outputFormat" problem: I noticed that my page was very slow with PageImage Manipulator. I took a closer look and noticed that the image files were created once again every time the page was loaded. After that, I was on a bug hunt...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, your first post is wrong, because the second and third param is processed by the function.

But you are right with the post regarding outputFormat. The options passed as 2 or 3 param gets processsed but not assigned to $outputFormat if it is a key in options, and unfortunately $outputFormat overrides $options['outputFormat'] at the end of the function.

It is in the todo now. But as a quick workaround for you, you may completly bypass sending the $options together with pimLoad(). Insteed use it this way:

pimLoad('prefix'[, true | false])->setOptions($options)-> ... ->pimSave();

This works as expected. (I will rewrite the pimLoad to use this internally the same way)

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

updated to version 0.1.3

  • fixed a bug with ignoring outputFormat when send as $options with method pimLoad found by @titanium
  • added support for php versions with buggy GD-lib for sharpening and unsharpMask
  • added support for the coming module PageimageNamingScheme into pimVariations()
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are there any known limits with this module?

I'm trying to grayscale 10+ images on a single page using $image->first()->width(320)->pimLoad('bw')->grayscale()->pimSave()->url; and it ends up returning the first 9 images correctly, followed by this error:
Error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded

This even occurs when the grayscaled images already exist, still getting a timeout. I've resorted to using file_exists() to check for the grayscaled images manually. If they don't it runs the code above, so with a few page refreshes atfer new image uploads I'm able to eventually have all the images converted.

Any suggestions?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are no limits with this module but with your max execution time for PHP.

add one line into your loop like here:

foreach($images as $image) {
    ini_set('max_execution_time', 30);  // this line resets the timer for max_execution_time with every loop.
    // following your code ...

EDIT:

It shouldn't take that long if images are already rendered. Please can you post your code of the loop here?

Edited by horst

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sure thing:

<?php foreach ($page->children as $article) {
	$coverimage = $article->cover_image->first()->width(320);
	$bw = $coverimage->pimLoad('bw')->grayscale()->pimSave()->url;
	?>
	<a class="archive-item" href="<?php echo $article->url; ?>">
		<div class="archive-item-img"><img class="archive-item-img-overlay" src="<?php echo $bw; ?>"></div>
		<div class="archive-item-text-container"><div class="archive-item-text">
			<?php
			echo "<div class='archive-item-title'>".$article->title."</div>";
			echo "<div>".$article->contributor->title."</div>";
			?>
		</div></div>
	</a>
<?php } ?>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hhm, you are not looping through images but childpages. You may try to debug the times for the images rendering.

Also you can do the resize to 320 and grayconvert in one step.
 

<?php   
$timerstotal = array();

foreach ($page->children as $article) {
    ini_set('max_execution_time', 30);
    $timers = array();
    $timer = Debug::timer();
    $timers[] = Debug::timer($timer);  // start image rendering
    $bw = $article->cover_image->first()->pimLoad('bw320')->width(320)->grayscale()->pimSave();
    $timers[] = Debug::timer($timer);  // finished image rendering
?>
    <a class="archive-item" href="<?php echo $article->url; ?>">
        <div class="archive-item-img"><img class="archive-item-img-overlay" src="<?php echo $bw->url; ?>"></div>
        <div class="archive-item-text-container"><div class="archive-item-text">
        <?php
            echo "<div class='archive-item-title'>".$article->title."</div>";
            echo "<div>".$article->contributor->title."</div>";
        ?>
        </div></div>
    </a>
<?php 
    $timers[] = Debug::timer($timer);  // none image stuff finished
    $timerstotal[] = $timers;
} 

// output timers
echo "<pre>\n"; // or "<!-- \n" to output it as HTML comment 
var_dump($timerstotal);
echo "\n</pre>"; // or "\n-->\n";
?>

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Horst,

a very helpful module! Thank you. However, I miss a feature that would be helpful: 

cropFromCenter(width, height); 

- Resizing and cropping in the original aspect ratio 

The image is reduced first to the width or the height. If it does not fit into the new format, the image is automatically cropped from the middle of the image.

Regards,

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@David: this is already supported by the core ImageSizer. You can combine ImageSizer and PiM manipulations in any order you like:

$croppedVariation1 = $image->size($width, $height, array('cropping'=>true))->pimLoad('prefix')->grayscale()->pimSave();
$croppedVariation2 = $image->pimLoad('prefix')->grayscale()->pimSave()->size($width, $height);  // cropping is true by default in $config->imageSizerOptions in site/config.php

If this doesn't suite your needs, report back please.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@David: this is already supported by the core ImageSizer. You can combine ImageSizer and PiM manipulations in any order you like:

$croppedVariation1 = $image->size($width, $height, array('cropping'=>true))->pimLoad('prefix')->grayscale()->pimSave();
$croppedVariation2 = $image->pimLoad('prefix')->grayscale()->pimSave()->size($width, $height);  // cropping is true by default in $config->imageSizerOptions in site/config.php

If this doesn't suite your needs, report back please.

Ah damn. Sorry, my mistake. :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hhm, you are not looping through images but childpages. You may try to debug the times for the images rendering.

Also you can do the resize to 320 and grayconvert in one step.

<?php   
$timerstotal = array();

foreach ($page->children as $article) {
    ini_set('max_execution_time', 30);
    $timers = array();
    $timer = Debug::timer();
    $timers[] = Debug::timer($timer);  // start image rendering
    $bw = $article->cover_image->first()->pimLoad('bw320')->width(320)->grayscale()->pimSave();
    $timers[] = Debug::timer($timer);  // finished image rendering
?>
    <a class="archive-item" href="<?php echo $article->url; ?>">
        <div class="archive-item-img"><img class="archive-item-img-overlay" src="<?php echo $bw->url; ?>"></div>
        <div class="archive-item-text-container"><div class="archive-item-text">
        <?php
            echo "<div class='archive-item-title'>".$article->title."</div>";
            echo "<div>".$article->contributor->title."</div>";
        ?>
        </div></div>
    </a>
<?php 
    $timers[] = Debug::timer($timer);  // none image stuff finished
    $timerstotal[] = $timers;
} 

// output timers
echo "<pre>\n"; // or "<!-- \n" to output it as HTML comment 
var_dump($timerstotal);
echo "\n</pre>"; // or "\n-->\n";
?>

Thanks for this horst, if I have more than 9 items in the loop it never actually executes the code which outputs the timings.

Stripped it back to 9 items, this is the output:

array(9) {
  [0]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0001"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "0.0243"
    [2]=>
    string(6) "0.0280"
  }
  [1]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "0.0150"
    [2]=>
    string(6) "0.0172"
  }
  [2]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "0.0250"
    [2]=>
    string(6) "0.0267"
  }
  [3]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "0.0484"
    [2]=>
    string(6) "0.0502"
  }
  [4]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "0.1159"
    [2]=>
    string(6) "0.1179"
  }
  [5]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "0.2891"
    [2]=>
    string(6) "0.2927"
  }
  [6]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "0.8478"
    [2]=>
    string(6) "0.8514"
  }
  [7]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "2.8584"
    [2]=>
    string(6) "2.8602"
  }
  [8]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(7) "10.3439"
    [2]=>
    string(7) "10.3459"
  }
}

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

as you can see all image renderings are less than a second. Only number 7 = nearly 3 seconds and number 8 is more than 10 seconds!

It seems that this is a much to big image, maybe.

Also the ini_set('max_execution_time', 30); seems to be disabled / forbidden on your server.  :(

I would try to get this enabled. Can you ask your hoster about this? Also you can try to use set_time_limit(30) instead first, but I guess this will be disabled too. You should have a look to your phpinfo() under safe_mode and disabled functions.

Second point: do you really need that large images like under #8 that takes 10 seconds for rendering a 320 thumbnail? You can set a max dimension for width and height for the images-field under Setup -> Fields -> yourimagesfield -> Input -> Max Images Dimensions. This will render the uploaded image to these max dimensions (e.g. 1200 or 960 px or what ever you need) and takes this as source for all smaller sizes.

Also it looks that your images don't get cached? Do they get recreated every time you run that script? This is not the normal behave and sounds very strange if so. ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi horst, thanks for looking at this so quickly!

The last two images that are taking ~3s and ~10s, the originals are only 450 x 600px (25kb) and 536 x 712px (74kb). They're no bigger than any of the other images, actually quite small compared to some others. Seems strange that each image is taking progressively longer to render?

The process is also still taking this long even though the images aren't being recreated each time, they're all saved in the assets directory and aren't being overwritten as far as I can see.

EDIT: Is this looking like it's something to with my server configuration? This is all happening on my local XAMPP server.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, this is looking very weird. If it is on your local server, you can configure php.ini according to my suggestions above, (allowing set_time_limit(), etc). You need to check phpinfo().

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

set_time_limit(300) did it. Could only load two more, but here's the output:

Last image took 158 seconds to render!

 

array(11) {
  [0]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0001"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "0.0880"
    [2]=>
    string(6) "0.0928"
  }
  [1]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "0.0338"
    [2]=>
    string(6) "0.0357"
  }
  [2]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "0.0454"
    [2]=>
    string(6) "0.0477"
  }
  [3]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "0.0879"
    [2]=>
    string(6) "0.0898"
  }
  [4]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "0.1946"
    [2]=>
    string(6) "0.1964"
  }
  [5]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "0.4132"
    [2]=>
    string(6) "0.4180"
  }
  [6]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "1.1618"
    [2]=>
    string(6) "1.1657"
  }
  [7]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(6) "3.4625"
    [2]=>
    string(6) "3.4644"
  }
  [8]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(7) "11.8296"
    [2]=>
    string(7) "11.8319"
  }
  [9]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(7) "43.1316"
    [2]=>
    string(7) "43.1335"
  }
  [10]=>
  array(3) {
    [0]=>
    string(6) "0.0000"
    [1]=>
    string(8) "158.5707"
    [2]=>
    string(8) "158.5729"
  }
}

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hhm, but this is not the solution. There must be something completely wrong, because if the images once are rendered, it should only took 0.02 seconds for each image, regardless if it is the first or the 19. ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hi  @horst  :

i want to add a watermark for page image. and use this module then got an error:

Error: Call to a member function pimLoad() on a non-object 

this caused error:

 
$img = $page->images->first();

$wmi = $page->watermark->pimLoad('wmi')->colorize('red')->pimSave();

$imgsrc = $img->pimLoad('tw',true)->width(180)->grayscale()->watermarkLogo($wmi, 'southeast', 0)->pimSave();

echo "<img src='{$imgsrc->url}' /><br />";
 

i use this,its works well, i found the new image be created:

$img = $page->images->first();
$imgsrc = $img->pimLoad('myPrefix')->setOptions($options)->width(300)->pimSave();
echo "<img src='{$imgsrc->url}' /><br />";

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @leoric,

I assume the error occures on the imagefield named watermark as you can use the pimLoad method with the field named images.

Here are a few questions:

  • Does your template / page have an imagefield with (exactly) that name?
  • Is this imagefield set to accept only a single image?
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @leoric,

I assume the error occures on the imagefield named watermark as you can use the pimLoad method with the field named images.

Here are a few questions:

  • Does your template / page have an imagefield with (exactly) that name?
  • Is this imagefield set to accept only a single image?

big help.

@horst, thank you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was able to reproduce POWERFULHORSE's speed issue.

some images hang for 30-40 seconds on an operation after they have been successfully rendered once.  

PHP: 5.4

PW: 2.4

GD: 2.10 compatible

CODE:
 

foreach ( $albumimages as $albumimage ) 
{
//FAST
$imgSrc = $albumimage->size(1000,600,array('upscaling' => true,'cropping' => false,'quality' => 70))->url;
//Fast with some files, but killer slow with others
$imgSrc =$sized->pimLoad('watermarked')->watermarkText("Gail Gelburd", 20, 'SW', 5, 100, null)->pimSave()->url;
//... 
}

The PIM portion of this operation can hang the the page for many seconds, even after successful rendering of page it does not get any faster on subsequent  page loads.  I can Upload the offending images if that offers any clues as to what can be going on.  If I can offer any additional debug info that might give any helpful clues as to what is going on let me know. Thanks for a great module Horst. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @neeks,
 
at first: I'm not really sure if you have the same effect as powerfulhorse has had, because he has used a loop through childpages and even has had large amount of processing times for cached images?! Doesn't make much sense, hhm?

second: especially the watermarkText method never was meant to be used in bulk rendering. It uses much cpu and memory for calling many memory image copy operations and also inspect images by histograms to autodetect the best used color for the text, etc. So that is a lot of work it does and that is time consuming, - sorry I haven't noted this in the first post here. It was meant for something like showing thumbnails without watermark text on a page and only watermark larger (single) images when requested. Also its text output can be a bit (or very) ugly!?! - If you want add the same text to all images, you should create and use a transparent png with a nice (and maybe smooth) text together with the watermarkLogo method instead.

third: you may use and inspect debug timers with your code. If there are no significant differences with images processed later (comparing to images processed first), everything seems to be ok. If you get significantly larger times only with later processed images in your loop, then this can be due to some (weird?) design in PHP? PiM uses the correct code to release and free memory (pointers) for all objetcs / instances, but the PHP interpreter internally only seems to set this objects to zero but do not really free the memory to the system site. Somewhere I have read about a discussion between the PHP Group and others and "the others" said that the PHP devs have said that it isn't necessary to release / free pointers because all pointers and handles will be released / freed at the end of every request, (because the complete php instance is closed / released then). I haven't investigated further on this, and maybe I have overlooked to release some objects. I will take a closer look to it when finding time for it. But don't expect it in the near future.

---

On the other hand do I use the watermarkLogo method within a loop on a gallery site where it sometimes create 100+ watermarked image variations [2] at first call of an album page without any drawbacks:

$gallery = "<div id='myGallery'>\n";
if(count($page->images)>0) {
    // display imageThumbs
    $num = -1;
    foreach($page->images as $image) {
[1]     set_time_limit(5);
        $imageName = pathinfo($image->name,PATHINFO_FILENAME);
        $imageDescription = strlen(trim($image->description))>0 ? ', ' . preg_replace('/[^0-9a-zA-ZöüäÖÜÄß -]/msi', '', trim($image->description)) : '';
        $num++;
[2]     $gallery .= "\t<a id='uid$num' rel='nofollow' title='{$imageName}{$imageDescription}' href='{$image->pimLoad('full',false)->watermarkLogo($wmPng)->pimSave()->url}'> </a>\n";
        ...
        ...
    }
}
$gallery .= "</div>\n";
set_time_limit(20);

All source images are max 1000 px and as you can see in the loop I use a time_limit of max 5 seconds [1] per loop.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By eelkenet
      Hi! I've created a small Inputfield module called InputfieldFloatRange which allows you to use an HTML5 <input type="range" ../> slider as an InputField. I needed something like this for a project where the client needs to be able to tweak this value more based on 'a feeling' than just entering a boring old number. Maybe more people can use this so I'm hereby releasing it into the wild. 
      EDIT: You can now install it directly from the Modules directory: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/inputfield-float-range/
       
      What is it?
      The missing range slider Inputfield for Processwire. 
      What does it do?
      This module extends InputfieldFloat and allows you to use HTML5 range sliders for number fields in your templates.
      It includes a visible and editable value field, to override/tweak the value if required.  
      Features
      Min/max values Precision (number of decimals) Optional step value (Read more) Optional manual override of the selected value (will still adhere to the rules above) Configurable rounding of manually entered values (floor, round, ceil, disable) Usage
      Clone / zip repo Install FieldtypeFloatRange, this automatically installs the Inputfield Create new field of type `Float (range)` or convert an existing `Float`, `Integer` or `Text` field. To render the field's value simply echo `$page->field` Demo
      A field with Min=0, Max=1, Step=0.2, Precision=2

      Field with settings Min=0, Max=200, Step=0.25, Precision=2

       
      Todo
      Make the display-field's size configurable (will use the Input Size field setting)  Hopefully become redundant  
      Changelog
      004 (current version)
      - Make rounding of manually entered values configurable (floor, round, ceil or disable)
      - Fix small JS bug when the value-display field was not displayed
      - Update README
      003
      - Code cleanup, add some ModuleInfo data & LICENSE
      - Submit to PW Modules directory (http://modules.processwire.com/modules/inputfield-float-range/)
      002
      - Fix issue where setting the step value to an empty value created problem with validation
      - Make the display-field optional
      001
      - Initial release
       
      Thanks!
       
       
    • By Gadgetto
      Status update links (inside this thread) for SnipWire development will be always posted here:
      2019-10-18
      2019-08-08
      2019-06-15
      2019-06-02
      2019-05-25
      If you are interested, you can test the current state of development:
      https://github.com/gadgetto/SnipWire
      Please note that the software is not yet intended for use in a production system (alpha version).
      If you like, you can also submit feature requests and suggestions for improvement. I also accept pull requests.
      ---- INITIAL POST FROM 2019-05-25 ----
      I wanted to let you know that I am currently working on a new ProcessWire module that fully integrates the Snipcart Shopping Cart System into ProcessWire. (this is a customer project, so I had to postpone the development of my other module GroupMailer).
      The new module SnipWire offers full integration of the Snipcart Shopping Cart System into ProcessWire.
      Here are some highlights:
      simple setup with (optional) pre-installed templates, product fields, sample products (quasi a complete shop system to get started immediately) store dashboard with all data from the snipcart system (no change to the snipcart dashboard itself required) Integrated REST API for controlling and querying snipcart data webhooks to trigger events from Snipcart (new order, new customer, etc.) multi currency support self-defined/configurable tax rates etc. Development is already well advanced and I plan to release the module in the next 2-3 months.
      I'm not sure yet if this will be a "Pro" module or if it will be made available for free.
      I would be grateful for suggestions and hints!
      (please have a look at the screenshots to get an idea what I'm talking about)
       




    • By Robin S
      Another little admin helper module...
      Template Field Widths
      Adds a "Field widths" field to Edit Template that allows you to quickly set the widths of inputfields in the template.

      Why?
      When setting up a new template or trying out different field layouts I find it a bit slow and tedious to have to open each field individually in a modal just to set the width. This module speeds up the process.
      Installation
      Install the Template Field Widths module.
      Config options
      You can set the default presentation of the "Field widths" field to collapsed or open. Field widths entered into the Template Field Widths inputfield are only applied if the Edit Template form is submitted with the Template Field Widths inputfield in an opened state. "Collapsed" is the recommended setting if you think you might also use core inputs for setting field widths in a template context. You can choose Name or Label as the primary identifier shown for the field. The unchosen alternative will become the title attribute shown on hover. You can choose to show the original field width next to the template context field width.  
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/TemplateFieldWidths
      https://modules.processwire.com/modules/template-field-widths/
    • By NehaPillai
      Hello Everyone, I was trying to update SEO meta title, description and meta keywords for my website in Process Wire CMS but it saving in the backend but it is not reflecting on my website, Please help me regarding this error. Please find below attached screen shot for your ref. TIA.


    • By adrian
      Tracy Debugger for ProcessWire
      The ultimate “swiss army knife” debugging and development tool for the ProcessWire CMF/CMS

       
      Integrates and extends Nette's Tracy debugging tool and adds 35+ custom tools designed for effective ProcessWire debugging and lightning fast development
      The most comprehensive set of instructions and examples is available at: https://adrianbj.github.io/TracyDebugger
      Modules Directory: http://modules.processwire.com/modules/tracy-debugger/
      Github: https://github.com/adrianbj/TracyDebugger
      A big thanks to @tpr for introducing me to Tracy and for the idea for this module and for significant feedback, testing, and feature suggestions.
×
×
  • Create New...