owzim Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Hi, is there something like that, or would you consider it useful? Maybe there's another way but I think it would be great. Since I tinkered around a bit with Jekyll (static site generator) I love the idea not depending on php or database acces for clients who don't want to change content that often (or even almost never). Still there would be the huge benefit of pw letting me organize the data in a very comfortable way, when finished, push a button an the site is output into a directory, ready to be used in a static way. Also if a client didn't pay for cms integration, they should not get it =) On a side note: I have so many initial questions, but I don't know if I should ask them each separately (better in my opinion) or all in one post. cheers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apeisa Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 I think procache gives you pretty much same end result. Of course there is htaccess enabled instead of direct folder/file mapping. Have you thought about that solution? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onjegolders Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 You can take a look at Ryan's ProCache module. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owzim Posted March 7, 2013 Author Share Posted March 7, 2013 Yes, Pro Cache might be an option, but the pages are still passed through php, and the .htaccess is necessary to mimic the static site structure. Perhaps I will use Pro Cache to make a module which takes care of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soma Posted March 7, 2013 Share Posted March 7, 2013 Pro cache builds a static site in cache. Not sure but it maybe could be just copied to root and voila. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryan Posted March 8, 2013 Share Posted March 8, 2013 Pro cache builds a static site in cache. Not sure but it maybe could be just copied to root and voila. When the cache is fully populated, you could do this. You could literally take everything in the /site/assets/ProCache/ dir, move it to the root on another web server and it would function statically. You would also need to have your other static assets copied over too, which I think would be limited to these dirs: /site/assets/files/* /site/assets/templates/styles/* /site/assets/templates/scripts/* 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joss Posted March 8, 2013 Share Posted March 8, 2013 hmmm - maybe you should add an export function to the Pro Cache module ... 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owzim Posted March 9, 2013 Author Share Posted March 9, 2013 hmmm - maybe you should add an export function to the Pro Cache module ... Would you consider this Ryan? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryan Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Would you consider this Ryan? Sure. Though it's a little problematic because in order to be complete, every single page in the site would have to be visited and have a cache file generated for it. It's certainly possible to do on your own, assuming you can easily visit every page in your site (i.e. it's not too big). But if I build it as a "feature", then it has to be scalable to very large situations… not sure I'm up for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teppo Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Another option, if what you want to do is simply a static copy of your whole site, is to use something like HTTrack: HTTrack is a free (GPL, libre/free software) and easy-to-use offline browser utility. It allows you to download a World Wide Web site from the Internet to a local directory, building recursively all directories, getting HTML, images, and other files from the server to your computer. HTTrack arranges the original site's relative link-structure. It's available as a Windows and Linux version + command line tool and (based on my experience so far) most of the time does good job. Windows version can sometimes require a bit of playing around with settings, but other than that it's simple, powerful, very configurable and completely automatic 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joss Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Sure. Though it's a little problematic because in order to be complete, every single page in the site would have to be visited and have a cache file generated for it. It's certainly possible to do on your own, assuming you can easily visit every page in your site (i.e. it's not too big). But if I build it as a "feature", then it has to be scalable to very large situations… not sure I'm up for that. Is there a way to fake that? Effectively run a crawler over the entire site based on a generated map or something? I don't see this as high priority, but interesting all the same! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
horst Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Sure. Though it's a little problematic because in order to be complete, every single page in the site would have to be visited and have a cache file generated for it. .... If you want to use Pro Cache Module for that and want to play save - I recommend a run with Xenu's Link Sleuth Also, like Teppo mentioned, HTTrack is a good solution for creating offline-version of sites Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
horst Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Is there a way to fake that? Effectively run a crawler over the entire site based on a generated map or something? Oh, Joss - sorry, I have not read it first. Xenu is a crawler which checks for broken links. I think there is no need for maps. Just let Xenu start at your root and wait until it emails you the result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Murphy Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 I have to admit a static site generator is something I would also be interested in. I have used similar plugins for other systems (wordpress, modx etc) and found it useful in various situations. I often use processwire for prototyping an idea on my local machine, and being able to quickly share that with clients or team members to get feedback requires copying the db and code over to the server (not a massive task but still takes time and effort). Having a one click export to folder or zip file for sharing would be a huge time saver. If you set that up with a dropbox folder and a service like site44 (http://www.site44.com/), you could have a pretty neat publishing workflow. Instant one click publishing - just like FrontPage 98! Another interesting use case, if you made the static site generator flexible enough, would be to use it for exporting to epub, pdf and mobi formats - a kind of ebook export module. This would fit in nicely with an idea I have been thinking about - a simple book publishing platform with PW - something similar to the booktype project by sourcefabric ( http://www.sourcefabric.org/en/booktype/ ) or the Leanpub site ( https://leanpub.com/ ), which could be used for writing books or documentation. Also, similar to httprack application suggested by teppo, If you are on a mac and want to create local copy of a website, site sucker is very good (and free) http://sitesucker.us 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owzim Posted March 10, 2013 Author Share Posted March 10, 2013 Another option, if what you want to do is simply a static copy of your whole site, is to use something like HTTrack: It's available as a Windows and Linux version + command line tool and (based on my experience so far) most of the time does good job. Windows version can sometimes require a bit of playing around with settings, but other than that it's simple, powerful, very configurable and completely automatic Tested it and works quite well, this solution is the best for me right now. Looking forward to see what might be coming to the ProCache module. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marty Walker Posted March 11, 2013 Share Posted March 11, 2013 There's also SiteSucker (for Mac people) which I think does the same kind of thing as HTTrack: http://www.sitesucker.us/mac/mac.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
owzim Posted March 11, 2013 Author Share Posted March 11, 2013 There's also SiteSucker (for Mac people) which I think does the same kind of thing as HTTrack: http://www.sitesucker.us/mac/mac.html That's more convenient and seems to work even better, thanks. Just for the people who also use this kind of solution and want to strip all "index.html" from the urls: find . -name '*.html' -print0 | xargs -0 sed -i '' 's/index.html//g' 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ryan Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 There's also good old wget with the recursive option: wget -r http://domain.com 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OrganizedFellow Posted March 14, 2013 Share Posted March 14, 2013 I stumbled upon this by mistake. I was actually looking for a method that would export a static page with a CSS extension, thereby allowing total control of "editable style sections" of a site. I'm gonna check out Ryans Pro Cache module. Maybe that'll give me some idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heldercervantes Posted May 11, 2015 Share Posted May 11, 2015 Same need here. I want to provide my client with a CMS where they can change content and when they're satisfied, export an offline version of the whole site that they can easily upload to their server or run from a pendrive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snck Posted December 1, 2015 Share Posted December 1, 2015 Sure. Though it's a little problematic because in order to be complete, every single page in the site would have to be visited and have a cache file generated for it. It's certainly possible to do on your own, assuming you can easily visit every page in your site (i.e. it's not too big). But if I build it as a "feature", then it has to be scalable to very large situations… not sure I'm up for that. Do you have a hint for anybody who wants to automate this visiting task? I have a client with a rather small website that shall not be visited but downloaded by him and I would love to offer a one-click solution to him. If this can be done using ProCache I would love to buy the module for this project. EDIT: I do not know ProCache yet. Is it possible to add a hook on page save that somehow calls ProCache and automatically indexes the page after it has been saved? Thanks! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elabx Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 Hi everyone! I come here after a very ugly situation in which mysql server was down holding around 50+ websites in a pretty big server using ProcessWire only. So I start to feel where all this static site generation hype comes from. Has anyone moved further on this aspect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
teppo Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 3 hours ago, elabx said: I come here after a very ugly situation in which mysql server was down holding around 50+ websites in a pretty big server using ProcessWire only. So I start to feel where all this static site generation hype comes from. Has anyone moved further on this aspect? Not an answer really, but technically just having ProCache could help with situations like these. The idea is to bypass PHP and MySQL entirely, after all. In fact in the past I've had a situation where MySQL was dead but the site I was monitoring kept working due to ProCache, so the issue didn't become apparent for quite a while... ? Another thing to consider would be something like Cloudflare ("always on" feature in particular), or adding Squid or Varnish (or some other proxy/cache/accelerator) in front of the site. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wbmnfktr Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 As @teppo already mentioned: Procache or/and Cloudflare... but... If you really want to establish a static site, just use the pre-rendered files from ProCache and upload them to your host. Images/assets should already be present - to make things easier. In case of a Linux/*nix setup you might get it done with a few custom rsync/rclone/git setups to push only files that were changed/new. There is one site (a client site) I manage through ProcessWire locally, run ScreamingFrog to generate the static files and push all changes via git to the repository, which is than published by Netlify. Yes... there are a few steps involved but it's still way easier to go this way than everything else I know (Jekyll, Ghost, etc.). 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elabx Posted August 1, 2019 Share Posted August 1, 2019 1 hour ago, teppo said: Not an answer really, but technically just having ProCache could help with situations like these. The idea is to bypass PHP and MySQL entirely, after all. Just pushed ProCache's cache time to like 100 years lol. That's also what I want to achieve at least, not letting the site completely die even if forms/backend are not working. 42 minutes ago, wbmnfktr said: In case of a Linux/*nix setup you might get it done with a few custom rsync/rclone/git setups to push only files that were changed/new. So like mentioned above, a "build" step is something i'd need to work on. I guess I could put pw backend in a subdomain (possible?) and put the rendered static files in another folder of the server to render on the right domain. Also I guess there's a lot other stuff to consider like 404's, formbuilder forms in iframes...Maybe I should just get MySQL to behave but I guess that's gonna take me a couple years at least :P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now