Jump to content
Roope

Email Obfuscation (EMO)

Recommended Posts

Thanks @Roope! The hook didn't work within the page template (maybe too late there) but did work in /site/ready.php

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/28/2016 at 10:30 AM, Bacelo said:

 


<?php echo '<script src="' . $config->urls->siteModules . 'EmailObfuscation/emo.min.js"></script>'; ?>

This works fine as before - the script gets included just fine.

But, none of the included E-Mails addresses are replaced with any text and elements at all. They are still untouched present in plain text.

 

I ran into a similar issue with v1.1.0. using Javascript Loading method: Load file to $config->scripts 

emo.min.js is included on the page before the <!-- emo --> script block which defines var emo_addr. The function emo_replace() never gets called because at the point of script inclusion emo_addr === undefined. In v1.5 of  emo.js window.onload was removed. So the script never executes when emo.min.js is included before the <!-- emo --> script block.

I have refactored emo.js as an object literal and modified the module Code so that the script block calls emo.init(emo_addr) after defining the addresses.

emo.thumb.png.162cbf4268f1b57ca53fb32f3182e542.png

Tested without problems. Modified module can be found at https://github.com/gebeer/EmailObfuscation/tree/dev

@Roope do you want a PR for that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello @gebeer!

I made a convert to object literal on your supposal but it had issue when "JavaScript loading method" was set to:manual (where emo.js is loaded after the inline script block). So script init is now again attached to the window onload event and emo.js can be included at any part of page. Thanks for the report!

I also dropped ProcessWire namespace for continued 2.x support, thanks for a remind @Robin S! That was maybe too hesitated and no requirements for it.

Version bumped to 1.1.1 and it's available at GitHub:
https://github.com/BlowbackDesign/EmailObfuscation/releases/tag/1.1.1

Besides bugfixes this version adds support to multilanguage nosript text and template cache.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking a bit closer at this, it looks like it's just Chrome on an Android mobile, desktop sees to be OK now. Every other browser I've tried is fine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/12/2017 at 10:23 AM, PWaddict said:

How can I re-initiate it via AJAX?

On 1/12/2017 at 2:41 PM, Roope said:

Currently this is not possible.

Would be really great, if this module could be used via Ajax. 😉

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New EMO version 1.2.0 released!

https://github.com/BlowbackDesign/EmailObfuscation/releases/tag/1.2.0

In this version only encryption key is stored in the emo object of html document and crypted email strings as data attributes to span elements that are used to replace found email addresses. This makes it possible to obfuscate emails generated within AJAX request.

There is also a new option at module config to lock the encryption key so that it does not change on every session like it does by default. This is required if you are caching AJAX output for more than session lifetime. Otherwise this option is good leave disabled.

Here is quick example of a simple AJAX request with obfuscated output:

<?php namespace ProcessWire;

if($config->ajax) {
  $str = "<p><a href='mailto:foo@bar.com'>Click to mail</a></p>";
  // auto obfuscation works only when complete html document is rendered so you
  // need to do manual obfuscation on AJAX calls even when mode is set to auto
  echo $sanitizer->emo($str);
  return $this->halt();
}

?>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
  <meta charset="UTF-8">
  <title>EMO ajax example</title>
</head>
<body>

  <p>john@doe.com</p>
  <div id="result"></div>
  <p><button onclick="sendExample()">Show me some</button></p>

  <script>
    var sendExample = function() {
      var xhttp = new XMLHttpRequest();
      xhttp.open("POST", "<?= $page->url ?>", true);
      xhttp.setRequestHeader("X-Requested-With", "XMLHttpRequest");
      xhttp.onreadystatechange = function() {
        if(this.readyState == 4 && this.status == 200) {
          document.getElementById("result").innerHTML = xhttp.response;
          // run emo init when there's something new to digest
          emo.init();
        }
      };
      xhttp.send();
    };
  </script>

</body>
</html>

 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a warning, this seems to have a conflict with SEO Maestro module?  I can't diagnose much as I'm at work and it's very busy at the moment.  Can anyone else confirm this?

Thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/25/2020 at 5:10 AM, grimezy said:

Just a warning, this seems to have a conflict with SEO Maestro module?  I can't diagnose much as I'm at work and it's very busy at the moment.  Can anyone else confirm this?

Thanks.

I can't confirm.

Running PW 3.0.123 + latest versions on both of modules.

What kind of issues are you facing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I am having a different issue. With v1.2.0. I get this warning: 
Warning
array_key_exists() expects parameter 2 to be array, null given
File: .../EmailObfuscation/EmailObfuscation.module:352

352 if(!is_array($options) && !array_key_exists('pageStack', $options)) {
          return false;
    }

If $options passes the first test, it is not an array. The second test checks for array_key_exists in a non-array. Hence the warning.

The error is being triggered when $options is null.

As a temp workaround I amended the if statement to read

if(is_array($options) && !array_key_exists('pageStack', $options)) {
	return false;
}

Not sure though if this is correct. Maybe you wanted to return false when $options is not an array, too?

 

Edited by gebeer
typo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello @gebeer (and @grimezy) and thanks for the info!

I was able to reproduce this and it was purely silly mistake I made when I was rearranging stuff. The is_array check in this condition is there only to prevent such a warning in array_key_exists function.

This is now fixed in 1.2.1 version.

And finally in 1.2.2 version.

While I was there I also added conditional autoload to block admin pages which is proposed by @tpr in this thread already long ago.

Thanks!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I had this piece of code in my template file's head section, a fix for older IE browsers:

<!--[if lt IE 9]>
    <script src="<?=$config->urls->templates?>js/html5-3.6-respond-1.4.2.min.js"></script>
    <script src="<?=$config->urls->templates?>js/rem.min.js"></script>
<![endif]-->

EMO 1.2.2 inserted its own code inside the conditional comment which resulted in it not working properly (in browsers other than old IE, of course):

<!--[if lt IE 9]>
<script>
var emo = emo || {};
emo.key = 'PDHeN7ZbGViB1m0ATUpc5rC3tY_8fgEqkl6dw2nMKQSLxWouahI.4vJFyOXzs9Rj';
</script>
	<script src="/site/templates/js/html5-3.6-respond-1.4.2.min.js"></script>
	<script src="/site/templates/js/rem.min.js"></script>
<![endif]-->

I don't know the exact way EMO determines where to place its code, but it should probably make sure its JS does not end up in any conditional comment.

Apart from that, thanks a lot for a very useful module.

Michael

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the "enable Javascript" message is currently appearing in both Chrome and Safari for Mac in place of email addresses.

EMO is inserting into a conditional comment, as noted by Michael.

Screen Shot 2020-03-30 at 12.41.49 PM.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello @CalleRosa40 and @Brian Williamson!

And thanks for the notice!

The logic with EMO insert changed at 1.2.x update and I haven't got time to push the update yet so in a meantime please use the version 1.1.1 instead as it works without any issues. I'll try to find some time to fix the script insert to head ASAP!

https://github.com/BlowbackDesign/EmailObfuscation/releases/tag/1.1.1

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can also confirm that the latest version affects email addresses entered in a FormBuilder field, so the visitor gets an "Invalid content" error but can't see any reason why they should.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Roope, a feature request: it would be great if it was possible to avoid the email replacement within elements that are given a particular HTML class, e.g. "no-emo".

My current issue is that if I show an email address as the value of a text input or textarea then EMO replaces those strings, which create invalid markup. Probably EMO shouldn't touch emails that are the values of form elements, but it would also be handy to be able to disable EMO inside other elements so I thought I'd request that class option.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all!

Issue with script insert to the head section is now fixed in version 1.2.3

https://github.com/BlowbackDesign/EmailObfuscation/releases/tag/1.2.3

@CalleRosa40 and @Brian Williamson please update and report back if you're still facing any problems.

@creativejay and @Robin S - EMO has skipped form tags on obfuscation since day one and I haven't been able to reproduce this error so I'm kind of lost here why are you guys facing this issue with recent 1.2.x update.

For example, none of the addresses in the markup below are not touched:

<form action="/">
  <p>john@doe.com</p>
  <input type="text" name="email" value="john@doe.com">
  <textarea name="message">john@doe.com</textarea>
</form>

Using no-emo class on element to avoid obfuscation is a nice idea but not so easy to implement safely to the current logic based on regular expressions.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Roope said:

EMO has skipped form tags on obfuscation since day one and I haven't been able to reproduce this error

To reproduce, put an input element in your template that is not within a form.

<input type="text" value="someone@domain.com">

2020-04-17_102446.jpg.d5adb48e51729b70937f0ee9f024e32a.jpg

It's valid to use inputs, textareas, etc outside of a form element.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/17/2020 at 1:25 AM, Robin S said:

It's valid to use inputs, textareas, etc outside of a form element.

Yes, I'm well aware that it is completely valid to have inputs and such outside of a form element and with email address EMO breaks the markup but I thought this was not the issue in your case since there was already previous post from creativejay about problems with FormBuilder and you also mentioned that EMO shoudn't touch values of form elements but you were literally talking about inputs and such, not the form element itself. Sorry about that.

There are also another technically valid situations where EMO fails e.g. like having an email inside data attribute. Generally it is kind of compicated topic to automatically replace email address by new node in every possible case without breaking things.

Anyway, current state where EMO skips whole content inside form element is not ideal since there are many cases where you can have email addresses inside form where they should get obfuscated but currenly are not. Like the one in my previous form example where email inside p element should be touched but it's not.

That said maybe we should remove the form element completely from ignored elements and concentrate only at form elements (what you suggested actually) like input, option and textarea where most likely touching email addresses will give us headaches.

I'll look into it.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Roope, I've noticed that the "Enable JavaScript to view protected content" notice appears for significantly longer in >= v1.2.0 than it did in v1.1.1. In the screencasts below I'm refreshing the page and I've used my browser dev tools to slow the network speed down to "Fast 3G" to make the effect more obvious. In both cases the EMO script should already be in the browser's cache.

v1.1.1

v1.gif.45493c322712289f82262cd5c2ad83f2.gif

 

v1.2.3

v2.gif.30006db5fc59a534b11e5c8b01bc2d55.gif

 

Is there some way to speed things up so performance is closer to the older version?

A couple of other little things...

1. Could you look at appending the module version number to the JS file src as a cache-busting querystring? Without that there can be problems if you upgrade/downgrade the module and the visitor has the JS from a different version cached in their browser.

2. I wonder if the module could use a <noscript> tag in some way so that the "Enable JavaScript to view protected content" is only visible to visitors who have JS disabled. If the visitor has JS enabled but EMO has not yet decoded the email address then the notice doesn't need to be seen and this would avoid the FOUC.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By David Karich
      ProcessWire InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDuplicate
      Thanks to the great ProModule "RepeaterMatrix" I have the possibility to create complex repeater items. With it I have created a quite powerful page builder. Many different content modules, with many more possible design options. The RepeaterMatrix module supports the cloning of items, but only within the same page. Now I often have the case that very design-intensive pages and items are created. If you want to use a content module on a different page (e.g. in the same design), you have to rebuild each item manually every time.
      This module extends the commercial ProModule "RepeaterMatrix" by the function to duplicate repeater items from one page to another page. The condition is that the target field is the same matrix field from which the item is duplicated. This module is currently understood as proof of concept. There are a few limitations that need to be considered. The intention of the module is that this functionality is integrated into the core of RepeaterMatrix and does not require an extra module.
      Check out the screencast
      What the module can do
      Duplicate multible repeater items from one page to another No matter how complex the item is Full support for file and image fields Multilingual support Support of Min and Max settings Live synchronization of clipboard between multiple browser tabs. Copy an item and simply switch the browser tab to the target page and you will immediately see the past button Support of multiple RepeaterMatrix fields on one page Configurable which roles and fields are excluded Configurable dialogs for copy and paste Duplicated items are automatically pasted to the end of the target field and set to hidden status so that changes are not directly published Automatic clipboard update when other items are picked Automatically removes old clipboard data if it is not pasted within 6 hours Delete clipboard itself by clicking the selected item again Benefit: unbelievably fast workflow and content replication What the module can't do
      Before an item can be duplicated in its current version, the source page must be saved. This means that if you make changes to an item and copy this, the old saved state will be duplicated Dynamic loading is currently not possible. Means no AJAX. When pasting, the target page is saved completely No support for nested repeater items. Currently only first level items can be duplicated. Means a repeater field in a repeater field cannot be duplicated. Workaround: simply duplicate the parent item Dynamic reloading and adding of repeater items cannot be registered. Several interfaces and events from the core are missing. The initialization occurs only once after the page load event Changelog
      2.0.0
      Feature: Copy multiple items at once! The fundament for copying multiple items was created by @Autofahrn - THX! Feature: Optionally you can disable the copy and/or paste dialog Bug fix: A fix suggestion when additional and normal repeater fields are present was contributed by @joshua - THX! 1.0.4
      Bug fix: Various bug fixes and improvements in live synchronization Bug fix: Items are no longer inserted when the normal save button is clicked. Only when the past button is explicitly clicked Feature: Support of multiple repeater fields in one page Feature: Support of repeater Min/Max settings Feature: Configurable roles and fields Enhancement: Improved clipboard management Enhancement: Documentation improvement Enhancement: Corrected few typos #1 1.0.3
      Feature: Live synchronization Enhancement: Load the module only in the backend Enhancement: Documentation improvement 1.0.2
      Bug fix: Various bug fixes and improvements in JS functions Enhancement: Documentation improvement Enhancement: Corrected few typos 1.0.1
      Bug fix: Various bug fixes and improvements in the duplication process 1.0.0
      Initial release Support this module
      If this module is useful for you, I am very thankful for your small donation: Donate 5,- Euro (via PayPal – or an amount of your choice. Thank you!)
      Download this module (Version 2.0.0)
      > Github: https://github.com/FlipZoomMedia/InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDuplicate
      > PW module directory: https://modules.processwire.com/modules/inputfield-repeater-matrix-duplicate/
      > Old stable version (1.0.4): https://github.com/FlipZoomMedia/InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDuplicate/releases/tag/1.0.4
    • By Robin S
      A new module that hasn't had a lot of testing yet. Please do your own testing before deploying on any production website.
      Custom Paths
      Allows any page to have a custom path/URL.
      Note: Custom Paths is incompatible with the core LanguageSupportPageNames module. I have no experience working with LanguageSupportPageNames or multi-language sites in general so I'm not in a position to work out if a fix is possible. If anyone with multi-language experience can contribute a fix it would be much appreciated!
      Screenshot

      Usage
      The module creates a field named custom_path on install. Add the custom_path field to the template of any page you want to set a custom path for. Whatever path is entered into this field determines the path and URL of the page ($page->path and $page->url). Page numbers and URL segments are supported if these are enabled for the template, and previous custom paths are managed by PagePathHistory if that module is installed.
      The custom_path field appears on the Settings tab in Page Edit by default but there is an option in the module configuration to disable this if you want to position the field among the other template fields.
      If the custom_path field is populated for a page it should be a path that is relative to the site root and that starts with a forward slash. The module prevents the same custom path being set for more than one page.
      The custom_path value takes precedence over any ProcessWire path. You can even override the Home page by setting a custom path of "/" for a page.
      It is highly recommended to set access controls on the custom_path field so that only privileged roles can edit it: superuser-only is recommended.
      It is up to the user to set and maintain suitable custom paths for any pages where the module is in use. Make sure your custom paths are compatible with ProcessWire's $config and .htaccess settings, and if you are basing the custom path on the names of parent pages you will probably want to have a strategy for updating custom paths if parent pages are renamed or moved.
      Example hooks to Pages::saveReady
      You might want to use a Pages::saveReady hook to automatically set the custom path for some pages. Below are a couple of examples.
      1. In this example the start of the custom path is fixed but the end of the path will update dynamically according to the name of the page:
      $pages->addHookAfter('saveReady', function(HookEvent $event) { $page = $event->arguments(0); if($page->template == 'my_template') { $page->custom_path = "/some-custom/path-segments/$page->name/"; } }); 2. The Custom Paths module adds a new Page::realPath method/property that can be used to get the "real" ProcessWire path to a page that might have a custom path set. In this example the custom path for news items is derived from the real ProcessWire path but a parent named "news-items" is removed:
      $pages->addHookAfter('saveReady', function(HookEvent $event) { $page = $event->arguments(0); if($page->template == 'news_item') { $page->custom_path = str_replace('/news-items/', '/', $page->realPath); } }); Caveats
      The custom paths will be used automatically for links created in CKEditor fields, but if you have the "link abstraction" option enabled for CKEditor fields (Details > Markup/HTML (Content Type) > HTML Options) then you will see notices from MarkupQA warning you that it is unable to resolve the links.
      Installation
      Install the Custom Paths module.
      Uninstallation
      The custom_path field is not automatically deleted when the module is uninstalled. You can delete it manually if the field is no longer needed.
       
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/CustomPaths
      https://modules.processwire.com/modules/custom-paths/
    • By teppo
      Hey folks!
      I'm happy to finally introduce a project I've been working on for quite a while now: it's called Wireframe, and it is an output framework for ProcessWire.
      Note that I'm posting this in the module development area, maily because this project is still in rather early stage. I've built a couple of sites with it myself, and parts of the codebase have been powering some pretty big and complex sites for many years now, but this should still be considered a soft launch 🙂
      --
      Long story short, Wireframe is a module that provides the "backbone" for building sites (and apps) with ProcessWire using an MVC (or perhaps MVVM... one of those three or four letter acronyms anyway) inspired methodology. You could say that it's an output strategy, but I prefer the term "output framework", since in my mind the word "strategy" means something less tangible. A way of doing things, rather than a tool that actually does things.
      Wireframe (the module) provides a basic implementation for some familiar MVC concepts, such as Controllers and a View layer – the latter of which consists of layouts, partials, and template-specific views. There's no "model" layer, since in this context ProcessWire is the model. As a module Wireframe is actually quite simple – not even nearly the biggest one I've built – but there's still quite a bit of stuff to "get", so I've put together a demo & documentation site for it at https://wireframe-framework.com/.
      In addition to the core module, I'm also working on a couple of site profiles based on it. My current idea is actually to keep the module very light-weight, and implement most of the "opinionated" stuff in site profiles and/or companion modules. For an example MarkupMenu (which I released a while ago) was developed as one of those "companion modules" when I needed a menu module to use on the site profiles.
      Currently there are two public site profiles based on Wireframe:
      site-wireframe-docs is the demo&docs site mentioned above, just with placeholder content replaced with placeholder content. It's not a particularly complex site, but I believe it's still a pretty nice way to dig into the Wireframe module. site-wireframe-boilerplate is a boilerplate (or starter) site profile based on the docs site. This is still very much a work in progress, but essentially I'm trying to build a flexible yet full-featured starter profile you can just grab and start building upon. There will be a proper build process for resources, it will include most of the basic features one tends to need from site to site, etc. --
      Requirements and getting started:
      Wireframe can be installed just like any ProcessWire module. Just clone or download it to your site/modules/ directory and install. It doesn't, though, do a whole lot of stuff on itself – please check out the documentation site for a step-by-step guide on setting up the directory structure, adding the "bootstrap file", etc. You may find it easier to install one of the site profiles mentioned above, but note that this process involves the use of Composer. In the case of the site profiles you can install ProcessWire as usual and download or clone the site profile directory into your setup, but after that you should run "composer install" to get all the dependencies – including the Wireframe module – in place. Hard requirements for Wireframe are ProcessWire 3.0.112 and PHP 7.1+. The codebase is authored with current PHP versions in mind, and while running it on 7.0 may be possible, anything below that definitely won't work. A feature I added just today to the Wireframe module is that in case ProcessWire has write access to your site/templates/ directory, you can use the module settings screen to create the expected directories automatically. Currently that's all, and the module won't – for an example – create Controllers or layouts for you, so you should check out the site profiles for examples on these. (I'm probably going to include some additional helper features in the near future.)
      --
      This project is loosely based on an earlier project called pw-mvc, i.e. the main concepts (such as Controllers and the View layer) are very similar. That being said, Wireframe is a major upgrade in terms of both functionality and architecture: namespaces and autoloader support are now baked in, the codebase requires PHP 7, Controllers are classes extending \Wireframe\Controller (instead of regular "flat" PHP files), implementation based on a module instead of a collection of drop-in files, etc.
      While Wireframe is indeed still in a relatively early stage (0.3.0 was launched today, in case version numbers matter) for the most part I'm happy with the way it works, and likely won't change it too drastically anytime soon – so feel free to give it a try, and if you do, please let me know how it went. I will continue building upon this project, and I am also constantly working on various side projects, such as the site profiles and a few unannounced helper modules.
      I should probably add that while Wireframe is not hard to use, it is more geared towards those interested in "software development" type methodology. With future updates to the module, the site profiles, and the docs I hope to lower the learning curve, but certain level of "developer focus" will remain. Although of course the optimal outcome would be if I could use this project to lure more folks towards that end of the spectrum... 🙂
      --
      Please let me know what you think – and thanks in advance!
    • By tcnet
      PageViewStatistic for ProcessWire is a module to log page visits of the CMS. The records including some basic information like IP-address, browser, operating system, requested page and originate page. Please note that this module doesn't claim to be the best or most accurate.
      Advantages
      One of the biggest advantage is that this module doesn't require any external service like Google Analytics or similar. You don't have to modify your templates either. There is also no JavaScript or image required.
      Disadvantages
      There is only one disadvantage. This module doesn't record visits if the browser loads the page from its browser cache. To prevent the browser from loading the page from its cache, add the following meta tags to the header of your page:
      <meta http-equiv="Cache-Control" content="no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate" /> <meta http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cache" /> <meta http-equiv="Expires" content="0" /> How to use
      The records can be accessed via the Setup-menu of the CMS backend. The first dropdown control changes the view mode. There are 4 different view modes.
      View mode "Day" shows all visits of the selected day individually with IP-address, browser, operating system, requested page and originate page. Click the update button to see new added records. View mode "Month" shows the total of all visitors per day from the first to the last day of the selected month. View mode "Year" shows the total of all visitors per month from the first to the last month of the selected year. View mode "Total" shows the total of all visitors per year for all recorded years. Please note that multiple visits from the same IP address within the selected period are counted as a single visitor.
      Settings
      You can access the module settings by clicking the Configuration button at the bottom of the records page. The settings page is also available in the menu: Modules->Configure->ProcessPageViewStat.
      IP2Location
      This module uses the IP2Location database from: http://www.ip2location.com. This database is required to obtain the country from the IP address. IP2Location updates this database at the begin of every month. The settings of ProcessPageViewStat offers the ability to automatically download the database monthly. Please note, that automatically download will not work if your webspace doesn't allow allow_url_fopen.
      Dragscroll
      This module uses DragScroll. A JavaScript available from: http://github.com/asvd/dragscroll. Dragscroll adds the ability in view mode "Day" to drag the records horizontally with the mouse pointer.
      parseUserAgentStringClass
      This module uses the PHP class parseUserAgentStringClass available from: http://www.toms-world.org/blog/parseuseragentstring/. This class is required to filter out the browser type and operating system from the server request.
      Special Feature
      PageViewStatistic for ProcessWire can record the time a visitor viewed the page. This feature is deactivated by default. To activate open the module configuration page and activate "Record view time". If activated you will find a new column "S." in the records which means the time of view in seconds. With every page request, a Javascript code is inserted directly after the <body> tag. Every time the visitor switches to another tab or closes the tab, this script reports the number of seconds the tab was visible. The initial page request is recorded only as a hyphen (-).
       
    • By MoritzLost
      This module allows you to integrate hCaptcha bot / spam protection into ProcessWire forms. hCaptcha is a great alternative to Google ReCaptcha, especially if you are in the EU and need to comply with privacy regulations.

      The development of this module is sponsored by schwarzdesign.
      The module is built as an Inputfield, allowing you to integrate it into any ProcessWire form you want. It's primarily intended for frontend forms and can be added to Form Builder forms for automatic spam protection. There's a step-by-step guide for adding the hCaptcha widget to Form Builder forms in the README, as well as instructions for API usage.
      Features
      Inputfield that displays an hCaptcha widget in ProcessWire forms. The inputfield verifies the hCaptcha response upon submission, and adds a field error if it is invalid. All hCaptcha configuration options for the widget (theme, display size etc) can be changed through the inputfield configuration, as well as programmatically. hCaptcha script options can be changed through a hook. Error messages can be translated through ProcessWire's site translations. hCaptcha secret keys and site-keys can be set for each individual inputfield or globally in your config.php. Error codes and failures are logged to help you find configuration errors. Please check the README for setup instructions.
      Links
      Github Repository and documentation InputfieldHCaptcha in the module directory Screenshots (configuration)

      Screenshots (hCaptcha widget)

       
       

       
×
×
  • Create New...