Jump to content
teppo

Module: Process Changelog

Recommended Posts

This module tracks changes, additions, removals etc. of public (as in "not under admin") pages of your site. Like it's name says, it doesn't attempt to be a version control system or anything like that - just a log of what's happened.

At the moment it's still a work in progress and will most likely be a victim of many ruthless this-won't-work-let's-try-that-instead cycles, but I believe I've nailed basic functionality well enough to post it here.. so, once again, I'll be happy to hear any comments you folks can provide :)

https://modules.processwire.com/modules/process-changelog/

https://github.com/teppokoivula/ProcessChangelog

How does it work?

Exactly like it's (sort of) predecessor, Process Changelog actually consists of two modules: Process Changelog and Process Changelog Hooks. Hooks module exists only to serve main module by hooking into various functions within Pages class, collecting data of performed operations, refining it and keeping up a log of events in it's own custom database table (process_changelog.) Visible part is managed by Process Changelog, which provides users a (relatively) pretty view of the contents of said log table.

How do you use it?

When installed this module adds new page called Changelog under Admin > Setup which provides you with a table view of collected data and basic filtering tools See attached screenshots to get a general idea about what that page should look like after a while.

For detailed installation instructions etc. see README.md.
 

post-175-0-29875500-1359836051_thumb.png

post-175-0-18450900-1359836057_thumb.png

  • Like 17

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow this looks great Teppo! I can't wait to try this one out tomorrow. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing stuff Teppo aka Mr. Log (you can keep that name if you go to build career in adult entertainment business too ;)).

After testing this will definitely be on our default installation for all sites!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Teppo

Awesome module and very useful for a few of my sites with many editors :)

I know it's not really for version control, but I wonder if you'd considered somehow saving a text copy of the body field if that changes? Not sure how you would go about that (save to text file with page ID and timestamp maybe?), but it occurs to me that it's the one field where if someone changes you may need to quickly look at what was there before and change it back, so even a basic text dump would be of some use there I think. But yep, this ventures into the realms of version control then when I start thinking about things like this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Teppo,

you've just saved me some time, and my new favorite client some money. Great job!

One thing though: have you have any idea how this impacts performance of the website? (not much I guess, but I'd better ask)

`Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, there were registered changes here today from a user "guest"... how can that be?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, there were registered changes here today from a user "guest"... how can that be?

Most likely either API usage, or perhaps some internal PW feature.. for these user seems to be "guest", which is a bit confusing to say the least :)

If you're sure that neither of these were the cause, then I'd love to dig in a bit deeper. These are the cases that have triggered changes by "guest" for me in the past.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Teppo,

you've just saved me some time, and my new favorite client some money. Great job!

One thing though: have you have any idea how this impacts performance of the website? (not much I guess, but I'd better ask)

Sorry Adam, I've completely managed to miss this post! And thanks, by the way -- it's good to hear that someone has found this module useful :)

This is a bit late for a reply, but anyway: I wouldn't be too worried about performance impact. There's no heavy lifting happening code-wise, just some hook methods with a bit of relatively simple logic. One extra query (most of the time) for each page save shouldn't do much harm either and since this only happens when saving pages it's definitely not a problem on most pages.

On the other hand, if you do find that there's some kind of performance penalty, I'd be happy to check it out and see if things can be further optimized. (I'm sure they can, just haven't found a reason to do that so far.)

Only case where I would worry a bit about things getting out of hand would be a site where pages are constantly changed (ie. some public feature triggers page save all the time) and that data gets logged. In a case like that it would make sense to a) not log every action and/or b) limit the time log entries are stored for. I could also add a template setting at some point, so that admin can select which templates require logging in the first place..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today we had an incident were lots of pages got unpublished. 

There were no normal editor activities around that time and there was no clearly seeable pattern.

The logs never should say "guest" if the api does something, better would be "system" or "API" and even better, which script.

Because of "guest" I immediately thought of a hacking attempt to the batcher, for example. But we found no sign of hacking.

700 "unpublishing"-changes in little time - this was a script and no person, for sure. We investigate at the moment.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@ceberlin: did couple of quick tests and it definitely looks like a) actions ran through Batcher get correctly logged as actions of the user that ran them and b) API actions via bootstrap method always point to Guest user.

In your case I'd keep looking for an external script that bootstraps PW and does some changes OR template code that alters content when a visitor loads a page with that template. Front-end edit forms would be potential causes for this too.

I have to agree that actions of API pointing to Guest is confusing, but as it's internal PW feature I prefer to keep it like that here too. Reasoning behind this seems to be that when doing something via API, whether triggered by unauthenticated visitor or some external script, you don't actually log in as any real user .. so the real issue here is probably just that "Guest" sounds very odd in this context.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 The logs never should say "guest" if the api does something, better would be "system" or "API" and even better, which script.

 I have to agree that actions of API pointing to Guest is confusing, but as it's internal PW feature I prefer to keep it like that here too. Reasoning behind this seems to be that when doing something via API, whether triggered by unauthenticated visitor or some external script, you don't actually log in as any real user .. so the real issue here is probably just that "Guest" sounds very odd in this context.

I would really like something like a (maybe hidden) user named e.g. system or API or CLI that gets invoked for that (at least for bootstrapped scripts).

It has confused me too in the past. :)

Also if you create new pages that way, they get owned by "guest" in the system. Therefor I always try to log in first, when starting a bootstrapped instance. (But forget sometimes)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would really like something like a (maybe hidden) user named e.g. system or API or CLI that gets invoked for that (at least for bootstrapped scripts).

Most of default content points (created_users_id DB field in pages table) to page ID 2, which is the /processwire/ page. This seems like a sensible solution to me.. even though /processwire/ obviously isn't real "user" either  :)

Edit: taking another look at that quote, I'd like to add that having user specific to bootstrapped scripts would be great. At least for those of us who use these quite a lot, it would help keeping track of things.

Edited by teppo
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finding that out of the sudden a "guest" batch-changed 700 file settings scared the hell out of me, I must say.

It scared me even more that I cannot see a pattern, why some files were changed and others not.

Glad to hear that "guest" was probably not a person and no hack, but only a script gone wild.

I really would find very useful if it was recorded somehow, what script was involved. But that is maybe to much to ask.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really would find very useful if it was recorded somehow, what script was involved. But that is maybe to much to ask.

This won't help much with your current issue, but I've just pushed new version of this module to GitHub. This version adds an option to log which script triggered (ie. initiated) each action; a path or an URL, depending whether context was HTTP or non-HTTP.

This feature can be enabled via settings of Process Changelog Hooks module to either external scripts only or both external and local scripts (ie. current PW installation called in "normal way" -- bootstrap method is considered "external.")

Haven't been able to test it thoroughly enough yet, but so far it seems to work. If anyone has time to test this, I'd love to get some feedback.

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd like to add that having user specific to bootstrapped scripts would be great. At least for those of us who use these quite a lot, it would help keeping track of things.

Guest means that no user is specifically logged in. But for things like your own bootstrapped scripts or other API usage, you can create a user specific to that need. Then in instances where you want them to be the current user (rather than guest) you can do a call like this:

$u = wire('user'); // save current user, if you want to
$users->setCurrentUser($users->get('api')); // set new user: api
// 
// .. your code that does stuff
// 
$users->setCurrentUser($u); // set back to the previous user, if you want to
  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just installed this wonderful module.

Q: A client wanted to have such a feature. But his role / permissions are not "superuser", but "manager". Hence, he doesn't even see the "setup" items in the admin menu.

How can I add / change user roles / permissions, so that a user that has not "superuser" status, can access this module?

I tried cloning the admin tpl, switched the module to this "admin light" tpl, and tried accessing the Changelog page /processwire/setup/changelog/ (logged in as client) - but alas, I get a redirect to the main page/ menu...

Any tips? Is it at all possible? Really, this module is all the client should be able to see in the "setup" category...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@dragan

Add 'permission' => 'your-permission'

to the array returned by the method getModuleInfo().

After this line: https://github.com/teppokoivula/ProcessChangelog/blob/master/ProcessChangelog.module#L35

Example: If all users who can edit pages should be able to access the module

    public static function getModuleInfo() {
        return array(
            'title' => __('Changelog'),
            'summary' => __('Keep track of changes (edits, removals, additions etc.)'),
            'href' => 'http://modules.processwire.com/modules/process-changelog/',
            'author' => 'Teppo Koivula',
            'version' => 126,
            'singular' => true,
            'autoload' => false,
            'installs' => 'ProcessChangelogHooks',
            'permission' => 'page-edit',
        ); 
    }
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks! That worked nicely.

I know I'm drifting away from this main thread topic now, but is there an easy way to add a custom admin link in the backend for a certain user / role?

i.e. adding "changelog" after "pages" in the top main admin nav? (without core-hacking)

I googled a fair bit, but didn't find any forum topics / modules / tutorials about this.

Problem: since access to this module is inside "setup", the "setup" menu doesn't appear for that backend-user. He has to remember the link page /processwire/setup/changelog/. I remember in MODX, there was an option to define a custom landing page after login. Or changing the admin dashboard (adding custom direct links). I was wondering if PW has something similar. (without creating a custom admin theme, or hacking the core)

Something like 

if ($user->role == this | $user->id == foo) {
  // echo | include ...
} 

inside a core file would probably be easy - but a hack...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing simpler than that. You know that every page in Admin is a page under "Admin"?

So you can drag the Changelog page from /Admin/Setup/ and drop it below the /Admin/Pages page.. et voila, the page is no longer displayed under "Setup" :)

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Easy indeed! I tried moving it outside of the admin folder, but got errors - moving it just above "setup" worked :-)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@dragan...a clarification - if you have a chance, have a look at Wanze's code in his module Batcher. He creates a permission "batcher" which you can give a certain role. Although the batcher page appears under setup, it doesn't have to be moved manually from under setup in order for the non-supersuser (manager in your case) to see it. They will only see "batcher" or in your case "changelog" under the setup menu; nothing else. Try it and see!

Speaking of batcher, I prefer the route batcher takes of creating a permission to give access to the module rather than applying it site-wide with a page-edit permission (Wanze was just giving an example above). Of course, there will be times you don't mind giving permissions site-wide....OK, enough rambling...Hope this makes sense!

Edited for clarity

Edited by kongondo
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Should've done this earlier, but I've just pushed to GitHub updated version of the module. This version is set to require "changelog" permissions and create it when the module is installed.

Dragan and any others who've already installed the module: I suggest that you get the latest version, add aforementioned permission manually and then apply it to those roles that should be able to access changelog page.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks! Will try it out later.

Quick Q: 

I tried to use some of the vars to send an email each time something is changed. Something really simple like

$message = "operation: $operation 
page id: {$page->id} 
page template id: {$page->template->id}
details: $detailsStr";
		
@mail($to, $subject, $message);

$detailsStr is just a var_dump of $details. But it remains blank in my test emails.

I inserted it after line 283: $this->insert($operation, $page->id, $page->template->id, $details);

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Mike Rockett
      Jumplinks for ProcessWire
      Release: 1.5.56
      Composer: rockett/jumplinks
      Jumplinks is an enhanced version of the original ProcessRedirects by Antti Peisa.
      The Process module manages your permanent and temporary redirects (we'll call these "jumplinks" from now on, unless in reference to redirects from another module), useful for when you're migrating over to ProcessWire from another system/platform. Each jumplink supports wildcards, shortening the time needed to create them.
      Unlike similar modules for other platforms, wildcards in Jumplinks are much easier to work with, as Regular Expressions are not fully exposed. Instead, parameters wrapped in curly braces are used - these are described in the documentation.
      Under Development: 2.0, to be powered by FastRoute
      As of version 1.5.0, Jumplinks requires at least ProcessWire 2.6.1 to run.
      View on GitLab
      Download via the Modules Directory
      Read the docs
      Features
      The most prominent features include:
      Basic jumplinks (from one fixed route to another) Parameter-based wildcards with "Smart" equivalents Mapping Collections (for converting ID-based routes to their named-equivalents without the need to create multiple jumplinks) Destination Selectors (for finding and redirecting to pages containing legacy location information) Timed Activation (activate and/or deactivate jumplinks at specific times) 404-Monitor (for creating jumplinks based on 404 hits) Additionally, the following features may come in handy:
      Stale jumplink management Legacy domain support for slow migrations An importer (from CSV or ProcessRedirects) Feedback & Feature Requests
      I’d love to know what you think of this module. Please provide some feedback on the module as a whole, or even regarding smaller things that make it whole. Also, please feel free to submit feature requests and their use-cases.
      Note: Features requested so far have been added to the to-do list, and will be added to 2.0, and not the current dev/master branches.
      Open Source

      Jumplinks is an open-source project, and is free to use. In fact, Jumplinks will always be open-source, and will always remain free to use. Forever. If you would like to support the development of Jumplinks, please consider making a small donation via PayPal.
      Enjoy! :)
    • By BitPoet
      As threatened in Ryan's announcement for 3.0.139, I built a little module for sliding toggles as a replacement for checkboxes. Styling of the input is CSS3 only (with all the usual caveats about older browsers), no JS necessary, and may still be a bit "rough around the edges", so to speak, since I didn't have much time for testing on different devices or brushing things up enough so I'd feel comfortable pushing it to the module directory. But here's the link to the GitHub repo for now:
      InputfieldSlideToggle
      Fieldtype and Inputfield that implements smartphone-style toggles as replacement for checkbox inputs. The visualization is CSS-only, no additional JS necessary.
      Status
      Still very alpha, use with caution!
      Features / Field Settings
      Size
      You can render the toggles in four different sizes: small, medium, large and extra large.
      Off Color
      Currently, "unchecked" toggles can be displayed either in grey (default) or red.
      On Color
      "Checked" toggles can be rendered in one of these colors: blue (default), black, green, grey, orange or red.
      Screenshots

      Some examples with checkbox label


      View all Size and Color Combinations
      Small toggles Medium toggles Big toggles Extra big toggles  









    • By Orkun
      Hi Guys
      I needed to add extended functionalities for the InputfieldDatetime Module (module is from processwire version 2.7.3) because of a Request of Customer.
      So I duplicated the module and placed it under /site/modules/.
      I have added 3 new Settings to the InputfieldDatetime Module.
      1. Day Restriction - Restrict different days based on weekdays selection (e.g. saturday, sunday) - WORKING

       
      2. Time Slots - Define Time slots based on custom Integer Value (max is 60 for 1 hour) - WORKING

       
      3. Time Range Rules per Weekday - Define a minTime and MaxTime per Weekday (e.g. Opening Hours of a Restaurant) - NOT WORKING PROPERLY

       
      The Problem
      Time Slots and Day Restriction working fine so far. But the Time Range Rules per Weekday doesn't work right.
      What should happen is, that when you click on a date, it should update the minTime and maxTime of the Time Select.
      But the change on the select only happens if you select a date 2 times or when you select a date 1 time and then close the datepicker and reopen it again.
      The time select doesn't get change when you select a date 1 time and don't close the picker.
      Here is the whole extended InputfieldDatetime Module.
      The Files that I have changed:
      InputfieldDatetime.module InputfieldDatetime.js jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.js (https://trentrichardson.com/examples/timepicker/) - updated it to the newest version, because minTime and maxTime Option was only available in the new version  
      Thats the Part of the JS that is not working correctly:
      if(datetimerules && datetimerules.length){ options.onSelect = function(date, inst) { var day = $(this).datetimepicker("getDate").getDay(); day = day.toString(); var mintime = $(this).attr('data-weekday'+day+'-mintime'); var maxtime = $(this).attr('data-weekday'+day+'-maxtime'); console.log("weekday: "+day); console.log("minTime: "+mintime); console.log("maxTime: "+maxtime); var optionsAll = $(this).datetimepicker( "option", "all" ); optionsAll.minTime = mintime; optionsAll.maxTime = maxtime; $(this).datetimepicker('destroy'); $(this).datetimepicker(optionsAll); $(this).datetimepicker('refresh'); //$.datepicker._selectDate($(this).attr("id"),date); //$.datepicker._base_getDateDatepicker(); // var inst = $.datepicker._getInst($(this)); // $.datepicker._updateDatepicker(inst); /*$(this).datetimepicker('destroy'); InputfieldDatetimeDatepicker($(this), mintime, maxtime); $(this).datetimepicker('refresh'); */ // $(this).datetimepicker('option', {minTime: mintime, maxTime: maxtime}); } } Can you have a look and find out what the Problem is?
      InputfieldDatetime.zip
       
      Kind Regards
      Orkun
    • By Gadgetto
      Status update links (inside this thread) for SnipWire development will be always posted here:
      2019-08-08
      2019-06-15
      2019-06-02
      2019-05-25
      If you are interested, you can test the current state of development:
      https://github.com/gadgetto/SnipWire
      Please note that the software is not yet intended for use in a production system (alpha version).
      If you like, you can also submit feature requests and suggestions for improvement. I also accept pull requests.
      ---- INITIAL POST FROM 2019-05-25 ----
      I wanted to let you know that I am currently working on a new ProcessWire module that fully integrates the Snipcart Shopping Cart System into ProcessWire. (this is a customer project, so I had to postpone the development of my other module GroupMailer).
      The new module SnipWire offers full integration of the Snipcart Shopping Cart System into ProcessWire.
      Here are some highlights:
      simple setup with (optional) pre-installed templates, product fields, sample products (quasi a complete shop system to get started immediately) store dashboard with all data from the snipcart system (no change to the snipcart dashboard itself required) Integrated REST API for controlling and querying snipcart data webhooks to trigger events from Snipcart (new order, new customer, etc.) multi currency support self-defined/configurable tax rates etc. Development is already well advanced and I plan to release the module in the next 2-3 months.
      I'm not sure yet if this will be a "Pro" module or if it will be made available for free.
      I would be grateful for suggestions and hints!
      (please have a look at the screenshots to get an idea what I'm talking about)
       




    • By apeisa
      Update 31.7.2019: AdminBar is now maintained by @teppo. Modules directory entry has been updated, as well as the "grab the code" link below.
      ***
      Latest screencast: http://www.screencas...73-ab3ba1fea30c
      Grab the code: https://github.com/teppokoivula/AdminBar
      ***
      I put this Adminbar thingy (from here: http://processwire.c...topic,50.0.html) to modules section and to it's own topic.
      I recorded quick and messy screencast (really, my first screencast ever) to show what I have made so far. You can see it from here: http://www.screencas...18-1bc0d49841b4
      When the modal goes off, I click on the "dark side". I make it so fast on screencast, so it might seem a little bit confusing. Current way is, that you can edit, go back to see the site (without saving anything), continue editing and save. After that you still have the edit window, but if you click "dark side" after saving, then the whole page will be reloaded and you see new edits live.
      I am not sure if that is best way: there are some strengths in this thinking, but it is probably better that after saving there shouldn't be a possibility to continue editing. It might confuse because then if you make edits, click on dark side -> *page refresh* -> You lose your edits.
      ***
      When I get my "starting module" from Ryan, I will turn this into real module. Now I had to make some little tweaks to ProcessPageEdit.module (to keep modal after form submits). These probably won't hurt anything:
      if($this->redirectUrl) $this->session->redirect($this->redirectUrl); if(!empty($_GET['modal'])) $this->session->redirect("./?id={$this->page->id}&modal=true"); // NEW LINE else $this->session->redirect("./?id={$this->page->id}");   and...
      if(!empty($_GET['modal'])) { $form->attr('action', './?id=' . $this->id . '&modal=true'); } else { $form->attr('action', './?id=' . $this->id); // OLD LINE }  
×
×
  • Create New...