Jump to content
teppo

SearchEngine

Recommended Posts

@teppo I don't think this is to with my setup. I have tried 3 x different character sets and encodings, all throwing errors. In particular... if I dump the result of processIndex() just before returning it, with that "à" character it is getting encoded as \xc3 when it should be \xC3\xA0. You can check this here: https://mothereff.in/utf-8.

I don't understand enough about how you are prepping the data before saving the field, but this I think is an issue with multibyte substrings.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the spam, but found a solution. I am not an expert on prepping strings for the database, but replace the line here with the below to make it unicode aware fixes things for me:

$processed_index = preg_replace('/\s+/u', ' ', $processed_index);

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks @Mikie! I'll take a closer look at this ASAP 🙂

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 hour ago, teppo said:

I'll take a closer look at this ASAP 🙂

Coolio, no rush. I think this might have also been to do with having html entity encoders set on those ckeditor fields. Have no idea why I did that, maybe I did it testing something else.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Mikie said:

@teppo I don't think this is to with my setup. I have tried 3 x different character sets and encodings, all throwing errors. In particular... if I dump the result of processIndex() just before returning it, with that "à" character it is getting encoded as \xc3 when it should be \xC3\xA0. You can check this here: https://mothereff.in/utf-8.

I don't understand enough about how you are prepping the data before saving the field, but this I think is an issue with multibyte substrings.

Heya!

I've looked a bit into this, but to be honest I'd like to gain a better understanding of the situation before applying the fix. Any chance you could check the charset and collation of the field_search_index table (assuming search_index is your search index field)? The output of "SHOW FULL COLUMNS FROM field_search_index" should be enough.

The "u" modifier for preg_replace() does some things I'm slightly worried about, i.e. it's documented as "not compatible with Perl", it changes how matches are treated, and it may also result in warnings if the subject string invalid UTF-8 — so at the very least it may require a bit of extra validation as well to account for that. Before going there I'd like to figure out how to reproduce this issue first. I've tried all sorts of special characters with no luck, so far everything has worked just fine here 🙂

Also, when you say that the ""à" character it is getting encoded as \xc3 when it should be \xC3\xA0", what do you mean exactly? I mean... do you literally see \xc3 somewhere, or do I have to grab the value and pass it through some sort of inspection process to see that it's wrong? If I dump the result of processIndex(), I see "à" character on the screen, and that's also what's being stored in the database.

Sorry, I'm easily confused when it comes to things like character sets etc. 😅

Edit: forgot to mention that based on StackOverflow this definitely looks like a character set issue, i.e. typical case where this error occurs is when you're trying to store UTF-8 data into a latin1 table. Assuming that the CKEditor field in question is some form of UTF-8, the index field data column should definitely also be UTF-8 — and if it's not, that sounds really weird.

Edited by teppo
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/6/2020 at 12:11 AM, Mikie said:

Cheers! I am storing magazine style story credits (role, name, website url etc) in the Table. I feel that since Table only accepts text based fields this is an ok candidate for indexing. Can try to hack away at your module myself for now, no rush.

Table field is now one of the supported fieldtypes in SearchEngine 0.17.0. The indexing part makes use of TableRows::render(); I may have to revisit this at some point, but this approach seemed to work quite well in my initial tests, and this way I don't have to identify each possible value but can rather let the fieldtype do all the heavy lifting 🙂

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, teppo said:

Table field is now one of the supported fieldtypes in SearchEngine 0.17.0. The indexing part makes use of TableRows::render(); I may have to revisit this at some point, but this approach seemed to work quite well in my initial tests, and this way I don't have to identify each possible value but can rather let the fieldtype do all the heavy lifting 🙂

I've edited this reply, since I double-checked and it is happening both with and without entity encoders active on CKEditor fields when trying to save the search index. 

See screenshots below, with the text Testing “testing” à 123 in a ckeditor field. Strange quotes get converted to utf-8 from html encoding, but the "à" symbol utf-8 gets clipped in half. Can confirm PW / DB / db table / db column all using utf8mb4 + unicode_ci (learnt alot about this stuff past few days!).

EB44487B-4E41-4581-B3B4-CD3E5FED313E.png.e4776af794ec130f505ffb801c4cd896.png

CF38A96B-ABCC-472A-B03E-9CC595C4D589.thumb.png.83ff9029aa80c41386b409ac18b618cf.png

B1FD22F1-0268-4A4A-BDAC-2F4753660148.png.3f11ed59793713dd8a7b77f5b50e2b7c.png

1F931F58-8F1A-42CF-99D8-EE625DB30669.png.a7c2d1c33dbc173e7c00968ddf4ffe89.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a dump adding that unicode aware regex tag:

Sorry about the line numbers in Tracey output, I had hacked your module to add tables 😏

0723C332-E2BE-48CE-8C43-974B77299F1A.png.ffe9772e743a4cc8aaadd43e71e3f6c8.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I'll try to dedicate this a bit more time later today. I'm still confused as for why it's happening (can only assume that there's some difference in the environment), but perhaps the "u" flag indeed is the correct fix. Will have to check that it doesn't cause additional issues in cases where the module is now working as expected... 🙂

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I wouldnt worry about it too much. If you can’t replicate your end it’s definitely a problem with the environment. Will try to figure out from my end.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And it only happens on mac as well! Wow, what an edge case.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Mikie said:

Here is the exact issue. Set locale seems to be the problem, when combined with preg_replace on white-space... 

https://github.com/silverstripe/silverstripe-framework/issues/7132

 

7 minutes ago, Mikie said:

And it only happens on mac as well! Wow, what an edge case.

Awesome — thanks for digging these out! 🙂

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, teppo said:

Awesome — thanks for digging these out! 🙂

No worries! Can confirm had setlocale(LC_ALL, 'en_US.UTF-8'); in my site config. I only do this when PW tells me to, haven't taken the time to even understand why. Turning that off fixed the issue also.

There's enough discussion within that silverstripe GitHub issue about the alternatives. Very very edge, will leave up to you!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aforementioned issue should be fixed now. As was already mentioned above, this could only be replicated under specific circumstances on macOS; nevertheless it seems that defining the "u" flag for preg_replace() is a relatively safe thing to do, so I've gone ahead and done that. If it ends up causing trouble, I may have to reconsider that, but at least for now it seems to be all good 🙂

Thanks @Mikie for tracking this down!

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@teppo Fantastic addition! Searching repeater and page reference fields are working great.

Would it be possible to add support for FieldsetPage fields?

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @teppo,

Thanks a lot for your module!

Whenever I check "Index pages now?" in the module's backend config and save to build/rebuild the index field, PW throws a lenghty error (see attached PNG). I've selected a couple of text/textarea fields to index and included the index field in my templates. Calling

$modules->get('SearchEngine')->indexPages();

from the search template seems to work fine though. Am I making some newbie mistake here or is that an actual bug?

Screenshot_2020-03-30.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello @teppo and all,

I currently run the same processwire site on multiple servers with a shared database and shared asset resources.  This has been working fine for years, but we've been using elasticsearch, which has required feeding index updates from our multiple servers to a single elasticsearch index.  It looks to me like this module will eliminate the need for that additional complexity, and here's where I would like someone to correct me if I'm wrong or point out any flaws in my understanding.  I see that the page indexes are updated with a hook upon page save, and the index info will be stored in the database as a page field.  It seems to me that this should work fine in a multi-server environment sharing a single database, as the page save events will only happen once from the server the page is saved on, and the index will be updated for all servers sharing that database.

Short of something extreme like simultaneously running a complete re-index from multiple servers (which probably would still work out ok...), does anyone see any problem with this approach, or see considerations in this scenario that I may be missing?  Your input is appreciated.

Best Regards,
David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, CalleRosa40 said:

Whenever I check "Index pages now?" in the module's backend config and save to build/rebuild the index field, PW throws a lenghty error (see attached PNG). I've selected a couple of text/textarea fields to index and included the index field in my templates.

It looks like you're using Hanna Code with one or more of your indexed fields. Is that correct?

Here something is trying to resize a Pageimage object while it's actually a Pageimages object, which usually means that output formatting is off. If so, you could fix this in the Hanna Code snippet itself (by checking for Pageimages and getting the first Pageimage from it). I'll see if there's something I can do to make this work better, but that's the quick fix anyway.

(Assuming I understood the stack trace correctly...)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/30/2020 at 3:21 PM, Confluent Design said:

Hello @teppo and all,

I currently run the same processwire site on multiple servers with a shared database and shared asset resources.  This has been working fine for years, but we've been using elasticsearch, which has required feeding index updates from our multiple servers to a single elasticsearch index.  It looks to me like this module will eliminate the need for that additional complexity, and here's where I would like someone to correct me if I'm wrong or point out any flaws in my understanding.  I see that the page indexes are updated with a hook upon page save, and the index info will be stored in the database as a page field.  It seems to me that this should work fine in a multi-server environment sharing a single database, as the page save events will only happen once from the server the page is saved on, and the index will be updated for all servers sharing that database.

Short of something extreme like simultaneously running a complete re-index from multiple servers (which probably would still work out ok...), does anyone see any problem with this approach, or see considerations in this scenario that I may be missing?  Your input is appreciated.

Best Regards,
David

Any thoughts on this?  @teppo?  If I am doing something wrong in terms of the form or placement of my inquiry, please let me know that as well.  I want to do things the right way.  Thanks for your time, and apologies for any inconvenience.

Best Regards,
David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey @Confluent Design,

Sorry for the delay. Your message slipped my mind, thanks for pinging me 🙂

Quote

[...] but we've been using elasticsearch, which has required feeding index updates from our multiple servers to a single elasticsearch index.  It looks to me like this module will eliminate the need for that additional complexity [...]

You're correct in that SearchEngine stores its index in a ProcessWire field, so yes — since your database is already shared, there's nothing else to do in that regard; unless I've very much misunderstood something here, it should work right out of the box.

Quote

Short of something extreme like simultaneously running a complete re-index from multiple servers (which probably would still work out ok...), does anyone see any problem with this approach, or see considerations in this scenario that I may be missing?  Your input is appreciated.

From a basic technical point of view, no, I don't see any issues here. It's worth noting, though, that elasticsearch is quite a bit more complex and feature-rich than this little module here. Depending on your needs that might or might not be an issue.

Basically with SearchEngine you get a searchable blob of all page content that can be converted to text without toying around with additional APIs or libraries (so no file data at the moment), and the search itself is done using a simple selector string — no advanced weighting, stemming, etc. I do have a few "advanced" features on my todo list, but at the moment there's no timeline for any of that 🙂

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you @teppo!  This was just the feedback I was looking for.  On both counts, that I was on the right track, and that I might be losing some fancy functionality by going away from elasticsearch.  Appreciate all of that.  I'm going to give your module a try as a replacement!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By David Karich
      ProcessWire InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDuplicate
      Thanks to the great ProModule "RepeaterMatrix" I have the possibility to create complex repeater items. With it I have created a quite powerful page builder. Many different content modules, with many more possible design options. The RepeaterMatrix module supports the cloning of items, but only within the same page. Now I often have the case that very design-intensive pages and items are created. If you want to use a content module on a different page (e.g. in the same design), you have to rebuild each item manually every time.
      This module extends the commercial ProModule "RepeaterMatrix" by the function to duplicate repeater items from one page to another page. The condition is that the target field is the same matrix field from which the item is duplicated. This module is currently understood as proof of concept. There are a few limitations that need to be considered. The intention of the module is that this functionality is integrated into the core of RepeaterMatrix and does not require an extra module.
      Check out the screencast
      What the module can do
      Duplicate multible repeater items from one page to another No matter how complex the item is Full support for file and image fields Multilingual support Support of Min and Max settings Live synchronization of clipboard between multiple browser tabs. Copy an item and simply switch the browser tab to the target page and you will immediately see the past button Support of multiple RepeaterMatrix fields on one page Configurable which roles and fields are excluded Configurable dialogs for copy and paste Duplicated items are automatically pasted to the end of the target field and set to hidden status so that changes are not directly published Automatic clipboard update when other items are picked Automatically removes old clipboard data if it is not pasted within 6 hours Delete clipboard itself by clicking the selected item again Benefit: unbelievably fast workflow and content replication What the module can't do
      Before an item can be duplicated in its current version, the source page must be saved. This means that if you make changes to an item and copy this, the old saved state will be duplicated Dynamic loading is currently not possible. Means no AJAX. When pasting, the target page is saved completely No support for nested repeater items. Currently only first level items can be duplicated. Means a repeater field in a repeater field cannot be duplicated. Workaround: simply duplicate the parent item Dynamic reloading and adding of repeater items cannot be registered. Several interfaces and events from the core are missing. The initialization occurs only once after the page load event Changelog
      2.0.0
      Feature: Copy multiple items at once! The fundament for copying multiple items was created by @Autofahrn - THX! Feature: Optionally you can disable the copy and/or paste dialog Bug fix: A fix suggestion when additional and normal repeater fields are present was contributed by @joshua - THX! 1.0.4
      Bug fix: Various bug fixes and improvements in live synchronization Bug fix: Items are no longer inserted when the normal save button is clicked. Only when the past button is explicitly clicked Feature: Support of multiple repeater fields in one page Feature: Support of repeater Min/Max settings Feature: Configurable roles and fields Enhancement: Improved clipboard management Enhancement: Documentation improvement Enhancement: Corrected few typos #1 1.0.3
      Feature: Live synchronization Enhancement: Load the module only in the backend Enhancement: Documentation improvement 1.0.2
      Bug fix: Various bug fixes and improvements in JS functions Enhancement: Documentation improvement Enhancement: Corrected few typos 1.0.1
      Bug fix: Various bug fixes and improvements in the duplication process 1.0.0
      Initial release Support this module
      If this module is useful for you, I am very thankful for your small donation: Donate 5,- Euro (via PayPal – or an amount of your choice. Thank you!)
      Download this module (Version 2.0.0)
      > Github: https://github.com/FlipZoomMedia/InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDuplicate
      > PW module directory: https://modules.processwire.com/modules/inputfield-repeater-matrix-duplicate/
      > Old stable version (1.0.4): https://github.com/FlipZoomMedia/InputfieldRepeaterMatrixDuplicate/releases/tag/1.0.4
    • By Robin S
      A new module that hasn't had a lot of testing yet. Please do your own testing before deploying on any production website.
      Custom Paths
      Allows any page to have a custom path/URL.
      Note: Custom Paths is incompatible with the core LanguageSupportPageNames module. I have no experience working with LanguageSupportPageNames or multi-language sites in general so I'm not in a position to work out if a fix is possible. If anyone with multi-language experience can contribute a fix it would be much appreciated!
      Screenshot

      Usage
      The module creates a field named custom_path on install. Add the custom_path field to the template of any page you want to set a custom path for. Whatever path is entered into this field determines the path and URL of the page ($page->path and $page->url). Page numbers and URL segments are supported if these are enabled for the template, and previous custom paths are managed by PagePathHistory if that module is installed.
      The custom_path field appears on the Settings tab in Page Edit by default but there is an option in the module configuration to disable this if you want to position the field among the other template fields.
      If the custom_path field is populated for a page it should be a path that is relative to the site root and that starts with a forward slash. The module prevents the same custom path being set for more than one page.
      The custom_path value takes precedence over any ProcessWire path. You can even override the Home page by setting a custom path of "/" for a page.
      It is highly recommended to set access controls on the custom_path field so that only privileged roles can edit it: superuser-only is recommended.
      It is up to the user to set and maintain suitable custom paths for any pages where the module is in use. Make sure your custom paths are compatible with ProcessWire's $config and .htaccess settings, and if you are basing the custom path on the names of parent pages you will probably want to have a strategy for updating custom paths if parent pages are renamed or moved.
      Example hooks to Pages::saveReady
      You might want to use a Pages::saveReady hook to automatically set the custom path for some pages. Below are a couple of examples.
      1. In this example the start of the custom path is fixed but the end of the path will update dynamically according to the name of the page:
      $pages->addHookAfter('saveReady', function(HookEvent $event) { $page = $event->arguments(0); if($page->template == 'my_template') { $page->custom_path = "/some-custom/path-segments/$page->name/"; } }); 2. The Custom Paths module adds a new Page::realPath method/property that can be used to get the "real" ProcessWire path to a page that might have a custom path set. In this example the custom path for news items is derived from the real ProcessWire path but a parent named "news-items" is removed:
      $pages->addHookAfter('saveReady', function(HookEvent $event) { $page = $event->arguments(0); if($page->template == 'news_item') { $page->custom_path = str_replace('/news-items/', '/', $page->realPath); } }); Caveats
      The custom paths will be used automatically for links created in CKEditor fields, but if you have the "link abstraction" option enabled for CKEditor fields (Details > Markup/HTML (Content Type) > HTML Options) then you will see notices from MarkupQA warning you that it is unable to resolve the links.
      Installation
      Install the Custom Paths module.
      Uninstallation
      The custom_path field is not automatically deleted when the module is uninstalled. You can delete it manually if the field is no longer needed.
       
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/CustomPaths
      https://modules.processwire.com/modules/custom-paths/
    • By teppo
      Hey folks!
      I'm happy to finally introduce a project I've been working on for quite a while now: it's called Wireframe, and it is an output framework for ProcessWire.
      Note that I'm posting this in the module development area, maily because this project is still in rather early stage. I've built a couple of sites with it myself, and parts of the codebase have been powering some pretty big and complex sites for many years now, but this should still be considered a soft launch 🙂
      --
      Long story short, Wireframe is a module that provides the "backbone" for building sites (and apps) with ProcessWire using an MVC (or perhaps MVVM... one of those three or four letter acronyms anyway) inspired methodology. You could say that it's an output strategy, but I prefer the term "output framework", since in my mind the word "strategy" means something less tangible. A way of doing things, rather than a tool that actually does things.
      Wireframe (the module) provides a basic implementation for some familiar MVC concepts, such as Controllers and a View layer – the latter of which consists of layouts, partials, and template-specific views. There's no "model" layer, since in this context ProcessWire is the model. As a module Wireframe is actually quite simple – not even nearly the biggest one I've built – but there's still quite a bit of stuff to "get", so I've put together a demo & documentation site for it at https://wireframe-framework.com/.
      In addition to the core module, I'm also working on a couple of site profiles based on it. My current idea is actually to keep the module very light-weight, and implement most of the "opinionated" stuff in site profiles and/or companion modules. For an example MarkupMenu (which I released a while ago) was developed as one of those "companion modules" when I needed a menu module to use on the site profiles.
      Currently there are two public site profiles based on Wireframe:
      site-wireframe-docs is the demo&docs site mentioned above, just with placeholder content replaced with placeholder content. It's not a particularly complex site, but I believe it's still a pretty nice way to dig into the Wireframe module. site-wireframe-boilerplate is a boilerplate (or starter) site profile based on the docs site. This is still very much a work in progress, but essentially I'm trying to build a flexible yet full-featured starter profile you can just grab and start building upon. There will be a proper build process for resources, it will include most of the basic features one tends to need from site to site, etc. --
      Requirements and getting started:
      Wireframe can be installed just like any ProcessWire module. Just clone or download it to your site/modules/ directory and install. It doesn't, though, do a whole lot of stuff on itself – please check out the documentation site for a step-by-step guide on setting up the directory structure, adding the "bootstrap file", etc. You may find it easier to install one of the site profiles mentioned above, but note that this process involves the use of Composer. In the case of the site profiles you can install ProcessWire as usual and download or clone the site profile directory into your setup, but after that you should run "composer install" to get all the dependencies – including the Wireframe module – in place. Hard requirements for Wireframe are ProcessWire 3.0.112 and PHP 7.1+. The codebase is authored with current PHP versions in mind, and while running it on 7.0 may be possible, anything below that definitely won't work. A feature I added just today to the Wireframe module is that in case ProcessWire has write access to your site/templates/ directory, you can use the module settings screen to create the expected directories automatically. Currently that's all, and the module won't – for an example – create Controllers or layouts for you, so you should check out the site profiles for examples on these. (I'm probably going to include some additional helper features in the near future.)
      --
      This project is loosely based on an earlier project called pw-mvc, i.e. the main concepts (such as Controllers and the View layer) are very similar. That being said, Wireframe is a major upgrade in terms of both functionality and architecture: namespaces and autoloader support are now baked in, the codebase requires PHP 7, Controllers are classes extending \Wireframe\Controller (instead of regular "flat" PHP files), implementation based on a module instead of a collection of drop-in files, etc.
      While Wireframe is indeed still in a relatively early stage (0.3.0 was launched today, in case version numbers matter) for the most part I'm happy with the way it works, and likely won't change it too drastically anytime soon – so feel free to give it a try, and if you do, please let me know how it went. I will continue building upon this project, and I am also constantly working on various side projects, such as the site profiles and a few unannounced helper modules.
      I should probably add that while Wireframe is not hard to use, it is more geared towards those interested in "software development" type methodology. With future updates to the module, the site profiles, and the docs I hope to lower the learning curve, but certain level of "developer focus" will remain. Although of course the optimal outcome would be if I could use this project to lure more folks towards that end of the spectrum... 🙂
      --
      Please let me know what you think – and thanks in advance!
    • By tcnet
      PageViewStatistic for ProcessWire is a module to log page visits of the CMS. The records including some basic information like IP-address, browser, operating system, requested page and originate page. Please note that this module doesn't claim to be the best or most accurate.
      Advantages
      One of the biggest advantage is that this module doesn't require any external service like Google Analytics or similar. You don't have to modify your templates either. There is also no JavaScript or image required.
      Disadvantages
      There is only one disadvantage. This module doesn't record visits if the browser loads the page from its browser cache. To prevent the browser from loading the page from its cache, add the following meta tags to the header of your page:
      <meta http-equiv="Cache-Control" content="no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate" /> <meta http-equiv="Pragma" content="no-cache" /> <meta http-equiv="Expires" content="0" /> How to use
      The records can be accessed via the Setup-menu of the CMS backend. The first dropdown control changes the view mode. There are 4 different view modes.
      View mode "Day" shows all visits of the selected day individually with IP-address, browser, operating system, requested page and originate page. Click the update button to see new added records. View mode "Month" shows the total of all visitors per day from the first to the last day of the selected month. View mode "Year" shows the total of all visitors per month from the first to the last month of the selected year. View mode "Total" shows the total of all visitors per year for all recorded years. Please note that multiple visits from the same IP address within the selected period are counted as a single visitor.
      Settings
      You can access the module settings by clicking the Configuration button at the bottom of the records page. The settings page is also available in the menu: Modules->Configure->ProcessPageViewStat.
      IP2Location
      This module uses the IP2Location database from: http://www.ip2location.com. This database is required to obtain the country from the IP address. IP2Location updates this database at the begin of every month. The settings of ProcessPageViewStat offers the ability to automatically download the database monthly. Please note, that automatically download will not work if your webspace doesn't allow allow_url_fopen.
      Dragscroll
      This module uses DragScroll. A JavaScript available from: http://github.com/asvd/dragscroll. Dragscroll adds the ability in view mode "Day" to drag the records horizontally with the mouse pointer.
      parseUserAgentStringClass
      This module uses the PHP class parseUserAgentStringClass available from: http://www.toms-world.org/blog/parseuseragentstring/. This class is required to filter out the browser type and operating system from the server request.
      Special Feature
      PageViewStatistic for ProcessWire can record the time a visitor viewed the page. This feature is deactivated by default. To activate open the module configuration page and activate "Record view time". If activated you will find a new column "S." in the records which means the time of view in seconds. With every page request, a Javascript code is inserted directly after the <body> tag. Every time the visitor switches to another tab or closes the tab, this script reports the number of seconds the tab was visible. The initial page request is recorded only as a hyphen (-).
       
    • By MoritzLost
      This module allows you to integrate hCaptcha bot / spam protection into ProcessWire forms. hCaptcha is a great alternative to Google ReCaptcha, especially if you are in the EU and need to comply with privacy regulations.

      The development of this module is sponsored by schwarzdesign.
      The module is built as an Inputfield, allowing you to integrate it into any ProcessWire form you want. It's primarily intended for frontend forms and can be added to Form Builder forms for automatic spam protection. There's a step-by-step guide for adding the hCaptcha widget to Form Builder forms in the README, as well as instructions for API usage.
      Features
      Inputfield that displays an hCaptcha widget in ProcessWire forms. The inputfield verifies the hCaptcha response upon submission, and adds a field error if it is invalid. All hCaptcha configuration options for the widget (theme, display size etc) can be changed through the inputfield configuration, as well as programmatically. hCaptcha script options can be changed through a hook. Error messages can be translated through ProcessWire's site translations. hCaptcha secret keys and site-keys can be set for each individual inputfield or globally in your config.php. Error codes and failures are logged to help you find configuration errors. Please check the README for setup instructions.
      Links
      Github Repository and documentation InputfieldHCaptcha in the module directory Screenshots (configuration)

      Screenshots (hCaptcha widget)

       
       

       
×
×
  • Create New...