Jump to content
tpr

Using Nette Tester with ProcessWire

Recommended Posts

Update 2018-07-09: ProcessNetteTester module is available in the Modules Directory and on GitHub.

processnettetester.thumb.png.ca7e5a36e142095fb2db7cf08a8c9a86.png

This is a short tutorial on how to use Nette Tester with ProcessWire.

As you will see it's very easy to setup and use and it's perfect for testing your code's functionality. With bootstrapping ProcessWire it's also possible to check the rendered markup of pages using the API, checking page properties, etc. It's also a great tool for module developers for writing better code. 

While there will be nothing extraordinary here that you couldn't find in Tester's docs this can serve as a good starting point.

Prerequisites: PHP 5.6+

01 Download Tester

Go to https://github.com/nette/tester/releases and download the latest release (currently 2.0.2). Download from the link reading "Source code (zip)". You can use composer also if you wish.

02 Extract Tester files

Create a new directory in your site root called "tester". Extract the zip downloaded here, so it should look like this:

/site
/tester/src
/tester/tools
/tester/appveyor.yml
/tester/composer.json
/tester/contributing.md
/tester/license.md
/tester/readme.md
/wire
...

03 Create directory for test files

Add a new directory in "/tester" called "tests". Tester recognizes "*.Test.php" and "*.phpt" files in the tests directory, recursively. 

04 Create your first test

In the "tests" directory create a new "MyTest.php" file.

The first test is a very simple one that bootstraps ProcessWire and checks if the Home page name is "Home". This is not the smartest test but will show you the basics.

Add this to "/tester/tests/MyTest.php":

<?php namespace ProcessWire;

use \Tester\Assert;
use \Tester\DomQuery;
use \Tester\TestCase;
use \Tester\Environment;

require __DIR__ . '/../src/bootstrap.php'; // load Tester
require __DIR__ . '/../../index.php'; // bootstrap ProcessWire

Environment::setup();

class MyTest extends TestCase
{
    // first test (step 04)
    public function testHomeTitle()
    {
        $expected = 'Home'; // we expect the page title to be "Home"
        $actual = wire('pages')->get(1)->title; // check what's the actual title
        Assert::equal($expected, $actual); // check whether they are equal
    }

    // second test will go here (step 06)
    // third test will go here (step 07)
}

// run testing methods
(new MyTest())->run();

I've added comment placeholders for the second and third tests that we will insert later.

05 Run Tester

Tester can be run either from the command line or from the browser. The command line output is more verbose and colored while in the browser it's plain text only (see later).

Running from the command line

Navigate to the "/tester" directory in your console and execute this:

php src/tester.php -C tests

This will start "/tester/src/tester.php" and runs test files from the "/tester/tests" directory. The "-C" switch tells Tester to use the system-wide php ini file, that is required here because when bootstrapping ProcessWire you may run into errors (no php.ini file is used by default). You may load another ini file with the "-c <path>" (check the docs).

If the title of your Home page is "Home" you should see this:

tester-ok.png.7af030edf8d090a2d50c38ce87fa5d5a.png

If it's for example "Cats and Dogs", you should see this:

tester-failure.png.0e1a44f116602b4373221ddfacd4850d.png

Running from the browser

First we need to create a new PHP file in ProcessWire's root, let's call it "testrunner.php". This is because ProcessWire doesn't allow to run PHP files from its "site" directory.

The following code runs two test classes and produces a legible output. IRL you should probably iterate through directories to get test files (eg. with glob()), and of course it's better not allow tests go out to production.

<?php
ini_set('html_errors', false);
header('Content-type: text/plain');

echo 'Starting tests.' . PHP_EOL;
echo '--------------------------' . PHP_EOL;

$file = __DIR__ . '/PATH_TO/FirstTest.php';
echo basename($file) . ' ';
require $file;
echo '[OK]' . PHP_EOL;

$file = __DIR__ . '/PATH_TO/SecondTest.php';
echo basename($file) . ' ';
require $file;
echo '[OK]' . PHP_EOL;

echo '--------------------------' . PHP_EOL;
echo 'Tests finished.';

exit;

Navigate to "DOMAIN/testrunner.php" in your browser to execute the file. If every test succeeds you should get this:

tester-ok-browser.png.bd4dc2b5d69f1be26ea2b00eabdd286f.png

If there are failed tests the execution stops and you can read the error message. If there were more tests (eg. ThirdTest), those won't be displayed under the failed test.

tester-failure-browser.png.1a89ccae06b187ab56fa9482b61e9240.png

06 DOM test

This test will check if a page with "basic-page" template has a "h1" element. We will create the page on the fly with ProcessWire's API. To keep things simple we will add the new test as a new method to our MyTest class.

Add this block to the MyTest class:

public function testBasicPageHeadline()
{
    $p = new Page();
    $p->template = 'basic-page';
    $html = $p->render();
    $dom = DomQuery::fromHtml($html);

    Assert::true($dom->has('h1'));
}

This will most likely be true but of course you can check for something more specific, for example "div#main". Note that we have used the DomQuery helper here (check the "use" statement on the top of the file).

07 Custom function test

You will probably want to make sure your custom functions/methods will work as they should so let's write a test that demonstrates this.

I don't want to complicate things so I'll check if the built-in "pageName" sanitizer works as expected. Add this to the myTest class:

public function testPageNameSanitizer()
{
    $expected = 'hello-world';
    $actual = wire('sanitizer')->pageName('Hello world!', true);

    Assert::equal($expected, $actual);
}

This should also be true. Try to change the expected value if you are eager to see a failure message.
 
08 Next steps

You can add more methods to the MyTest class or create new files in the "tests" directory. Check out the range of available Assertions and other features in the docs and see how they could help you writing more fail-safe code.

Once you make a habit of writing tests you'll see how it can assist making your code more bulletproof and stable. Remember: test early, test often 🙂

If you find out something useful or cool with Tester make sure to share.

  • Like 18
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems like nette is a bit less crufty than phpunit, which is nice. However I'm wondering how you're handling state in the database. E.g. how do you make sure if one tests creates a new page it's not affecting the next test?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Honestly I haven't went that far yet but the closest I found are the setUp and tearDown methods (see the docs). Of course this creates holes in the autoincrement ids but I don't think that matters much. 

Method calls order
------------------
setUp()
testOne()
tearDown()

setUp()
testTwo()
tearDown()
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When using setUp and tearDown methods it's good to keep in mind that Tester runs tests in parallel threads. That is, if you except that a Page you create in the setUp method will be deleted in tearDown before the next test method begins, you may be wrong.

For example I've created and saved a new Page with the same title in setUp and deleted it in tearDown. I randomly got a ProcessWire error saying it could not generate a unique name for the page, and that was because the other tests have been started before the page could be deleted in the tearDown method.

The actual thread number can be retrieved, so appending it to the title solved the issue (or by adding a random suffix):

$p->title = 'Test ' . getenv(\Tester\Environment::THREAD);

Alternatively you can reduce the number of threads to 1 with the "-j 1" switch (runtime will increase a lot).

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've updated the first post with info on how to run tests from the browser, so there's no need to have command line access to the server.

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm working on a module that makes easier to run tests, from within the admin. It's a process module and you can add pages anywhere in the admin and set each page a tests directory. So you can add new tester pages, or specify a path to an existing tests directory, see my TemplateLatteReplace module's tests in action on the screencap. Furthermore you can narrow the list of tests within a directory with URL parameters, to include only a few tests or exclude some. This may come handy if you don't want to run all the tests within a directory.

Another handy feature is that you can re-run tests via ajax, that makes it easy to check whether your fixes are working (whether in "real" code or in test code).

processnettetester.thumb.gif.f6e93f5b9eec35e88d3958f291fef11b.gif

  • Like 9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm close to release the initial version of the module, only a few issues are left behind.

I rewrite the UI so it uses ajax all the time. It was an overkill to start all test on page load, plus it was done in one PHP thread which involved a few issues (timeout, included files were inherited by next tests, etc). With ajax it's not only user-friendlier but more reliable too, and it's possible to catch PHP errors too (beforehands the syntax error was outputted on the whole page).

I also managed to format the Assert error message so now it's much easier to grasp the message.

I really like how it looks and works now. Even so it seems simple the JS part was tricky sometimes 🙂

processnettetester-20180705.thumb.gif.682e100030265b137bca591426405d6a.gif

  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is really nice @tpr! I am currently reading up on these test suites like Codeception and Tester or plain testing like phpunit. This comes in very handy.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there, it is good to hear that someone cares about code testing in PW community. Some time ago I've created a tool which helps you to run your tests against multiple version of PW quite easily. You can check it out there: https://github.com/uiii/tense. It is compatible with any testing framework. I would be really glad if I'm not the only one using it 🙂

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

5 hours ago, Richard Jedlička said:

... I've created a tool which helps you to run your tests against multiple version of PW quite easily. You can check it out there: https://github.com/uiii/tense. ...

But the truth is my tool is more suitable for module or site profile development rather than for site testing, where you would test the specific PW instance.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Richard Jedlička said:

Hello there, it is good to hear that someone cares about code testing in PW community.

Well I'm a starter only but it's fun, and knowing you can any time run tests to ensure everything is OK is invaluable.

  • Like 6

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just added the beforementioned ProcessNetteTester module download links to the first post. Read the readme on GitHub on how to set it up.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

I am discovering PHP tests and this great module (thanks !).

Just to mention in case it helps others. The first example kept failing on my website until I understood it was due to the multilanguage setup. Eventually, test 01 became :

	    public function testHomeTitle()
    {
      $expected = 'Home'; // we expect the page title to be "Home"
      $actual = wire('pages')->get(1)->title->getLanguageValue("default"); // check what's the actual title
      Assert::equal($expected, $actual); // check whether they are equal
    }

and passed 🙂 

This may seem perfectly obvious to most of you, but it might help a few ?

By the way, I wish I could use my usual debugging tools to debug my tests (sounds quite funny to say 🙂 ) and write something like 

	bd($actual);
	

Here I had to fiddle until I found out about my multiLanguage thing... Would you have any tips on that ?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, celfred said:

By the way, I wish I could use my usual debugging tools to debug my tests (sounds quite funny to say 🙂 ) and write something like 


	bd($actual);
	

Here I had to fiddle until I found out about my multiLanguage thing... Would you have any tips on that ?

It might be a module load order issue. Please try grabbing the latest dev version of PW and the latest Tracy and see if that helps. Tracy is now the first module loaded so that should hopefully solve things for you.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/23/2018 at 5:41 PM, adrian said:

It might be a module load order issue. Please try grabbing the latest dev version of PW and the latest Tracy and see if that helps. Tracy is now the first module loaded so that should hopefully solve things for you.

Thanks a lot for your quick help. But I'm not that good and I am running PW 3.0.62 both on local and production. I won't update right now because I'm not able to easily manage different version on local and remote... So I'll manage little by little and do the update later 🙂 But thanks !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By teppo
      This module tracks changes, additions, removals etc. of public (as in "not under admin") pages of your site. Like it's name says, it doesn't attempt to be a version control system or anything like that - just a log of what's happened.
      At the moment it's still a work in progress and will most likely be a victim of many ruthless this-won't-work-let's-try-that-instead cycles, but I believe I've nailed basic functionality well enough to post it here.. so, once again, I'll be happy to hear any comments you folks can provide
      https://modules.processwire.com/modules/process-changelog/
      https://github.com/teppokoivula/ProcessChangelog
      How does it work?
      Exactly like it's (sort of) predecessor, Process Changelog actually consists of two modules: Process Changelog and Process Changelog Hooks. Hooks module exists only to serve main module by hooking into various functions within Pages class, collecting data of performed operations, refining it and keeping up a log of events in it's own custom database table (process_changelog.) Visible part is managed by Process Changelog, which provides users a (relatively) pretty view of the contents of said log table.
      How do you use it?
      When installed this module adds new page called Changelog under Admin > Setup which provides you with a table view of collected data and basic filtering tools See attached screenshots to get a general idea about what that page should look like after a while.
      For detailed installation instructions etc. see README.md.
       


    • By Gadgetto
      Status update links (inside this thread) for SnipWire development will be always posted here:
      2019-08-08
      2019-06-15
      2019-06-02
      2019-05-25
      If you are interested, you can test the current state of development:
      https://github.com/gadgetto/SnipWire
      Please note that the software is not yet intended for use in a production system (alpha version).
      If you like, you can also submit feature requests and suggestions for improvement. I also accept pull requests.
      ---- INITIAL POST FROM 2019-05-25 ----
      I wanted to let you know that I am currently working on a new ProcessWire module that fully integrates the Snipcart Shopping Cart System into ProcessWire. (this is a customer project, so I had to postpone the development of my other module GroupMailer).
      The new module SnipWire offers full integration of the Snipcart Shopping Cart System into ProcessWire.
      Here are some highlights:
      simple setup with (optional) pre-installed templates, product fields, sample products (quasi a complete shop system to get started immediately) store dashboard with all data from the snipcart system (no change to the snipcart dashboard itself required) Integrated REST API for controlling and querying snipcart data webhooks to trigger events from Snipcart (new order, new customer, etc.) multi currency support self-defined/configurable tax rates etc. Development is already well advanced and I plan to release the module in the next 2-3 months.
      I'm not sure yet if this will be a "Pro" module or if it will be made available for free.
      I would be grateful for suggestions and hints!
      (please have a look at the screenshots to get an idea what I'm talking about)
       




    • By apeisa
      Update 31.7.2019: AdminBar is now maintained by @teppo. Modules directory entry has been updated, as well as the "grab the code" link below.
      ***
      Latest screencast: http://www.screencas...73-ab3ba1fea30c
      Grab the code: https://github.com/teppokoivula/AdminBar
      ***
      I put this Adminbar thingy (from here: http://processwire.c...topic,50.0.html) to modules section and to it's own topic.
      I recorded quick and messy screencast (really, my first screencast ever) to show what I have made so far. You can see it from here: http://www.screencas...18-1bc0d49841b4
      When the modal goes off, I click on the "dark side". I make it so fast on screencast, so it might seem a little bit confusing. Current way is, that you can edit, go back to see the site (without saving anything), continue editing and save. After that you still have the edit window, but if you click "dark side" after saving, then the whole page will be reloaded and you see new edits live.
      I am not sure if that is best way: there are some strengths in this thinking, but it is probably better that after saving there shouldn't be a possibility to continue editing. It might confuse because then if you make edits, click on dark side -> *page refresh* -> You lose your edits.
      ***
      When I get my "starting module" from Ryan, I will turn this into real module. Now I had to make some little tweaks to ProcessPageEdit.module (to keep modal after form submits). These probably won't hurt anything:
      if($this->redirectUrl) $this->session->redirect($this->redirectUrl); if(!empty($_GET['modal'])) $this->session->redirect("./?id={$this->page->id}&modal=true"); // NEW LINE else $this->session->redirect("./?id={$this->page->id}");   and...
      if(!empty($_GET['modal'])) { $form->attr('action', './?id=' . $this->id . '&modal=true'); } else { $form->attr('action', './?id=' . $this->id); // OLD LINE }  
    • By Mike Rockett
      Jumplinks for ProcessWire
      Release: 1.5.54
      Composer: rockett/jumplinks
      Jumplinks is an enhanced version of the original ProcessRedirects by Antti Peisa.
      The Process module manages your permanent and temporary redirects (we'll call these "jumplinks" from now on, unless in reference to redirects from another module), useful for when you're migrating over to ProcessWire from another system/platform. Each jumplink supports wildcards, shortening the time needed to create them.
      Unlike similar modules for other platforms, wildcards in Jumplinks are much easier to work with, as Regular Expressions are not fully exposed. Instead, parameters wrapped in curly braces are used - these are described in the documentation.
      Under Development: 2.0, to be powered by FastRoute
      As of version 1.5.0, Jumplinks requires at least ProcessWire 2.6.1 to run.
      View on GitLab
      Download via the Modules Directory
      Read the docs
      Features
      The most prominent features include:
      Basic jumplinks (from one fixed route to another) Parameter-based wildcards with "Smart" equivalents Mapping Collections (for converting ID-based routes to their named-equivalents without the need to create multiple jumplinks) Destination Selectors (for finding and redirecting to pages containing legacy location information) Timed Activation (activate and/or deactivate jumplinks at specific times) 404-Monitor (for creating jumplinks based on 404 hits) Additionally, the following features may come in handy:
      Stale jumplink management Legacy domain support for slow migrations An importer (from CSV or ProcessRedirects) Feedback & Feature Requests
      I’d love to know what you think of this module. Please provide some feedback on the module as a whole, or even regarding smaller things that make it whole. Also, please feel free to submit feature requests and their use-cases.
      Note: Features requested so far have been added to the to-do list, and will be added to 2.0, and not the current dev/master branches.
      Open Source

      Jumplinks is an open-source project, and is free to use. In fact, Jumplinks will always be open-source, and will always remain free to use. Forever. If you would like to support the development of Jumplinks, please consider making a small donation via PayPal.
      Enjoy! :)
×
×
  • Create New...