Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Not directly, its not. But with a custom script it is possible; something to tell Blog about the IDs of your comment related pages and that comments feature is enabled.

Alternatively, if you know what you are doing and TESTING on a development server first, you can directly edit the necessary values in your database using a programme like phpMyAdmin. The code below is from a fully installed blog, in the PW db table 'modules' and the row 'ProcessBlog'. It tells you what is going on.


In your case, you would first need to create the four comments pages and note down their IDs.

blog-comments":2484" - comments (parent of below three)

blog-asc":4017, - always show comments

"blog-dnc":4018, - disable new comments

"blog-dc":4019 - disable comments

There is also the recent comments page to install under widgets.


You would also have to create the necessary fields that go with those pages as in a full blog install. 

Then it would be a matter of simply adding the above key/value pairs that have the IDs of your newly created comment page. This would be faster than writing a custom PHP script :-)

You would also need to change this:

"commentsUse":1, in your case the value is '0' - it would need to be changed to '1'

It is not as complicated as it sounds but like I said, you would need to try and thoroughly test on a development install first! If you want to go this route (rather than install afresh), I suggest you fully install blog on a test server and compare the above db values to your current install that's missing the comments feature as well as compare their respective Blog Pages tree....I think that's it really...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

@ kongondo: Thank you for your fast reply.

I will try it out but I am considering making a fresh install because its a new blog with still a couple of artikels. The neccesarry testing should take up at least the same amount of work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@ kongondo

I’ve been playing around with processblog for a week and uninstalled etc etc.

I finally found out a few things that are going wrong during the install:

1. The processwire install uses this file structure for the default template:


2. But when installed the source shows:

<link rel="stylesheet" href="/pw/site/templates/css/pocketgrid.css" /><!-- The PocketGrid -->

<link rel="stylesheet" href="/pw/site/templates/css/blog.css" /><!-- Custom Styles -->

This means these css files are never accessed. If I copy them manually they work, sort of. My blog looks nothing like the screenshort consisting of only 1 column etc.

Ive installed and re installed in different directories etc, but it makes no difference. I've manually created the css directories and copied the files over into the tempaltes directory which changes some of hte colours/formatting but it's clearly not picking up all the files it needs.

How can I install processblog into processwire to make sure it works?

I can only think that the blog.js etc files aren't being referenced?


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @loopyloo. 

Welcome to the forums and thanks for trying out Blog.

If you want to install Blog with the demo content, you have to manually copy over those two CSS files and the blog.js file to some folder in your /site/templates/. If your paths are different, you would have to change them in 'blog-main.inc'. Check in Firebug/Chrome Developer that the files are actually being loaded. In case you missed it, let me also reiterate that the demo Blog is just that - a demo; you will probably want to change it here and there to suit your needs :-).

Link to post
Share on other sites


This is a default 2.5.2 processwire install so I havent changed my paths...

So just to be clear I have to change all the referenced files in blog-main.inc before installing ProcessBlog? Or can I change them after? Should blog-main.inc be in the site/templates folder as it's not there in my installation



I have reinstalled and can see the blog but the formatting/layout is incorrect. I've moved:




into site/templates

Link to post
Share on other sites

After (but only if necessary - see below). As outlined in the must README :-)

  • If you chose to install the demo Template Files, also manually copy over the /css/ and /js/ folders present in Blog module's folder to your /site/templates/ folder.

+ You have to manually copy over the files CSS + JS files. If you don't copy them to /site/templates/css/ and /site/templates/js/ then, you have to amend the links in blog-main.inc (e.g. you could have copied them to /site/templates/styles/ and /site/templates/scripts/ respectively. 

Have you confirmed that the files are being loaded in the browser. If your answer is yes, then the problem I suspect is that the default PW install _init.php and/or _main.php files are interfering with the rendering. It has happened to me before :-). I always use the PW blank install so I don't tend to notice this much. 

If blog-main.inc wasn't copied to over to /site/templates/ it means you did not install Blog with demo content :-)

Maybe send some screenshots of your settings when you initially set up blog (step 1 in the module config) + what your frontend looks like. 

Link to post
Share on other sites


I was literally about to post the same thing, this second.

Here is what has happened if anyone else is experiencing this issue:

1. Install XAMMP on windows

2. Install bitnami processwire. Here is where we have the first problem. The bitnami processwire install does NOT allow you to choose which site template and installs the intermediate site template by default. You CANNOT choose an empty site.

3. If you do a manual install of processwire you can install a blank site.

4. When you install processblog, copy over the CSS and JS folders, or edit the blog-main.inc to point to the where you have copied the new files.

5. Edit EACH template file in the BLOG section (Admin > Setup > templates > files >

tick the checkbox " Disable automatic append of file: _main.php"

then the blog will work.

6. To make things additionally confusing (to a beginner) :-) the intermediate site template has home/about links as does the blog and the blog jumps back to the main site intermediate template.  The home / about / links are completely different.

To reiterate, the Bitnami processwire install does not allow a blank site template.



  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Good detective work...Just to reiterate:

1. This is about Blog AND Demo content

2. If one wishes, they can use the _main.php with Blog Demo files but they would have to set that up themselves... (I should do a tutorial about this)


Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem, Just took me a week to figure out what was going on. When I did a manual install I noticed I could choose site template whereas the Bitnami processwire installer didn't.

What would be really helpful is if in the ProcessBlog page on the module download ...


...you put a screenshot of what the blog should look like. (eg above picture in post) I could not figure out what the blog was supposed to look like so kept modifying things trying to get it to work. If i had an image to refer to I would have known straight away something was wrong.  To those familiar with processwire/css/php it would have been apparent but I am completely new to processwire :-)


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help! I think processwire is great and your blog is a great step as it saves so much work.

Oh also may be a good idea to add it to the first screenshot in this forum section as you have the admin pages but not what it looks like at the front end.

I know the video has a finished site (last link), but it wasn't clear what a default site would look like)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Kongondo,

Happy New Year to everyone!

When using renderPosts with "small" set true, the text that is output takes any headings in the post (h2's in my case), strips the h2 elements, leaving the rendered h2's innerText in-line with the body copy.

The headings are not meant to be read in-line and as a result, what is output in the summary rendering doesn't read very well. 

As everything is output in a single paragraph, I guess I need to have the headings completely stripped out of the copy. I can't believe this hasn't happened before - any thoughts, recommendations?

Cheers! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it has happened before and we've dealt with it as shown here using 'post_small_allowable_tags'. Specify and configure that as you wish in your renderPosts() third argument $options.

//holds string of HTML tags for strip_tags $allowable_tags. Needs to be in format '<code><p><img>'
$options = array('post_small_allowable_tags' => '<h2><img>',//etc..);

Sorry, still haven't gotten round to updating the docs! So, that post #207 is your go to post :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Kongondo,

Just a heads-up, I'm noticing that the markup returned by renderPost "small" returns an uneven set of <p> elements. In my case, the markup encounters a ... </p> which is followed later on by <p> .... </p>.

I noticed this by passing the code into a DOM parser that was choking on the uneven elements.

Can you confirm you see this too?


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Kongondo,

Sorry my previous post was a "red-herring". The <p> were balanced. The problem is that now I am allowing 'h2' elements through, the blog markup code is wrapping the 'h2' element pairs in 'p' tags which is in-turn causing the DOM parser to choke.

I assume that from the HTML DOM perspective, you cannot have a heading element inside a paragraph element?


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Kongondo,

This appears to be a slightly more tricky problem than originally anticipated. I thought I had a workaround to the issue by stripping out the embedded 'h2' elements from inside the paragraphs and replacing them with an empty string. This worked until I tested with different posts with differing text and headers. I ended up hitting the same issue again with the DOM parser choking because the post truncating code that makes the post "small" did not take account of the need for a closing 'h2' element and inadvertently trims the small post string with a now malformed 'h2' element (it has a <h2> but no </h2>). This means that my parsing RegExp fails because it aims to replace <h2>...</h2> and of course, the </h2> may have been trimmed by "smallification". In any event, I'm still left with a paragraph that contains an <h2> that isn't closed which I still incorrectly formed HTML.

I hope this makes sense! :)


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you are right about what elements can be nested in what. Thanks for helping me rethink this.
For the benefit of others, below is a lengthy explanation + the solution I propose (you can skip right to it :-))

HTML does not allow nesting of <p> (or other block level elements):
Because a paragraph is a paragraph .. and that's how HTML is defined (and HTML is not XML).
Any <p> (or other block-level element) will implicitly close any open <p>.
Per 9.3.1 Paragraphs: the P element of the HTML 4.01 specification:
The P element represents a paragraph. It cannot contain block-level elements (including P itself).

http://webtips.dan.info/nesting.html - old but good
First the code in MarkupBlog.module

//MarkupBlog Line #933
//notice the surrounding '<p></p>' tags
if($small) $out .= "<p>" . $page->summary . "… <a class='more' href='{$page->url}'>" . $options['post_more_text'] . "</a></p>";

In your template file e.g. 'blog-posts.php', assuming you have this code:

$options = array(
   'post_small_image' => 3,//here for array illustration only
   'post_small_image_width' => 250,//ditto
   'post_small_allowable_tags' => '<h2>',  

//render a limited number of summarised posts
$content .= $blog->renderPosts("limit=5", true, $options);//passed $options to renderPosts()

Example content entered in your 'blog_body'

<p>This is my paragraph that I am going to test.</p>
<p>Here comes a second paragraph.</p>
<h2>And here comes a h2 we will allow through.</h2>
<p>This is another paragraph.</p>
<p>Our final paragraph.</p>
<h2>A second h2 to allow.</h2>

1. Output without 'post_small_allowable_tags'

<p>This is my paragraph that I am going to test. Here comes a second paragraph. And here comes a h2 we will allow through. This is another paragraph. Our final paragraph. A second h2 to allow</p>

2. Output with 'post_small_allowable_tags'
In the second output, since you have allowed <h2> (it doesn't matter whether they came first or in-between other text in your content), this is what line #933 will send to the browser:


As stated, that is invalid code and the browser will remedy it. The next block level element will be used to close the first <p> or the browser will self-close it (empty <p></p>). So, what you will end up with in the browser is:

<p></p><h2>....</h2>some free untagged text<h2>....</h2></p>.

Although the browser (view source) will seemingly also place an empty <p></p> at the end of the text, in fact, it will just be a closing </p> without an opening <p>. The W3C validator will then give you the error 'No p element in scope but a p end tag seen.'
For comparison, if you allowed an inline element, e.g. <img> tag instead

$options = array('post_small_allowable_tags' => '<img>');

This would be output correctly since an <img> is an inline element. The output would be:

<p>Some text<img>More text<a>Read More</a></p>.

Hopefully this long explanation will help inform decisions about how to use the solution I envisage.
I will make what HTML element (or not) to surround a blog excerpt (blop post small) with configurable (add to $options). So:

  • Let user decide whether to surround post excerpt with <span>,<p>, nothing, etc. since they know what tags they will be making 'allowable' (inline vs block level).
  • The option will apply whether using 'post_small_allowable_tags' or not.
  • Default will be to surround with <p>.
  • An empty value passed to the option will mean 'do not surround the excerpt with anything'.
  • I will also add a class to that tag, e.g. <p class='post-excerpt'>...</p> to aid with more specific style-targeting.

Hope to update this soon. The update should not break any existing installs since it will default to the current use of <p></p> tags.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi kongondo, thank you for the awesome module!
I have just installed the module on a site I am currently developing and am now getting an issue when I go to the blog control panel I get the following error:
FieldtypeComments: SQLSTATE[42S01]: Base table or view already exists: 1050 Table 'field_blog_comments_votes' already exists

There was another error stating that field_blog_comments did not exist when I first went to the blog control panel but that one has cleared and the table does exist.

But I can't seem to figure what is the issue with this error. Have tried removing and uninstalling and then re-installing to no avail.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Many Thanks,


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Alex,

Thanks for trying out Blog.

Most likely you are hitting the limits of xdebug.max_nesting_level=100; so the Blog wizard is not completing the installation.

Please check out these posts to see if they resolve your issue:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply! Much appreciated.

So I did a cleanup, then removed field_blog_comments_votes which didn't get deleted from the DB and then did an uninstall of the blog module, then increased the limit of xdebug.max_nesting_level to 200 in php.ini and then tried a re-install and got the same/similar issues at the same point. Have attached a screenshot if you get chance to take a look.

Sorry for the trouble.


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply! Much appreciated.

So I did a cleanup, then removed field_blog_comments_votes which didn't get deleted from the DB and then did an uninstall of the blog module, then increased the limit of xdebug.max_nesting_level to 200 in php.ini and then tried a re-install and got the same/similar issues at the same point. Have attached a screenshot if you get chance to take a look.

Sorry for the trouble.

Yeah i had those issues, What i did was usually use ProcessMigrator and revert or delete those fields using ProcessBatcher as deleting one by one takes time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea I didn't need to use the batcher because there was only 1 table not removed from the DB. All fields were removed fine.

Just need to try and figure out what is up with these errors at my post above now

Link to post
Share on other sites


I am wondering whether it is because of this? field_blog_comments_votes. This is the latest comments module. I haven't tried it out with Blog and seems like I should. The error suggests it has something to do with it (i.e. it is not being uninstalled, I think). Have you confirmed in your db that the field is actually removed before trying to reinstall Blog? Same goes for the other tables. Meanwhile I'll find some time to try out Blog with the latest comments module...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yea each time the field sticks in the DB so I manually remove it before trying again.

Have just tried re-installing again now but it's all gone mental now and am getting about 28 or so errors now. Ahhhhh. 

Dunno what's happening. Haha. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By FireWire
      Hello community!

      I want to share a new module I've been working on that I think could be a big boost for multi-language ProcessWire sites.

      Some background, I was looking for a way for our company website to be efficiently translated as working with human translators was pretty laborious and a lack of updating content created a divergence between languages. I, and several other devs here, have talked about translation integrations and have recognized the power that DeepL has. DeepL is an AI deep learning powered service that delivers translation quality beyond any automated service available. After access to the API was opened up to the US, I built Fluency, a DeepL translation integration for ProcessWire.
      Fluency brings automated translation to every multi-language field in the admin, and also provides a translation tool allowing the user to translate their text to any language without it being inside a template's field. With Fluency you can:
      Translate any plain textarea or text input Translate any CKEditor content (yes, with markup) Translate page names for fully localized URLs on every page Translate your in-template translation function wrapped strings Translate modules Fluency is free, and now so is DeepL
      Since this module was first built DeepL has introduced free Developer accounts that allow anyone to start using Fluency at zero cost and beginning with the version 0.3.0 release Fluency now supports free DeepL accounts. As of June 2021 DeepL supports translation to 26 languages and continues to offer more!
      Installation and usage is completely plug and play. Whether you're building a new multi-language site, need to update a site to multi-language, or simply want to stop manually translating a site and make any language a one-click deal, it could not be easier to do it. Fluency works by having you match the languages configured in ProcessWIre to DeepL's. You can have your site translating to any or all of the languages DeepL translates to in minutes (quite literally).
      Let's break out the screenshots...
      When the default language tab is shown, a message is displayed to let users know that translation is available. Clicking on each tab shows a link that says "Translate from English". Clicking it shows an animated overlay with the word "Translating..." cycling through each language and a light gradient shift. Have a CKEditor field? All good. Fluency will translated it and use DeepL's ability to translate text within HTML tags. CKEditor fields can be translated as easily and accurately as text/textarea fields.

      Repeaters and AJAX created fields also have translation enabled thanks to a JavaScript MutationObserver that searches for multi-language fields and adds translation as they're inserted into the DOM. If there's a multi-language field on the page, it will have translation added.

      Same goes for image description fields. Multi-language SEO friendly images are good to go.

      Creating a new page from one of your templates? Translate your title, and also translate your page name for native language URLs. (Not available for Russian, Chinese, or Japanese languages due to URL limitations). These can be changed in the "Settings" tab for any page as well so whether you're translating new pages or existing pages, you control the URLs everywhere.

      Language configuration pages are no different. Translate the names of your languages and search for both Site Translation Files (including all of your modules)

      Translate all of the static text in your templates as well. Notice that the placeholders are retained. DeepL is pretty good at recognizing and keeping non-translatable strings like that. If it is changed, it's easy to fix manually.

      Fluency adds a "Translate" item to the CMS header. When clicked this opens up a modal with a full translation tool that lets the user translate any language to any language. No need to leave the admin if you need to translate content from a secondary language back to the default ProcessWire language. There is also a button to get the current API usage statistics. DeepL account owners can set billing limitations via character count to control costs. This may help larger sites or sites being retrofitted keep an eye on their usage. Fluency can be used by users having roles given the fluency-translate permission.

      It couldn't be easier to add Fluency to your new or existing website. Simply add your API key and you're shown what languages are currently available for translation from/to as provided by DeepL. This list and all configuration options are taken live from the API so when DeepL releases new languages you can add them to your site without any work. No module updates, just an easy configuration. Just match the language you configured in ProcessWire to the DeepL language you want it to be associated with and you're done. Fluency also allows you to create a list of words/phrases that will not be translated which can prevent items such as brands and company names from being translated when they shouldn't

      No "translate page" - Translating multiple fields can be done by clicking multiple translation links on multiple fields at once but engineering a "one click page translate" is not feasible from a user experience standpoint. The time it takes to translate one field can be a second or two, but cumulatively that may take much longer (CKEditor fields are slower than plain text fields). There may be a workaround in the future but it isn't currently on the roadmap. No "translate site" - Same thing goes for translating an entire website at once. It would be great, but it would be a very intense process and take a very (very) long time. There may be a workaround in the future but it isn't on the roadmap. No current support for Inline CKEditor fields - Handling for CKEditor on-demand hasn't been implemented yet, this is planned for a future release though and can be done. I just forgot about it because I've never really used that feature personally.. Alpha release - This module is in alpha. Releases should be stable and usable, but there may be edge case issues. Test the module thoroughly and please report any bugs via a Github issue on the repository or respond here. Please note that the browser plugin for Grammarly conflicts with Fluency (as it does with many web applications). To address this issue it is recommended that you disable Grammarly when using Fluency, or open the admin to edit pages in a private window where Grammarly may not be loaded. This is an issue that may not have a resolution as creating a workaround may not be possible. If you have insight as to how this may be solved please visit the Github page and file a bugfix ticket.
      ProcessWire  3.0+ UIKit Admin Theme That's Fluency in a nutshell. A core effort in this module is to create it so that there is nothing DeepL related hard-coded in that would require updating it when DeepL offers new languages. I would like this to be a future-friendly module that doesn't require developer work to keep it up-to-date.
      The Module Is Free
      This is my first real module and I want to give it back to the community as thanks. This is the best CMS I've worked with (thank you Ryan & contributors) and a great community (thank you dear reader).
      DeepL Developer Accounts
      In addition to paid Pro Developer accounts, DeepL now offers no-cost free accounts. Now all ProcessWire developers and users can use Fluency at no cost.
      Learn more about free and paid accounts by visiting the DeepL website. Sign up for a Developer account, get an API key, and start using Fluency today.
      Download & Feedback
      Download the latest version here
      Github repository:
      File issues and feature requests here (your feedback and testing is greatly appreciated):
      Thank you! ¡Gracias! Ich danke Ihnen! Merci! Obrigado! Grazie! Dank u wel! Dziękuję! Спасибо! ありがとうございます! 谢谢你!

    • By monollonom
      (once again I was surprised to see a work of mine pop up in the newsletter, this time without even listing the module on PW modules website 😅. Thx @teppo !)
      Github: https://github.com/romaincazier/FieldtypeQRCode
      Modules directory: https://processwire.com/modules/fieldtype-qrcode/
      This is a simple module I made so a client could quickly grab a QR Code of the page's url in the admin.
      There's not much to it for now, but if need be you can output anything using a hook:
      $wire->addHookAfter("FieldtypeQRCode::getQRText", function($event) { $event->return = "Your custom text"; }) You can also output the QR code on your front-end by calling the field:
      echo $page->qr_code_field; The module uses the PHP library QR Code Generator by Kazuhiko Arase. When looking for a way to generate a QR Code in PW I came across @ryan's integration in his TFA module. I'm not very familiar with fieldtype/inputfield module development so I blindly followed @bernhard (great) tutorial and his BaseFieldtypeRuntime. At some point I'll take a deeper look to make a module on my own.
      Some ideas for improvements :
      add the ability to choose what to ouput : page's url / editUrl / file(s) / image(s) / ... allow to output multiple QR codes ?
    • By Chris Bennett
      Inspired by @bernhard's excellent work on the new customisable LESS CSS getting rolled into the core soon, I thought I would offer up the module for beta testing, if it is of interest to anyone.

      It takes a different approach to admin styling, basically using the Cascade part of CSS to over-ride default UiKit values.
      Values are stored in ModuleConfig Module creates a separate AdminThemeTweaker Folder at root, so it can link to AdminThemeTweaker.php as CSS AdminThemeTweaker.php reads the module values, constructs the CSS variables then includes the CSS framework Can be switched on and off with a click. Uninstall removes everything, thanks to bernhard's wonderful remove dir & contents function.
      It won't touch your core. It won't care if stuff is upgraded. You won't need to compile anything and you don't need to touch CSS unless you want to.

      It won't do much at all apart from read some values from your module config, work out the right CSS variables to use (auto contrast based on selected backgrounds) and throw it on your screen.
      You can configure a lot of stuff, leave it as it comes (dark and curvy), change two main colors (background and content background) or delve deep to configure custom margins, height of mastheads, and all manner of silly stuff I never use.

      Have been developing it for somewhere around 2 years now. It has been (and will continue to be) constantly tweaked over that time, as I click on something and find something else to do.
      That said, it is pretty solid and has been in constant use as my sole Admin styling option for all of those 2 years.

      If nothing else, it would be great if it can provide any assistance to @bernhard or other contributor's who may be looking to solve some of the quirkier UiKit behavior.
      Has (in my opinion) more robust and predictable handling of hidden Inputfields, data-colwidths and showIf wrappers.
      I am very keen to help out with that stuff in any way I can, though LESS (and any css frameworks/tools basically) are not my go.
      I love CSS variables and banging-rocks-together, no-dependency CSS you can write with notepad.


    • By opalepatrick
      I see old posts saying that repeaters are not the way to go in Custom Process Modules. If that is the case, when using forms (as I am trying to do) how would one tackle things like repeat contact fields where there can be multiple requirements for contact details with different parameters? (Like point of contact, director, etc) or even telephone numbers that have different uses?
      Just for background I am creating a process module that allows me to create types of financial applications in the admin area (no need to publish any of this, pure admin) that require a lot of personal or company information.
      Maybe I am thinking about this incorrectly?
    • By HMCB
      I ran across a reference to IftRunner module. The post was 6 years ago. I cant find it in available modules. Has it been pulled?
  • Create New...