adrian

Tracy Debugger

Recommended Posts

I have latest PW+Tracy installed and when I go to edit a page in the admin I randomly get these notifications

Quote

 404 occurred: /wire/modules/Inputfield/InputfieldFile/InputfieldFile.css.map
 404 occurred: /wire/modules/LanguageSupport/LanguageTabs.css.map

I looked in those folders and there are no map files, not sure why PW is trying to find them or why they would be missing.

This seems occur when I use the "inspector" in the browser to look at elements.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/19/2018 at 9:20 PM, Robin S said:

I'm seeing an issue in the Console panel where the indentation (tabs) of saved snippets gets lost when the page is reloaded.

Thanks @Robin S - I am seeing it too - the solution however I am not seeing :) I'll try to take another look tomorrow.

 

14 hours ago, neosin said:

I looked in those folders and there are no map files, not sure why PW is trying to find them or why they would be missing.

Hi @neosin - this is not related to Tracy. Have a read: 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/19/2018 at 9:20 PM, Robin S said:

I'm seeing an issue in the Console panel where the indentation (tabs) of saved snippets gets lost when the page is reloaded.

Hey Robin - sorry for the delay on this, but it should now be fixed - please let me know if it works for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, adrian said:

Hey Robin - sorry for the delay on this, but it should now be fixed - please let me know if it works for you.

Thanks. Did you push the changes to GitHub? It's still showing 4.9.31 which is the version I was seeing the issue with.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, Robin S said:

Thanks. Did you push the changes to GitHub? It's still showing 4.9.31 which is the version I was seeing the issue with.

Oops - sorry, I committed the tag and release for 4.9.32 but not the actual code :)

Try again now!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, adrian said:

Try again now!

Working great, thanks!

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

hey @adrian

I'm working on my DataTables module (that might get renamed to RockGrid btw because I'm experimenting with another grid software :) ) and have 30k sample data pages (basic-page with only title field). When I open such a page in the admin, the page load takes very long (around 10s). I looked at the network tab and saw that the request for initial page load (?id=1017) loads 5.7MB of data.

Cookie: pagelist_open=JSON%5B%221-0%22%2C%221016-0%22%2C%221017-0%22%2C%227-0%22%5D;
wire=...;
wire_challenge=...;
tracyCodeError=ERROR%3A+Maximum+execution+time+of+120+seconds+exceeded+on+line%3A+454+in+D%3A%5Claragon%5Cwww%5Caggrid1%5Cwire%5Ccore%5CWireDatabasePDO.php

When i switch off tracy the page load is instant.

The code for the debug bar is huge:

5abe34353a933_2018-03-3014_56_46-view-source_www.aggrid1.to_admin_page_edit__id1017.thumb.png.d78afa1bf702eb5736d06d114ce4a018.png

Any ideas which feature of the panel is causing this behaviour?

Thanks in advance, no hurry at all with this one :) 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, bernhard said:

Any ideas which feature of the panel is causing this behaviour?

My guess is that it's the Field List & Values section of the Request Info panel. Can you try disabling just that section and let me know?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Spoiler

 

 

4 hours ago, bernhard said:

The code for the debug bar is huge:

5abe34353a933_2018-03-3014_56_46-view-source_www.aggrid1.to_admin_page_edit__id1017.thumb.png.d78afa1bf702eb5736d06d114ce4a018.png

 

 

Hello Neo, are you in the Matrix already? :D

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, adrian said:

My guess is that it's the Field List & Values section of the Request Info panel. Can you try disabling just that section and let me know?

good guess ;)

5abe551804b24_2018-03-3017_17_17-EditPage_5abe0ddaa8d6daggrid1_to.png.3c13c58e1b64ae3c7deb0718ebe66357.png5abe551908bbb_2018-03-3017_16_50-EditPage_5abe0ddaa8d6daggrid1_to.png.456ea78e60d9bc8e5ae95dac71894c36.png

Debug Mode is also very slow, but only if Request Info is ON. If Request Info is OFF the Debug Mode is 10ms (first screenshot)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post a screenshot of the contents of the Field List & Value section?

Or maybe you can send me a test version of the module so I can take a look?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see any suspicious information in the panel. Only the HTML code of the debug bar is totally bloated. I think the simplest is to test it on your own. I'm running a fresh dev installation with blank profile and tracy v4.9.33

I've just created a page "data" under /home and added 30k pages with the tracy console:

for($i=0; $i<30000; $i++) {
    $p = new Page();
    $p->template = 'basic-page';
    $p->parent = $pages->get('/data');
    $p->title = uniqid();
    $p->save();
}

Then when I open one of those pages in edit mode the tracy bar takes 10s to load..

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@bernhard - could you please let me know how it goes when you disable the "Pages Loaded" section in the Debug Mode panel. This seems to be the main issue at my end.

image.png.75374c3ad0b69e9495cddbb7f5a9a603.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a followup @bernhard - I notice that when editing a child with thousands of siblings, all the siblings get loaded, but this doesn't seem to be a Tracy issue - take a look at the PW core Debug Mode panel. I wonder if that's a bug?

image.png.982b0230793ffede41ed596ccdea602c.png

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hm, I have "pages loaded: 23"

$config->debug = true/false does not make any difference. Only difference is when I hit the "Disable Tracy" Button in the Debug Bar it instantly becomes fast as usual. I can send you a site profile, maybe that helps :)

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey @bernhard - sorry for the delay on this - had family in town.

Please try the latest version - it prevents all siblings from being loaded by the prev/next links in the Request Info panel (which was a bug I hadn't noticed). This should actually make a huge different to anyone using Tracy on a page with a lot of siblings - can't believe I didn't come across this till now - thanks for bringing it to my attention.

One caveat - if you are running AOS with the "Add links to edit previous and next pages" feature enabled you might still have problems, although it shouldn't affect page load speed. I have made a note here: 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, adrian said:

Please try the latest version - it prevents all siblings from being loaded by the prev/next links in the Request Info panel (which was a bug I hadn't noticed). This should actually make a huge different to anyone using Tracy on a page with a lot of siblings - can't believe I didn't come across this till now - thanks for bringing it to my attention.

Thanks @adrian, that solves the issue and my pw admin is lightning fast again :) I've experienced slower loading with tracy several times, but I was not able to identify when it occured. Maybe this was the reason, I'll keep an eye.

BTW: Where do I find the prev/next links?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, bernhard said:

Thanks @adrian, that solves the issue and my pw admin is lightning fast again :) I've experienced slower loading with tracy several times, but I was not able to identify when it occured. Maybe this was the reason, I'll keep an eye.

 

Glad to hear!

3 hours ago, bernhard said:

BTW: Where do I find the prev/next links?

In the Request Info Panel. The name is a View link and the ID is an Edit link.

image.png.c6efe82a531d35fdc19f83611005eddc.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thx adrian! Didn't use the request info panel so far, but I'll start using it :)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, bernhard said:

Thx adrian! Didn't use the request info panel so far, but I'll start using it :)

Don't forget to also take a look at it when editing a field, template, or module - shows all the settings for those in addition to the normal sections. Can be very handy for certain dev needs.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@bernhard - could you please check the latest version for me - I left out "include=all" for the prev/next links in the last commit. Everything still seems fast here, but would appreciate it if you could confirm it's ok at your end too please?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thx, I confirm everything is still working great :) 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone - looking for some feedback. The Tracy core has just introduced an option to dump objects using the __debugInfo() magic method which PW also supports.

It changes this:

image.png.ba3041ba468af6e569ded6068673daec.png

 

to:

image.png.bfb0aa40445b6cd37b4bb37ac1a068e6.png

 

What I am wondering is whether to make using __debugInfo() the default or not. And also wondering how often you guys might want to switch between one vs the other - in other words, will it be ok as a config setting, or do you think it's something that should be easier to change on-the-fly?

Thanks for any input.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would you mind adding some additional information to your question? What is the difference between the two? What would be the pros/cons?

I use dumping a lot but I use only very basic features I guess. Most of the information in the first screencap does not seem to be very helpful to me (at least most of the time, or at least not yet). The second looks cleaner to me, but what I do not like is that "template" is a string and not a ProcessWire\Template as shown in the first pic (though that's a tiny detail and i guess dumping $page->template would show the correct classname?).

[2min later] To me, the second looks cleaner and more helpful. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, adrian said:

What I am wondering is whether to make using __debugInfo() the default or not.

You'll know more about this than me, but my understanding is that what is available in a dump from __debugInfo() depends on what the developer of the class makes available in the method. So if that method in a class was quite limited in what it made available (either intentionally or not intentionally) then the Tracy user potentially misses out on a lot of relevant information.

To give a silly example, if I do this in a class...

public function __debugInfo() {
    return ['Nothing to see here.'];
}

...then dumping an instance of it will be useless.

It looks like most of the __debugInfo() work is done in the dedicated WireDebugInfo class. If you think that Ryan has covered everything that anyone could ever need here then I guess shorter/tidier is better. But if you have doubts I'd rather get all the data as per the status quo than be wondering about what might have been overlooked.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Robin S
      Another little admin helper module...
      Template Field Widths
      Adds a "Field widths" field to Edit Template that allows you to quickly set the widths of inputfields in the template.

      Why?
      When setting up a new template or trying out different field layouts I find it a bit slow and tedious to have to open each field individually in a modal just to set the width. This module speeds up the process.
      Installation
      Install the Template Field Widths module.
      Config options
      You can set the default presentation of the "Field widths" field to collapsed or open. You can choose Name or Label as the primary identifier shown for the field. The unchosen alternative will become the title attribute shown on hover. You can choose to show the original field width next to the template context field width.  
      https://github.com/Toutouwai/TemplateFieldWidths
      https://modules.processwire.com/modules/template-field-widths/
    • By horst
      Croppable Image 3
      for PW 3.0.20+
      Module Version 1.1.16
      Sponsored by http://dreikon.de/, many thanks Timo & Niko!
      You can get it in the modules directory!
      Please refer to the readme on github for instructions.
       
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
      Updating from prior versions:
       
      Updating from Croppable Image 3 with versions prior to 1.1.7, please do this as a one time step:
      In the PW Admin, go to side -> modules -> new, use "install via ClassName" and use CroppableImage3 for the Module Class Name. This will update your existing CroppableImage3 module sub directory, even if it is called a new install. After that, the module will be recogniced by the PW updater module, what makes it a lot easier on further updates.
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
      For updating from the legacy Thumbnail / CropImage to CroppableImage3 read on here.
       
      -------------------------------------------------------------------------
       
    • By MoritzLost
      UPDATE: I have published a stable version of this module!
      Discussion thread:
      Github: https://github.com/MoritzLost/TextformatterPageTitleLinks
      ---
      Hello there,
      I'm working on a tiny textformatter module that searches the text for titles of other pages on your site and creates hyperlinks to them. I'm not sure if something like this exists already, but I haven't found anything in the module directory, so I wrote my own solution 🙂
      It's not properly tested yet and is still missing some functionality I would like to implement, so at the moment it should be considered in BETA. Features include limiting the pages that will get searched by template, and adding a custom CSS class to the generated hyperlinks. As I'm writing this I noticed that it will probably include unpublished and hidden pages at the moment, so yeah ... it's still in development alright 😅
      You can download the module from Github:
      https://github.com/MoritzLost/TextformatterPageTitleLinks
      There's some more information in the readme as well.
      Anyway, let me know what you think! I'm happy about any feedback, possible improvements or ideas on how to improve the module. Cheers.
    • By blad
      Hi guys!
      I just uploaded a module to explore files based on elFinder. By default it will show the "Files" folder.
      Screenshots:

      Video:
       
      To do:
       More options To fix:
       The function of rotating or scaling an image fails  Image editors V 1.01 (view issue)
      Fixed the bug working with the Multi-Language support ( translation of folders ). Fixed the name of elfinder.en  Github:
      https://github.com/LuisSantiago/ProcessElFinder/
      I hope you like it.
    • By BitPoet
      I'm really in love with FormBuilder, but the one thing missing to match all my end users' expectations were repeatable field groups. Think repeaters, in ProcessWire terms. Our primary application of PW is our corporate intranet, so "lines" of fields are quite common in the forms I build. We have all kinds of request forms where the information for a varying number of colleagues needs to be entered (from meal order to flight booking request) and where it is simply impractical to send a form for each, and I don't want to clutter my forms with multiple instances of fields that may only get used ten percent of the time.
      That's why I started to build FormBuilderMultiplier (link to GitHub).
      What it does:
      Adds an option to make a regular Fieldgroup repeatable Lets you limit the number of instances of a Fieldgroup on the form Adds an "Add row" button the form that adds another instance of the Fieldgroup's fields Adds a counter suffix at the end of every affected field's label Stores the entered values just like regular fields Makes the entered values available in preview and email notifications Supports most text based fields, textareas and selects (really, I haven't had enough time to test all the available choices yet) What it doesn't do (yet):
      Support saving to ProcessWire pages (i.e. real Repeaters) I haven't tested all the validation stuff, Date/Time inputs etc. yet, but since I'm utterly swamped with other stuff at work, I didn't want to wait until I have it polished. Any feedback is welcome. There might also be some issues with different output frameworks that I haven't encountered yet. The forms I work with mostly use UIKit.
      Status:
      Still alpha, so test well before using it in the field.
      Known issues:
      When rows are added, the form's iframe needs to be resized, which isn't completely clean yet.
      How it works:
      The Fieldgroup settings are added through regular hooks, as is the logic that adds the necessary field copies for processing the form and displaying previews.
      "Multiplied" field instances are suffixed with _NUM, where NUM is an incremental integer starting from 1. So if you have add two fields named "surname" and "givenname" to a fieldgroup and check the "multiply" checkbox, the form will initially have "surname_1" and "givenname_1" field (I'm still considering changing that to make the risk to shoot oneself into the foot by having a regular "surname_1" field somewhere else in the form less likely).
      When a "row" is added, the first row is cloned through JS and the counter in the fields' IDs, names and "for" attributes as well as the counter in the label are incremented before appending the copies to the Fieldset container in the form.
      To keep backend and frontend in sync, a hidden field named [name of the fieldset]__multiplier_rows is added to the form. Both the backend and the frontend script use this to store and retrieve the number of "rows".
      ToDo:
      Naturally, add the option to store the data in real repeaters when saving to pages. Do a lot of testing (and likely fixing). Make a few things (like the "Add row" button label etc.) configurable in field(set) context. Add a smooth API to retrieve the multiplied values as WireArrays. The mandatory moving screenshot: